Downtown Boise Multimodal Center
|
|
- Morris Johnson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment June 2009 Prepared by the Federal Transit Administration and Valley Regional Transit. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration
2 This page left blank intentionally. Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment June 1, 2009
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This summary provides a brief description of the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Downtown Boise Multimodal Center (MMC) Project. The purpose of an EA is to consider potential effects of a proposed Project on the natural and built environment, and address the requirements of Federal, state and local regulations (such as the National Environmental Policy Act or NEPA). This summary presents a brief overview of the EA. If you have more detailed questions or specific concerns you should review the complete EA. There are also several supportive reports, technical memorandums and other documents that have been prepared in support of the EA. The supporting documents are listed in the EA. For additional information on the Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Project contact: Kelli Fairless, Executive Director Valley Regional Transit 830 N Main St, Suite 230 Meridian, ID (208) kfairless@valleyregionaltransit.org The entire Environmental Assessment is available at: serv/specialprojects-tvhcts.htm Valley Regional Transit (VRT) is the project sponsor. VRT initiated the transit center study in the Fall of 2007 and has been working with the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS), the City of Boise, the Capital City Development Corporation (CCDC), Ada County Highway District (ACHD) and the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) to identify and evaluate potential sites, and to implement the Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Project. The process of identifying and evaluating potential sites was led by two committees: the Downtown Technical Advisory Committee (DTAC) made up of senior agency staff; and the Downtown Policy Advisory Committee (DPAC) made up of elected officials and representatives of the downtown business community. What is the Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Project? VRT proposes to build a Multimodal Center in downtown Boise to consolidate local and regional transit services. The proposed Project would be located in central Boise on the ½-block area on the east side of North 11 th Street, between West Bannock and Idaho Streets. The new transit center would accommodate transfers between bus routes and other modes while fostering pedestrian and bicycle access to a significant portion of downtown Boise. It would include bus bays, passenger waiting areas, transit information kiosks, operator break facilities, replacement parking, vanpool and carpool drop-off and pick-up areas, bicycle storage and public art. Some street level retail space will also be included. The transit center is expected to be completed by the end of The Project is planned as a publicly funded street level transit center and a 5 to 6 story parking structure above the transit center that would be a primarily privately funded joint development project. The parking structure would include approximately 500 spaces. Approximately 100 of the parking spaces would replace existing surface parking spaces on the site displaced by the transit center project. The parking structure above could be constructed either concurrent with the multimodal center or at a later date. What is the purpose of the Project? The purpose of the Downtown Boise Multimodal Center is: To consolidate local and regional transit services and other transportation functions in a single location, and provide user-friendly transitions among public transit services, walking, bicycling and other transportation modes. To serve as a gateway to the downtown for commuters, tourists and visitors and be a catalyst for implementation of broader downtown land-use and economic development goals. June 1, 2009 Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment Page S-1
4 Why is the Project needed? The need for the Downtown Boise Multimodal Center results from: The community desire to connect the broad range of local and regional transit and transitrelated services to downtown Boise at a single location. The historic and projected rapid population and employment growth in both the Boise Metropolitan Area and the Treasure Valley, which have strained the transportation systems. The increasing levels of traffic congestion and travel delay within downtown Boise resulting in continued deterioration of transportation in and to the downtown area. The demand for improved, more efficient, effective and easily understood transit services in the downtown Boise area. The adopted regional and local transportation and land-use plans that encourage a cost efficient, innovative and effective multimodal transportation system. Have other sites been considered? Since the fall of 2007, VRT along with other agency partners have been working to identify a site for a new Multimodal Transit Center in downtown Boise. Initially eight potential sites were identified. Six of the 8 sites were evaluated in detail against a set of 15 evaluation criteria. The criteria were defined by the study technical and policy committees and were based on the Purpose and Need Statement, a Project Goal and a set of Objectives. After the initial evaluation and elimination of low rated sites, further analysis was done on four sites (A, B, C & C2) and discussions were held the property owners and the public. Three sites (B, C, & C2) dropped out of further consideration at the request of owners of the sites and an additional location (Site H) was introduced for consideration. Based on additional and more detailed evaluation and public input, Site H was recommended by the technical and policy committees, and was endorsed by the local partner agencies. The VRT Board of Directors Management Committee adopted Site H as the locally preferred alternative on August 4, In early 2009, one additional site on 10 th Street was considered, but lacked sufficient support to be advanced. For additional information on the site selection process refer to the question below on the public involvement process. What has been evaluated in the EA? The EA examines two alternatives: the No-Build Alternative; and the Site H Alternative (a combined Multimodal Center and Joint Development Project). The No- Build Alternative assumes that the transit center would remain at the current on-street location along Idaho and Main Streets between Capital and 9 th Streets. The Site H Alternative would include the development of a new multimodal transit center on the half block east of 11 th Street between Idaho and Bannock Streets. The west side of Downtown Boise with the current on-street transit center, Site H and the 12-block target area for the proposed Multimodal Center Page S-2 Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment June 1, 2009
