Appendix A Air Quality Construction Emissions Calculations
|
|
- Lucas McGee
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Appendix A Air Quality Construction Emissions Calculations ES SCO/POLBEDISONAVENEGDEC_BS2501.DOC/
2 Appendix A POLB - Edison Avenue Construction Emissions Table 1. Construction Emissions Construction Equipment Hours of Operation per Day or Number of Vehicles* Emissions (lb/day) Activity: Install Fence/Install Gate ROG CO NOx SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 Stinger Crane - Model TC Backhoe w/ Auger - Model CAT Cement Mixer - Model Canoga Flatbed Truck - Model 1995 Ford F Worker Trips Total (lb/day) Activity: Install K-rail ROG CO NOx SOx PM 10 PM Ton Crane - Model P&H OMT Hydraulic Hammer Air Compressor - IR P-185A-W-JD FlatBed Truck - Model 1996 Ford F Worker Trips Total (lb/day) Activity: Grind Traffic Striping and Markings ROG CO NOx SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 Line Eraser & Trailer - Model Pave Mark PM Crew Truck - Model 2000 Ford F Worker Trips Total (lb/day) Activity: Install Asphalt Curb ROG CO NOx SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 Berm Machine Dump Truck Ford F750 5yard Worker Trips Total (lb/day) Activity: Install Traffic Island - Asphalt ROG CO NOx SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 Curbing Machine - Curb-Tec CT Skip Loader - Model JD 210 LE Compactor - Model IR Worker Trips Total (lb/day) Activity: Grade ROG CO NOx SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 Skip Loader - Model JD210 le Roller - Model IR DD Dump Truck Ford F750 5yard Worker Trips Total (lb/day)
3 Appendix A POLB - Edison Avenue Construction Emissions Activity: Paint Traffic Striping ROG CO NOx SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 Striper & Trailer - Graco Line Laser II Crew Truck - Model Ford F Worker Trips Total (lb/day) Activity: Relocate Guide Signs ROG CO NOx SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 Air Compressor - IR P185A-W-JD Worker Trips Total (lb/day) Activity: Install Delineators ROG CO NOx SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 Crew Truck - Model 2000 Ford F Worker Trips Total (lb/day) GRAND TOTAL (lb/day) SCAQMD Regional Thresholds (lb/day) Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Amount Over (Under) Threshold SCAQMD Localized Thresholds (lb/day) NA 6, NA Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Amount Over (Under) Threshold NA -6, NA * For flatbed trucks, crew trucks, dump trucks, and worker trips, the value equals the number trucks or number of workers. 1.One piece of each type of construction equipment would be used for each activity. 2. The construction activities were conservatively assumed to overlap for comparison to the SCAQMD thresholds.
4 Appendix A POLB - Edison Avenue Construction Emissions Table 2. Construction Equipment Emission Factors Emission Factor (lb/hr) Construction Equipment ROG CO NOx SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 Fuel Type Crane Diesel Backhoe Diesel Cement Mixer Gasoline Hydraulic Hammer Gasoline Air Compressor Diesel Line Eraser & Trailer - Model Pave Mark PM Gasoline Berm Machine Gasoline Curbing Machine - Curb-Tec CT Gasoline Skip loader Diesel Compactor Diesel Roller Diesel Striper Gasoline 1. For diesel fueled equipment, the emission factors are from the SCAQMD offroad emission factor tables for the year 2007, posted December 7, Assumed that 100% of the PM emission factor would be PM 10. It was assumed composite emission factors for each equipment type, rather than horsepower specific emission factors, would represent the construction equipment. 2. It was assumed that the cement mixer, hydraulic hammer, line eraser and trailer, berm machine, curbing machine, and striper would be gasoline powered. The emission factors for this equipment are from the OFFROAD2007 model for Los Angeles County for the year PM 2.5 emission factors were calculated following the SCAQMD Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 Significance Thresholds and Calculation Methodology, October For offroad diesel fueled equipment, 92% of the PM 10 would be PM 2.5 and for offroad gasoline fueled equipment, 90% of the PM would be PM 10 and 68% of the PM would be PM VOC emissions from paint traffic striping were assumed to be minor and were not included in the calculations. The VOC content of the paint would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113 Architectural Coatings. Table 3. Vehicle Emission Factors Vehicle Miles Emission Factor (lb/mile) Vehicle Type Traveled per Day ROG CO NOx SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 Passenger car Heavy-duty Truck Crew Truck Emission factors are from the SCAQMD highest (most conservative) EMFAC2007 v 2.3 summary table ( for calendar year The emission factors account for emissions from start, running, and idling exhaust. In addition, the ROG emission factor takes into account diurnal, hot soak, running and resting emissions, and PM10 emission factor takes into account the tire and brake wear. 2. The emission factors for automobiles represent the passenger vehicle (<8,500 pounds) EMFAC2007 vehicle category, the emission factors for heavy-duty trucks represent the heavy-heavy duty truck (33,001-60,000 pounds) EMFAC2007 vehicle category, and the crew truck represent the medium-duty truck ( >8,500 pounds) EMFAC2007 vehicle category. 3. Assumed workers would commute a distance of 30 miles per day, the crew trucks would travel 10 miles per day onsite, and the heavy-duty trucks (flatbed or dump) would travel 5 miles per day onsite.
5 Appendix A POLB - Edison Avenue Construction Emissions Table 4. Fugitive Dust Calculations Grading Emission Factor (lb PM 10 /acre) PM 2.5 Emissions (lb/day) Acres Graded per PM 10 Emissions Area Graded (ft 2 ) Day (lb/day) The acres graded based on the Project Description. 2. The emission factor for grading is from URBEMIS2002, version PM 2.5 emission factors were calculated following the SCAQMD Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 Significance Thresholds and Calculation Methodology, October For construction and demolition sources, 20.8% of the PM 10 would be PM 2.5.
