FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
|
|
- Nicholas Alexander
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California Tabulations From a Survey of California Likely Voters about the 2016 Presidential Elections - prepared for the - Capitol Alert and the Sacramento Bee July 7,
2 Introduction This volume presents the statistical data developed from a Field Poll survey of likely voters in California about the 2016 presidential elections. The survey was conducted by The Field Poll among a representative sample of 1,635 California adults by telephone June 8-July 2, 2016, of whom 956 were considered likely voters in the November general election. To capture the diversity of the California population, the survey was administered in six languages and dialects English, Spanish, Cantonese, Mandarin, Vietnamese and Korean. Interviewing and Sampling Interviews were administered by telephone by live, professionally-trained interviewers calling from Interviewing Service of America s central location call center in Van Nuys. The overall sample was developed using dual frame random digit dial landline and cell phone methodology to generate telephone listings covering the state of California. Interviewers completed their work using a computer-assisted telephone interviewing (TI) system. TI controls the telephone scripts read to individual respondents by displaying the appropriate questionnaire items and their valid response code alternatives in their proper sequence on computer screens at each interviewer's booth. The interviewer then reads each question aloud to the respondent from the screen and enters each respondent's pre-coded answer category through the keyboard directly to a computer disk. All answers are automatically stored in computer memory. In order to bring hard-to-reach respondents into the survey, up to six attempts were made to each telephone number selected for inclusion into the sample. Callbacks were made at different times and on different days to increase the probability of finding voters available for the interview. Where possible, appointments are made at specified dates and times to maximize convenience and cooperation rates. In this survey, 715 likely voters were interviewed on their cell phone and 241 were interviewed on a landline or other type of telephone. 2
3 Data Processing The data file resulting from TI interviewing is itself virtually error-free. Even so, a final series of data checks were performed by means of a specially designed cleaning program that scrutinizes each respondent record for internally inconsistent information. Once the data were determined to be clean and error-free, the combined landline and cell phone sample was weighted to match demographic, geographic and voter registration estimates of the adult and registered voter populations in California. The weighting process also takes into account the higher probability of reaching respondents who regularly receive calls on both a landline and cell phone. Guide to Reading the Tables The question or questions upon which the data are based is shown at the top of each table. Tables are percentaged vertically with the raw percentage base appearing at the top of each column. The data have been weighted to known parameters of the statewide adult and registered voter populations. All percentages and frequencies reported in each table are therefore weighted tabulations. In instances where percentages are calculated on small bases (e.g., when the base is fewer than 100 respondents) the reader is urged to interpret the data with caution, since results are subject to larger levels of sampling error. Throughout the tables an asterisk is used to denote a value of less than 1/2 of 1%. A hyphen indicates zero value. On some tables the percentages may add to more than 100% due to multiple mentions. s of subgroups used in the tabulations may add to less than the total number of respondents due to some respondents not reporting that characteristic. 3
4 Regional Subgroup Definitions Section Southern : Northern : San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Riverside, San Bernardino, Imperial and Kern counties all other 48 California counties Area Coastal Counties: San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Mateo, San Francisco, Contra Costa, Alameda, Marin, Napa, Solano, Sonoma, Santa Clara, Mendocino, Humboldt, Del Norte Inland counties: Region Los Angeles: Inland Empire: South Coast: Central Valley: SF Bay Area: all other 38 California counties Los Angeles county San Bernardino and Riverside counties San Diego County and Orange counties Butte, Colusa, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba San Francisco, Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo California: includes the combined total of the other Southern and Northern California counties listed below: So. : Ventura, Santa Barbara, Imperial and San Luis Obispo No. : Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Del Norte, El Dorado, Humboldt, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Monterey, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Plumas, San Benito, Santa Cruz, Sierra, Siskiyou, Trinity, Tuolumne 4
5 Estimates of Sampling Error In any survey based on a sampling, there is some sampling error introduced into the data by the process of sampling itself. When the sample has been drawn using random processes, it is possible to apply probability principles to determine the potential range of such error. While survey samples of human populations rarely, if ever, meet all of the criteria theoretically required for the application of these principles, it is customary to use them as an approximation of error that is introduced as a result of sampling. The table below shows the range of error associated with samples of various sizes at the 95% confidence level, which is customary for most public opinion surveys. For example, if 50% of the overall sample of 956 likely voters answered yes to a specific question, this statistic would have a sampling error of plus or minus 3.2 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. This means that there is a 95% chance that had the overall population of likely voters statewide been interviewed using the same questionnaire and methods, the results of such a census would yield a result between 46.8% and 53.2%. The same procedure can be used to estimate the sample error ranges of any other statistic contained in this report. Approximate percentage distribution of replies to question Sample size 10% 30% 50% 70% 90% 100 +/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /- 1.9 There are many other possible sources of error other than sampling variability in this and any other public opinion survey. The overall design and execution of the survey minimized the potential for these other sources of error. 5