5 Alternatives Evaluated In the Environmental Assessment No-Build Alternative Site H Alternative Photo of No-Build Alternative (existing on-street transit center) View looking west along Main from 8th to existing transit shelter Illustration of Site H Alternative (multimodal center with parking structure above) View looking Southwest Photo of No-Build Alternative (existing on-street transit center) View looking east along Idaho from 8th to bus lane and shelter Illustration of Site H Alternative (multimodal center with parking structure above) View looking Northeast Would there be any significant impacts from the proposed Project? Project studies have determined that neither the No-Build Alternative nor the Site H Alternative would result in any significant environmental impacts. However, the alternatives would still have some effects, sometimes positive and sometimes negative as briefly described on the following page. Chapter 3 of the EA has a more detailed description of the expected effects and an explanation of how they were determined. June 1, 2009 Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment Page S-3
6 Summary of Effects of the Site H Alternative Transportation Transit Ease of use for transit riders would be improved with the Site H Alternative by improving access and transfers between routes in downtown. Site H is adjacent to the proposed downtown streetcar. Traffic The Site H Alternative would not have a significant effect on traffic in the downtown area. Parking The proposed project would remove approximately 100 surface lot parking spaces and 18 on-street spaces. The proposed parking structure would provide approximately 500 spaces, 400 new spaces and 100 replacement parking spaces. Pedestrians & bicycles Pedestrian and bicycle access would be good at the Site H Location. Secure bicycle parking would be provided. Pedestrian safety will be incorporated into the site design. Freight Buses and auto traffic accessing and leaving the Site H Alternative would not significantly affect freight traffic in the downtown area. Natural Environment Biological Resources Because the Site H Alternative would be located in a highly developed urban environment, no adverse effects to biological resources are expected from the proposed project. Water quality and Hydrology The Site H Alternative would be required to provide for on-site detention of stormwater, providing a net benefit to water quality in the area. Options could include bioswales, a green roof, working with existing wastewater infrastructure, or ponding/retaining within the proposed impervious surface area. The Design Review process required by the City of Boise would ensure compliance with the storm water regulations. Built Environment Land use The Site H Alternative would be required to obtain a conditional use permit from the City of Boise for the transit center. The project would support the city of Boise plans and policies for the area and could serve as a catalyst for new development and redevelopment in the vicinity. Economics The Site H Alternative would result in a short-term economic effect from construction of the project. The $8.5 million project cost (2009 dollars) for the MMC would result in an estimated 92 short-term jobs during construction, which would increase with construction of a parking structure. Operations of the MMC would not result in a significant long-term increase in jobs in the area. Neighborhoods and Environmental Justice There is very limited residential population in the vicinity of the Site H Alternative. No low income or minority populations would be adversely affected by the proposed project. Transit improvements frequently benefit both low income and minority populations by improving access to transit. Noise There would be no significant noise impacts from the Site H Alternative. Commercial structures on the same block as the Site H Alternative would not experience significant increases in noise from the proposed facility. Air Quality The Site H Alternative would meet air quality conformity requirements. The project effects would be minimal on intersection operations; therefore there would not be a significant air quality effect. Visual The Site H Alternative would add a new 5-6 story structure in downtown Boise. Boise s Design Review process would ensure that it blends into the existing and emerging urban visual environment. Historic and Cultural Resources The Site H Alternative would have no effect on any historic or cultural resources in the vicinity of the project. Hazardous Materials A Phase 1 site assessment would be performed prior to property acquisition. If contaminants are discovered, then steps would be taken during construction to safely manage the contaminated materials. Safety and Security The project design for the Site H Alternative will include measures addressing pedestrian and vehicle safety. Safety and security will be coordinated between VRT, the City of Boise and the parking structure owner, and will include regular security visits and monitoring. Page S-4 Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment June 1, 2009
