November Water & Wastewater Rate Survey. Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District
|
|
- Elinor Harrington
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 & Rate Survey Metropolitan North Georgia Planning District Metropolitan North Georgia Planning District 40 Courtland Street, NE Atlanta, GA November
2
3 & Rate Survey 2010 Metropolitan North Georgia Planning District November 2010 Prepared by Atlanta Regional Commission Environmental Planning Division For Metropolitan North Georgia Planning District
4
5 Table of Contents Background Introduction... 1 Information Requested... 1 Factors Affecting Rate Comparisons... 1 Survey Results and Charges... 2 Rate Structures... 5 Rate Structures Billing Cycles Next Effective Rate Increase One-Time Hook-Up Fees/Capital Cost Charges Industrial Surcharges Irrigation Meters List of Figures Figure 1 Residential Charges 6,000 GPM... 3 Figure 2 Residential and Combined Charges 6,000 GPM... 3 Figure 3 Residential Charges 12,000 GPM... 4 Figure 4 Residential and Combined Charges 12,000 GPM... 4 Figure 5 Commercial Charges 150,000 GPM... 5 Figure 6 Commercial and Combined Charges 150,000 GPM... 5 Figure 7 Rate Structures by Percent Population Served... 6 Figure 8 Metropolitan North Georgia Planning District Rate Structure... 7 Figure 9 Types of Rate Structures... 9 Figure Combined and Bills at 6,000 GPM List of Tables Table Residential and Bill Example Table Summer Residential and Bill Example Table Commercial and Bill Example Table 4a Rate Summary Table 4b Rate Summary Base Charge by Meter Table 5a Rate Summary Table 5b Rate Summary Base Charge by Meter Table 6 Surcharges Table 7 Rate Increase Dates Table 8 One-Time Connection (Tap-On) Fees for / Systems Table 9 Development/Impact Fees Table 10 Industrial Surcharges by Pollutant Table 11a Irrigation Rate Summary Table 11b Irrigation Rate Summary Base Charge by Meter... 70
6
7 BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION The Metropolitan North Georgia Planning District (Metro District) was created to provide comprehensive water resource plans for the greater metropolitan Atlanta area. The three major plans, a water supply and conservation management plan, a wastewater management plan and a watershed management plan were originally adopted in September 2003 and updated in May The Metro District s Supply and Conservation Management Plan includes strategies and recommendations for water supply management. conservation is an integral part of the water supply plan. The water conservation element of the plan includes twelve measures for local governments to adopt. One such measure is that conservation pricing be used by all Metro District drinking water supply utilities. The goal of this measure is to reduce excessive discretionary water use, especially outdoor irrigation, by increasing the cost of water as the volume of use increases. All Metro District water utilities should be implementing at least a three tiered rate structure; however, water utilities may elect to create more than three tiers to further enhance water conservation and revenue needs. Irrigation rates should be at least equal to or greater than 200 percent of the first tier of the water rate structure. In the summer of 2010, the Metro District conducted a survey of water and wastewater rates in the 15-county Metro District area. The purpose of this survey is to assess the rates within the Metro District and to inventory the region s use of water-conserving rate structures and surcharges. INFORMATION REQUESTED The Metro District surveyed 56 water supply retail utilities which included 5 authorities, 9 county systems, and 42 municipal systems. There were 52 wastewater retail utilities surveyed, made up of 6 authorities, 8 county systems, and 38 municipal systems. The response rate was 100 percent participation. The information requested included: and wastewater charges; Effective date of rates; One-time charges assessed to connect to the utility system; Billing cycle; Next anticipated rate increase; Excess use and/or seasonal surcharge; Irrigation rates; and Industrial wastewater surcharges. The following sections summarize the results of the survey. The more detailed information is found in Tables 1 through 11b. FACTORS AFFECTING RATE COMPARISONS The Metro District survey showed a wide range of water and wastewater prices in the metropolitan area. There are many reasons or factors that explain these differences. Factors 1
8 which should be considered when making rate comparisons 1 are listed below: Natural Resources and Geography: Availability and quality of water resources and pumping distances influence prices; Customer Base: Unit costs are less with a densely populated customer base. The costs per customer are higher to service a large area with a limited number of customers. Another influencing factor is the makeup of the customer base, or the percentage of customers in residential, commercial, industrial, and other classes; Age and Condition of System: A system will have lower costs when it is old enough to have taken advantage of good financing but not so old that major repair is required; Level of Treatment: effluent treatment requirements vary. Higher levels of treatment cost more than lower requirements; Use of Capital Recovery Fees: These fees assist water systems in recovering their costs for connecting customers to the systems and recovering capital costs without overall rate increases; and Offsets for Grants, Taxes, etc.: Older water and wastewater systems were able to use federal grants. Federal grants are no longer so readily available. Some areas have used a 1 percent sales tax and other fees and taxes to support water and wastewater systems. WATER AND WASTEWATER CHARGES SURVEY RESULTS For comparison purposes, three examples of monthly water and wastewater charges were developed. The first example assumes a family uses 6,000 gallons per month (GPM). Figure 1 presents the price range of monthly residential water charges in the Metro District. The water charges for using 6,000 gallons are as low as $6.90 and as high as $79.00 per month. 1 Source: Comprehensive Guide to and Finance and Pricing, George A. Raftelis, 1993 CRC Press. 2
9 Figure 1 Residential Charges 6,000 GPM $90.00 $80.00 $70.00 $60.00 $50.00 $40.00 $30.00 $20.00 $10.00 $0.00 $79.00 $32.00 $6.90 Minimum Average Maximum Most utilities in the Metro District combine their water and wastewater charges in one bill. Figure 2 presents the combined charges, which range from $10.40 to $134.99, for residential water and wastewater service in the Metro District. Table 1 lists the water and wastewater charges for each utility in the Metro District using the residential example of 6,000 GPM. Figure 10 is a graphic representation of Table 1. Figure 2 Residential and Combined Charges 6,000 GPM $ $ $ $ $80.00 $60.00 $40.00 $20.00 $0.00 $ $67.37 $10.40 Minimum Average Maximum The second example illustrates the demand in water consumption during spring and summer seasons. In general, tiered rate structures encourage water conservation by charging higher rates for customers with higher water use. If, for example, a family used 6,000 GPM during fall and winter seasons but consumed 12,000 GPM during spring and summer seasons, then this increased usage should result in a billed consumption at the highest tier in the rate structure. Figure 3 presents the range of monthly residential water charges for water utilities in the Metro 3
10 District. The water charges for using 12,000 gallons are as low as $14.80 and as high as $ per month. $ $ Figure 3 Residential Charges 12,000 GPM $ $ $ $50.00 $0.00 $14.80 $64.17 Minimum Average Maximum The combined water and wastewater charges using a residential seasonal example of 12,000 GPM is illustrated in Figure 4. Combined water and wastewater charges range from $21.30 to $ Table 2 lists the water and wastewater charges for Metro District water utilities using a residential example of 12,000 GPM. $ $ Figure 4 Residential and Combined Charges 12,000 GPM $ $ $ $ $ $ $50.00 $0.00 $21.30 Minimum Average Maximum The third example assumes a consumption rate of 150,000 GPM with a 2 inch meter for a commercial entity. The water charges for a business using 150,000 GPM range from a low of $ to a high of $1, Figure 5 presents the water charges for a commercial entity using 150,000 GPM. 4
11 Figure 5 Commercial Charges 150,000 GPM $2, $2, $1, $1, $1, $1, $ $ $ $0.00 $1, $ $ Minimum Average Maximum Figure 6 illustrates the combined water and wastewater charges which range from $ to $3, The water and wastewater charges for each utility in the Metro District using the commercial example of 150,000 GPM are shown in Table 3. Figure 6 Commercial and Combined Charges 150,000 GPM $4, $4, $3, $3, $2, $2, $1, $1, $ $0.00 $3, $1, $ Minimum Average Maximum WATER RATE STRUCTURES In general, there are three major categories of water rate structures. They include increasing block, uniform, and decreasing block. Table 4 and Table 5 list the base and unit charges for the 5