6 Appendix B Air Quality Operations Emissions Calculations ES SCO/POLBEDISONAVENEGDEC_BS2501.DOC/
7 Appendix B POLB - Edison Avenue Operation Emissions Emissions (lb/day) = VMT x EF Where, VMT = daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (miles per day) EF = emission factor (lb/mile) Table 1. Emission Estimates No Build Build Alternative Daily VMT Emission Factors (lb/mile) Emissions (lb/day) CO NOx ROG SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 CO NOx ROG SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 Automobile 103, Truck 37, TOTAL 1,299 1, Automobile 103, Truck 37, TOTAL 1,300 1, Emission factors are from the SCAQMD highest (most conservative) EMFAC2007 v 2.3 summary table ( for calendar year The emission factors account for emissions from start, running, and idling exhaust. In addition, the ROG emission factor takes into account diurnal, hot soak, running and resting emissions, and PM10 emission factor takes into account the tire and brake wear. 2. The emission factors for automobiles represent the passenger vehicle (<8500 pounds) EMFAC2007 vehicle category and the emission factors for trucks represent the heavy-heavy duty truck (33,001-60,000 pounds) EMFAC2007 vehicle category. Table 2. Incremental Emisssion Increase with the Build Alternative Emissions (lb/day) Alternative CO NOx ROG SOx PM 10 PM 2.5 No Build ,299 1, Build ,300 1, Incremental Increase SCAQMD Regional Thresholds (lb/day) Threshold Exceeded with Project? No No No No No No
8 Appendix C Edison Avenue Closure Traffic Analysis Report ES SCO/POLBEDISONAVENEGDEC_BS2501.DOC/
9 Final Report Edison Avenue Closure Traffic Analysis Prepared for Port of Long Beach June 22, 2007 Prepared by 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, CA 92707
10 1. INTRODUCTION Table of Contents 1. Introduction Project Description and Location Study Area Analysis Methodology Significance Criteria Existing Conditions Roadways and Intersections Existing Traffic Volume Level of Service Analysis Traffic Forecasting Methodology Future Conditions (2010) Without Closure of Edison Avenue (No Project) With Closure of Edison Avenue (Project) Daily Volumes with the Closure of Edison Avenue...14 List of Tables Table 1-1- LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections...6 Table 1-2- LOS Criteria for Stop Controlled Intersections...7 Table 1-3- Port / City of Long Beach Significant Traffic Impact Criteria...7 Table 1-4- Port / City of Los Angeles Significant Traffic Impact Criteria...7 Table 2-1- Existing Intersection LOS Analysis...10 Table Without Closure of Edison Avenue - Intersection LOS Analysis...13 Table With Closure of Edison Avenue - Intersection LOS Analysis...14 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1-1 Vicinity Map...4 Exhibit 1-2 Project Study Area...5 Exhibit 2-1 Geometry and Traffic Control...9 Appendices Appendix A Existing Turning Movement Counts Appendix B Traffic Analysis Work Sheets Existing Conditions Appendix C - Traffic Analysis Work Sheets 2010 Without Closure of Edison Avenue Appendix D - Traffic Analysis Work Sheets 2010 With Closure of Edison Avenue C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CPOTLAPA\DESKTOP\NEW FOLDER (2)\REVISED EDISON AVENUE CLOSURE - TRAFFIC REPORT DOC 2
11 1. INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction This traffic study has been prepared to document the potential traffic related impacts due to the permanent closure and vacation of Edison Avenue between Pier B Street and 9 th Street, in the Port of Long Beach. 1.1 Project Description and Location The project location is shown in its regional setting in Exhibit 1-1. The removal of the Edison Avenue rail crossing requires the closing of a short segment of Edison Avenue between Pier B Street and 9th street. Approximately 4,000 vehicles use this segment of Edison Avenue on a daily basis. The closure of this segment will cause drivers to divert to the nearby streets to reach their destinations. The impacts at the surrounding intersections, due to the addition of diverted traffic, are summarized in this report. The right-of-way for the rail tracks (the most northerly pair of tracks) is owned jointly by the Port of Long Beach (POLB) and the Port of Los Angeles (POLA). The Edison Avenue rightof-way north and south of the rail tracks is owned by the City of Long Beach. The proposed project would not involve private property (land or buildings) and would not restrict access to private property. The project site is located about 1,000 feet from the northern limit of the Long Beach Harbor District that runs along the south side of Anaheim Street. Interstate 710 (I-710) is located approximately one half mile to the east. State Route 103 (SR-103, the Terminal Island Freeway) is located approximately one half mile to the west. 1.2 Study Area Eight study intersections were selected by the POLB for detailed analysis. Those intersections are listed below and illustrated in Exhibit 1-2: Pier B Street/Edison Avenue (East) 9 th Street /I-710 SB Ramps /Pier B Street/Pico Avenue Anaheim Street / 9 th Street Anaheim Street / Farragut Avenue Anaheim Way / Pier B Street Edison Avenue / 9 th Street Pier B Street/ Edison Avenue (West) Anaheim Street / Santa Fe Avenue For each of the study intersections, the following weekday, peak hours were analyzed: 8-9 a.m., 2-3 p.m., and 4-5 p.m. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CPOTLAPA\DESKTOP\NEW FOLDER (2)\REVISED EDISON AVENUE CLOSURE - TRAFFIC REPORT DOC 3
12
13
14 1. INTRODUCTION 1.3 Analysis Methodology Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative indication of an intersection s operating conditions, represented by traffic congestion, delay and volume-to capacity (V/C) ratio. For signalized intersections, it is measured from LOS A (excellent conditions) to LOS F (extreme congestion), with LOS D (V/C of 0.90) typically considered to be the threshold of acceptability. A summary of each LOS and the corresponding V/C ratio is provided in Table 1-1. TABLE 1-1 LOS Descriptions for Signalized Intersections Source: CH2M HILL LOS V/C Ratio Traffic Conditions A 0 to 0.60 Little or no delay or congestion B >0.60 to 0.70 Slight congestion or delay C >0.70 to 0.80 Moderate delay or congestion D >0.80 to 0.90 Significant delay or congestion E > 0.90 to 1.00 Extreme congestion or delay F > Intersection breakdown or demand in excess of capacity For signalized intersections, the LOS values were determined by using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology, consistent with the protocols established for traffic analysis by the POLB. The ICU calculation assumes a per-lane capacity of 1,600 vehicles per hour (vph) for each travel lane (through or turning lane) through the intersection. A capacity value of 2,880 vph was used for dual left turn lanes. A clearance factor of 0.10 (10%) of the total intersection cycle length is included in the ICU calculation. Unsignalized intersections were analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology for stop-controlled intersections (two-way and multi-way stops). For unsignalized intersections, the HCM methodology analysis determines the average total delay for each vehicle making any movement from the stop-controlled minor street, as well as left turns from the major street. Just as with the ICU methodology, the HCM delay forecast translates to a LOS designation, ranging from LOS A to LOS F, using the delay ranges shown in Table 1-2. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CPOTLAPA\DESKTOP\NEW FOLDER (2)\REVISED EDISON AVENUE CLOSURE - TRAFFIC REPORT DOC 6