7 How much would the Project cost, and how would it be paid for? Based on the current level of definition of the proposed Project, the Project cost is estimated at approximately $8.5 million (2009 dollars). The Project includes the street level transit center (bus bays, passenger waiting areas, operator facilities, transit information, bicycle storage, public restrooms, and public art). This cost does not include the parking structure that would be privately funded, except for replacing the existing on site surface parking spaces that would be displaced by the transit center project, which is included in the stated costs. The public funding for the transit center would come from a combination of Federal funds and local funds. Federal funds from the Section 5309 Bus and Bus Facilty Program would provide up to 80 percent of the transit center costs. The local funds for the transit center costs (20 percent) would come from the City of Boise through the Capital City Development Corporation. The parking structure would be primarily funded by the project developer. Has the public been involved in the Project? The site selection process has included an extensive public outreach and information process, including open houses and outreach to businesses and property owners in the area. Public and business outreach has included: On January 17, 2008 a public open house was held in downtown Boise by VRT and COMPASS for Treasure Valley residents and key stakeholders. Nearly 500 participants attended and many provided written comments on sticky notes and comment cards. In March 2008 a follow-up Newsletter was mailed to 21,000 resident, business and stakeholders. On April 1, 2008 a public meeting was held by VRT and COMPASS with property owners and businesses surrounding potential sites. About 40 participants attended. A follow up letter was sent to 260 surrounding businesses and property owners. Open House on January 17, 2008 On May 22, 2008 a second open house was held for residents and stakeholders. Approximately 250 people attended. In December 2008 a project update Newsletter was prepared and sent to 5,025 area residents, businesses and other stakeholders. In February 2009 VRT hosted a second business meeting. Fifty-six business and property owners attended. This meeting introduced a new 10 th Street transit center option. Following the meeting 26 comment sheets and 40 letters from the business community were received. Many were opposed to the new 10 th Street option. In March 2009 another open house was held. Approximately 300 people attended. The public comments favored the Site H Alternative over the 10 th Street transit center option. June 1, 2009 Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment Page S-5
8 After the May 2008 open house and recommendations from the DTAC and DPAC to select Site H, letters of support for the Site H Alternative were provided from: Ada County Highway District Idaho Transportation Department City of Boise Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho Capital City Development Corporation How can I get more information about the Project? The full Environmental Assessment is the best source of additional information. If you are interested in further details refer to the full EA or the supporting documents. Requests for a copy of the EA or other documents may be submitted in writing, by or by telephone. The full EA is available from VRT and at the following web site or from VRT via the contact information below: Kelli Fairless, Executive Director Valley Regional Transit 830 N Main St, Suite 230 Meridian, ID kfairless@valleyregionaltransit.org How can I comment on the Project and EA? Comments on the EA should be submitted in writing or via and must be received at VRT no latter than 5:00 PM Mountain Time, on June 30, Comments should be submitted to VRT to the or mailing address below: Mark Carnopis Community Relations/Marketing Manager Valley Regional Transit 830 N Main St, Suite 230 Meridian, ID MCarnopis@ValleyRegionalTransit.org Page S-6 Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment June 1, 2009
November 28, 2012 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING
November 28, 2012 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING Project Background Description of the Project Alternatives Analysis Process Project Progress Activity Stations Comments Adjourn 2 VIA spent 2 years
More informationThe Blue Line Extension
The Blue Line Extension NORTH CAROLINA JOINT TRANSPORTATION OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Presented by Carolyn Flowers CATS Chief Executive Officer Raleigh, NC February 10, 2012 Overview Charlotte Area Transit System
More informationMeeting attendees are now required to go through security screenings upon entering the building. Please allow for extra time.
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE OF RE-SCHEDULED BOARD MEETINGS This is notice that the re-scheduled meetings of the Board of Directors of the New Jersey Transit Corporation, NJ Transit Rail Operations,
More informationCouncil of State Governments. Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing. October 28, 2013
Council of State Governments Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing October 28, 2013 Takoma Langley Transit Center Purpose and Need Provide a safe, attractive and efficient facility
More informationIntegrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017 Chattanooga 2045 RTP Chattanooga 2045 RTP addresses both transportation supply and demand Continued
More informationCreating Dallas-Fort Worth s Transportation System: Celebrating Partnerships and Milestones
Creating Dallas-Fort Worth s Transportation System: Celebrating Partnerships and Milestones Presentation to the Texas Transportation Commission August 27, 2014 Presenters Mike Cantrell Commissioner, Dallas
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project San Jose Downtown Association
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project San Jose Downtown Association August 24, 2017 THANK YOU! San Jose Downtown Association for inviting us & San Jose First United Methodist Church for
More informationAdopted by La Mesa City Council July 9, 2013 Resolution
Adopted by La Mesa City Council July 9, 2013 Resolution 2013-059 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... A-1 INTRODUCTION... I-1 Vision... I-1 Background... I-1 Citizen Participation... I-3 Planning in La
More informationMARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018
MARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018 TODAY S AGENDA o Key driver of the program o Recommended plan o Project summaries o Next steps 2 KEY DRIVER: PUBLIC INPUT o Atlanta City Design o Atlanta s Transportation
More informationNCTCOG MTP Policy Bundle Application for TXDOT
MTP Policy Application Acknowledgement I hereby certify that all information provided and contained herein is complete, accurate, and true. I am authorized to provide information on behalf of my agency.