12 utilities in the Metro District. Figure 7 illustrates the proportion of water rate structures attributable to each structure type found in the region by the percent of the Metro District s population they serve. The map in Figure 8 displays the use of increasing block and uniform rates throughout the Metro District. Decreasing block rates are no longer used by water utilities in the Metro District. Figure 7 Rate Structures by Percent Population Served Two Tiers 3.3% Unif orm 0.08% Three Tiers 53.9% Four or More Tiers 42.7% 6
13 Figure 8 Clermont Adairsville Nelson Hall Lula Waleska Gainesville Bartow White Ball Ground Cherokee Forsyth Euharlee Taylorsville Braswell Villa Rica Kingston Paulding Newnan Douglas Grantville Corinth Cartersville Dallas Hiram Coweta Emerson Cobb Powder Springs Chattahoochee Hills Moreland Douglasville Palmetto Acworth Kennesaw Smyrna Austell Fulton Sharpsburg Turin Union City Fairburn Haralson Tyrone Fayetteville Peachtree City Senoia Canton Holly Springs Woodstock Fayette Milton Mountain Alpharetta Park Roswell Marietta Atlanta Woolsey Brooks Sandy Springs East Point Hapeville College Park Forest Park Riverdale Dunwoody Morrow Jonesboro Lovejoy Hampton Johns Creek Norcross Doraville Chamblee Lilburn Clarkston Decatur Stone Pine Mountain Lake Avondale Estates Clayton DeKalb Cumming Duluth Berkeley Lake Lithonia Stockbridge Lawrenceville Gwinnett Rockdale McDonough Henry Locust Grove 7 Sugar Hill Suwanee Snellville Conyers Buford Dacula Grayson Flowery Branch Oakwood Braselton Metropolitan North Georgia Planning District Rate Structure <all other values> Rate Structure Uniform Increasing Block, 2 Tiers Increasing Block, 3 Tiers Increasing Block, 4 Tiers + Seasonal / Excess Use
14 Increasing Block Rate The most commonly used rate structure in the Metro District is the increasing block rate structure. This rate structure is considered an aggressive water conservation measure. With this rate, the price per unit increases as consumption increases. The increasing block rate is a type of tiered rate that may have 2 or more tiers. As a required water conservation measure in the Supply and Conservation Management Plan, all water utilities in the Metro District must implement at least a three-tiered rate structure. Seasonal and Excess Use Surcharges Excess use surcharges and seasonal surcharges are variations of the increasing block rate or increasing tiered approach that are used by some water systems in the Metro District. These approaches may apply increasing blocks based on volume used in the spring and summer seasons or may be a fixed tiered charge for excessive use (see Table 6). Increasing block or tiered rates serve percent of the Metro District s population, with percent served by 3 or more tiers and 3.34 percent served by 2 tiers. Uniform Rate The uniform rate structure promotes water conservation because the cost of water is directly proportional to the amount of water used. The price per unit remains constant regardless of consumption. Uniform rates serve 0.08 percent of the Metro District s population. Decreasing Block Rate In a decreasing block rate structure, the price per unit decreases as consumption or volume increases. This rate structure is beneficial to large users and is considered a disincentive to conservation. Decreasing block rate structures are not allowed within the Metro District and none of the water utilities use this pricing structure. Figure 9 shows the relationship between the price per unit and the cost to the customer for the three types of rates found in the Metro District. Commercial One of the decisions for a water system is whether to apply different rates to residential and commercial customers. Many commercial customers have a uniform use while residential customers, especially those with irrigations systems, have excessive peak use that cause greater impacts on the water resources and the water system. It is most effective to apply conservation rate structures to those customers that can change their behavior. Certain industrial, commercial and institutional water users or use sectors may need to have their individual systems analyzed to determine appropriate rate. 8
15 Figure 9 Types of Rate Structures 9
16 WASTEWATER RATE STRUCTURES rates are typically determined by the nature and volume of flows. Facilities that have received grants or loans under the Federal Clean Act may be required to adhere to user charges that recover costs proportional to each user. BILLING CYCLES Utilities in the Metro District use either monthly or bimonthly billing cycles. Of the 56 water utilities, 95 percent have a monthly billing cycle and 5 percent have a bimonthly cycle. Of the 52 wastewater utilities, 96 percent have a monthly billing cycle and 4 percent have a bimonthly billing cycle. Billing cycles should be set so that customers can observe and therefore modify their behaviors. Cycles should not be so long that changes would have no impact. With enhanced metering technology, short billing cycles, such as monthly, help keep customers in tune with actual usage patterns. NEXT EFFECTIVE RATE INCREASE As tiered rate structures achieve success, use in the top tier should decrease; therefore, conservation rates should be re-analyzed periodically. Periodic rate adjustments may be needed to ensure that the funds needed for regular operations are not jeopardized and also help prevent excessive rate increases in any given year. The majority of the water and wastewater utilities in the Metro District have recently undergone increases in their rates. Of the 56 water utilities, 55 (98 percent) have had rate increases in the last two years. Twentysix water utilities (46 percent) anticipate rate increases in the next two years. This information is presented in Table 7. ONE-TIME HOOK-UP FEES/CAPITAL COST CHARGES One-time capital charges and other types of fees are often used as a water and wastewater funding source. In the Metro District, the one-time capital or connection costs for a single family residence with a 5/8 or 3/4 water meter range from $ to $4, for water. The one-time wastewater capital or connection costs for a single family residence ranges from $ to $6, Table 8 lists the one-time capital or connection costs for water and wastewater. Table 9 presents additional development and/or impact fees for water and wastewater customers. It is extremely difficult to compare one-time fees between utilities. When comparing these fees, it is important to note that the charges may not cover the same services for all utilities. Costs which may or may not be included are: hook-up, tap and meter, backflow preventor, and system development costs. In addition, costs may vary significantly depending on the location of the development in question. 10
17 INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER SURCHARGES Industrial wastewater surcharges are used to recover costs associated with treating highstrength wastewater from industrial users. The pollutants included in these surcharges vary across jurisdiction and common pollutants that are surcharged include biological oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), ammonia (NH₃), phosphorus (P), fats, oils and grease (FOG), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), and acidity and basicity (ph). Fifteen of the 52 wastewater utilities have industrial surcharges. The information is presented in Table 10. IRRIGATION METERS Irrigation often poses an added burden to the local water utility by creating very large peaks in water demand. Rate schedules for irrigation meters should recognize the impact that the high peak demand of irrigation places on the local water system and encourage conservation of our region s limited water supplies. All Metro District water utilities that allow the use of irrigation meters should have an irrigation rate that is significantly higher than the rate for indoor use. At a minimum, the rate for irrigation use should at least be equal to or greater than 200 percent of the first tier of the water rate structure. Table 11 lists the base and unit charges for water utilities in the Metro District. The table also notes if the irrigation rate is at least 200 percent of the first tier of the water rate structure. 11