6 Questions Asked (ASKED OF REGISTERED DEMOCRATS) Which of the following best describes how you feel about Hillary Clinton becoming the Democratic Party's nominee for President enthusiastic, satisfied but not enthusiastic, dissatisfied but not upset, or upset? Do you favor Bernie Sanders continuing his campaign for the presidential nomination all the way to the Democratic National Convention in July, or should he step aside before the convention and throw his support to Hillary Clinton? (ASKED OF REGISTERED REPUBLINS) Which of the following best describes how you feel about Donald Trump becoming the Re-publican Party's nominee for President enthusiastic, satisfied but not enthusiastic, dissatisfied but not upset, or upset? (ASKED OF ALL LIKELY VOTERS) If the November general election for President were being held today and the candidates were Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton, for whom would you vote Trump or Clinton? (ASKED OF RANDOM SUBSAMPLE OF 495 LIKELY VOTERS) What if the choices in the November general election for President were Republican Donald Trump, Democrat Hillary Clinton or Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson? If the election were being held today, for whom would you vote Trump, Clinton or Johnson? (ASKED OF RANDOM SUBSAMPLE OF 461 LIKELY VOTERS) Generally speaking, is your opinion of (Hillary Clinton) (Donald Trump) favorable or unfavorable? 6
7 Q5 (Banner 1) : Registered as Democrat Southern Section Area Region Northern Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County Inland Empire South Coast Central Valley SF Bay Area (total) So. Citizenship Status No. Citizen Non- Citizen Registered Democrat Voter registration/party Registered to vote Registered Registered Republican NPP/other 5. Which of the following best describes how you feel about Hillary Clinton becoming the Democratic Party's nominee for President enthusiastic, satisfied but not enthusiastic, dissatisfied but not upset, or upset? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% % ENTHUSIASTIC 35.2% 35.7% 34.3% 36.2% 31.6% 33.5% 43.2% 39.0% 23.6% 42.7% 26.9% 33.2% 21.5% 35.2% % 35.2% % SATISFIED BUT NOT ENTHUSIASTIC 37.3% 38.4% 35.8% 35.7% 43.0% 38.0% 41.6% 35.3% 42.7% 29.2% 45.4% 41.7% 48.6% 37.3% % 37.3% % DISSATISFIED BUT NOT UPSET 14.3% 15.2% 13.1% 14.7% 13.2% 16.0% 10.8% 18.9% 15.6% 9.0% 17.8% 10.4% 24.2% 14.3% % 14.3% % UPSET % 8.6% 12.9% 10.5% 10.0% 10.0% 4.3% 6.8% 15.0% 14.4% 5.9% 8.9% 3.3% 10.4% % 10.4% % * % 2.1% 3.9% 3.0% 2.2% 2.5% 0.1% - 3.1% 4.6% 4.0% 5.8% 2.4% 2.8% - 2.8% 2.8% % Likely voter in Nov election Field Research Corporation Table 9 7
8 Q5 (Banner 2) : Registered as Democrat Male Female Gender Race/Ethnicity Age Marital Status White non- Hispanic Latino Spanish speaking English speaking Asian/ Pac Isle African- American Married Not married living together Never married Widow/ separated/ divorced Child under 18 in HH 5. Which of the following best describes how you feel about Hillary Clinton becoming the Democratic Party's nominee for President enthusiastic, satisfied but not enthusiastic, dissatisfied but not upset, or upset? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% ENTHUSIASTIC 35.2% 26.7% 41.4% 36.9% 33.4% 33.8% 33.2% 36.3% 34.7% 17.6% 26.4% 27.6% 45.4% 44.0% 35.5% 27.4% 31.1% 40.8% 29.8% 37.1% SATISFIED BUT NOT ENTHUSIASTIC 37.3% 44.2% 32.2% 33.7% 40.3% 57.9% 31.3% 37.3% 49.5% 35.3% 31.8% 48.1% 35.6% 38.2% 42.4% 43.0% 30.3% 36.3% 34.9% 38.3% DISSATISFIED BUT NOT UPSET 14.3% 16.2% 13.0% 14.6% 18.4% 5.2% 25.1% 14.6% 2.8% 25.8% 23.2% 15.2% 9.4% 6.5% 12.1% 19.4% 21.3% 9.7% 20.5% 12.0% UPSET % 11.6% 9.5% 12.2% 5.7% 3.1% 7.0% 9.4% 10.1% 18.3% 14.0% 7.5% 8.1% 6.8% 8.0% 10.1% 13.2% 9.8% 10.2% 10.6% % 1.2% 4.0% 2.7% 2.2% - 3.3% 2.3% 2.9% 3.0% 4.7% 1.5% 1.5% 4.5% 2.0% - 4.0% 3.3% 4.6% 2.0% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 10 8
9 Q5 (Banner 3) : Registered as Democrat $22,000 Under - $22,000 $39,999 Household Income FPL Education Political Ideology Tenure Less More Less Some $40,000 $50,000 Post Strongly Moderately Middle than than than H.S. college/ College Moderately Strongly - - $100,000+ graduate conservative ative road conserv- of the Own 138% 138% high graduate trade graduate liberal liberal $49,999 $99,999 work FPL FPL school school 5. Which of the following best describes how you feel about Hillary Clinton becoming the Democratic Party's nominee for President enthusiastic, satisfied but not enthusiastic, dissatisfied but not upset, or upset? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% ENTHUSIASTIC 35.2% 39.4% 32.2% 36.0% 30.5% 36.0% 36.0% 34.9% 44.5% 25.3% 35.9% 34.1% 41.1% 58.1% 30.4% 31.9% 29.5% 43.9% 37.6% 33.4% SATISFIED BUT NOT ENTHUSIASTIC 37.3% 35.3% 33.7% 40.9% 34.1% 43.2% 39.1% 36.8% 41.8% 36.1% 36.2% 39.7% 34.6% 18.3% 37.3% 45.3% 44.6% 22.8% 38.0% 36.1% DISSATISFIED BUT NOT UPSET 14.3% 13.1% 17.8% 8.5% 14.7% 13.5% 14.3% 14.4% 8.0% 18.4% 13.1% 16.9% 12.3% 13.8% 12.7% 13.2% 13.9% 16.9% 10.8% 18.6% UPSET % 7.0% 12.7% 14.6% 17.5% 6.2% 5.8% 11.6% 3.4% 13.9% 10.7% 7.5% 12.0% 9.8% 18.9% 7.6% 10.2% 12.6% 10.4% 9.6% * % 5.2% 3.5% - 3.3% 1.0% 4.8% 2.3% 2.3% 6.3% 4.2% 1.7% % 2.0% 1.8% 3.8% 3.2% 2.3% Rent/ Field Research Corporation Table 11 9
10 Q6 (Banner 1) : Registered as Democrat (English/Spanish) Southern Section Area Region Northern Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County Inland Empire South Coast Central Valley SF Bay Area (total) So. Citizenship Status No. Citizen Non- Citizen Registered Democrat Voter registration/party Registered to vote Registered Registered Republican NPP/other 6. Do you favor Bernie Sanders continuing his campaign for the presidential nomination all the way to the Democratic National Convention in July, or should he step aside before the convention and throw his support to Hillary Clinton? Weighted % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% % CONTINUE TO THE CONVENTION 38.4% 39.8% 36.5% 37.9% 40.0% 38.9% 41.1% 42.1% 41.2% 34.8% 36.1% 38.8% 33.8% 38.4% % 38.4% % STEP ASIDE AND SUPPORT CLINTON 52.6% 49.6% 56.8% 52.7% 52.0% 50.4% 53.0% 52.2% 50.4% 59.1% 48.5% 34.9% 60.3% 52.6% % 52.6% % % 10.6% 6.7% 9.3% 8.0% 10.7% 5.9% 5.7% 8.4% 6.1% 15.4% 26.4% 5.9% 9.0% - 9.0% 9.0% % Likely voter in Nov election Field Research Corporation Table 12 10
11 Q6 (Banner 2) : Registered as Democrat (English/Spanish) Male Female Gender Race/Ethnicity Age Marital Status White non- Hispanic Latino Spanish speaking English speaking Asian/ Pac Isle African- American Married Not married living together Never married Widow/ separated/ divorced Child under 18 in HH 6. Do you favor Bernie Sanders continuing his campaign for the presidential nomination all the way to the Democratic National Convention in July, or should he step aside before the convention and throw his support to Hillary Clinton? Weighted % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% CONTINUE TO THE CONVENTION 38.4% 42.1% 35.7% 37.5% 45.8% 31.2% 53.3% 31.7% 25.8% 62.0% 52.7% 34.3% 28.6% 26.2% 32.3% 31.8% 53.3% 32.6% 45.9% 35.6% STEP ASIDE AND SUPPORT CLINTON 52.6% 52.5% 52.6% 52.8% 46.4% 60.2% 39.4% 60.4% 66.0% 29.0% 44.8% 56.7% 59.4% 65.7% 57.6% 60.4% 39.0% 59.0% 47.2% 54.9% % 5.4% 11.6% 9.7% 7.7% 8.6% 7.3% 7.9% 8.2% 9.0% 2.4% 9.0% 12.0% 8.1% 10.1% 7.8% 7.7% 8.4% 6.9% 9.4% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 13 11