More informationMetrobus 30s Line Enhancements
Customer Service, Operations and Safety Committee Action Item III-C February 14, 2008 Metrobus 30s Line Enhancements Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority Board Action/Information Summary
More informationPublic Outreach Overview Tuesday, September 27. COTA William J. Lhota Building 33 N. High St. Columbus, OH 43215
Public Outreach Overview Tuesday, September 27 COTA William J. Lhota Building 33 N. High St. Columbus, OH 43215 Project Overview Goals and Overview Create a community vision for the future of public transportation
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of December 12, 2015 DATE: December 1, 2015 SUBJECT: SP-84-U-15-1 USE PERMIT ASSOCIATED WITH A SITE PLAN for a telecommunications facility; located
More informationDallas Streetcar Central Link Locally Preferred Alternative Selection
Dallas Streetcar Central Link Locally Preferred Alternative Selection Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure & Sustainability Committee August 28, 2017 Tanya Brooks, Assistant Director Mobility and Street
More information2017 STP PROJECT APPLICATION (OREGON)
Project Title Section 1. Applicant Information Name of Lead Agency/ Organization Address Phone Number Name & Title of Contact Person Email Address Certified Local Public Agency (Yes/No) Section 2. Project
More informationDulles Area Transportation Association
Dulles Area Transportation Association February 8, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation Transform 66: Outside the Beltway 2 Project Scope Multimodal improvements
More informationThe Maryland Transit Administration. A Plan to Connect Baltimore
The Maryland Transit Administration A Plan to Connect Baltimore 1 What We ve Heard Over 1,100 stakeholder comments submitted through the Bus Network Improvement Project (BNIP) Six workshops, three pop-up
More informationTRANSPORT SUSTAINABILITY
TRANSPORT SUSTAINABILITY IN SAN FRANCISCO Dr. Charles R. Rivasplata San Jose State University CODATU XVII Session 8 5 th November 2017 San Francisco: Background Data Major city in the U.S. Cultural, historic
More informationPUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
PUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART C-108 Actual 2012-13 Adopted Year-End Estimated 2014-15 2015-16 PROGRAM EXPENSES/REVENUES Salaries & Benefits $ 1,725,030 $ 1,855,980 $ 1,676,130 $ 1,956,510 $ 1,979,470
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 7, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 7, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT TO UPDATE TITLE 10, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AND TITLE 19, ZONING ORDINANCE, WEST HOLLYWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE TRANSPORTATION
More informationHigh Speed Rail Update
Update Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure and Sustainability Committee October 8, 2018 Brady Redwine Vice President Texas Central Molly Carroll Executive Director Project City of Dallas 1 Presentation
More informationEILEEN WAGLEY (fka Hiltner/Pavlik) ParaCruz Eligibility Coordinator SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT
EILEEN WAGLEY (fka Hiltner/Pavlik) ParaCruz Eligibility Coordinator SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT Eileen has been working with the METROs ADA application and eligibility process since its inception
More informationSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 12 DIVISION: Sustainable Streets BRIEF DESCRIPTION: SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Endorsing proposed legislation amending the Planning Code to adopt
More informationReston Town Center North Development. Community Update
Reston Town Center North Development Community Update May 31, 2017 1 Presentation Agenda Project Overview Site and Current Property Ownerships Development Plan/Grid of Streets Proposed Ownership Comprehensive
More informationWest of Hudson Regional Transit Access Study
West of Hudson Regional Transit Access Study Open House Presentation June 1, 2009 1 Agenda 1. Progress to Date 2. Level 1 Screening Analysis 3. Level 2 Screening Criteria 4. Next Steps 5. Questions and
More informationATLANTA BELTLINE A g e n cy C o o r d i n at i o n P l a n
RFP P5413 Contract No. 200703566 Work Order No. -07 ATLANTA BELTLINE A g e n cy C o o r d i n at i o n P l a n Prepared for: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Prepared by: DMJM Harris/JJG Joint
More informationEASTSIDE CITY OF BELLEVUE/ PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE MULTI-PRIVATE MULTI-PRIVATE
SITE COMPARISON CHART CITY Bellevue County Kirkland Kirkland Redmond ADDRESS 555 116th Ave. Lane 118th Ave. 14955 90th St. ACREAGE 5.6 10.7 7.5 5.5 7.2 to 11.6 ACRES ZONING COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