15 1. INTRODUCTION TABLE 1-2 LOS Descriptions for Stop Controlled Intersections LOS Control Delay per Vehicle (s/veh) A 0-10 B > C > D > E > F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual Significance Criteria Based on the Port of Long Beach/City of Long Beach/City of Los Angeles traffic impact criteria, this project would have a significant vehicular traffic impact at an intersection if the impact thresholds shown in Table 1-3 and 1-4 were exceeded. TABLE 1-3 Port / City of Long Beach Significant Traffic Impact Criteria Future w/o Project LOS Future w/project LOS and/or Change in V/C A, B, C or D To E or F, and 0.02 or greater E, F 0.02 or greater Source : Environmental Protocol, Port of Long Beach Planning Division TABLE 1-4 Port / City of Los Angeles Significant Traffic Impact Criteria C > D > Future w/o Project LOS 0.04 or greater 0.02 or greater Change in V/C With Project E, F > or greater Source : Environmental Protocol, Port of Long Beach Planning Division At unsignalized intersections, a project impact would not be considered significant if the intersection is projected to operate at LOS D or better with the proposed project. If the intersection is projected to operate at LOS E or F, the protocol calls for the intersection to be reanalyzed using the signalized intersection methodology for the purpose of determining significance of impacts using the above criteria. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CPOTLAPA\DESKTOP\NEW FOLDER (2)\REVISED EDISON AVENUE CLOSURE - TRAFFIC REPORT DOC 7
16 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2. Existing Conditions 2.1 Roadways and Intersections Regional access to the project area is provided by a network of freeway and arterial facilities. The freeways include the Long Beach Freeway (I-710), and the Terminal Island Freeway (SR-103/SR-47). I-710 is a north-south freeway that extends from the Port area to downtown Los Angeles. It has six lanes in the vicinity of the harbor and widens to eight lanes to the north. The Terminal Island Freeway extends from Terminal Island across the Heim Bridge and terminates at Willow Street. It is six lanes between Ocean Boulevard and Anaheim Street, and then becomes four lanes. The small segment of the Edison Avenue, which will be closed with the project implementation, connects Pier B Street and 9 th Street. The surrounding roadways that may be affected by the closure of the Edison Avenue rail crossing are the following: Anaheim Street Anaheim Way Pier B Street 9 th Street Anaheim Street is an east-west major arterial with three lanes in each direction. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the project site is 45 mph. Anaheim Street connects SR-103 and the Long Beach Freeway (I-710). Anaheim Way is a north-south connector with one lane in each direction. It connects Pier B Street and Farragut Avenue. Pier B Street is an east west local street with two lanes in each direction. Pier B Street connects I-710 and SR-103 through Anaheim Way. The posted speed limit on this street is 35 mph. South of 9 th street, Pier B Street is known as Pico Avenue. 9 th Street is an east-west connector road with two lanes in each direction. 9 th Street connects Anaheim Street to I-710. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. The geometry and the traffic control of the study intersections are shown in Exhibit 2-1. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CPOTLAPA\DESKTOP\NEW FOLDER (2)\REVISED EDISON AVENUE CLOSURE - TRAFFIC REPORT DOC 8
17
18 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.2 Existing Traffic Volume Peak-hour traffic volume data for the study intersections were collected to quantify the existing traffic conditions. Morning and afternoon peak period turning movement traffic counts were conducted at the study intersections in December, Copies of the traffic count data sheets are provided in Appendix A. Trucks use more roadway capacity than the passenger cars because of the size and acceleration capabilities. Therefore, truck traffic was converted to equivalent passenger car volume using a Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) factor of 1.1 for bobtails and 2.0 for chassis, containers and other types of trucks. 2.3 Level of Service Analysis Existing peak hour operating conditions were evaluated and are summarized on Table 2-1. Table 2-1 includes LOS results for each intersection, for each of the three peak periods. For the signalized intersections, the V/C ratio is reported as a decimal (less than 1.0). For unsignalized intersections, the delay is reported as a whole number. The V/C ratio and delay values were used to determine the LOS grade. The following assumptions were used in the analysis: Peak Hour Factor(PHF) for all intersections Saturation flow/lane 1600 vph Saturation flow for dual left turn lanes 2880 vph Loss time for signalized intersection 10 seconds TABLE 2-1 Existing Intersection LOS Analysis Intersections Traffic Control 2006 Existing Conditions 8-9 a.m. 2-3 p.m. 4-5 p.m. LOS Delay or LOS Delay or LOS Delay or V/C V/C V/C Pier B St/Edison Avenue (East)* (U) A 10 A 9 B 11 Pier B St / 9th St / I-710 SB Ramps (S) A 0.52 A 0.45 A 0.53 Anaheim St / 9th St (S) A 0.48 A 0.47 B 0.62 Anaheim St / Farragut Ave (S) A 0.44 A 0.43 B 0.61 Anaheim Way / Pier B St (U) A 8 A 8 B 10 Edison Ave / 9th St * (U) B 11 B 11 B 11 Pier B St/Edison Avenue (West) (U) A 8 A 9 B 11 Anaheim St / Santa Fe (S) B 0.61 A 0.58 D 0.80 *Delay reported for NB stop-controlled approach only (S): Signalized (U): Unsignalized C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CPOTLAPA\DESKTOP\NEW FOLDER (2)\REVISED EDISON AVENUE CLOSURE - TRAFFIC REPORT DOC 10
19 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS Copies of the intersection analysis worksheets for Existing Conditions are provided in Appendix B. As shown in Table 2-1, all of the study intersections except one currently operate at LOS B or better during the analyzed hours, with exception of Anaheim Street/Santa Fe, which operates at LOS D between 4-5 p.m. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CPOTLAPA\DESKTOP\NEW FOLDER (2)\REVISED EDISON AVENUE CLOSURE - TRAFFIC REPORT DOC 11
20 3. TRAFFIC FORECASTING METHODOLOGY 3. Traffic Forecasting Methodology Short-term future peak hour traffic projections for the study intersections have been developed for the year Year 2010 baseline includes all sources of traffic and future growth within and adjacent to the Ports of Long Beach/Los Angeles. The current version of the Ports transportation model, which is a focus model of the SCAG RTP model, was used to forecast 2010 traffic volumes. Year 2010 baseline traffic volumes also include growth in non-port traffic through the use of the Southern California Association of Governments regional model. The SCAG model is used for the region s federally required Regional Transportation Plan, as well as the State Implementation Plan and South Coast Air Basin Air Quality Management Plan. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CPOTLAPA\DESKTOP\NEW FOLDER (2)\REVISED EDISON AVENUE CLOSURE - TRAFFIC REPORT DOC 12
21 4. FUTURE CONDITIONS (2010) 4. Future Conditions (2010) 4.1 Without Closure of Edison Avenue (No Project) The study intersections were re-analyzed for the Year 2010 No Project conditions, and the results are summarized in Table 4-1. Copies of the intersection analysis worksheets for Year 2010 without the Edison Avenue closure conditions are provided in Appendix C. TABLE No Project (Without Closure of Edison Avenue) - Intersection LOS Analysis Intersections 2010 No Project Conditions Pier B St/Edison Avenue (East)* Traffic Control 8-9 a.m 2-3 p.m. 4-5 p.m. LOS Delay or LOS Delay or LOS Delay or V/C V/C V/C (U) B 11 B 10 B 12 Pier B St / 9th St / I-710 SB Ramps (S) A 0.58 A 0.49 B 0.58 Anaheim St / 9th St (S) A 0.42 A 0.41 A 0.58 Anaheim St / Farragut Ave (S) A 0.41 A 0.37 B 0.66 Anaheim Way / Pier B St (U) A 8 A 8 A 10 Edison Ave / 9th St * (U) A 10 B 10 B 11 Pier B St/Edison Avenue (West) (U) A 8 A 9 B 10 Anaheim St / Santa Fe (S) A 0.53 A 0.53 D 0.80 * Delay reported for NB stop-controlled approach only (S): Signalized (U): Unsignalized As shown in Table 4-1, all of the study intersections are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS during the 8-9 a.m., 2-3 p.m. and 4-5 p.m. peak hours. The LOS is very similar to existing conditions. Most of the changes are due to delay or V/C ratio near the threshold values for a change in LOS grade, and should not be considered significant. 4.2 With Closure of Edison Avenue (Project) For the Project scenario, traffic volumes from the forecast model include the diverted project traffic. Baseline 2010 traffic volumes used for the analysis are shown in Appendix D. The study intersections were re-analyzed for Year 2010 with Project conditions, and the results are summarized in Table 4-2. Copies of the intersection analysis worksheets for Year 2010 with the Edison Avenue closure conditions are provided in Appendix D. C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CPOTLAPA\DESKTOP\NEW FOLDER (2)\REVISED EDISON AVENUE CLOSURE - TRAFFIC REPORT DOC 13