12 Q6 (Banner 3) : Registered as Democrat (English/Spanish) $22,000 Under - $22,000 $39,999 Household Income FPL Education Political Ideology Tenure Less More Less Some $40,000 $50,000 Post Strongly Moderately Middle than than than H.S. college/ College Moderately Strongly - - $100,000+ graduate conservative ative road conserv- of the Own 138% 138% high graduate trade graduate liberal liberal $49,999 $99,999 work FPL FPL school school 6. Do you favor Bernie Sanders continuing his campaign for the presidential nomination all the way to the Democratic National Convention in July, or should he step aside before the convention and throw his support to Hillary Clinton? Weighted % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% CONTINUE TO THE CONVENTION 38.4% 45.8% 46.3% 38.7% 42.7% 26.1% 43.3% 37.1% 28.9% 49.6% 46.1% 34.5% 28.7% 17.5% 47.6% 38.1% 35.5% 43.4% 31.2% 45.9% STEP ASIDE AND SUPPORT CLINTON 52.6% 46.9% 42.5% 51.8% 49.3% 67.3% 49.0% 53.5% 56.3% 45.8% 44.8% 57.8% 61.0% 73.1% 49.5% 53.0% 52.0% 50.5% 60.7% 44.5% % 7.2% 11.2% 9.6% 8.0% 6.6% 7.8% 9.3% 14.8% 4.6% 9.1% 7.7% 10.4% 9.5% 3.0% 8.9% 12.5% 6.0% 8.1% 9.6% Rent/ Field Research Corporation Table 14 12
13 Q7 (Banner 1) : Registered as Republican Southern Section Area Region Northern Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County Inland Empire South Coast Central Valley SF Bay Area (total) So. Citizenship Status No. Citizen Non- Citizen Registered Democrat Voter registration/party Registered to vote Registered Registered Republican NPP/other 7. Which of the following best describes how you feel about Donald Trump becoming the Republican Party's nominee for President enthusiastic, satisfied but not enthusiastic, dissatisfied but not upset, or upset? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % % % ENTHUSIASTIC 32.5% 27.5% 40.3% 32.3% 33.0% 24.9% 16.0% 37.5% 43.5% 43.3% 24.3% 29.3% 15.1% 32.5% % % % SATISFIED BUT NOT ENTHUSIASTIC 27.2% 27.0% 27.5% 21.7% 36.6% 19.0% 49.8% 19.8% 27.1% 20.9% 37.8% 32.0% 48.7% 27.2% % % % DISSATISFIED BUT NOT UPSET 17.7% 19.8% 14.3% 21.9% 10.4% 23.0% 11.7% 21.1% 10.7% 15.9% 23.0% 20.0% 28.5% 17.7% % % % UPSET % 22.0% 15.8% 22.0% 15.4% 30.4% 15.0% 19.6% 15.1% 19.9% 11.7% 13.8% 7.7% 19.6% % % % % 3.8% 2.1% 2.2% 4.7% 2.7% 7.5% 2.0% 3.6% - 3.2% 4.9% - 3.1% - 3.1% - 3.1% - 2.2% Likely voter in Nov election Field Research Corporation Table 15 13
14 Q7 (Banner 2) : Registered as Republican Male Female Gender Race/Ethnicity Age Marital Status White non- Hispanic Latino Spanish speaking English speaking Asian/ Pac Isle African- American Married Not married living together Never married Widow/ separated/ divorced Child under 18 in HH 7. Which of the following best describes how you feel about Donald Trump becoming the Republican Party's nominee for President enthusiastic, satisfied but not enthusiastic, dissatisfied but not upset, or upset? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% ENTHUSIASTIC 32.5% 26.2% 39.0% 33.2% 23.8% % 35.3% % 41.8% 24.0% 28.8% 37.0% 34.4% 23.2% 6.4% 35.7% 26.1% 34.7% SATISFIED BUT NOT ENTHUSIASTIC 27.2% 35.0% 19.2% 26.7% 26.4% 30.0% 25.8% 26.0% 29.8% 8.9% 13.3% 30.2% 31.1% 32.5% 27.2% 42.6% 26.8% 27.7% 17.6% 30.3% DISSATISFIED * * BUT NOT UPSET 17.7% 15.8% 19.6% 17.3% 22.2% 59.0% 16.2% 16.7% 1.3% 22.7% 6.8% 30.2% 19.8% 14.8% 18.6% 5.3% 20.8% 15.9% 23.0% 15.9% UPSET % 17.8% 21.4% 21.0% 20.8% % 13.3% 68.9% 38.6% 36.5% 10.6% 17.8% 13.0% 17.0% 28.9% 43.0% 15.9% 28.8% 16.5% % 5.3% 0.8% 1.8% 6.7% 11.0% 6.0% 8.8% - 6.6% 1.6% 5.1% 2.4% 2.8% 2.8% - 3.0% 4.7% 4.5% 2.6% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 16 14
15 Q7 (Banner 3) : Registered as Republican $22,000 Under - $22,000 $39,999 Household Income FPL Education Political Ideology Tenure Less More Less Some $40,000 $50,000 Post Strongly Moderately Middle than than than H.S. college/ College Moderately Strongly - - $100,000+ graduate conservative ative road conserv- of the Own 138% 138% high graduate trade graduate liberal liberal $49,999 $99,999 work FPL FPL school school 7. Which of the following best describes how you feel about Donald Trump becoming the Republican Party's nominee for President enthusiastic, satisfied but not enthusiastic, dissatisfied but not upset, or upset? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% ENTHUSIASTIC 32.5% 40.3% 36.0% 31.7% 18.2% 33.1% 31.4% 32.8% 52.1% 27.9% 33.2% 42.8% 17.3% 40.2% 29.0% 25.3% 30.5% 47.1% 37.1% 21.4% SATISFIED * BUT NOT ENTHUSIASTIC 27.2% 28.7% 31.4% 21.5% 32.4% 24.7% 33.2% 26.5% 38.7% 27.3% 29.5% 20.6% 32.0% 35.5% 28.4% 20.5% 3.9% % 17.9% DISSATISFIED BUT NOT UPSET 17.7% 7.3% 14.2% 24.3% 21.1% 17.8% 9.8% 18.8% 9.2% 29.1% 10.5% 18.8% 20.5% 12.5% 22.3% 20.4% 20.4% % 24.7% UPSET % 20.7% 18.5% 22.5% 26.1% 19.0% 20.9% 19.1% % 24.6% 13.7% 26.6% 10.4% 14.0% 31.1% 45.2% 30.3% 12.6% 33.8% % 3.0% % 5.4% 4.7% 2.9% - 3.1% 2.1% 4.1% 3.6% 1.3% 6.3% 2.7% % 3.6% 2.3% Rent/ Field Research Corporation Table 17 15
16 Q9a (Banner 1) : Likely voters Southern Section Area Region Northern Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County Inland Empire South Coast Central Valley SF Bay Area (total) So. Citizenship Status No. Citizen Non- Citizen Registered Democrat Voter registration/party Registered to vote Registered Registered Republican NPP/other 9a. If the November general election for President were being held today and the candidates were Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton, for whom would you vote Trump or Clinton? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% TRUMP % 25.3% 31.9% 23.5% 39.8% 15.5% 31.9% 39.3% 46.3% 22.5% 27.9% 28.4% 27.3% 28.1% % 4.9% 71.7% 20.2% 28.1% CLINTON % 60.6% 53.1% 61.7% 46.5% 71.3% 51.1% 44.6% 41.3% 63.0% 56.1% 62.7% 48.7% 57.5% % 87.3% 16.4% 48.4% 57.5% DO NOT READ NEITHER 7.6% 7.3% 8.1% 7.1% 9.2% 4.9% 12.0% 9.9% 7.9% 6.9% 8.8% 5.3% 12.7% 7.6% - 7.6% 5.0% 6.1% 15.0% 7.6% UNDECIDED % 6.7% 6.9% 7.7% 4.6% 8.3% 5.0% 6.1% 4.5% 7.6% 7.3% 3.6% 11.3% 6.8% - 6.8% 2.8% 5.8% 16.4% 6.8% Likely voter in Nov election Field Research Corporation Table 21 16
17 Q9a (Banner 2) : Likely voters Male Female Gender Race/Ethnicity Age Marital Status White non- Hispanic Latino Spanish speaking English speaking Asian/ Pac Isle African- American Married Not married living together Never married Widow/ separated/ divorced Child under 18 in HH 9a. If the November general election for President were being held today and the candidates were Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton, for whom would you vote Trump or Clinton? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% TRUMP % 32.4% 24.4% 37.0% 11.9% % 26.6% 3.1% 12.7% 26.3% 27.9% 26.8% 40.0% 37.6% 8.8% 13.3% 26.8% 23.2% 30.3% CLINTON % 52.7% 61.5% 48.9% 74.8% 91.3% 68.6% 55.0% 87.2% 69.3% 55.4% 52.1% 60.9% 49.9% 49.0% 71.7% 69.3% 63.0% 59.0% 56.8% DO NOT READ NEITHER 7.6% 9.1% 6.4% 9.3% 6.5% 3.6% 7.7% 3.7% 6.1% 11.1% 9.4% 10.5% 7.5% 3.3% 7.1% 18.2% 9.2% 5.1% 12.0% 6.0% UNDECIDED % 5.9% 7.6% 4.8% 6.8% 5.1% 7.4% 14.7% 3.6% 7.0% 8.9% 9.5% 4.8% 6.8% 6.4% 1.3% 8.2% 5.2% 5.8% 6.9% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 22 17