More informationBus Circulator Feasibility Study Scope of Work March 12, 2018
The City of Hyattsville Comprehensive Transportation and Infrastructure Study Bus Circulator Feasibility Study Scope of Work March 12, 2018 Project Approach At the request of the City of Hyattsville, Toole
More informationDATE: April 8, 2013 REPORT NO. CD TYPE OF REPORT CONSENT ITEM [ ] ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION [ X ]
DATE: April 8, 2013 REPORT NO. CD2013-040 TO: FROM: Chair and Members Committee of the Whole Community Services Gregory Dworak, General Manager Community Services 1.0 TYPE OF REPORT CONSENT ITEM [ ] ITEM
More informationApproval of Navy Yard Chiller Joint Development Agreement
Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item V B July 9, 2015 Approval of Navy Yard Chiller Joint Development Agreement Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information
More informationDATE: September 2014 Project Sponsors Rachel Schuett and Transportation Team Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Data Collection
DATE: September 2014 TO: FROM: RE: Project Sponsors Rachel Schuett and Transportation Team Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Data Collection The San Francisco Planning Department and the San Francisco
More informationBike Sharing Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan 2012
Source: Nice Ride (Twin Cities MN) Source: Capital Bikeshare (Washington, DC) City of Cleveland Bike Sharing Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan 2012 November 20, 2013 Toole Design Group BrownFlynn,
More informationPROJECT TIMELINE. Next steps. Plan. Start of Service
PROJECT TIMELINE 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 WE ARE HERE Plan Develop Build Develop design options for termini, station locations, and transit operations Conduct environmental research Assess funding
More informationProposed FY 06 Project Development Program and FY 05 Project Development Program Update
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Proposed FY 06 Project Development Program and FY 05 Project Development Program Update Presented to the Board of Directors: P D E C Planning & Development
More information// Atlanta BeltLine Quarterly Briefing
// Atlanta BeltLine Quarterly Briefing Second Quarter // May 15, 2014 5/20/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // 2014 Page 1 // Agenda Welcome Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Update Parks, Trails, Transit Art on the Atlanta
More informationDowntown to NAIT LRT Concept Plan Attachment 4 Public Involvement Summary
north, lrt, light, transit, rail, track, line, closure, close, road, interuption, partial, lane, construction, bulletin, NAIT, line, motorist, pedestrian, map, metro, line,downtown to NAIT LRT Concept
More informationNorthern Virginia Transportation Authority
IV Northern Virginia Transportation Authority March 23, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation 66 Outside the Beltway Project Scope Multimodal improvements to
More informationInfrastructure PA Stephen Lecce
PA Stephen Lecce Ministry of Stephen Lecce, Parliamentary Assistant Meeting: Topics: Topics: PA Stephen Lecce, MPP Monday, August 20, 2018 9:15 am 9:45 am Shaw Centre, Room 107, Level 1 National Centre
More informationC Line Rapid Bus 90% Design
C Line Rapid Bus 90% Design Karyssa Jackson, Community Outreach Coordinator Shawn Walding, Senior Engineer Metro Transit TAAC August 2, 2017 1 Today s Discussion Informational Feedback from February Project
More informationMetropolitan Council meeting: February 22, 2012
Business Item T Transportation Committee Item: 202-29 Meeting date: January 23, 202 REVISED Metropolitan Council meeting: February 22, 202 ADVISORY INFORMATION Date: February 2, 202 Subject: Light Rail
More informationREVIEW OF REGIONAL GROWTH CENTER APPLICATION
REGIONAL DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATION REPORT REVIEW OF REGIONAL GROWTH CENTER APPLICATION CITY OF ISSAQUAH MARCH 18, 2015 OVERVIEW On January 30, 2015, PSRC staff received an application from the City of
More informationCITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2012
CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2012 Item 23, Report No. 33, of the Committee of the Whole, which was adopted without amendment by the Council of the City of Vaughan
More informationConstruction Phase Public Outreach Plan
Construction Phase Public Outreach Plan Updated: Jan. 16, 2018 Hennepin County Metro Transit City of Minneapolis 1. Public Engagement Phase Overview Construction of the C Line / Penn Avenue Improvements
More information2018 State and Federal Legislative Program
2018 State and Federal Legislative Program STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING The passage of HB 2313 (2013) was the result of bipartisan cooperation throughout the Commonwealth. The regional funding provided