18 TABLE 1: 2010 Residential & Bill Example 1 Bartow County Combined Bartow County Department $29.39 $28.41 $57.80 City of Adairsville Inside City $14.03 $14.03 $28.06 Outside City $21.05 $21.05 $42.10 Inside City $15.60 $16.56 $32.16 City of Cartersville Department 2 Outside City $30.20 $27.12 $57.32 City of Emerson Inside City $19.99 $38.27 $58.26 Outside City $32.86 $67.03 $99.89 City of Kingston 3 City of White Inside City Inside City $45.00 $16.75 N/A 4 $40.75 $57.50 Outside City Outside City $67.50 $19.50 N/A 4 $48.50 $68.00 Cherokee County Combined Cherokee County and Sewerage Authority $30.20 $38.00 $68.20 Inside City $33.05 $46.10 $79.15 City of Ball Ground 5,6 Outside City $44.05 $46.10 $90.15 City of Canton $28.20 $34.50 $62.70 City of Waleska $34.38 N/A 4 City of Woodstock and Sewer Utility $37.38 $54.68 $92.06 Clayton County Combined Clayton County Authority $27.39 $28.53 $55.92 Cobb County Combined Cobb County System 5 $26.65 $30.60 $57.25 City of Austell Inside City $19.84 $34.02 $53.86 Outside City $21.34 $35.58 $56.92 Marietta Power and $31.64 $42.34 $73.98 City of Powder Springs Inside City $25.86 $33.42 $59.28 Department Outside City $30.76 $36.00 $66.76 City of Smyrna $34.68 $39.30 $73.98 Coweta County Combined Coweta County and Sewerage Authority $43.27 $44.65 $87.92 City of Grantville $35.50 $44.00 $79.50 Inside City $24.30 $28.65 $52.95 Newnan Utilities 5 Outside City $30.60 $36.45 $67.05 City of Senoia $32.50 $37.00 $69.50 Town of Turin 7 $37.70 $42.84 $80.54 DeKalb County Combined DeKalb County and Sewer $12.27 $47.25 $59.52 Douglas County Combined Douglasville-Douglas County and Sewer Authority 5,6 $32.88 $35.66 $68.54 City of Villa Rica 5 Inside City $28.86 $32.83 $61.69 Outside City $43.19 $49.25 $
19 TABLE 1: 2010 Residential & Bill Example 1 ; continued Fayette County Combined Fayette County System $31.40 N/A 4 Town of Brooks 8 $31.40 $31.40 $62.80 City of Fayetteville 5 $26.10 $27.35 $53.45 Peachtree City and Sewerage Authority 8 $31.40 $28.98 $60.38 Town of Tyrone 8 $31.40 $46.90 $78.30 Forsyth County Combined Forsyth County and Sewer 5 $29.00 $39.04 $68.04 Inside City $20.04 $16.74 $36.78 City of Cumming 5 Outside City $24.64 $16.74 $41.38 Fulton County Combined North Fulton County System 3 $25.02 $41.34 $66.36 City of Atlanta Department of Inside City $38.18 $96.81 $ shed Management 2,5,9 Outside City $46.10 $37.89 $83.99 City of College Park $37.06 $33.94 $71.00 City of East Point $20.50 $14.75 $35.25 Inside City $52.46 $32.00 $84.46 City of Fairburn Outside City $79.00 $44.00 $ City of Hapeville $47.16 $28.50 $75.66 City of Mountain Park $34.93 $52.25 $87.18 City of Palmetto $24.15 $40.25 $64.40 City of Roswell 11 $29.20 N/A 4 $70.54 City of Union City $55.24 $31.32 $86.56 Gwinnett County Combined Gwinnett County Resources $32.16 $37.28 $69.44 Town of Braselton Inside City $31.15 $31.71 $62.86 Outside City $38.10 $31.71 $69.81 Inside City $6.90 $3.50 $10.40 City of Buford Outside City $15.30 $3.50 $18.80 City of Lawrenceville 3,10 $29.46 N/A 4 $29.46 City of Norcross 5 $39.64 $37.88 $77.52 City of Suwanee 10 $27.09 N/A 4 $64.37 Hall County Combined Inside City $33.29 $37.34 $70.63 City of Flowery Branch 5,6 Outside City $36.62 $49.66 $86.28 Inside City $21.05 $43.29 $64.34 City of Gainesville Public Utilities 2 Outside City $42.16 $45.19 $87.35 Henry County Combined Henry County and Sewerage Inside County $33.36 $33.36 $66.72 Authority Outside County $50.04 $50.04 $ City of Hampton $29.51 $44.51 $74.02 City of Locust Grove $38.19 $38.19 $76.38 City of McDonough $30.90 $30.90 $61.80 City of Stockbridge $35.24 $35.24 $
20 TABLE 1: 2010 Residential & Bill Example 1 ; continued Paulding County Combined Paulding County System $38.96 $32.00 $70.96 Inside City $26.76 $26.76 $53.52 City of Dallas Outside City $32.34 $32.34 $64.68 City of Hiram $21.30 N/A 4 Rockdale County Combined Rockdale Resources $33.65 $39.23 $ This analysis assumes a household with a 5/8" or 3/4" meter uses 6,000 gallons of water each month. Applicable minimum fees included. 2 Billed in cubic feet. Rates converted to gallons for comparison purposes. 3 Have excessive use penalty or surcharge. Surcharge not included in these calculations. 4 Not applicable. Service is not available in the area. 5 A discount rate for senior citizens is available. 6 A discount rate for disabled customers is available. 7 service outside of service area is provided by Newnan Utilities. 8 service is provided by Fayette County System. Sewer service is provided by the municipality, but billed by Fayette County System. 9 service outside of city is provided by Fulton County System. 10 Sewer service provided and billed by County. 14
21 Figure Combined and Bills at 6,000 GPM 1 City of Adairsville City of Atlanta Department of shed Management City of Austell City of Ball Ground Bartow County Department Town of Braselton Town of Brooks City of Buford City of Canton City of Cartersville Department Cherokee County and Sewerage Authority Clayton County Authority Cobb County System City of College Park Coweta County and Sewerage Authority City of Cumming City of Dallas DeKalb County and Sewer Douglasville-Douglas County and Sewer Authority City of East Point City of Emerson City of Fairburn City of Fayetteville City of Flowery Branch Forsyth County and Sewer City of Gainesville Public Utilities City of Grantville Gwinnett County Resources City of Hampton City of Hapeville Henry County and Sewerage Authority City of Lawrenceville City of Locust Grove Marietta Power and City of McDonough City of Mountain Park Newnan Utilities City of Norcross North Fulton County System City of Palmetto Paulding County Public Works Peachtree City City of Powder Springs Rockdale Resources City of Roswell City of Senoia City of Smyrna City of Stockbridge City of Suwanee Town of Turin Town of Tyrone City of Union City City of Villa Rica City of White City of Woodstock and Sewer $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 1 The following utilities were not included because they do not bill directly for wastewater: City of Kingston, City of Waleska, Fayette County System, and City of Hiram. 15
22 TABLE 2: 2010 Summer Residential & Bill Example 1 Bartow County Combined Bartow County Department $62.87 $52.05 $ City of Adairsville Inside City $23.03 $23.03 $46.06 Outside City $34.55 $34.55 $69.10 Inside City $37.60 $27.12 $64.72 City of Cartersville Department 2 Outside City $57.28 $48.24 $ City of Emerson Inside City $36.03 $61.25 $97.28 Outside City $58.54 $ $ City of Kingston 3 City of White Inside City Inside City $45.00 $30.25 N/A 4 $54.25 $84.50 Outside City Outside City $67.50 $34.50 N/A 4 $63.50 $98.00 Cherokee County Combined Cherokee County and Sewerage Authority $62.20 $77.60 $ Inside City $62.25 $76.70 $ City of Ball Ground 5,6 Outside City $78.15 $76.70 $ City of Canton $57.80 $69.00 $ City of Waleska $70.26 N/A 4 City of Woodstock and Sewer Utility $70.06 $ $ Clayton County Combined Clayton County Authority $60.80 $58.83 $ Cobb County Combined Cobb County System 5 $49.93 $61.20 $ City of Austell Inside City $42.97 $68.04 $ Outside City $46.27 $71.16 $ Marietta Power and $59.65 $84.70 $ City of Powder Springs Inside City $57.90 $66.84 $ Department Outside City $63.22 $72.00 $ City of Smyrna $62.69 $78.60 $ Coweta County Combined Coweta County and Sewerage Authority $87.19 $87.55 $ City of Grantville $74.50 $80.00 $ Inside City $47.90 $49.05 $96.95 Newnan Utilities 5 Outside City $59.00 $64.65 $ City of Senoia $61.50 $61.00 $ Town of Turin 7 $78.30 $42.84 $ DeKalb County Combined DeKalb County and Sewer $25.87 $90.15 $ Douglas County Combined Douglasville-Douglas County and Sewer Authority 5,6 $59.10 $66.19 $ City of Villa Rica 5 Inside City $65.12 $59.17 $ Outside City $97.25 $88.76 $
23 TABLE 2: 2010 Summer Residential & Bill Example 1 ; continued Fayette County Combined Fayette County System $50.78 N/A 4 Town of Brooks 8 $50.78 $50.78 $ City of Fayetteville 5 $44.95 $44.45 $89.40 Peachtree City and Sewerage Authority 8 $50.78 $57.96 $ Town of Tyrone 8 $50.78 $97.60 $ Forsyth County Combined Forsyth County and Sewer 5 $56.18 $68.08 $ Inside City $37.86 $33.78 $71.64 City of Cumming 5 Outside City $45.46 $33.78 $79.24 Fulton County Combined North Fulton County System 3 $43.14 $75.78 $ City of Atlanta Department of Inside City $82.28 $ $ shed Management 2,5,9 Outside City $99.62 $72.33 $ City of College Park $68.60 $68.80 $ City of East Point $39.00 $36.25 $75.25 Inside City $ $59.00 $ City of Fairburn Outside City $ $77.00 $ City of Hapeville $ $63.00 $ City of Mountain Park $ $ $ City of Palmetto $46.85 $81.65 $ City of Roswell 10 $58.80 N/A 4 $ City of Union City $ $47.64 $ Gwinnett County Combined Gwinnett County Resources $65.06 $69.56 $ Town of Braselton City of Buford Inside City $60.11 $62.25 $ Outside City $67.06 $62.25 $ Inside City $14.80 $6.50 $21.30 Outside City $32.00 $6.50 $38.50 City of Lawrenceville 3,10 $58.92 N/A 4 $58.92 City of Norcross 5 $73.48 $70.76 $ City of Suwanee 10 $54.61 N/A 4 $ Hall County Combined City of Flowery Branch 5,6 City of Gainesville Public Utilities 2 Inside City $75.26 $67.22 $ Outside City $95.24 $89.38 $ Inside City $41.48 $86.60 $ Outside City $83.08 $90.37 $ Henry County Combined Henry County and Sewerage Inside County $69.66 $64.80 $ Authority Outside County $ $97.20 $ City of Hampton $64.41 $94.41 $ City of Locust Grove $81.69 $81.69 $ City of McDonough $65.49 $65.49 $ City of Stockbridge $79.91 $79.91 $