18 Q9a (Banner 3) : Likely voters $22,000 Under - $22,000 $39,999 Household Income FPL Education Political Ideology Tenure Less More Less Some $40,000 $50,000 Post Strongly Moderately Middle than than than H.S. college/ College Moderately Strongly - - $100,000+ graduate conservative ative road conserv- of the Own 138% 138% high graduate trade graduate liberal liberal $49,999 $99,999 work FPL FPL school school 9a. If the November general election for President were being held today and the candidates were Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton, for whom would you vote Trump or Clinton? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% TRUMP % 18.8% 30.9% 22.9% 27.8% 33.1% 14.6% 30.7% 14.7% 22.7% 29.3% 34.1% 24.0% 70.0% 43.2% 24.5% 5.5% 2.1% 36.4% 16.7% CLINTON % 67.0% 56.7% 56.7% 56.5% 56.7% 73.2% 54.4% 76.9% 60.9% 55.8% 51.5% 62.8% 17.4% 41.8% 61.2% 76.9% 87.9% 50.2% 67.8% DO NOT READ NEITHER 7.6% 7.0% 6.1% 11.3% 10.9% 4.7% 4.1% 8.3% 3.8% 9.4% 7.9% 6.9% 7.9% 9.3% 9.7% 6.2% 9.0% 6.8% 6.5% 9.2% UNDECIDED % 7.1% 6.3% 9.1% 4.7% 5.4% 8.1% 6.6% 4.7% 7.0% 7.0% 7.4% 5.4% 3.4% 5.3% 8.0% 8.6% 3.1% 6.9% 6.3% Rent/ Field Research Corporation Table 23 18
19 19
20 Q10 (Banner 1) : Likely voters (Form A) Southern Section Area Region Northern Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County Inland Empire South Coast Central Valley SF Bay Area (total) So. Citizenship Status No. Citizen Non- Citizen Registered Democrat Voter registration/party Registered to vote Registered Registered Republican NPP/other 10. What if the choices in the November general election for President were Republican Donald Trump, Democrat Hillary Clinton or Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson? If the election were being held today, for whom would you vote Trump, Clinton Weighted % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% TRUMP % 22.9% 29.2% 21.6% 37.0% 11.3% 29.5% 34.5% 42.9% 20.6% 33.4% 40.0% 27.5% 25.6% % 6.1% 64.3% 18.4% 25.6% CLINTON % 49.7% 50.6% 55.1% 36.2% 63.7% 36.9% 36.9% 31.4% 60.4% 48.5% 34.0% 61.5% 50.1% % 81.1% 10.2% 37.7% 50.1% JOHNSON % 8.9% 10.5% 7.9% 14.3% 6.1% 13.4% 11.9% 17.7% 8.6% 4.1% 8.6% - 9.6% - 9.6% 5.5% 11.8% 14.6% 9.6% UNDECIDED 14.7% 18.4% 9.7% 15.4% 12.5% 18.9% 20.2% 16.8% 8.0% 10.5% 14.1% 17.4% 11.1% 14.7% % 7.2% 13.7% 29.3% 14.7% Likely voter in Nov election Field Research Corporation Table 27 20
21 Q10 (Banner 2) : Likely voters (Form A) Male Female Gender Race/Ethnicity Age Marital Status White non- Hispanic Latino Spanish speaking English speaking Asian/ Pac Isle African- American Married Not married living together Never married Widow/ separated/ divorced Child under 18 in HH 10. What if the choices in the November general election for President were Republican Donald Trump, Democrat Hillary Clinton or Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson? If the election were being held today, for whom would you vote Trump, Clinton Weighted % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% TRUMP * % 30.1% 21.3% 33.4% 9.2% % 24.1% 4.5% 11.2% 26.4% 17.1% 26.4% 37.2% 36.4% 2.5% 9.8% 20.6% 25.1% 26.1% CLINTON % 45.0% 55.1% 40.4% 71.1% 85.5% 64.9% 51.7% 79.8% 58.6% 46.2% 45.1% 52.9% 46.1% 42.3% 46.9% 56.5% 63.9% 54.4% 48.6% JOHNSON * % 12.6% 6.7% 13.6% 5.2% 1.6% 6.8% 1.0% 3.9% 18.5% 13.3% 14.4% 8.3% 1.1% 9.6% 8.1% 17.2% 3.8% 10.8% 9.3% UNDECIDED 14.7% 12.3% 17.0% 12.6% 14.4% 12.9% 15.1% 23.2% 11.8% 11.7% 14.0% 23.3% 12.3% 15.5% 11.7% 42.5% 16.5% 11.6% 9.7% 15.9% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 28 21
22 Q10 (Banner 3) : Likely voters (Form A) $22,000 Under - $22,000 $39,999 Household Income FPL Education Political Ideology Tenure Less More Less Some $40,000 $50,000 Post Strongly Moderately Middle than than than H.S. college/ College Moderately Strongly - - $100,000+ graduate conservative ative road conserv- of the Own 138% 138% high graduate trade graduate liberal liberal $49,999 $99,999 work FPL FPL school school 10. What if the choices in the November general election for President were Republican Donald Trump, Democrat Hillary Clinton or Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson? If the election were being held today, for whom would you vote Trump, Clinton Weighted % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% TRUMP % 13.4% 22.5% 23.4% 22.2% 32.2% 14.0% 27.9% 6.5% 28.1% 20.4% 33.4% 26.0% 65.7% 35.7% 17.9% 7.8% 3.9% 32.1% 16.3% CLINTON % 65.8% 51.8% 49.0% 47.2% 49.5% 69.7% 46.2% 65.3% 54.5% 50.9% 41.6% 55.0% 18.2% 40.8% 53.1% 61.2% 79.6% 46.7% 54.4% JOHNSON % 2.4% 4.6% 19.1% 13.1% 9.5% 2.5% 11.0% 3.5% 2.7% 7.8% 14.5% 10.2% 7.4% 10.3% 12.2% 16.7% 4.5% 8.9% 11.1% UNDECIDED 14.7% 18.5% 21.2% 8.5% 17.6% 8.9% 13.7% 14.9% 24.7% 14.7% 20.9% 10.6% 8.8% 8.7% 13.2% 16.9% 14.3% 12.0% 12.2% 18.2% Rent/ Field Research Corporation Table 29 22
23 Q11a (Banner 1) : Likely voters (Form B) Southern Section Area Region Northern Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County Inland Empire South Coast Central Valley SF Bay Area (total) So. No. Citizen Citizenship Status Non- Citizen Registered Democrat Voter registration/party Registered to vote Registered Registered Republican NPP/other 11a. Generally speaking, is your opinion of Hillary Clinton favorable or unfavorable? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% FAVORABLE 52.8% 57.9% 45.2% 57.4% 41.7% 65.9% 52.0% 43.8% 36.3% 58.5% 44.8% 61.3% 21.8% 52.8% % 77.2% 18.5% 46.6% 52.8% UNFAVORABLE 42.6% 36.7% 51.2% 38.5% 52.2% 29.4% 41.3% 52.0% 57.6% 40.2% 48.3% 30.6% 72.9% 42.6% % 19.9% 81.0% 38.7% 42.6% % 5.4% 3.7% 4.1% 6.1% 4.7% 6.7% 4.2% 6.0% 1.3% 6.9% 8.1% 5.3% 4.7% - 4.7% 2.9% 0.5% 14.7% 4.7% Likely voter in Nov election Field Research Corporation Table 33 23
24 Q11a (Banner 2) : Likely voters (Form B) Male Female Gender Race/Ethnicity Age Marital Status White non- Hispanic Latino Spanish speaking English speaking Asian/ Pac Isle African- American Married Not married living together Never married Widow/ separated/ divorced Child under 18 in HH 11a. Generally speaking, is your opinion of Hillary Clinton favorable or unfavorable? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% FAVORABLE 52.8% 48.3% 56.1% 46.9% 62.6% 91.5% 53.0% 44.0% 83.8% 50.9% 48.6% 53.6% 60.8% 45.8% 46.8% 60.0% 63.8% 52.3% 49.4% 53.5% UNFAVORABLE 42.6% 47.6% 38.8% 49.5% 34.0% 3.5% 44.1% 45.2% 11.8% 43.0% 48.3% 38.6% 37.3% 47.8% 47.5% 37.8% 32.9% 44.5% 46.7% 41.7% % 4.1% 5.1% 3.5% 3.4% 5.0% 2.9% 10.9% 4.4% 6.1% 3.1% 7.8% 1.9% 6.4% 5.8% 2.2% 3.3% 3.2% 3.9% 4.9% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 34 24