More informationMunicipal Service Park 3 December Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex
Municipal Service Park 3 December 2010 Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex Overview: Operational Challenges and Opportunities South East Connector impacts Opportunities: The South
More informationHennepin Avenue Downtown
Hennepin Avenue Downtown Construction Kick-off Meeting Stakeholders, Owners, Managers January 14 & 17, 2019 Agenda Summary Background Principles Scope, Schedule, Budget Construction Utilities Roadway What
More informationProject Presentation April, 2017
Project Presentation April, 2017 Background and Summary Proposed 114 mile, series compensated 500 kv transmission line project Connects Arizona Public Service s Delaney Substation (Tonopah, AZ) to Southern
More informationTransportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan WELCOME TO COMMUNITY MEETING #2 AGENDA 5:30 6:10 PM Presentation, including Q&A 6:10 PM Open House 6:30 PM Meeting Adjourns Please sign in and fill out a comment
More informationContext Sensitive Case Study: Grand Avenue Bridge
Context Sensitive Case Study: Grand Avenue Bridge MODERATOR: Craig Gaskill, TSH Engineering Joe Elsen, Colorado Department of Transportation - DOT Perspective / Client Brian Pettet, Pitkin County - Pitkin
More informationCorridor Management Committee. December 17, 2014
Corridor Management Committee December 17, 2014 1 Today s Topics Technical Issues/Issue Resolution Process Environmental Consultant Contract Update Advisory Committees Community Advisory Committee Business
More informationGORE BUILDING. 238 N. Massachusetts Avenue, Lakeland, FL 33801
GORE BUILDING 238 N. Massachusetts Avenue, Lakeland, FL 33801 CDB LOCATION REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT MUNN PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT INCENTIVES AVAILABLE ADJACENT PARKING INCLUDED BK698301 Phone: (863) 683-3425
More informationRecord of Public Comment on Central Corridor SDEIS
Executive Summary Page 1 Executive Summary Project Background The Ramsey County Regional Rail Authority (RCRRA) initiated the Central Corridor scoping process in 2001 and conducted the Alternatives Analysis
More informationApproval of Medical Center New Entrance Agreement
Finance & Administration Committee Action Item III-A February 14, 2013 Approval of Medical Center New Entrance Agreement Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary
More informationImplementation Plan FY
Implementation Plan FY 2013 2015 January 18, 2012 Financial Integrity - Address the District's Structural Deficit - Financially support the District's reinvention of its family of services - Promote funding
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Alum Rock Community Working Group February 10, 2016 1 Agenda Follow-up Items and Work Plan Economic Analysis Surrounding BART Stations Nelson Nygaard San Jose
More informationPhase Two: Plan Recommendations Public Comment Summary Report June 23, 2016
Phase Two: Plan Recommendations Public Comment Summary Report June 23, 2016 Overview Public Involvement Objectives The objectives of the 2040 Plan s public involvement and outreach efforts are: Provide
More informationS-03-SegB: South Federal Way to Fife LRT
Project Number S-03-SegB Subarea South King/Pierce Primary Mode Light Rail Facility Type Corridor Length 4.0 miles Version ST Board Workshop Date Last Modified 11-25-2015 PROJECT AREA AND REPRESENTATIVE
More informationTraveler Information System
Traveler Information System Regional Safety Advisory Committee January 27, 2017 Marian Thompson, P.E. Transportation System Operations Supervisor 511DFW.org 511DFW Regional in DFW Multimodal 2 511DFW.org
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT Date of Meeting: STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION SUBJECT: ELECTION DISTRICT: FIDP-2016-0002, Ashburn Station North Broad Run CRITICAL ACTION DATE: STAFF
More informationStakeholder Engagement Summary Report
Stakeholder Engagement Summary Report South Shore Corridor Project 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview Port Metro Vancouver s South Shore Trade Area is of critical importance to Canadian trade. One of
More informationGDOT PowerPoint Title Page MMPT. Technical Committee April 6, 2010
GDOT PowerPoint Title Page MMPT Technical Committee April 6, 2010 Introduction Senate Bill 200, enacted in May2009, revamped existing P3 enabling legislation This new legislative direction provides an
More informationDes Moines Area Regional Transit Non Rider Survey
Moines Area Regional Transit Non Rider Survey helping organizations make better decisions since 1982 Findings Report Submitted to the Moines Area Regional Transit Authority by: ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier
More informationSACOG Board of Directors
SACOG Board of Directors Item #15-9-4 Consent September 10, 2015 Adopt Transportation Demand Management Funding Program Guidelines Issue: Guidelines for SACOG s FY 2015/16 Transportation Demand Management
More informationSECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2015 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 198 Van Buren Street, Suite 300 Herndon, Virginia 20170 JANUARY 2016 Introduction The
More informationCrystal Springs Upland School Transportation Demand Management Plan. March 2016
Crystal Springs Upland School Transportation Demand Management Plan March 06 CONTENTS Introduction... Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program.... Background/Survey of Existing Student Commuting
More informationOpportunity: BaltimoreLink
Opportunity: BaltimoreLink Cities and Transit: Reimagined, Redesigned, and Reborn Rail~Volution October 11, 2016 Joshua B Diamond 51 Monroe St, Suite 1103 Rockville, MD 20850 301-774-4566 X 410 jdiamond@foursquareitp.com
More informationKCP&L SmartGrid Demonstration
KCP&L SmartGrid Demonstration Kansas House Energy & Environment Committee Bill Menge Director, SmartGrid February 7, 2013 Topeka, KS What is SmartGrid? SmartGrid is basically the integration of digital
More informationRecommendation to Board. Final Action
MOTION NO. M2017-59 City of Seattle Center City Mobility Plan Agreement MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Operations and Administration Committee PROPOSED ACTION 05/04/2017 05/25/2017 Recommendation
More informationDirector of Public Works/City Engineer. Secretary. Word Processor. Streets and Facilities Supervisor. Traffic Signal Technician.
PUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Director of Public Works/City Engineer Secretary Word Processor Transit Services Manager Fleet Services Supervisor Streets and Facilities Supervisor Principal Principal
More informationDecision D ATCO Electric Ltd. Crystal Lake 722S Substation Telecommunications Tower Replacement
Decision 21617-D01-2016 Crystal Lake 722S Substation October 5, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 21617-D01-2016 Crystal Lake 722S Substation Proceeding 21617 Application 21617-A001 October 5,
More informationEngaging Maryland toward CAV advancements Christine Nizer, Administrator
Engaging Maryland toward CAV advancements Christine Nizer, Administrator Maryland Department of Transportation Motor Vehicle Administration Maryland CAV activities Overall goal: Maryland is open for business
More informationApproval to Negotiate and Execute a Term Sheet for the Navy Yard Chiller Site Joint Development
Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item V- B September 11, 2014 Approval to Negotiate and Execute a Term Sheet for the Navy Yard Chiller Site Joint Development Washington Metropolitan
More informationOrganizational Structure of the Toronto Environment Office
STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY Organizational Structure of the Toronto Environment Office Date: April 20, 2007 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Parks and Environment Committee Richard Butts, Deputy City
More informationSubject YRRTC Accomplishments and Highlights
Date May 17, 2018 To Members of York Region Council From Mary-Frances Turner, York Region Rapid Transit Corporation, President Subject 2014-2018 YRRTC Accomplishments and Highlights Ref: Edocs #8410552
More informationMoving Forward with Transit Oriented Communities
Moving Forward with Transit Oriented Communities Planning & Development Committee October 7, 2014 Packet Pg. 33 History of TOD at RTD Mid 1990s - Local jurisdictions start planning for TOD 2000 RTD hires
More informationBOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2017 TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2017 TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM Date of Meeting: # 9 SUBJECT: ELECTION DISTRICTS: STAFF CONTACTS: Public and Private Infrastructure Improvements Adjacent to the Dulles
More informationScoping Notice. For a new North Kaibab. Inter-agency Office Complex
Scoping Notice For a new North Kaibab United States Department of Agriculture Inter-agency Office Complex North Kaibab Ranger District Kaibab National Forest Forest Service Coconino County, Arizona Section
More informationTRANSIT CENTER DISTRICT PLAN
TRANSIT CENTER DISTRICT PLAN Informational Presentation Planning Commission 04.19.2012 San Francisco Planning Department In partnership with: San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Transbay Joint Powers Authority
More informationNCTCOG MTP Policy Bundle Application for Cities
MTP Policy Application Acknowledgement I hereby certify that all information provided and contained herein is complete, accurate, and true. I am authorized to provide information on behalf of my agency.