22 4. FUTURE CONDITIONS (2010) TABLE Project (With Closure of Edison Avenue) - Intersection LOS Analysis Intersections 2010 With Project Conditions Traffic Control LOS 8-9 a.m. 2-3 p.m. 4-5 p.m. Delay or V/C LOS Delay or V/C LOS Delay or V/C Pier B St/Edison Avenue (East)* (U) B 10 A 10 B 14 Pier B St / 9th St / I-710 SB Ramps (S) B 0.62 A 0.56 B 0.59 Anaheim St / 9th St (S) A 0.42 A 0.41 A 0.56 Anaheim St / Farragut Ave (S) A 0.41 A 0.38 B 0.69 Anaheim Way / Pier B St (U) A 8 A 8 A 10 Edison Ave / 9th St ** (U) Pier B St/Edison Avenue (West) (U) Anaheim St / Santa Fe (S) A 0.45 A 0.44 C 0.76 * Delay reported for NB stop-controlled approach only ** Intersection no longer exists with project in place (S): Signalized (U): Unsignalized As shown in Table 4-2, all of the study intersections are projected to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS with the project in place. Comparing Tables 2-1 and 4-2 shows that the project will cause the study intersections to either slightly increase or decrease in delay or volume/capacity. However, no intersection will increase to an unacceptable LOS. Therefore, the project will not have a significant impact at any of the study intersections. 4.3 Daily Volumes with the Closure of Edison Avenue The impacts of closing Edison Avenue was also assessed under Year 2015 traffic conditions. The Year 2015 daily model runs were conducted with and with out the project to determine the impacts on surrounding streets in the project vicinity on a daily basis. Based on the year 2015 daily model runs it was determined that the traffic volumes and delays on the surrounding streets, specifically Anaheim Street to be insignificant. TABLE Project (With Closure of Edison Avenue) - Increase in Daily Volumes on Study Street Segments Segment 2015 Daily Volumes Difference Without Project With Project EB WB EB WB EB WB Anaheim Street e/o 9th Street 8,369 9,607 8,756 9, Anaheim Street w/o 9th Street 13,014 13,451 12,686 12,835 (328) (616) C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CPOTLAPA\DESKTOP\NEW FOLDER (2)\REVISED EDISON AVENUE CLOSURE - TRAFFIC REPORT DOC 14
23 Appendices
24 Appendix A
25 Traffic Count Intersection # 1 Intersection: Edison Avenue / Pier B Street Count Date: 12/18/06 NB Left NB Through NB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM NB Left NB Through NB Right EB Left EB Through EB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM EB Left EB Through EB Right SB Left SB Through SB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM SB Left SB Through SB Right WB Left WB Through WB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM PM WB Left WB Through WB Right
26 Traffic Count Intersection # 2 Intersection: Ninth Street / I-710 SB Ramps Count Date: 12/19/06 NB Left NB Through NB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM NB Left NB Through NB Right EB Left EB Through EB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM EB Left EB Through EB Right SB Left SB Through SB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM SB Left SB Through SB Right WB Left WB Through WB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM PM WB Left WB Through WB Right
27 Traffic Count Intersection # 3 Intersection: Ninth Street / Anaheim St Count Date: 12/12/06 NB Left NB Through NB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM NB Left NB Through NB Right EB Left EB Through EB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM EB Left EB Through EB Right SB Left SB Through SB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM SB Left SB Through SB Right WB Left WB Through WB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM PM WB Left WB Through WB Right
28 Traffic Count Intersection # 4 Intersection: Farragut Street / Anaheim St Count Date: 12/11/06 NB Left NB Through NB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM NB Left NB Through NB Right EB Left EB Through EB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM EB Left EB Through EB Right SB Left SB Through SB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM SB Left SB Through SB Right WB Left WB Through WB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak WB Left WB Through WB Right AM MD PM
29 Traffic Count Intersection # 5 Intersection: Anaheim Way / Pier B St Count Date: 12/11/06 NB Left NB Through NB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM NB Left NB Through NB Right EB Left EB Through EB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM EB Left EB Through EB Right SB Left SB Through SB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM SB Left SB Through SB Right WB Left WB Through WB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM WB Left WB Through WB Right
30 Traffic Count Intersection # 6 Intersection: Edison Ave / 9th St Count Date: 12/19/06 NB Left NB Through NB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM NB Left NB Through NB Right EB Left EB Through EB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM EB Left EB Through EB Right SB Left SB Through SB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM SB Left SB Through SB Right WB Left WB Through WB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak WB Left WB Through WB Right AM MD PM
31 Traffic Count Intersection # 7 Intersection: Edison Ave / Pier B St Count Date: 12/12/06 NB Left NB Through NB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM NB Left NB Through NB Right EB Left EB Through EB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM EB Left EB Through EB Right SB Left SB Through SB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM SB Left SB Through SB Right WB Left WB Through WB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak WB Left WB Through WB Right AM MD PM
32 Traffic Count Intersection # 8 Intersection: Santa Fe / Anaheim St Count Date: 12/19/06 NB Left NB Through NB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM NB Left NB Through NB Right EB Left EB Through EB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM EB Left EB Through EB Right SB Left SB Through SB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak AM MD PM SB Left SB Through SB Right WB Left WB Through WB Right Peak Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total Autos Bobtail Chassis Contnr. Other Total AM MD PM Traffic Volume using PCE of 1.1 for Bobtail and 2.0 for other type of trucks Peak WB Left WB Through WB Right AM MD PM
33 Appendix B
34 Existing- AM Thu Feb 8, :03:19 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenario: Existing- AM Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: Default Command Existing- AM Volume AM -Geometry Default Impact Fee Default Trip Generation Default Trip Distribution Default Paths Default Routes Default Configuration
35 Existing- AM Thu Feb 8, :03:19 Page HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Edison Ave / Pier B st Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.6] Street Name: Edison Avenue Pier B Street Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: Volume Module: >> Count Date: 18 Dec 2006 << AM Peak Hour Base Vol: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Final Vol.: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 336 xxxx 106 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 197 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 640 xxxx 934 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1388 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 626 xxxx 927 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1382 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: Queue: 0.1 xxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 10.9 xxxx 9.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * A * * * * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * A * * ApproachDel: 9.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * * *
36 Existing- AM Thu Feb 8, :03:19 Page 3-1 ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 9th St / I-710 SB Ramps / Pier B St / Pico Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.4 Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 9th Street / I-710 Sb ramps Pier B Street / Pico Avenue Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ignore Include Include Ignore Min. Green: Lanes: Volume Module: >> Count Date: 19 Dec 2006 << AM Peak Hour Base Vol: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: Volume/Cap: Delay/Veh: Delay Adj: AdjDel/Veh: DesignQueue:
37 Existing- AM Thu Feb 8, :03:19 Page 4-1 ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Anaheim St / 9th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.1 Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 9th Street Anaheim Street Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: Lanes: Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Dec 2006 << AM Peak Hour Base Vol: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: Volume/Cap: Delay/Veh: Delay Adj: AdjDel/Veh: DesignQueue:
38 Existing- AM Thu Feb 8, :03:19 Page 5-1 ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Anaheim St / Farragut Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 10 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.9 Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: A Street Name: Farragut Avenue Anaheim Street Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: Lanes: Volume Module: >> Count Date: 11 Dec 2006 << AM Peak Hour Base Vol: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: Final Vol.: Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: Volume/Cap: Delay/Veh: Delay Adj: AdjDel/Veh: DesignQueue:
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. MIDWAY SOLAR FARM II County of Imperial, California January 11, 2011
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS MIDWAY SOLAR FARM II County of Imperial, California January 11, 2011 LLG Ref. 3-10-2013 Prepared by: Cara Leone Transportation Planner II Under the Supervision of: Chris Mendiara
More informationTraffic Impact Study for the Girard Winery Project
October 16, 2014 Ms. Heather McCollister 1512 D Street Napa, CA 94559 Traffic Impact Study for the Girard Winery Project Dear Ms. McCollister; Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. (W-Trans) has completed
More informationHILLTOP SENIOR LIVING CENTER Pollard Station Traffic Impact Analysis
HILLTOP SENIOR LIVING CENTER Pollard Station Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for Town of Truckee Prepared by TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Pollard Station TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for the Town
More informationTraffic Impact Study for the Grove Street Subdivision
Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. 490 Mendocino Avenue Suite 201 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 voice (707) 542-9500 fax (707) 542-9590 475 14 th Street Suite 290 Oakland, CA 94612 voice (510) 444-2600
More informationTraffic Impact Study for the TAVA Homes Project at 1584 East Santa Clara Avenue in the City of Santa Ana
Traffic Impact Study for the TAVA Homes Project at 1584 East Santa Clara Avenue in the City of Santa Ana March 2011 Prepared for: URS Corporation 2020 E. First Street, Suite #400 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Tel:
More information195 Hegenberger Road Hotel: Traffic Circulation Analysis in Response to Comments on the Final EIR
350 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza Suite 300 Oakland, CA 94612 510.839.5066 phone 510.839.5825 fax www.esassoc.com Technical Memorandum date November 12, 2014 to from subject Colleen Liang, Port Associate Environmental
More informationCalipatria Solar Farm TIA
Calipatria Solar Farm TIA Prepared for: 7SM 8ME, LLC 71SM 8ME, LLC c/o 8minutenergy Renewables LLC Prepared by: Fehr & Peers March 25, 211 IE1-37 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... i Project Trip Estimates...
More informationAPPENDIX D. Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX D Traffic Impact Analysis TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CALEXICO SOLAR FARM I County of Imperial, California July 8, 2011 LLG Ref. 3-11-2034 Prepared by: Cara Leone Transportation Planner II Under the
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Shotwell Road Residential Clayton, NC
Shotwell Road Residential Clayton, NC TABLE O CONTENTS 1. INTROUCTION...1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area...1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access...2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses...2 1.4. Existing Roadways...2
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis
LA PALMA VILLAGE INITIAL STUDY CITY OF ANAHEIM Appendices Appendix I Traffic Impact Analysis September 2015 LA PALMA VILLAGE INITIAL STUDY CITY OF ANAHEIM Appendices This page intentionally left blank.
More informationCITY OF KIRKLAND TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
CITY OF KIRKLAND TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES SEPA TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY - ROAD IMPACT FEES Introduction Revised February 2004 These guidelines describe how to prepare a traffic study, or Traffic
More informationAppendix D. Transportation Study
Appendix D Transportation Study Draft KUNZLER TERRACE MINE PROJECT Transportation Study Prepared for May 29 County of Mendocino Draft KUNZLER TERRACE MINE PROJECT Transportation Study Prepared for May
More informationENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 3 REFINED MLT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 3 REFINED MLT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Final Report Prepared for Maricopa County Department of Transportation Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 STUDY
More informationPROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE BOOYSENDAL SOUTH EVEREST MINE
BOOYSENDAL PLATINUM (PTY) LTD TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (FEB 2017) REV 2 PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE BOOYSENDAL SOUTH EVEREST MINE PREPARED BY: HAMATINO CONSULTING ENGINEERS 13 HOOGGELEGEN ROAD WHITE RIVER 1240
More informationSIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF ARTERIAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ALONG THE US 61 CORRIDOR IN BURLINGTON, IOWA FINAL REPORT
SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF ARTERIAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ALONG THE US 61 CORRIDOR IN BURLINGTON, IOWA FINAL REPORT Principal Investigator Tom Maze Principal Contributor Ali Kamyab Sponsored by the Engineering
More informationAPPENDIX E TRANSPORTATION
APPENDIX E TRANSPORTATION 2011 PATRON SURVEYS VISSIM MODEL CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION Environmental and Planning Consultants 440 Park Avenue South 7th Floor New York, NY 10016 tel: 212 696-0670 fax:
More informationMEMORANDUM. Church of the Redeemer School Focused Transportation Impact Analysis
MEMORANDUM Date: Februrary 2, 2016 To: From: Subject: Father Samer Youssef, Church of the Redeemer Sarah Jampole and Matt Haynes, Fehr & Peers Church of the Redeemer School Focused Transportation Impact
More informationPrepared for: Rocklin. Prepared by:
APPENDIX L Sierra Gateway Apartments Transportation Impact Analysis Report Prepared for: Rocklin Sierra Apartments II, LLC Prepared by: SIERRA GATEWAY APARTMENTS TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT PREPARED
More informationEXTENDING RED/PURPLE LINE REVENUE SERVICE TO EAST SIDE OF DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES/ARTS DISTRICT
16 One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.2000 Tel metro. net PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE MARCH 18, 2015 SUBJECT: ACTION: EXTENDING RED/PURPLE LINE REVENUE SERVICE TO EAST SIDE OF
More informationEMFAC2011-SG RTP Conformity Analysis and SB-375 Analysis Instructions. for the San Joaquin Valley MPOs. October, 2013
EMFAC2011-SG 2014 RTP Conformity Analysis and SB-375 Analysis Instructions for the San Joaquin Valley MPOs October, 2013 Prepared by Cari Anderson, Cari Anderson Consulting and Alexandra Marcucci, Sierra
More informationBellevue s Traffic Adaptive Signals