24 TABLE 2: 2010 Summer Residential & Bill Example 1 ; continued Paulding County Combined Paulding County System $75.20 $62.00 $ Inside City $62.16 $62.16 $ City of Dallas Outside City $75.20 $75.20 $ City of Hiram $55.54 N/A 4 Rockdale County Combined Rockdale Resources $53.21 $63.83 $ This analysis assumes a household with a 5/8" or 3/4" meter uses 12,000 gallons of water each month. Applicable minimum fees included. 2 Billed in cubic feet. Rates converted to gallons for comparison purposes. 3 Have excessive use penalty or surcharge. Surcharge not included in these calculations. 4 Not applicable. Service is not available in the area. 5 A discount rate for senior citizens is available. 6 A discount rate for disabled customers is available. 7 service outside of service area is provided by Newnan Utilities. 8 service is provided by Fayette County System. Sewer service is provided by the municipality, but billed by Fayette County System. 9 service outside of city is provided by Fulton County System. 10 Sewer service provided and billed by County. 18
25 TABLE 3: 2010 Commercial & Bill Example 1 Bartow County Combined Bartow County Department $ $ $1, City of Adairsville Inside City $ $ $ Outside City $ $ $ Inside City $ $ $ City of Cartersville Department 2 Outside City $ $ $1, City of Emerson City of Kingston 3 City of White Inside City Inside City Inside City $ $ $ $ N/A 4 $ $1, $1, Outside City Outside City Outside City $ $1, $ $1, N/A 4 $ $1, $1, Cherokee County Combined Cherokee County and Sewerage Authority $ $ $1, City of Ball Ground Inside City $ $ $1, Outside City $ $ $1, City of Canton $ $ $1, City of Waleska $ N/A 4 City of Woodstock and Sewer Utility $ $1, $2, Clayton County Combined Clayton County Authority $ $ $1, Cobb County Combined Cobb County System $ $ $1, City of Austell Inside City $1, $ $2, Outside City $1, $ $2, Marietta Power and $ $1, $1, City of Powder Springs Department $ $ $1, City of Smyrna $ $ $1, Coweta County Combined Coweta County and Sewerage Authority $1, $1, $2, City of Grantville $ $1, $2, Newnan Utilities Inside City $ $ $1, Outside City $ $ $1, City of Senoia $ $ $1, Town of Turin 5 $1, N/A 4 $1, DeKalb County Combined DeKalb County and Sewer $ $1, $1, Douglas County Combined Douglasville-Douglas County and Sewer Authority $ $ $1, City of Villa Rica Inside City $ $ $1, Outside City $ $1, $2,
26 TABLE 3: 2010 Commercial & Bill Example 1 ; continued Fayette County Combined Fayette County System $ N/A 4 Town of Brooks 6 $ $ $1, City of Fayetteville $ $ $ Peachtree City and Sewerage Authority 6 $ $ $1, Town of Tyrone 6 $ $1, $1, Forsyth County Combined Forsyth County and Sewer $ $ $1, City of Cumming Inside City $ $ $ Outside City $ $ $1, Fulton County Combined North Fulton County System 3 $ $ $1, City of Atlanta Department of Inside City $1, $2, $3, shed Management 2,7 Outside City $1, $ $2, City of College Park $ $ $1, City of East Point $ $ $1, City of Fairburn Inside City $1, $ $2, Outside City $1, $1, $2, City of Hapeville $1, $ $2, City of Mountain Park N/A 4 N/A 4 City of Palmetto $ $1, $1, City of Roswell 8 $ N/A 4 $1, City of Union City $1, $ $1, Gwinnett County Combined Gwinnett County Resources $ $ $1, Town of Braselton City of Buford Inside City Inside City $ $ $ $ $1, $1, Outside City Outside City $ $ $ $ $1, $1, City of Lawrenceville 3,8 $ N/A 4 $ City of Norcross $ $ $1, City of Suwanee 8 $1, N/A 4 $1, Hall County Combined City of Flowery Branch Inside City $ $1, $2, Outside City $1, $1, $3, Inside City $ $1, $1, City of Gainesville Public Utilities 2,3 Outside City $ $1, $2, Henry County Combined Henry County and Sewerage Authority Inside County $ $ $1, Outside County $1, $1, $2, City of Hampton $1, $1, $2, City of Locust Grove $1, $1, $2, City of McDonough $1, $1, $2, City of Stockbridge $1, $ $1,
27 TABLE 3: 2010 Commercial & Bill Example 1 ; continued Paulding County Combined Paulding County System $ $ $1, City of Dallas Inside City $1, $1, $3, Outside City $1, $1, $3, City of Hiram $ N/A 4 Rockdale County Combined Rockdale Resources $ $ $1, This analysis assumes a commercial establishment with a 2" meter using 150,000 gallons of water each month. 2 Billed in cubic feet. Rates converted to gallons for comparison purposes. 3 Have excessive use penalty or surcharge. Surcharge not included in these calculations. 4 Not applicable. Service is not available or does not exist in the area. 5 service provided and billed by Newnan Utilities. 6 service is provided by Fayette County System. Sewer service is provided by the municipality, but billed by Fayette County System. 7 service outside of city is provided by Fulton County System. 8 Sewer service provided and billed by County. 21
28 Table 4a: Rate Summary Number of Jurisdiction Base Charge 1 Commodity Charge 1 ($/gallon) Rate Type Blocks Billing Cycle Bartow County Bartow County Residential 4.77 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-5,000 Increasing Block 4 Department 4.92 / 1,000 = 6,000-8, / 1,000 = 9,000-15, / 1,000 = 16,000 Commercial (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform Industrial varies by meter / 1,000 Uniform City of Adairsville Inside City ,000 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = > 3,000 Uniform Outside City ,000 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = > 3,000 Uniform City of Cartersville Res Inside City 6.00 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-7,480 Increasing Block 4 Department / 1,000 = 8,228-10, / 1,000 = 11,220-14, / 1,000 = > 14,960 Res Outside City (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-7,480 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 8,228-10, / 1,000 = 11,220-14, / 1,000 = > 14,960 Com Inside City (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform Com Outside City (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform Industrial Inside City (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform Industrial Outside City (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform City of Emerson Res Inside City / 1,000 = 0-5,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 5,000-10, / 1,000 = > 10,000 Res Outside City / 1,000 = 0-5,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 5,000-10, / 1,000 = > 10,000 Com Inside City (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform Com Outside City (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform City of Kingston Inside City 8.00 (varies by meter) / 1,000 Increasing Block 4 4 Outside City (varies by meter) / 1,000 Increasing Block 4 4 Com Inside City (varies by meter) / 1,000 Increasing Block 4 2 Com Outside City (varies by meter) / 1,000 Increasing Block 4 2 City of White Res Inside City , / 1,000 Uniform Res Outside City , / 1,000 Uniform Com Inside City ,000 (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform Com Outside City ,000 (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform Cherokee County Cherokee County and Residential / 1,000 = 1,000-2,000 Increasing Block 3 Sewerage Authority 5.00 / 1,000 = 3,000-10, / 1,000 = > 10,000 Commercial , / 1,000 = > 34,000 Uniform (varies by meter and consumption) 2 22
29 Table 4a: Rate Summary; continued Number of Jurisdiction Base Charge 1 Commodity Charge 1 ($/gallon) Rate Type Blocks Billing Cycle Cherokee County City of Ball Ground Inside City / 1,000 = 0-3,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 3,001-5, / 1,000 = 5,001-8, / 1,000 = 8,001-10, / 1,000 = 10,001 Outside City / 1,000 = 0-3,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 3,001-5, / 1,000 = 5,001-8, / 1,000 = 8,001-10, / 1,000 = 10,001 City of Canton Residential , / 1,000 = 3,000-10,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 11,000-15, / 1,000 = 16,000 Com/Ind , / 1,000 = 3,000 Uniform City of Waleska Residential , / 1,000 = 2,000-5,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 5,000-15, / 1,000 = > 15,000 Small Commercial , / 1,000 = 2,000-5,000 Increasing Block 3 (less than 2" meter) 6.48 / 1,000 = 5,000-15, / 1,000 = > 15,000 Institutional , / 1,000 = 10, ,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = > 100,000 City of Woodstock , / 1,000 = 1,000-10,000 Increasing Block 2 and Sewer Utility Clayton County Clayton County Residential , / 1,000 = > 10, / 1,000 = 0-3,000 Increasing Block 4 Authority 4.81 / 1,000 = 4, 000-7, / 1,000 = 8,000-20, / 1,000 = > 20,000 Commercial ,000 (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform Cobb County Cobb County System Residential 7.00 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 1,000-3,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 4,000-15, / 1,000 = 16,000-29, / 1,000 = 30,000-49, / 1,000 = > 50,000 Com/Ind (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform City of Austell Inside City , / 1,000 = 2,001-7,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 7,001-15, / 1,000 = 15,001-50, / 1,000 = 50,001 Outside City , / 1,000 = 2,001-7,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 7,001-15, / 1,000 = 15,001-50, / 1,000 = > 50,001 23