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Memorandum of Understanding: Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (I-80 ICM) Project
Office of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR May 1, 2012 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, Interim City Manager Submitted by: Andrew Clough, Director, Public Works
More informationAPPENDIX C SOURCES & REFERENCES CITED
APPENDIX C SOURCES & REFERENCES CITED Sources & References Cited Chapter 1 City of Minneapolis. 2007. Access Minneapolis Ten Year Transportation Action Plan. Connetics Transportation Group. 2012. Transit
More informationSECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 198 Van Buren Street, Suite 300 Herndon, Virginia 20170 JANUARY 2017 Introduction The
More informationTexas Clear Lanes. Congestion Relief Initiative
Texas Clear Lanes Congestion Relief Initiative March 2016 Governor Greg Abbott s Charge In September 2015, Governor Greg Abbott challenged the Texas Transportation Commission (Commission) and the (TxDOT)
More informationMemorandum CITY OF DALLAS
Memorandum DATE February 22, 2019 CITY OF DALLAS TO Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council SUBJECT February 27, 2019 City Council Agenda Item #19 On Wednesday, February 27, 2019 you will be presented
More informationMETRO SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY Executive Summary May 2009 DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS
METRO SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2010 2014 2014 Executive Summary May 2009 DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS OVERVIEW Purpose of Metro SRTP Develop multi year strategic plan to improve transit quality,
More informationNorth Metro Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Public Hearings. December 9 & 10, 2009
North Metro Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Public Hearings December 9 & 10, 2009 1 Welcome & Introductions 2 3 What Are We Doing Here Tonight? Public Hearing for RTD North Metro Corridor
More informationAppendix 2. Capital Funding Source Summary Table of Contents
Capital Source Summary Table of Contents 2016 Corporate Services APP 2-3 Mayor and Council APP 2-5 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer APP 2-5 Office of the Chief Operating Officer APP 2-5 Planning
More informationLAWRENCE-DOUGLAS COUNTY INTELLIGENT JOURNEY
LAWRENCE-DOUGLAS COUNTY INTELLIGENT JOURNEY L-DC REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE AND STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Lawrence-Douglas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (L- DC MPO) has
More informationAPPENDIX A TDM Development Guideline
Appendix A: TDM Development Guideline APPENDIX A TDM Development Guideline Appendix A: TDM Development Guideline Page A.1 1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1.1 About This Guideline This guideline contains information
More informationTransportation Sustainability Program
Transportation Sustainability Program Photo: Sergio Ruiz Keeping people moving as our City grows ENHANCE TRANSPORTATION TO SUPPORT GROWTH November 2015 MODERNIZE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE
More informationRegion 2000 Bicycle Plan
Region 2000 Bicycle Plan Adopted October 21, 2010 by: Virginia s Region 2000 Local Government Council Central Virginia Metropolitan Planning Organization This report was prepared for the Virginia s Region
More informationTHE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9
THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9 History & Background Began in 2001 as a Major Investment Study (MIS), Schematic, and Environmental
More informationTHE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9
THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9 History & Background Began in 2001 as a Major Investment Study (MIS), Schematic, and Environmental
More informationAn Assessment of Congestion in the Kansas City Region using the MARC Travel Demand Model
An Assessment of Congestion in the Kansas City Region using the MARC Travel Demand Model The Congestion Management Process Federal Regulations state that all metropolitan planning organizations must carry
More informationRegional Centers Framework Update. Regional Project Evaluation Committee March 24, 2017
Regional Centers Framework Update Regional Project Evaluation Committee March 24, 2017 Overview Background Project Overview and Previous Board Direction Overview of Stakeholder Working Group Report Process
More informationENMAX Power Corporation
Decision 22769-D01-2017 Transmission Lines 138-1.80L and 138-1.81L September 15, 2017 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 22769-D01-2017 Transmission Lines 138-1.80L and 138-1.81L Proceeding 22769 Application
More informationStephanie Stuckey Chief Resilience Officer
Stephanie Stuckey Chief Resilience Officer Helping cities around the world become more resilient to the physical, social and economic challenges that are a growing part of the 21st century. 2 100RC MEMBER
More informationTransportation Demand Management: The Mississauga Experience Lorenzo Mele TDM Coordinator
Transportation Demand Management: The Mississauga Experience Lorenzo Mele TDM Coordinator Transportation Resources TDM Primer Mississauga Experience What if we considered empty transit seats a perishable
More informationCommunity Update. May 31, 2011
Community Update May 31, 2011 Presented to: Leaside Community Presented by: Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Minister of Transportation Councillor Karen Stintz, Chair, Toronto Transit Commission Eglinton-Scarborough
More information2045 DEMOGRAPHIC FORECAST SURFACE TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL COMMITTEE APRIL 28, 2017
2045 DEMOGRAPHIC FORECAST SURFACE TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL COMMITTEE APRIL 28, 2017 BACKGROUND The demographic forecasts provide a common base for regional planning and resource allocations. The forecasts
More information