What we ll cover Bellevue s Traffic Adaptive Signals SCATS Phase 1 Implementation SCATS Operations Responsiveness New Features Some Initial Results 2011 Program and Beyond Final Thoughts ITE Quad Mtg April
More informationTravel Demand Modeling and Project Coding Procedures
Travel Demand Modeling and Project Coding Procedures Revised July 2008 As described in the Final Transportation Conformity Rule (section 93.122), travel demand models used to generate emission estimates
More informationAn Assessment of Congestion in the Kansas City Region using the MARC Travel Demand Model
An Assessment of Congestion in the Kansas City Region using the MARC Travel Demand Model The Congestion Management Process Federal Regulations state that all metropolitan planning organizations must carry
More informationFinal Report. Interstate-680 Bus-on-Shoulder Feasibility Assessment. prepared for
Final Report Interstate-680 Bus-on-Shoulder Feasibility Assessment prepared for Metropolitan Transportation Commission & Contra Costa Transportation Authority prepared by HDR in association with Fehr &
More informationAPPENDIX I Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX I Traffic Impact Analysis Traffic Impact Analysis Collier Park Renovations Final Report Prepared for: 3570 Carmel Mountain Road Suite 300 San Diego, CA, 92130 8130 Allison Avenue La Mesa, CA
More informationAn Analysis of TDM Impacts on a Corridor Segment Research Findings
An Analysis of TDM Impacts on a Corridor Segment Research Findings Phil Winters, CUTR TDM Program Director Liren Zhou, Graduate Research Assistant Sachin Rai, ITS Research Associate Nevine Georggi, TDM
More informationUsing GPS Based Origin-Destination Data to Improve Traffic Studies. Michael R. Wahlstedt, PE, PTOE OTEC October 11, 2017
Using GPS Based Origin-Destination Data to Improve Traffic Studies Michael R. Wahlstedt, PE, PTOE OTEC October 11, 2017 Overview Benefits of using O-D data for traffic analysis, particularly for operational
More informationMunicipal Service Park 3 December Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex
Municipal Service Park 3 December 2010 Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex Overview: Operational Challenges and Opportunities South East Connector impacts Opportunities: The South
More informationTRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Business Plan
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 2018 Business Plan Today s Agenda Mission Department Overview Planning Initiatives Commission Priorities and 2018 Budget Requests Five-year Plan Department of Transportation Mission
More informationSpeed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia Inside Southern part of 3rd Street Tunnel
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia Inside Southern part of 3rd Street Tunnel Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description
More informationCorridor Management Committee. January 14, 2016
Corridor Management Committee January 14, 2016 1 Today s Topics 2 Regional METRO System Overview 2016 Project Overview: Key Activities and Milestones Municipal Consent Schedule Design Resolution Schedule
More informationStudy Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description G Planned Connecticut Avenue Northbound at Military Road Northwest
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia Connecticut Avenue at Military Road NW Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description
More informationAn Analysis of TDM Impacts on a Corridor Segment
An Analysis of TDM Impacts on a Corridor Segment Phil Winters, CUTR TDM Program Director Liren Zhou, Graduate Research Assistant Sachin Rai, ITS Research Associate Nevine Georggi, TDM Research Associate
More informationNorthwest Needs Improvements Survey
PW5 NW 107th Ave One thousand feet N of NW 122nd St Okeechobee Rd Widen bridge over Miami Canal PW6 NW 82nd Ave NW 8th St NW 12th St Construct new 4-lane road PW7 NW 87 Ave NW 36th St NW 58th St Add 2-lanes
More informationAPPENDIX E. Supplemental Air Quality and Noise Analyses
APPENDIX E Supplemental Air Quality and Noise Analyses Project Memorandum: Project: Marketplace at Newburgh Subject : Supplemental Air Quality and Noise Analyses Marketplace at Newburgh 1 Date: December
More informationITS Canada Annual Conference and General Meeting. May 2013
Evaluation of Travel Time Data Collection Technologies: An Innovative Approach for a Large- Scale Network ITS Canada Annual Conference and General Meeting May 2013 Study Steps Obtain the traffic data from
More informationStudy Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description A Proposed I-395 Southwest after Exit 4, Eastbound
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia I-395 SW after Exit 4 E/B Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description 1 71 8 8A
More informationNorthern Virginia Transportation Authority
IV Northern Virginia Transportation Authority March 23, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation 66 Outside the Beltway Project Scope Multimodal improvements to
More informationESTIMATING PARAMETERS FOR MODIFIED GREENSHIELD S MODEL AT FREEWAY SECTIONS FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS
0 ESTIMATING PARAMETERS FOR MODIFIED GREENSHIELD S MODEL AT FREEWAY SECTIONS FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS Omor Sharif University of South Carolina Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 00 Main Street
More informationSite 17 W3-160 KEY: District Department of Transportation 55 M Street, SE, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20003
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia Connecticut Avenue at Calvert Street NW Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description
More informationCreating transportation system intelligence using PeMS. Pravin Varaiya PeMS Development Group
Creating transportation system intelligence using PeMS Pravin Varaiya PeMS Development Group Summary Conclusion System overview Routine reports: Congestion monitoring, LOS Finding bottlenecks Max flow
More informationUsing Empirical (real-world) Transportation Data to Extend Travel Demand Model Capabilities
Portland State University PDXScholar TREC Friday Seminar Series Transportation Research and Education Center (TREC) 10-4-2013 Using Empirical (real-world) Transportation Data to Extend Travel Demand Model
More informationLos Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Arterial Performance Measures Framework
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Arterial Performance Measures Framework Anita Vandervalk-Ostrander Iteris, Inc. Santa Ana, California, USA Steven Gota, Deputy Executive
More informationFeasibility Study Downtown Moorhead Railroad Grade Separation Moorhead, Minnesota July 2008
Feasibility Study Downtown Moorhead Railroad Grade Separation Moorhead, Minnesota July 2008 INTRODUCTION The City of Moorhead (City), along with the Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments (FM
More informationOR 217,I-5 Experience Portland, OR
OR 217,I-5 Experience Portland, OR By: Abby Caringula Parsons Brinckerhoff July 8th, 2011 Presentation Outline Background VISUM Network Adjustment Model Origin-Destination(O-D) Demand Development ANM Export
More informationManaged Lane owner decision needed San Mateo County s options Understanding revenues & costs Pros & cons of County s options Proposed next steps
San Mateo County Transportation Authority Meeting August 2, 2018 1 OVERVIEW Managed Lane owner decision needed San Mateo County s options Understanding revenues & costs Pros & cons of County s options
More informationStudy Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description A Proposed 6100 Block Georgia Avenue Northwest Southbound
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 6100 Block Georgia Avenue NW Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description 4 402 4
More informationStudy Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description D Proposed 1900 Block Foxhall Road Northwest Southbound
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 19 Block Foxhall Road NW S/B Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description 2 25 3
More informationSpeed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia DC Miles South of Pennsylvania Avenue SE