30 Table 4a: Rate Summary; continued Number of Jurisdiction Base Charge 1 Commodity Charge 1 ($/gallon) Rate Type Blocks Billing Cycle Cobb County Marietta Power and Residential , / 1,000 = 2,000-7,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 7,000-12, / 1,000 = > 12,000 Commercial (based on , / 1,000 = 25,000 Uniform 2" meter) (varies by meter and consumption) 2 City of Powder Springs Res Inside City , / 1,000 = 2,001-6,000 Increasing Block 3 Department 5.34 / 1,000 = 6,001-15, / 1,000 = 15,001 Res Outside City , / 1,000 = 2,001-6,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 6,001-15, / 1,000 = 15,001 Commercial , / 1,000 = > 2,001 Uniform City of Smyrna Residential (varies by meter) 2, / 1,000 = 0-3,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 3,001-7, / 1,000 = 7,001-14, / 1,000 = 14,001 Multi-Family/Com (varies by meter) 2, / 1,000 Uniform Coweta County Coweta County Residential / 1,000 = 0-5,000 Increasing Block 4 and Sewerage Authority 7.32 / 1,000 = 5,001-15, / 1,000 = 15,001-30, / 1,000 = 30,001 Com/Ind / 1,000 = 0-5,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 5,001-15, / 1,000 = 15,001-30, / 1,000 = 30,001 Church/School / 1,000 Uniform City of Grantville Residential , / 1,000 = 2,001-5,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = > 5,000 Commercial , / 1,000 = 2,001-5,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = > 5,000 Newnan Utilities Res Inside City / 1,000 = 0-4,500 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 4,501-10, / 1,000 = > 10,000 Res Outside City / 1,000 = 0-4,500 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 4,501-10, / 1,000 = > 10,000 Com Inside City / 1,000 = 0-16,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 16,001-70, / 1,000 = > 70,000 Com Outside City / 1,000 = 0-16,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 16,001-70, / 1,000 = > 70,000 City of Senoia Residential , / 1,000 = 1,501-10,000 Increasing Block 2 Commercial , / 1,000 = 10, / 1,000 = 1,501-10,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 10,000 Industrial , / 1,000 = 1,501-10,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 10,000 24
31 Table 4a: Rate Summary; continued Number of Jurisdiction Base Charge 1 Commodity Charge 1 ($/gallon) Rate Type Blocks Billing Cycle Coweta County Town of Turin Residential , / 1,000 = 2,001-5,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 5,001-10, / 1,000 = > 10,001 Commercial , / 1,000 = 2,001-5,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 5,001-10, / 1,000 = > 10,000 DeKalb County DeKalb County and Res / Small Com 3.60 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-4,000 Increasing Block 4 Bimonthly Sewer 1.94 / 1,000 = 4,001-20, / 1,000 = 20,001-40, / 1,000 = > 40,000 Commercial (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform Douglas County Douglasville-Douglas County Residential based on 9.60 (varies by meter) 2, / 1,000 = 0-6,000 Increasing Block 3 and Sewer Authority 3/4" meter 4.86 / 1,000 = 6,001-9, / 1,000 = > 9,000 Commercial based on / 1,000 = 0-48,000 Increasing Block 3 2" meter (varies by meter and consumption) 2, / 1,000 = 48,001-72, / 1,000 = > 72,000 City of Villa Rica Res Inside City 6.50 (varies by meter) / 1000 = 0-5,000 Increasing Block / 1000 = 5,001-8, / 1000 = > 8,500 Res Outside City 9.75 (varies by meter) / 1000 = 0-5,000 Increasing Block / 1000 = 5,001-8, / 1000 = > 8,500 Com Inside City based on / 1000 = 0-85,000 Increasing Block 3 2" meter (varies by meter and consumption) 2, / 1000 = 85, , / 1000 = > 250,000 Com Outside City based / 1000 = 0-85,000 Increasing Block 3 on 2" meter (varies by meter and consumption) 2, / 1000 = 85, , / 1000 = > 250,000 Fayette County Fayette County System Small Res (3/4" & 1" , / 1,000 = 2,001-19,999 Increasing Block 2 meters) 4.39 / 1,000 = 20,000 Large Res (1 1/2", 2", (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-19,999 Increasing Block 2 3", & 4" meters) Commercial (varies by meter) / 1,000 = > 19, / 1,000 Uniform Town of Brooks provided by the County City of Fayetteville Residential , / 1,000 = > 2,000-10,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 10,000-20, / 1,000 = > 20,000 Commercial , / 1,000 = > 2,000 Uniform Peachtree City and Sewerage Authority provided by the County Town of Tyrone provided by the County 25
32 Table 4a: Rate Summary; continued Number of Jurisdiction Base Charge 1 Commodity Charge 1 ($/gallon) Rate Type Blocks Billing Cycle Forsyth County Forsyth County and Residential ,000 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 1,000-6,000 Increasing Block 5 Sewer 4.53 / 1,000 = 6,000-12, / 1,000 = 12,000-24, / 1,000 = 24,000-36, / 1,000 = > 36,000 Commercial ,000 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = > 1,000 Uniform City of Cumming Res Inside City / 1,000 = 0-6,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 6,001-16, / 1,000 = > 16,600 Res Outside City / 1,000 = 0-6,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 6,001-16,600 Com Inside City , / 1,000 = > 16, / 1,000 = > 3,000 Uniform Com Outside City , / 1,000 = > 3,000 Uniform Fulton County North Fulton County Residential 6.90 (varies by meter) / 1,000 Seasonal Increasing 4 3 Bimonthly System Commercial (varies by meter) / 1,000 Seasonal Increasing 4 3 City of Atlanta Department of Inside City / 1,000 = 0-2,244 Increasing Block 3 shed Management / 1,000 = 2,992-4, / 1,000 = > 4,488 Outside City / 1,000 = 0-2,244 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 2,992-4, / 1,000 = > 4,488 City of College Park Residential / 1,000 = 0-4,000 Increasing Block 3 Multi Family / 1,000 = 4,001-8, / 1,000 = > 8, / 1,000 = 0-4,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 4,001-8, / 1,000 = > 8,000 Commercial / 1,000 Uniform City of East Point Residential ,000 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 4,000-7,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 8,000-15, / 1,000 = 16,000 Multi-Family/Comm ,000 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 4,000-7,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 8,000-15, / 1,000 = 16,000 City of Fairburn Res Inside City , / 1,000 = 2,001-4,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 4,001-6, / 1,000 = 6,001-9, / 1,000 = > 9,000 Res Outside City , / 1,000 = 2,001-4,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 4,001-6, / 1,000 = 6,001-9, / 1,000 = > 9,000 Com Inside City based on , / 1,000 = 2,000-20,000 Increasing Block 3 2" meter / 1,000 = 20,001-36, / 1,000 = 36,001 Com Outside City based , / 1,000 = 2,000-20,000 Increasing Block 3 on 2" meter / 1,000 = 20,001-36, / 1,000 = 36,001 26
33 Table 4a: Rate Summary; continued Number of Jurisdiction Base Charge 1 Commodity Charge 1 ($/gallon) Rate Type Blocks Billing Cycle Fulton County City of Hapeville , / 1,000 = > 2,000 - < 10,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = > 10,000 - < 50, / 1,000 = > 50,000 City of Mountain Park , / 1,000 = 4,500-8,500 Increasing Block , / 1,000 = > 8,500 City of Palmetto Residential , / 1,000 = 3,000-8,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 9,000-20, / 1,000 = 21,000 Commercial , / 1,000 = 3,000-10,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 11,000 City of Roswell Residential 7.00 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-10,000 Increasing Block 3 Bimonthly 7.40 / 1,000 = 10,001-20, / 1,000 = > 20,001 Small Commercial (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-100,000 Increasing Block 3 Bimonthly 7.40 / 1,000 = 100, , / 1,000 = > 150,001 Large Commercial (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-245,000 Increasing Block 3 Bimonthly 7.40 / 1,000 = 245, , / 1,000 = > 600,001 City of Union City (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-15,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = > 15,000 Gwinnett County Gwinnett County Residential 7.50 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-8,000 Increasing Block 3 Resources 6.17 / 1,000 = 8,001-12, / 1,000 = > 12,000 Commercial (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform Town of Braselton (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 2,001-5,000 Increasing Block 3 City of Buford Res Inside City 4.75 / 1,000 = 5,001-10, / 1,000 = > 10, / 1,000 = 0-8,000 Increasing Block 3 Res Outside City 1.40 / 1,000 = 8,000-15, / 1,000 = > 15, / 1,000 = 0-8,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 8,000-15, / 1,000 = > 15,000 Com/Ind (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform City of Lawrenceville Residential , / 1,000 Seasonal Increasing 4 3 Commercial , / 1,000 Seasonal Increasing 4 3 City of Norcross (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-5,000 Increasing Block 3 City of Suwanee , / 1,000 = 5, , / 1,000 = > 100, / 1,000 = 2,001-5,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 5,001-10, / 1,000 = > 10,001 27