25 Q11a (Banner 3) : Likely voters (Form B) $22,000 Under - $22,000 $39,999 Household Income FPL Education Political Ideology Tenure Less More Less Some $40,000 $50,000 Post Strongly Moderately Middle than than than H.S. college/ College Moderately Strongly - - $100,000+ graduate conservative ative road conserv- of the Own 138% 138% high graduate trade graduate liberal liberal $49,999 $99,999 work FPL FPL school school 11a. Generally speaking, is your opinion of Hillary Clinton favorable or unfavorable? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% FAVORABLE 52.8% 61.7% 50.0% 52.3% 48.4% 52.2% 69.8% 49.5% 56.7% 54.1% 44.2% 51.5% 62.4% 19.1% 43.5% 52.8% 73.3% 71.5% 43.4% 65.0% UNFAVORABLE 42.6% 35.9% 45.4% 35.9% 50.4% 43.4% 26.1% 45.7% 34.5% 42.1% 50.2% 47.0% 30.0% 77.7% 47.4% 41.9% 19.5% 28.5% 51.1% 31.6% % 2.4% 4.6% 11.8% 1.2% 4.4% 4.1% 4.8% 8.8% 3.9% 5.5% 1.5% 7.6% 3.2% 9.1% 5.3% 7.3% - 5.5% 3.4% Rent/ Field Research Corporation Table 35 25
26 Q11b (Banner 1) : Likely voters (Form B) Southern Section Area Region Northern Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County Inland Empire South Coast Central Valley SF Bay Area (total) So. No. Citizen Citizenship Status Non- Citizen Registered Democrat Voter registration/party Registered to vote Registered Registered Republican NPP/other 11b. Generally speaking, is your opinion of Donald Trump favorable or unfavorable? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% FAVORABLE 23.5% 19.9% 28.7% 19.7% 32.6% 10.0% 25.1% 38.2% 40.1% 23.1% 16.7% 18.4% 14.3% 23.5% % 3.4% 59.5% 17.4% 23.5% UNFAVORABLE 72.5% 76.0% 67.5% 75.9% 64.7% 85.2% 74.9% 56.6% 57.6% 74.3% 75.1% 76.8% 72.9% 72.5% % 94.9% 36.4% 73.6% 72.5% % 4.1% 3.8% 4.5% 2.8% 4.8% - 5.3% 2.3% 2.6% 8.2% 4.8% 12.8% 4.0% - 4.0% 1.7% 4.1% 9.0% 4.0% Likely voter in Nov election Field Research Corporation Table 36 26
27 Q11b (Banner 2) : Likely voters (Form B) Male Female Gender Race/Ethnicity Age Marital Status White non- Hispanic Latino Spanish speaking English speaking Asian/ Pac Isle African- American Married Not married living together Never married Widow/ separated/ divorced Child under 18 in HH 11b. Generally speaking, is your opinion of Donald Trump favorable or unfavorable? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% FAVORABLE 23.5% 26.2% 21.5% 30.0% 12.7% 4.7% 15.4% 25.6% 4.9% 9.9% 21.4% 14.2% 22.7% 38.4% 28.7% 13.0% 9.3% 31.5% 16.9% 26.2% UNFAVORABLE 72.5% 69.7% 74.6% 67.1% 83.9% 90.9% 81.5% 65.8% 92.4% 88.8% 77.9% 79.4% 72.6% 56.6% 66.3% 87.0% 89.2% 64.2% 81.0% 69.2% * % 4.0% 3.9% 2.8% 3.4% 4.4% 3.0% 8.6% 2.8% 1.4% 0.7% 6.4% 4.7% 5.0% 5.0% - 1.5% 4.3% 2.1% 4.5% Yes No Field Research Corporation Table 37 27
28 Q11b (Banner 3) : Likely voters (Form B) $22,000 Under - $22,000 $39,999 Household Income FPL Education Political Ideology Tenure Less More Less Some $40,000 $50,000 Post Strongly Moderately Middle than than than H.S. college/ College Moderately Strongly - - $100,000+ graduate conservative ative road conserv- of the Own 138% 138% high graduate trade graduate liberal liberal $49,999 $99,999 work FPL FPL school school 11b. Generally speaking, is your opinion of Donald Trump favorable or unfavorable? Weighted 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% FAVORABLE 23.5% 25.9% 37.9% 15.1% 22.2% 20.0% 19.3% 24.3% 30.1% 14.9% 32.6% 26.7% 12.3% 55.3% 44.9% 20.6% 2.5% 0.7% 31.2% 13.4% UNFAVORABLE 72.5% 70.3% 60.4% 72.2% 74.7% 76.9% 76.4% 71.8% 69.9% 79.2% 60.7% 71.1% 85.7% 38.8% 49.4% 75.5% 94.8% 98.4% 64.1% 84.0% % 3.8% 1.7% 12.7% 3.2% 3.2% 4.3% 3.9% - 5.9% 6.7% 2.3% 2.0% 5.8% 5.7% 3.9% 2.8% 0.9% 4.8% 2.6% Rent/ Field Research Corporation Table 38 28
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Field Poll Survey of California Registered Voters About
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Survey of Californians Likely to Vote in the June 2016 Presidential
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Survey of California Likely Voters about the 2016 Presidential
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Survey of California Registered Voters About the Overall
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 4153925763 Tabulations From a Field Poll Survey of California Likely Voters in the June
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Survey of California Likely Voters Measuring Voter Preferences
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Survey of California Likely Voters Measuring Voter Preferences
More informationCity and County of Denver Thursday, August 25, :39 PM City and County of Denver: EBE Approval Letter
From: Sent: To: Subject: City and County of Denver Thursday, August 25, 2016 4:39 PM email City and County of Denver: EBE Approval Letter COMPANY NAME ADDREESS Dear : SUBJECT: Emerging
More informationCERTIFIED ENROLLMENT ENTITY CHANGE REQUEST FORM FOR APPROVED APPLICATIONS
Tips for Faster Processing Use IPAS My Files to submit your change request form https://ipas.ccgrantsandassisters.org/ o If unable to upload documents, please fax to: (559) 436-5293 Must submit page 1;
More informationCertified Enrollment Entity Change Request Form
Certified Enrollment Entity Change Request Form USE THIS FORM TO REQUEST CHANGES, UPDATES, OR EDITS TO YOUR ONLINE CERTIFIED ENROLLMENT ENTITY APPLICATION Entity Name: Change Request Submitted For Entity
More information2014 CFD Rating Analysis
214 CFD Rating Analysis ITEM NUMBER CFDs issued 2 213 (1) 1,51 CFDs with Reserve Fund draws (1) 32 CFDs with Reserve Funds draw for administrative reasons (2) 7 Reserve Fund draws for credit reasons 25
More informationThe Growing Gap between Landline and Dual Frame Election Polls
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2010 Republican Share Bigger in -Only Surveys The Growing Gap between and Dual Frame Election Polls FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Keeter Director of Survey Research Michael
More informationAn Introduction To: Help Me Grow-LA. August 11, 2016
An Introduction To: Help Me Grow-LA August 11, 2016 Presenters MODERATOR Reena John Senior Program Officer First 5 LA Christina Altmayer Vice President of Programs First 5 LA Wendy Schiffer Director of
More informationCAIR2 Health Plan HEDIS/Patient Match Flat File Specification
CAIR2 HEDIS/Patient Match Flat File Specification CAIR2 Health Plan HEDIS/Patient Match Flat File Specification (for Health Plans, Medical Groups, IPAs only) Last Updated: April 11, 2018 Note: The file
More informationProvisional Envelopes An Overview
Provisional Envelopes An Overview This section of the Provisional Manual contains this Overview, Images of Provisional Envelopes in a pdf format, and a spreadsheet summarizing size and attributes of the
More informationClinton Leads Trump in Michigan by 10% (Clinton 49% - Trump 39%)
P R E S S R E L E A S E FOR RELEASE: August 16, 2016 Contact: Steve Mitchell 248-891-2414 Clinton Leads Trump in Michigan by 10% (Clinton 49% - Trump 39%) EAST LANSING, Michigan --- The latest Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell
More informationSurvey Questions and Methodology
Survey Questions and Methodology Spring Tracking Survey 2012 Data for March 15 April 3, 2012 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American Life Project
More informationSurvey Questions and Methodology
Survey Questions and Methodology Winter Tracking Survey 2012 Final Topline 02/22/2012 Data for January 20 February 19, 2012 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center