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia DC 295.4 Miles South of Pennsylvania Avenue SE Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description
More informationBOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2017 TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2017 TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM Date of Meeting: # 9 SUBJECT: ELECTION DISTRICTS: STAFF CONTACTS: Public and Private Infrastructure Improvements Adjacent to the Dulles
More informationARTS DISTRICT 2018 E. 8 TH STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA
DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES ARTS DISTRICT 2018 E. 8 TH STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA INVESTMENT / OWNER-USER OPPORTUNITY MARKETING BROCHURE WWW.LAREALTYPARTNERS.COM PROPERTY SUMMARY PROPERTY OVERVIEW 2017 E. 8TH STREET
More informationSAFETY ON THE IH 35 EXPANSION PROJECTS. Andy Petter, P.E. - Waco District
SAFETY ON THE IH 35 EXPANSION PROJECTS Andy Petter, P.E. - Waco District Presentation IH 35 Expansion through the Waco District Safety Requirements on the Projects IH 35 Safety Summit Meetings Crash Data
More informationConcept Definition Report Adaptive Urban Signal Control Integration (AUSCI) Project. Executive Summary -- August 1995
Executive Summary -- August 1995 This summary highlights the work performed as part of the AUSCI Concept Definition Report. Additional supporting and background material is presented in a separate document
More informationProvo-Orem Bus Rapid Transit
Provo-Orem Bus Rapid Transit and Timpanogos Maintenance Facility Expansion Procurements Informational Meeting August 18, 2014 Agenda Topic Presenter Time Introduction of key project personnel Project history
More informationCedar Rapids ITS Deployment Project
Cedar Rapids ITS Deployment Project Concept of Operations July 29, 2011 Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction Purpose Goal of ITS Deployments Section 2 Needs Assessment General Background Stakeholders
More information2014 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (UTP) UPDATE
2014 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (UTP) UPDATE Texas Transportation Commission June 26, 2014 Proposed amendments under consideration Funding-level adjustments Project list updates Projects under consideration
More informationPage 2D-12 Revised the following language in the last sentence on the page from; as shown in Figure 2D-3. To; as shown in Chapter 2H, Figure 2H-35.
IMPERIAL ROAD DESIGN MANUAL REVISIONS January, 2015 CHAPTER 2A Page 2A-1 Revised the following language at the end of the paragraph under PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION from; Funding Allocation/Verification/Submittal
More informationBluetooth Travel Time Technology Evaluation Using the BlueTOAD TM
Bluetooth Travel Time Technology Evaluation Using the BlueTOAD TM E01271 PennDOT District 6-0 ITS & Support Open End Contract Work Order #1 Submitted To: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Engineering
More informationHerzog History. and the future of transportation
Herzog History and the future of transportation How It all Began 1969 Herzog Contracting Corp. was founded on May 7, 1969 by William Bill Herzog as an asphalt paving contractor on the guiding principles
More informationNorth Metro Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Public Hearings. December 9 & 10, 2009
North Metro Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Public Hearings December 9 & 10, 2009 1 Welcome & Introductions 2 3 What Are We Doing Here Tonight? Public Hearing for RTD North Metro Corridor
More informationSpeed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 1100 Block 4th Street NE
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 11 Block 4th Street NE Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description 1 14 6 6C Proposed
More informationSite 40. Recreational Center
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia Georgia Avenue S/B at Missouri Avenue NW Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description
More informationS-03-SegB: South Federal Way to Fife LRT
Project Number S-03-SegB Subarea South King/Pierce Primary Mode Light Rail Facility Type Corridor Length 4.0 miles Version ST Board Workshop Date Last Modified 11-25-2015 PROJECT AREA AND REPRESENTATIVE
More informationTransportation & Mobility
Transportation & Mobility October 11, 2017 October 11, 2017 Community Dialogue Series Session 3: Transportation & Mobility YOU ARE NOT STUCK IN TRAFFIC. YOU ARE TRAFFIC. October 11, 2017 Community Dialogue
More informationPUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
PUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART C-108 Actual 2012-13 Adopted Year-End Estimated 2014-15 2015-16 PROGRAM EXPENSES/REVENUES Salaries & Benefits $ 1,725,030 $ 1,855,980 $ 1,676,130 $ 1,956,510 $ 1,979,470
More informationM50 Demand Management Study
Study Briefing paper to the Strategic Policy Committees (Transport) of : Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council, Dublin City Council Fingal County Council South Dublin Co Council 5 th June 2013 December
More informationSpeed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia East Capitol Street at Southern Avenue NE
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia East Capitol Street at Southern Avenue NE Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description
More informationThe Maryland Transit Administration. A Plan to Connect Baltimore
The Maryland Transit Administration A Plan to Connect Baltimore 1 What We ve Heard Over 1,100 stakeholder comments submitted through the Bus Network Improvement Project (BNIP) Six workshops, three pop-up
More information4215 Exchange Ave, Vernon
4215 Exchange Ave, Vernon 112,933 SF on 5.03 Acres USDA Processing Facility Rail Served (LAJ) 21 DH Positions / 1,273 Sewer Units Call for Leaseback Details ** Exclusively Listed By: John Repstad Senior
More informationNational Roundabout Conference 2005 DRAFT High-Capacity Roundabout Intersection Analysis: Going Around in Circles David Stanek, PE & Ronald T. Milam,
High-Capacity Roundabout Intersection Analysis: Going Around in Circles David Stanek, PE & Ronald T. Milam, AICP TRB National Roundabout Conference May 24, 2005 Vail, CO Presentation Overview What is a
More informationCornerstone of downtown; Gateway to the state
Paving the information highway Building public trust through reliable communications Brian Manthey Communications Officer Marquette Interchange Team Wisconsin Department of Transportation September 12,
More informationDESIGN CRITERIA MEMORANDUM
State Route 49 Realignment Study DESIGN CRITERIA MEMORANDUM ATTACHMENT G SR 49 Realignment Study STATE ROUTE 49 El Dorado to Coloma El Dorado County, CA DESIGN CRITERIA MEMORANDUM Introduction The El
More informationDowntown Boise Multimodal Center
Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment June 2009 Prepared by the Federal Transit Administration and Valley Regional Transit. U.S. Department
More informationPROPOSED SOUTH LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY PLAN Transportation Improvement & Mitigation Program (TIMP) Draft Version 2.2
PROPOSED SOUTH LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY PLAN Transportation Improvement & Mitigation Program (TIMP) October 2016 Submitted to: 17J17 0080 Prepared by Iteris, Inc. City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning
More informationThe Practical Side of Cell Phones as Traffic Probes
The Practical Side of Cell Phones as Traffic Probes The information contained in this document is considered proprietary, and may not be reproduced or redistributed without the consent of Delcan Inc. Cell
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. PUBLIC SERVICES 1. FIRE PROTECTION
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. PUBLIC SERVICES 1. FIRE PROTECTION INTRODUCTION This section evaluates the potential impacts of the Proposed Project on the fire and police protection services and
More informationDirector of Public Works/City Engineer. Secretary. Word Processor. Streets and Facilities Supervisor. Traffic Signal Technician.
PUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Director of Public Works/City Engineer Secretary Word Processor Transit Services Manager Fleet Services Supervisor Streets and Facilities Supervisor Principal Principal
More informationOpening the New Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge: Planning & Implementing a Major Traffic Switch
Opening the New Memorial : Planning & Implementing a Major Traffic Switch Scott C. Crumley, P.E., P.T.O.E. Manager March 26, 2009 1 Agenda Background The Major Milestone: Opening the New to Traffic Challenges
More informationStudy Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description G Proposed 2900 Block Military Road Northwest Eastbound
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 29 Block Military Road NW E/B Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description 2 21 3
More informationApplicant Type (Conditional Use Permit, Variance, Tract Map, etc.): Applicant: Address: Phone(s): Fax:
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE City of Twentynine Palms Community Development Department 6136 Adobe Road Twentynine Palms, CA 92277 (760) 367-6799 Fax (760) 367-5400 29palms.org : Please complete each statement
More informationDeployment of ITS Projects in Pasadena A Local Agency Perspective
Deployment of ITS Projects in Pasadena A Local Agency Perspective ITS California Annual Meeting October 2, 2013 Norman Baculinao, PE Pasadena and the Region Source: Census Transportation Planning Package,
More informationStudy Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description C Existing 3500 Block Massachusetts Avenue Northwest Eastbound
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 35 Block Massachusetts Avenue NW Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description 2 24
More informationTRACY HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN RECIRCULATED DRAFT SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VOLUME III OCTOBER 2015
TRACY HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN RECIRCULATED DRAFT SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VOLUME III OCTOBER 2015 APPENDIX H-6B CORRESPONDENCE DOCUMENTS LIVERMORE, DATED FALL 2014 Chau, Elizabeth From: Sent:
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Memorandum of Understanding: Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (I-80 ICM) Project
Office of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR May 1, 2012 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, Interim City Manager Submitted by: Andrew Clough, Director, Public Works
More informationRapid Incident Scene Clearance (RISC) Annual Report
Rapid Incident Scene Clearance (RISC) Annual Report Fiscal Year 2014/2015 September 2015 Publication of: Florida Department of Transportation Commercial Vehicle Operations and Traffic Incident Management
More informationAddendum: Final Design Noise Analysis Study Noise Sensitive Area (NSA) 11 Post March 15, 2016 Open House Response to Comments
Final Design Township of Lower Makefield, Bucks County, Pennsylvania Township of Ewing, Mercer County, New Jersey Addendum: Final Design Noise Analysis Study Noise Sensitive Area (NSA) 11 Post March 15,
More informationK. PUBLIC SERVICES K.1. POLICE PROTECTION
K. PUBLIC SERVICES K.1. POLICE PROTECTION 1. INTRODUCTION This section addresses impacts on police protection services that would occur due to increased population, traffic, and construction activities
More informationIntegrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017 Chattanooga 2045 RTP Chattanooga 2045 RTP addresses both transportation supply and demand Continued
More informationManaging DC Work Zones via a Citywide Transportation Management Plan. ITE Mid-Colonial District Annual Meeting May 20, 2014
Managing DC Work Zones via a Citywide Transportation Management Plan ITE Mid-Colonial District Annual Meeting May 20, 2014 Presentation Outline The Team The Challenge The Approach Project Diagram Work
More informationvision42
vision42 www.vision42.org vision4 auto-free light rail 2 boulevard for 42nd Street Roxanne Warren, AIA, Chair George Haikalis, ASCE, Co-Chair Institute for Rational Urban Mobility,Inc. www.vision42.org
More informationBaseline Bridge Crossing. Priorities Committee Meeting
Baseline Bridge Crossing Priorities Committee Meeting June 14, 2016 1 Unparalleled Asset Footprint Largest Energy Infrastructure Company in North America Over 12,000 employees in Canada and the U.S. $18.2
More informationThe Blue Line Extension
The Blue Line Extension NORTH CAROLINA JOINT TRANSPORTATION OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Presented by Carolyn Flowers CATS Chief Executive Officer Raleigh, NC February 10, 2012 Overview Charlotte Area Transit System
More informationSouth Central ROP Projects
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation ROP Overview and Summary South Central ROP Projects November 2007 77 INCIDENT MANAGEMENT (IM) Draft Version 1 July 2007-40 - IM 1: SOUTH CENTRAL PA ITS DEPLOYMENT
More informationRapid Incident Scene Clearance (RISC) Annual Report
Rapid Incident Scene Clearance (RISC) Annual Report Fiscal Year 2013/2014 September 2014 Publication of: Florida Department of Transportation Commercial Vehicle Operations and Traffic Incident Management
More informationVARIATIONS IN CAPACITY AND DELAY ESTIMATES FROM MICROSCOPIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODELS
VARIATIONS IN CAPACITY AND DELAY ESTIMATES FROM MICROSCOPIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODELS (Transportation Research Record 1802, pp. 23-31, 2002) Zong Z. Tian Associate Transportation Researcher Texas Transportation
More informationNovember 28, 2012 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING
November 28, 2012 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING Project Background Description of the Project Alternatives Analysis Process Project Progress Activity Stations Comments Adjourn 2 VIA spent 2 years
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) for a Permit to Construct Electrical Facilities: Cerritos
More informationCounty of Loudoun. Department of Planning and Zoning MEMORANDUM
County of Loudoun Department of Planning and Zoning MEMORANDUM DATE: June 12, 2015 TO: FROM: Jacqueline Harlow, Project Manager Planner III, Land Use Review Kelly Williams, Planner III Community Planning
More informationDulles Area Transportation Association
Dulles Area Transportation Association February 8, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation Transform 66: Outside the Beltway 2 Project Scope Multimodal improvements
More informationMETRO SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY Executive Summary May 2009 DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS
METRO SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2010 2014 2014 Executive Summary May 2009 DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS OVERVIEW Purpose of Metro SRTP Develop multi year strategic plan to improve transit quality,
More information