34 Table 4a: Rate Summary; continued Number of Jurisdiction Base Charge 1 Commodity Charge 1 ($/gallon) Rate Type Blocks Billing Cycle Hall County City of Flowery Branch Res Inside City , / 1,000 = 4,501-7,500 Increasing Block 2 (Built before June 2000) 5.80 / 1,000 = 7,501 Res Inside City , / 1,000 = 4,501-7,500 Increasing Block 2 (Built after June 2000) Res Outside City , / 1,000 = 7, / 1,000 = 4,501-7,500 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 7,501 Com Inside City , / 1,000 = 7,001-60,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 60,001 Com Outside City , / 1,000 = 7,001-60,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 60,001 City of Gainesville Res Inside City / 1,000 = 0-7,480 Increasing Block 3 Public Utilities / 1,000 = 8,228-13, / 1,000 = > 13,464 Res Outside City / 1,000 = 0-7,480 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 8,228-13, / 1,000 = > 13,464 Com/Multi-Family / 1,000 Increasing Block 4 3 Inside City Com/Multi-Family / 1,000 Increasing Block 4 3 Outside City Industrial Inside City / 1,000 Uniform Industrial Outside City / 1,000 Uniform Henry County Henry County and Res Inside County / 1,000 = 0-6,000 Increasing Block 3 Sewerage Authority 5.24 / 1,000 = 6,001-10, / 1,000 = 10,001 Res Outside County 150% of Res Inside County rate Increasing Block 3 Com/Ind Inside County (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform Com/Ind Outside County 150% of Com/Ind Inside County rate Uniform City of Hampton / 1,000 = 0-6,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 6,001-10, / 1,000 = 10,001 City of Locust Grove , / 1,000 = 2,001-10,000 Increasing Block 2 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 10,001 City of McDonough , / 1,000 = 3,001-9,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = > 9,000 City of Stockbridge Residential 6.00 (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-4,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 4,001-9, / 1,000 = 9,001 Commercial (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-10,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 10,001 Paulding County Paulding County System Residential / 1,000 = 0-8,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 8,001-16,000 Commercial / 1,000 = > 16, / 1,000 Uniform 28
35 Table 4a: Rate Summary; continued Number of Jurisdiction Base Charge 1 Commodity Charge 1 ($/gallon) Rate Type Blocks Billing Cycle Paulding County City of Dallas Res Inside City 6.78 = 2,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 0-6, / 1,000 = 6,001-10, / 1,000 = 10,001-14, / 1,000 = > 14,000 Res Outside City 6.78 = 2,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 0-6, / 1,000 = 6,001-10, / 1,000 = 10,001-14, / 1,000 = > 14,000 Com Inside City 6.78 = 2,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 0-6, / 1,000 = 6,001-10, / 1,000 = 10,001-14, / 1,000 = > 14,000 Com Outside City 6.78 = 2,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 0-6, / 1,000 = 6,001-10, / 1,000 = 10,001-14, / 1,000 = > 14,000 City of Hiram , / 1,000 = 2,000-6,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 6,001-8, / 1,000 = > 8,000 Rockdale County Rockdale Resources Residential (varies by meter) / 1,000 = 0-6,000 Increasing Block / 1,000 = 7,000-12, / 1,000 = 13,000 Com/Ind (varies by meter) / 1,000 Uniform 1 The water rates are the same for all customer classes unless otherwise noted. (Res - Residential, Com - Commercial, Ind - Industrial) 2 The utility has a minimum fee based on the size of the water meter. See table 4b for details on cost by meter size. Certain minimum fees also vary by consumption. For example, for a 3/4" meter a utility may have a minimum charge of $10 for the first 2,000 gallons and charge $60 for the first 25,000 on a 2" meter. 3 Billed in cubic feet. Rates converted to gallons for comparison purposes. 4 See Table 6 for Surcharge Rates 5 minimum charge is combined with wastewater minimum charge. 6 The utility rate structure varies based on meter size. For example, a 3/4" meter may have the first tier from 0-3,000 gallons while a 2" meter may have the first tier from 0-48,000 gallons. 29
Water & Wastewater Rate Survey
& Rate Survey Metropolitan North Georgia Planning District October 2008 This page intentionally left blank. & Rate Survey 2008 Metropolitan North Georgia Planning District October 2008 Prepared by Atlanta
More informationFreeport Tax Exemption Status
Appling 100% 100% 100% Baxley 100% 100% 100% Atkinson 0% 0% 0% Pearson 20% 20% 20% Willacoochee 20% 20% 20% Bacon 100% 100% 100% Alma 100% 100% 100% Baker 0% 0% 0% Baldwin 100% 100% 100% Milledgeville
More informationLIVABLE CENTERS INITIATIVE THE ATLANTA EXPERIENCE. Amy Goodwin Alabama Planning Association Conference May 2, 2013
LIVABLE CENTERS INITIATIVE THE ATLANTA EXPERIENCE Amy Goodwin Alabama Planning Association Conference May 2, 2013 Atlanta Regional Commission ARC is a multi-disciplinary regional planning agency with wide-ranging
More informationBid Specification Sheet. Georgia Cyber Academy- Testing Digital Learning Laptops & Equipment Rental and Support. Bid # FY
Bid Specification Sheet Georgia Cyber Academy- Testing Digital Learning Laptops & Equipment Rental and Support Bid # FY17-00010 January 13, 2017 Georgia Cyber Academy is seeking one supplier that can provide
More informationUnited Way of Greater Atlanta ANDAR Community Building Module Manual. LINK TO ANDAR SIGN ON PAGE:
United Way of Greater Atlanta ANDAR Community Building Module Manual LINK TO ANDAR SIGN ON PAGE: https://epledge.unitedwayatlanta.org/agency 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Welcome 3 2. What is Andar? 3 3. Helpful
More informationANDAR INSTRUCTIONS MANUAL
2019 2020 Child Well-Being Grant Renewal Application ANDAR INSTRUCTIONS MANUAL LINK TO ANDAR SIGN ON PAGE: https://epledge.unitedwayatlanta.org/begin.jsp TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Welcome and What is ANDAR?
More informationProposed Increase In Rates In Water, Sewer and Reclaimed. June 9, 2009
Proposed Increase In Rates In Water, Sewer and Reclaimed June 9, 2009 1 WATER 2 3 Reclaimed Water Accounts 27,500 25,000 22,500 20,000 17,500 15,000 12,500 10,000 7,500 5,000 2,500 387-24,863 4 FY 96 FY
More informationANDAR INSTRUCTIONS MANUAL
[Type here] 2017-2018 Year End Report ANDAR INSTRUCTIONS MANUAL LINK TO ANDAR SIGN ON PAGE: https://epledge.unitedwayatlanta.org/agency TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Welcome and What is ANDAR? 2 2. Helpful tips
More informationGeorgia Department of Education 2015 Four-Year Graduation Rate All Students
SYSTEM Districts/schools highlighted in yellow have incomplete data. Data will be updated at a later time. System 769 Chickamauga City ALL All Schools ALL Students 112 109 97.3 System 744 Union County
More informationJames P. Erb, CPA Auditor-Controller Treasurer-Tax Collector James W. Hamilton, CPA Assistant Auditor-Controller Treasurer-Tax Collector
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUDITOR - CONTROLLER TREASURER - TAX COLLECTOR James P. Erb, CPA Auditor-Controller Treasurer-Tax Collector James W. Hamilton, CPA Assistant Auditor-Controller Treasurer-Tax Collector
More information2018 GHSA State Cross Country Meet Box Assignments A-Private BOYS
A-Private BOYS 9 Individual(s) Athens Christian (1) 10 Individual(s) Mount de Sales Academy (1) 11 Area 4th Riverside Military 12 Area 4th Savannah Country Day 13 Area 3rd North Cobb Christian 14 Area
More informationKyeil Kim, Guy Rousseau, Kyung-Hwa Kim & David D Onofrio
Kyeil Kim, Guy Rousseau, Kyung-Hwa Kim & David D Onofrio 4 th International Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling April 30-May 2, 2012 Tampa, Florida Anti-intellectualism nurtured by the false notion
More information2017 GHSA State Cross Country Meet Box Assignments A-Private BOYS
A-Private BOYS 9 Individual(s) Mount de Sales Academy (1) 10 Individual(s) Tattnall Square Academy (1) 11 Area 4th Paideia 12 Area 4th Savannah Country Day 13 Area 3rd First Presbyterian 14 Area 3rd Galloway
More informationPUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT
ST. MARY S COUNTY GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT Denis D. Canavan, Director Board of County Commissioners: Thomas F. McKay, President Kenneth R. Dement, Commissioner Lawrence D.