More informationCAIR2 Patient Match (HEDIS) Flat File Specifications
CAIR2 Patient Match (HEDIS) Flat File Specifications Effective January 27, 2017; revised February 9, 2017 1 of 12 New Patient Match Requirements Because of the transition to the new CAIR2 software, health
More informationThe Rise of the Connected Viewer
JULY 17, 2012 The Rise of the Connected Viewer 52% of adult cell owners use their phones while engaging with televised content; younger audiences are particularly active in these connected viewing experiences
More informationCASF FUNDED RURAL AND URBAN REGIONAL BROADBAND CONSORTIA
For more information: Gladys Palpallatoc, Associate Vice President, California Emerging Technology Fund (CETF) CETF is lending technical assistance, support and resources to Regional Consortia in California
More informationUC Berkeley Research Reports
UC Berkeley Research Reports Title Observational Study of Cell Phone and Texting Use Among California Drivers 0 and Comparison to 0 Data Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/vdxdm Authors Cooper,
More informationSample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:
Survey Questions Spring 2013 Tracking Survey Final Topline 5/21/2013 Data for April 17-May 19, 2013 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American
More informationSample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:
Survey Questions Spring 2013 Tracking Survey Final Topline 5/21/2013 Data for April 17-May 19, 2013 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American
More informationSmartphone Ownership 2013 Update
www.pewresearch.org JUNE 5, 2013 Smartphone Ownership 2013 Update 56% of American adults now own a smartphone of some kind; Android and iphone owners account for half of the cell phone user population.
More informationSpring (percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding)
Spring 2016 Survey Information: Registered Voters, Random Selection, Landline and Cell Telephone Survey Number of Adult Wisconsin Registered Voters: 616 Interview Period: 4/12-4/15, 2016 Margin of Error
More informationSegmented or Overlapping Dual Frame Samples in Telephone Surveys
Vol. 3, Issue 6, 2010 Segmented or Overlapping Dual Frame Samples in Telephone Surveys John M Boyle *, Faith Lewis, Brian Tefft * Institution: Abt SRBI Institution: Abt SRBI Institution: AAA Foundation
More informationSnyder leads by 5%, Peters leads by 14% Snyder 48% - Schauer 43% Peters 52% - Land 38%
P R E S S R E L E A S E FOR RELEASE AFTER 6:30 PM October 28, 2014: Contact: Steve Mitchell 248-891-2414 Snyder leads by 5%, Peters leads by 14% Snyder 48% - Schauer 43% Peters 52% - Land 38% EAST LANSING,
More informationGUIDELINES FOR CONTRIBUTORS TO THE LEGAL SECRETARY
GUIDELINES FOR CONTRIBUTORS TO THE LEGAL SECRETARY 1. DEADLINES FOR RECEIPT OF ARTICLES BY EDITOR a. For August issue (First Quarter)................ June 1st b. For November issue (Second Quarter)...........
More informationGALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS
GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS -- FINAL TOPLINE -- Timberline: 937008 IS: 727 Princeton Job #: 16-05-006 Jeff Jones, Lydia Saad May 4-8, 2016 Results are based on telephone
More information2017 NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE SURVEY ON OUR HEALTH AND WELL BEING Methodology Report December 1, 2017
207 NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE SURVEY ON OUR HEALTH AND WELL BEING Methodology Report December, 207 Prepared for: Center for State Health Policy Rutgers University 2 Paterson Street, 5th Floor New Brunswick,
More informationDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, UC San Diego CSE Course Approximations
CSE5A CSE8A CSE8B CSE11 CSE12 CSE 15L CSE20 CSE21 CSE30 CSE 70 CSE80 CSE 80 CSE 86 ALAN HANCOCK AMERICAN RIVER CISC 32A CISC 401 CISC 39 & CISC 40 ANTELOPE VALLEY CITY CISC 161 CISC 164 CISC 440 CISC 310
More information2013 Local Arts Agency Salary & Benefits Summary EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR / PRESIDENT / CEO
Local Arts Agency Salary & Benefits Summary EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR / PRESIDENT / CEO PRIVATE LAAS ONLY PUBLIC LAAS ONLY The Executive Director / President / Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is the chief staff
More informationColorado Results. For 10/3/ /4/2012. Contact: Doug Kaplan,
Colorado Results For 10/3/2012 10/4/2012 Contact: Doug Kaplan, 407-242-1870 Executive Summary Following the debates, Gravis Marketing, a non-partisan research firm conducted a survey of 1,438 likely voters
More informationTelephone Survey Response: Effects of Cell Phones in Landline Households
Telephone Survey Response: Effects of Cell Phones in Landline Households Dennis Lambries* ¹, Michael Link², Robert Oldendick 1 ¹University of South Carolina, ²Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
More informationMobile Access July 7, 2010 Aaron Smith, Research Specialist.
Mobile Access 2010 Six in ten Americans go online wirelessly using a laptop or cell phone; African-Americans and 18-29 year olds lead the way in the use of cell phone data applications, but older adults
More informationSpring Change Assessment Survey 2010 Final Topline 6/4/10 Data for April 29 May 30, 2010
Spring Change Assessment Survey 2010 Final Topline 6/4/10 Data for April 29 May 30, 2010 for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American Life Project Sample: n= 2,252 national adults, age 18 and older,
More informationx_ APPROVED BY CLIENT
POLL (SEPTEMBER '99) - project Registration # OMNIBUS (POLL) SEPTEMBER '99 Gallup Canada, Inc. Josephine Mazzuca, Analyst/ SOM September, 999 x_ APPROVED BY CLIENT DATE-, -.,... -:: Copyright, Gallup Canada,
More information2014 AARP Connecticut Telecommunications Survey
2014 AARP Connecticut Telecommunications Survey Residents Age 50+ Support Oversights and Protections for All Telecommunication Customers Nearly all Connecticut residents age 50 and older (96%) surveyed
More informationBay Area Information Sharing Report
East Bay ARIES- Jason Vorhauer, Lieutenant Contra Costa County SO West Bay COPLINK- Ronda Caine Alcantara, NCRIC Data Sharing Partnership Administrator South Bay COPLINK- Juan J. Gallardo, IT Director
More informationPractical Issues in Conducting Cell Phone Polling
Practical Issues in Conducting Phone Polling for DC-AAPOR April 16, 2009 Michael Dimock, Leah Christian & Scott Keeter Pew Research Center Frame Surveys at Pew 14 full dual frame surveys in 2008 ~22,000
More informationCalifornia. CA1 Feather River BSM
California If you cannot locate a chapter 4vp@bluestarmothers.us near you contact the Chartering Chair at CA1 Feather River BSM Chapter President Gina Pixler Email ginapixler@gmail.com Mailing Address
More informationQ1. Do you have a cellphone, or not? 1. Yes 2. No [SHOW IF Q1=1] Q2. Do you have a cellphone that connects to the Internet and can have apps, or does your phone only receive calls and text messages? 1.
More informationFY Bay Area UASI Risk and Grants Management Program Update. November 14, 2013
FY 2013-2014 Bay Area UASI Risk and Grants Management Program Update November 14, 2013 Overview FY 2013 Bay Area UASI Risk and Grants Management Program May 2013 December 2013 Data Management Analysis
More informationNANOS SURVEY NANOS SURVEY
Canadians are three times more likely to say Canada should ban than allow Huawei from participating in the 5G network in Canada National survey released August, 2018 Project 2018-1260A Summary Fifty-four
More informationSpring FREQUENCIES
Survey Information: Random Selection, Landline and Cell Telephone Survey Number of Adult Wisconsin Residents: 401 Interview Period: 3/24 4/3, 2014 Margin of Error: +/- 5% at the 95% confidence level. Spring
More informationPut your Paralegal Career into Second Gear Become Certified!
Subscribe Past Issues Translate RSS www.caparalegal.org View this email in your browser. CAPA Connection Issue # 11 - August 2018 Share Tweet Forward CAPA's GOAL WEBINAR AUGUST PRESENTATION Put your Paralegal
More informationNew Jersey economic issues poll April 5-14, 2018 Stockton Polling Institute Weighted frequencies
New Jersey economic issues poll April 5-14, 2018 Stockton Polling Institute Weighted frequencies Q1. How would you rate the U.S. economy: Frequency Valid Valid Excellent 47 6.6 6.6 6.6 Good 302 42.1 42.1
More informationIssue # 9 - June 2018
Subscribe Past Issues Translate RSS www.caparalegal.org View this email in your browser. CAPA Connection Issue # 9 - June 2018 Share Tweet Forward Obtaining the CCP credential is a way for California paralegals
More informationSPRING 2014 PENN STATE POLL
SPRING 2014 PENN STATE POLL Report of Methods Prepared by: Center for Survey Research May 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 METHODOLOGY...2 Instrument Development...2 Sample Design...2 RDD Landline
More information2013 AARP Survey of Pennsylvania Residents Age 50+ on Telecommunications
2013 AARP Survey of Pennsylvania Residents Age 50+ on Telecommunications AARP s Pennsylvania State Office, in response to its commitment to ensure reliable telecommunications service for all residents,
More informationAT&T California SCHEDULE CAL.P.U.C. NO. 175-T San Francisco, California 8th Revised Sheet 563 Cancels 7th Revised Sheet 563
San Francisco, California 8th Revised Sheet 563 Cancels 7th Revised Sheet 563 9. Directory Services 9.1 Directory Assistance Service 9.1.1 General Description Directory Assistance (DA) Service Transport
More informationTHE AP/AOL POLL CONDUCTED BY IPSOS PUBLIC AFFAIRS PROJECT # ONLINE VIDEO STUDY
1101 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 463-7300 Interview dates: July 27-30, August 1-3, & August 7-9, 2006 Interviews: 3003 adults, 1347 online video watchers Margin of error:
More informationSAMPLE Treatment Perceptions Survey (TPS) Report. XXXXXX County, N=239. (Not Real Data) All Substance Use Treatment Programs Surveyed.
Perceptions Survey (TPS) Report XXXXXX County, N=239 (Not Real Data) All Substance Use s Surveyed November 2017 Prepared by the University of California, Los Angeles Integrated Substance Abuse s *For county
More informationBilling Zip Codes in Cellular Telephone Sampling
Vol. 7, Issue 4, 2014 Billing Zip Codes in Cellular Telephone Sampling David Dutwin 1 Survey Practice 10.29115/SP-2014-0019 Aug 01, 2014 Tags: telephone, sampling, cellphone 1 Institution: Social Science
More informationL2 VoterMapping - Display Options
L2 VoterMapping - Display Options In L2 VoterMapping, there are six ways to control the display of voter data and each can provide you with valuable information for visual analysis: Map Type, Boundaries,
More informationMobile-only web survey respondents
Vol. 9, Issue 4, 2016 Mobile-only web survey respondents Peter Lugtig *, Vera Toepoel, Alerk Amin * Institution: Utrecht University Institution: Utrecht University Institution: RAND Corporation Abstract
More informationSPRING 2015 PENN STATE POLL
SPRING 2015 PENN STATE POLL Report of Methods BLUE POLL Prepared by: Center for Survey Research May 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 METHODOLOGY...2 Instrument Development...2 Sample Design...2
More information(2) Provide fair compensation that aligns with regional market indicators for compensation levels for each position;
Policy Number: 10 Original Adoption Date: December 15, 2016 Revised: October 25, 2018 Subject: Inclusive and Sustainable Workforce Policy Policy: One of PCE s strategic goals is to foster a work environment
More informationMarquette Law School Poll September 25-28, 2014 Results for Likely Voters
Marquette Law School Poll September 25-28, 2014 Results for Likely Voters (ages are rounded to whole numbers for reporting of results. Values ending in.5 are rounded to even whole numbers. Frequencies
More informationBY Aaron Smith and Kenneth Olmstead
FOR RELEASE APRIL 30, 2018 BY Aaron Smith and Kenneth Olmstead FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Aaron Smith, Associate Director, Research Tom Caiazza, Communications Manager 202.419.4372 RECOMMENDED CITATION
More informationAnnual Gadgets Survey Final Topline 4/21/06
Annual Gadgets Survey Final Topline 4/21/06 Data for February 15 April 6, 2006 1 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Internet & American Life Project Sample: n = 4,001 adults
More informationFall 2012 PENN STATE POLL
Fall 2012 PENN STATE POLL Report of Methods Prepared by: Center for Survey Research November 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 METHODOLOGY...2 Instrument Development...2 Sample Design...2 RDD Landline
More informationTHE MISSING AGENDA THE IMPORTANCE OF CYBER SECURITY TO U.S. VOTERS
THE MISSING AGENDA THE IMPORTANCE OF CYBER SECURITY TO U.S. VOTERS This election season voters have heard promises to make the U.S. great again and how we re stronger together. But they have yet to hear
More informationDATA MEMO. The volume of spam is growing in Americans personal and workplace accounts, but users are less bothered by it.
DATA MEMO BY: Senior Research Fellow Deborah Fallows DATE: May 2007 The volume of spam is growing in Americans personal and workplace email accounts, but email users are less bothered by it. Spam continues
More informationCell phones and Nonsampling Error in the American Time Use Survey
Cell phones and Nonsampling Error in the American Time Use Survey Brian Meekins Stephanie Denton AAPOR 2012 American Time Use Survey (ATUS) A Bureau of Labor Statistics survey, conducted by the U.S. Census
More informationCenters for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics
Wireless-Only and Wireless-Mostly Households: A growing challenge for telephone surveys Stephen Blumberg sblumberg@cdc.gov Julian Luke jluke@cdc.gov Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National
More informationVictim Personal Statements 2016/17
Victim Personal Statements / Analysis of the offer and take-up of Victim Personal Statements using the Crime Survey for England and Wales, April to March. November Foreword One of my commitments as Victims
More informationClient and Service Information (CSI) Statewide Data Quality Best Practices Plan Report
Client and Service Information (CSI) Statewide Data Quality Best Practices Plan Report Issues and Proposed Solutions for CSI Data Quality The following document and project was funded by the Mental Health
More informationPoll Results: American Voters Views on Police Body Cameras. August 2015
Poll Results: American Voters Views on Police Body Cameras August 215 Sample Size: n=1, completed interviews random nationwide Sample: Provided by Labels & Lists; drawn proportionally nationwide Eligibility:
More informationVoters and Mail. 5 Insights to Boost Campaign Impact. A United States Postal Service and American Association of Political Consultants (AAPC) study
Voters and Mail 5 Insights to Boost Campaign Impact A United States Postal Service and American Association of Political Consultants (AAPC) study Voters are waiting for you at the mailbox. The American
More informationStudents Preferences for Receiving Communication from the University: A Report from the Student Life Survey
Preferences for Receiving Communication from the University: A Report from the Student Life Survey Center for the Study of Student Life March 2017 INTRODUCTION This report explores questions on the Student
More informationBoard of Directors April 25, BART The Next 40 Years BART Metro Vision Update Enhancing Service, Capacity and Coverage
Board of Directors April 25, 2013 BART The Next 40 Years BART Metro Vision Update Enhancing Service, Capacity and Coverage Agenda Project background Update on progress of study Review evaluation process
More informationMarquette Law School Poll September 24-28, 2015 Results for Registered Voters
Marquette Law School Poll September 24-28, 2015 Results for Registered Voters (ages are rounded to whole numbers for reporting of results. Values ending in.5 here may round up or down if they are slightly
More informationZogby Analytics Online Survey of Adults 11/9/16-11/10/16 MOE +/- 2.8 Percentage Points
11/9/16-11/1/16 MOE +/- 2.8 age Points 1. Are you planning to purchase any internet-connected devices this holiday season, such as fitness trackers, televisions, video cameras, home appliances or wearables?