More informationDallas Municipal Archives Archives Collections Finding Guides and Inventories
Dallas Municipal Archives Archives Collections Finding Guides and Inventories Guide No. 29A City of Dallas Water Works, 1890 1993 (Collection 91060) Processed by: Cindy Smolovik City Archivist Office of
More information2016 GHSA State Cross Country Meet Box Assignments A-Private BOYS
A-Private BOYS 9 Individual(s) Atlanta International (1) 10 Individual(s) Aquinas (1) 11 Area 4th Lakeview Academy 12 Area 4th St. Francis 13 Area 3rd Stratford Academy 14 Area 3rd Galloway 15 Area 2nd
More information5/4/2018. General Manager, Calhoun Utilities 700 West Line Street, Calhoun, GA Phone: (706) ; Vickery;
, Partner (Development Incentives, Energy & Public Finance) Alston & Bird LLP, 1201 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Phone: 404-881-4510; Cell: 404-285-0155; e-mail: peter.floyd@alston.com
More informationSAN JOSE WATER COMPANY (U-168-W) Advice Letter No. 513 Attachment F Page 1 of 2 A copy of Advice Letter No. 513 has been sent to the following municipalities, water companies and interested parties: City
More informationFinal Benchmarking Policy and Procedures
Final Benchmarking Policy and Procedures Strategic Plan Task 3.1.1 Deliverable 2.2.3 Funded by Southern California Edison Company Local Government Strategic Plan Strategies Program 2013 2015 Program Period
More informationAnnual Report for the Utility Savings Initiative
Report to the North Carolina General Assembly Annual Report for the Utility Savings Initiative July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY http://portal.ncdenr.org Page
More informationFACILITY SERVICES UILDINBUILDG
FACILITY SERVICES UILDINBUILDG PROGRAM MAP Facilities, Real Estate & Environment and Energy Facilities Management Real Estate Environment & Energy Custodial Care Appraise Property Research & Policy Development
More informationCITY OF NORTH OLMSTED ORDINANCE NO
CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED ORDINANCE NO. 2011-74 BY: Mayor Kennedy AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 915.04 OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED TO ESTABLISH REVISED CHARGES FOR THE USE OF THE
More informationTOWN OF FARMINGTON FEE SCHEDULE 2018 Adopted by Town Board Resolution #80 of 2018
TOWN OF FARMINGTON FEE SCHEDULE 2018 Adopted by Town Board Resolution #80 of 2018 All of the following town fees are to be paid at the Town Clerk s Office during normal business hours, Monday through Friday,
More informationTOWN OF FARMINGTON FEE SCHEDULE 2017
TOWN OF FARMINGTON FEE SCHEDULE 2017 Adopted by Town Board Resolution # of 2017 All of the following town fees are to be paid at the Town Clerk s Office during normal business hours, Monday through Friday,
More informationSan Diego County Water Authority vs. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
San Diego County Water Authority vs. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 1 2 Metropolitan Water District: 26 Member Agencies City of Anaheim City of Beverly Hills City of Burbank City of
More informationEnergy Benchmarking Commercial Buildings. Cities that support or require energy benchmarking of commercial buildings
Energy Benchmarking Commercial Buildings Cities that support or require energy benchmarking of commercial buildings Large Cities (250,000+ people) Madison WI 250,000 We are working on a voluntary program.
More informationTHE NEXUS OF LEAK DETECTION & ASSET MANAGEMENT
THE NEXUS OF LEAK DETECTION & ASSET MANAGEMENT AN INNOVATIVE AND EFFICIENT APPROACH IN SAN MARCOS, TX & SAN JUAN, PR Wayne Pratt WPratt@wachsws.com (847) 946-5907 Agenda Leak Detection Key Drivers Methodology
More information2017 UPWP UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
2017 UPWP UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM for the Atlanta Metropolitan Transportation Planning Area www.atlantaregional.com Draft Document- Fall 2017 TCC Adoption anticipated for 11/4/2016 TAQC Adoption
More informationCity Of London Environmental & Engineering Services Department Wastewater Treatment Operations
City Of London Environmental & Engineering Services Department Wastewater Treatment Operations Greenway Pollution Control Centre 2014 Annual Report February 2015 Page 1 of 87 Summary This annual report
More information2016 SAC Task Force. December 1, 2016
2016 SAC Task Force December 1, 2016 Welcome and Introductions Ned Smith, MCES Director of Finance & Revenue Wendy Wulff, Metropolitan Council Member Meeting 1 Overview Charter, Timeline & Meeting Plan,
More information1605 Lakes Parkway. Lawrenceville, Georgia Gwinnett County. 100,000 SF (Expandable) 17.7 Acres
Sandy Springs Downtown Atlanta FULTON 400 Alpharetta 675 Sugar Hill GWINNETT Grayson Conyers Dacula Lawrenceville Loganville WALTON Oxford Covington Gwinnett County Office / WAREHOUSE for SALE - lender
More informationService Plan for Infrastructure Engineering
Service Plan for Infrastructure 2016-2019 Capital Regional District Date submitted: Revised: August 14, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Overview... 1 1.1 Division & Service Summary... 1 1.2 Organization Chart...
More informationStephanie Stuckey Chief Resilience Officer
Stephanie Stuckey Chief Resilience Officer Helping cities around the world become more resilient to the physical, social and economic challenges that are a growing part of the 21st century. 2 100RC MEMBER
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ITS SMART METER UNIVERSAL DEPLOYMENT PLAN
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. 2 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ITS SMART METER UNIVERSAL DEPLOYMENT PLAN DOCKET NO. M-2009-2123944
More informationCLAYTON COUNTY TRANSIT INITIATIVE. Technical Advisory Committee/ Stakeholder Advisory Committee Webinar August 29, 2017
CLAYTON COUNTY TRANSIT INITIATIVE Technical Advisory Committee/ Stakeholder Advisory Committee Webinar August 29, 2017 AGENDA Welcome! Introduction of Speakers Webinar Housekeeping Project Overview & Status
More information2016 UPWP UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
2016 UPWP UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM for the Atlanta Metropolitan Transportation Planning Area www.atlantaregional.com Draft for Adoption TCC- 11/6, TAQC 11/12, ARC Board 12/2 From the ARC Title VI
More informationCOUNCIL REPORT. Item Meeting date: August 13, 2018 Engineering & Public Works
Item 7.3.5 Meeting date: August 13, 2018 Department: Prepared by: Reviewed by: SUBJECT: Engineering & Public Works COUNCIL REPORT George Elliott, P.Eng., Director of Engineering & Public Works Greg McClinchey,
More informationGEORGIA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRENDS NEW & NEXT AROUND THE STATE
GEORGIA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRENDS NEW & NEXT AROUND THE STATE Tom Croteau Georgia Department of Economic Development Brian Kastick PortFresh Logistics Steve Grable Jones, Lang, LaSalle Bert Brantley
More informationLoad-balancing service
Load-balancing service OVERVIEW COSTS OF LOAD-BALANCING SERVICE Load-balancing is the management of variations between summer and winter consumption. While there may be significant seasonal fluctuations
More informationTRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Business Plan
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 2018 Business Plan Today s Agenda Mission Department Overview Planning Initiatives Commission Priorities and 2018 Budget Requests Five-year Plan Department of Transportation Mission
More informationSafe Kids Athens. Safe Kids Carroll/Harralson. Safe Kids Chattooga. Safe Kids Cherokee. Safe Kids Clayton. Safe Kids Cobb
Safe Kids Athens Safe Kids Carroll/Harralson Safe Kids Chattooga Safe Kids Cherokee Safe Kids Clayton Safe Kids Cobb Coordinator: Kathy Sego Counties served: Clarke Lead Agency: Athens Regional Medical
More informationA Growing Hub in the Heart of the Bakken
A Growing Hub in the Heart of the Bakken Presented to the Interim Energy Development and Transmission Committee March 8, 2018 Key Points 1 2 3 CITY GROWTH 2006-2017 DEBT SERVICE GROWTH 2008-2018 CONTINUED
More informationVillage of Gowanda 2017/18 Budget. Village of Gowanda: March 28, 2017
Village of Gowanda 2017/18 Budget Village of Gowanda: March 28, 2017 Police Department Public Works Department Highlights Projected Outlook Village of Gowanda, March 2017 Organizational Chart 2017-18 Officer
More informationAGENDA SPARTANBURG SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING. MEETING PLACE: 200 Commerce Street. Tuesday, January 24, 2012, 2:15 p.m.