More informationThe Demographics of Mobile News Habits
December 11, 2012 The Demographics of Mobile News Habits Men, College Grads and the Young are more Engaged FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Amy Mitchell, Acting Director, Pew Research Center s Project for Excellence
More informationAdobe Creative Cloud Mike Riley and Jim Babbage, Adobe Adobe Systems Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Adobe Creative Cloud Mike Riley and Jim Babbage, Adobe Changing the world through digital experiences April 3, 2010? April 3, 2010 New platforms mean new challenges Introducing the Creative Cloud Everything
More informationVIDA Application. [ ] Yes [ ] No
Please complete this entire form. The information is for VIDA s use and will not be shared with any other agency without your consent. It is needed to determine your qualifications and to help us understand
More informationHEALTH COVERAGE ENROLLMENT REPORT
WASHINGTON HEALTH BENEFIT EXCHANGE WAhealthplanfinder.org HEALTH COVERAGE ENROLLMENT REPORT Open Enrollment 5: Nov. 1, 2017 - Jan. 15, 2018 Published March 2018 Table of Contents Total Enrollees... 1 Enrollees
More informationTo start, please type the ID number from your invitation letter here, then click Log in.
ANES 2016 Time Series Web Screening Questionnaire [PROGRAMMING: Define preload variable PRESELECTED. Set PRESELECTED=0 for all cases (meaning there is no pre-selected person, meaning that the household
More informationAbstract. Introduction. Number 61 n October 12, 2012
Number 61 n October 12, 2012 Wireless Substitution: State-level Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, 2010 2011 by Stephen J. Blumberg, Ph.D., Julian V. Luke, National Center for Health
More informationSample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:
Survey Questions Spring 2013 Tracking Survey Final Topline 5/21/2013 Data for April 17-May 19, 2013 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American
More informationUser Manual. Last updated 1/19/2012
User Manual Last updated 1/19/2012 1 Table of Contents Introduction About VoteCast 4 About Practical Political Consulting 4 Contact Us 5 Signing In 6 Main Menu 7 8 Voter Lists Voter Selection (Create New
More informationAlmost half of all internet users now use search engines on a typical day
Data Memo BY: Senior Research Fellow Deborah Fallows CONTACT: Associate Director Susannah Fox (202-419-4500) RE: Search Engine Use August 6, 2008 Almost half of all internet users now use search engines
More informationCell and Landline Phone Usage Patterns among Young Adults and the Potential for Nonresponse Error in RDD Surveys
Cell and Landline Phone Usage Patterns among Young Adults and the Potential for Nonresponse Error in RDD Surveys Doug Currivan, Joel Hampton, Niki Mayo, and Burton Levine May 16, 2010 RTI International
More informationInformed Delivery. June 2018
Informed Delivery June 2018 Informed Delivery offers an integrated marketing approach to meet today s consumer demands. 1 https://www. BeyondCubicle.com What is Informed Delivery? e Informed Delivery users
More informationLab Assignment. Lab 3: Potpourri. Assignment Preparation. Part 1: Finishing SQL scripts
.. Fall 2012 CSC/CPE 365: Database Systems Alexander Dekhtyar.. Lab 3: Potpourri Due date: Tuesday, October 16, beginning of the lab Lab Assignment Please note, you will definetly get Lab 4 assignment
More informationHEALTH COVERAGE ENROLLMENT REPORT
WASHINGTON HEALTH BENEFIT EXCHANGE WAhealthplanfinder.org HEALTH COVERAGE ENROLLMENT REPORT Published December 218 Table of Contents Total Enrollees... 1 Enrollees Qualified Health Plan Enrollees Subsidized/Non-Subsidized
More informationEducational Message Services, Inc Alessandro Drive. Suite 100, Ventura CA USA Phone:
Currently supporting Texting Programs for WICs in CA: Santa Barbara County BFED Santa Cruz County Alameda County San Luis Obispo County Other States Louisiana Ohio North Carolina Colorado Idaho! *The Santa
More informationCause/reason (if currently known)
The Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool (AFFH-T): for AFFH-T Release 4.1 Published: December 20, As part of its efforts to support program participants in conducting their Assessments
More informationUndergraduate Admission File
Undergraduate Admission File June 13, 2007 Information Resources and Communications Office of the President University of California Overview Population The Undergraduate Admission File contains data on
More informationMobile Internet & Smartphone Adoption
Mobile Internet & Smartphone Adoption New Insights into Consumer Usage of Mobile Devices, the Shift to Smartphones & the Emergence of Tablets United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), Germany (DE), France
More informationENERGY PERMIT SUMMARY REPORT PRIVATE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
ENERGY PERMIT SUMMARY REPORT PRIVATE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION The Energy Permit Summary report contains detailed building permit data by category for all 58 counties and reporting cities pertaining to change-outs
More informationTopline Questionnaire
24 Topline Questionnaire HOME4NW Do you currently subscribe to internet service at HOME? 3 Based on all internet users [N=1,740] YES NO DON T KNOW REFUSED Current 84 16 * 0 April 2015 89 11 * 0 September
More informationTri-C College Credit Plus Application Instructions
Tri-C College Credit Plus Application Instructions 1. Go to the website: http://www.tri-c.edu/college-credit-plus/. This website provides you with enrollment information for prospective and current CCP
More informationITHAKA S+R ASERL: DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION
ITHAKA S+R ASERL: DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION Katherine Daniel and Roger Schonfeld November 30, 2017 Thank you to the following institutions for their participation Auburn University Clemson University
More informationTHE MAGAZINE FOR EXPERT INTERIOR DESIGN IDEAS
2018 THE MAGAZINE FOR EXPERT INTERIOR DESIGN IDEAS A great source of inspiration for helpful, accessible design ideas, Les idées de ma maison guides readers through their design projects with plenty of
More information51.42 Million. 16,344 students ICT taught in instructors preparing the ICT workforce. 139,055 students since inception
Corporate Social Responsibility Impact Profile California Cisco Networking Academy Education and technology are two of the greatest social equalizers. Education helps people improve their economic opportunities,
More information1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER
1 Survey questions August Tracking 2013 / Facebook Survey Final Topline 9/18/2013 Data for August 7-September 16, 2013 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet
More informationBring Your Own Device and the 2020 Census Research & Testing
Bring Your Own Device and the 2020 Census Research & Testing Ryan King, Evan Moffett, Jennifer Hunter Childs, Jay Occhiogrosso, Scott Williams U.S. Census Bureau 4600 Silver Hill Rd, Suitland, MD 20746
More information