AGENDA SPARTANBURG SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MEETING PLACE: 200 Commerce Street, 2:15 p.m. This is a regular meeting of the Spartanburg Sanitary Sewer District Commission. Written
More information5 Servicing Capacity Assignment for Aurora, East Gwillimbury and Newmarket
Clause 5 in Report No. 11 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on June 28, 2018. 5 Servicing Capacity Assignment
More informationSENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 12, 2016
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER, 0 Sponsored by: Senator STEPHEN M. SWEENEY District (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem) Senator LINDA R. GREENSTEIN District (Mercer and
More informationAT&T Billing Glossary
# A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z # 411 An information/directory Assistance service provided by operators who assist customers in obtaining the telephone number(s) they wish to call.
More informationPASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this
ORDINANCE NO. 5340 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, amending and reestablishing the assessments, rates, fees, and charges established in Ordinance No. 5324 relating
More informationCURRENT BROADBAND ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE IN EL DORADO COUNTY
CURRENT BROADBAND ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE IN EL DORADO COUNTY January 2018 Abstract This report has been assembled for the County of El Dorado to summarize preliminary activities of the Countywide
More informationNortheast Georgia WIA Eligible Provider List
Northeast Georgia WIA Eligible Provider List The State Eligible Provider List (EPL) is currently under modification by the Governor s Office of Workforce Development. During this time, our local area will
More informationMount Pleasant Waterworks. Cross-Connection Control Program Guidelines October 2010
Mount Pleasant Waterworks Cross-Connection Control Program Guidelines October 2010 1 PREFACE The purpose of this policy is to protect the public water supply from the possibility of contamination. The
More informationHapeville WI-FI Network. Project Status Report
Hapeville WI-FI Network Project Status Report Project Background The Hapeville Wireless Network will use wireless mesh technology that will be implemented in a two phased approach Phase A and Phase B.
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. General Information. I. Territory to Which the Rate Schedule Applies... 9
PSC NO: 9 GAS LEAF: 2 COMPANY: CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. REVISION: 4 INITIAL EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/01/15 SUPERSEDING REVISION: 3 Effective date postponed to 01/01/2016. See Supplement
More informationCASE STUDIES. Brevard Community College: Florida Power & Light. Cape Canaveral Air Force Station: NORESCO
6 CASE STUDIES Brevard Community College: Florida Power & Light City of Miami Beach: Johnson Controls, Inc. Cape Canaveral Air Force Station: NORESCO Arbor Shoreline Office Park: Progress Energy Solutions
More informationAdopted by La Mesa City Council July 9, 2013 Resolution
Adopted by La Mesa City Council July 9, 2013 Resolution 2013-059 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... A-1 INTRODUCTION... I-1 Vision... I-1 Background... I-1 Citizen Participation... I-3 Planning in La
More informationMARTA Transit Oriented Development Update Regional Transit Committee Thursday, May 14, 2015
MARTA Transit Oriented Development Update Regional Transit Committee Thursday, May 14, 2015 1 Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Goals Transit-oriented development, or TOD, means development that is vibrant,
More informationTraverse City Asset Management Plan
Utilities and Public Services Larry LaCross, GISP, Asset Management/GIS Analyst Traverse City Department of Public Services Introduction About Traverse City (TC) TC Assets Department of Public Services
More informationMAJOR PROJECTS STRATEGY
MAJOR PROJECTS STRATEGY Texas Transportation Commission October 25, 2017 Outline and Goals Current TexasClearLanes initiatives to mitigate congestion for non-tolled projects Review Unified Transportation
More informationFrontier Telephone Companies TARIFF FCC NO. 3 1st Revised Page 3-1 Cancels Original Page 3-1 ACCESS SERVICE
1st Revised Page 3-1 Cancels Original Page 3-1 3. End User Access Service The Telephone Company will provide End User Access Service (End User Access) to End Users who obtain Local Telephone Service from
More informationCouncil of State Governments. Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing. October 28, 2013
Council of State Governments Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing October 28, 2013 Takoma Langley Transit Center Purpose and Need Provide a safe, attractive and efficient facility
More informationInformation Technology Community Involvement
Information Technology Community Involvement Tom Hoover Associate Vice Chancellor Helping students achieve through technology Information Technology at the University of Tennessee Chattanooga is focused
More informationTOWN MANAGER S WEEKLY REPORT
TOWN MANAGER S WEEKLY REPORT UPCOMING MEETINGS & EVENTS Planning Commission Meeting: Wednesday, February 15, 6:00 PM, Town Hall 1. Shops of College Park Retail and Hotel 2. VA Clinic Additional Signage
More informationBROADBAND STATUTES AND RECENT LEGISLATION
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov 68-West Statehouse 300 SW 10th Ave. Topeka, Kansas 66612-1504 (785) 296-3181 January 15, 2019 kslegislature.org/klrd BROADBAND STATUTES AND RECENT LEGISLATION Statutes Forty-three
More informationTERMS OF SERVICE Delta County Tele-Comm, Inc. Section 6 d/b/a TDS Telecom Original Sheet 1 Colorado LOCAL EXCHANGE SERVICES
d/b/a TDS Telecom Original Sheet 1 A. LOCAL EXCHANGE ACCESS SERVICE 1. General Description Local Exchange Access Service (Switching and Access Line) provides for an access line and the ability to switch
More informationUrban Land Institute A Bend in the Road
Urban Land Institute A Bend in the Road Brian Beaulieu CEO 216 Forecast Results 2 Duration Accuracy US GDP 15 99.1% US Ind. Prod. 1 99.9% Eur Ind. Prod. 15 99.2% Canada Ind Prod 15 99.6% China Ind Prod
More informationTOWN OF ARNPRIOR STRATEGIC PLAN AT A GLANCE ( )
VISION 2019 1. Robust sustainable growth We have solid economic development and growth management strategies resulting in expanded commercial, retail activity and industrial base. Our Values LONG TERM
More information2015 Major Projects Work Program
2015 Major Projects Work Program COMMUNITY SERVICES November 2015 Charter Amendment Election Conduct Coordinated Election with Douglas County on Town Charter Amendment to move Town elections to November
More informationT-CON: The Midwest Water & Wastewater Technology Conference Wednesday, June 5, College of Lake County, Grayslake, IL
T-CON: The Midwest Water & Wastewater Technology Conference Wednesday, June 5, 2013 - College of Lake County, Grayslake, IL Water 20/20: Bringing Smart Water Networks Into Focus Smart Water Networks Right
More informationRepowering Downtown Austin
Repowering Downtown Austin Downtown Then and Now Downtown Skyline 2000 Downtown Skyline in 2018 2 Downtown Customers Residential Customers 15,000 - Population of Downtown Residents 946 - Condo Units Under
More informationSTATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION ORDER
STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION The Citizens Utility Board and : The Environmental Defense Fund : : 14-0507 Proceeding to Adopt the Illinois Open Data : Access Framework. : By the Commission:
More informationLOUISVILLE UTILITY AND PUBLIC WORKS ADVISORY GROUP UTILITY OPERATIONS REVIEW
14 Marrch 2012 LOUISVILLE UTILITY AND PUBLIC WORKS ADVISORY GROUP UTILITY OPERATIONS REVIEW OVERVIEW Introduction Industry Overview Management Best Practices Benchmarking Other Utility Governance Models
More information20.6 Million. 8,426 students ICT taught in instructors preparing the ICT workforce. 46,987 students since inception
Corporate Social Responsibility Cisco Networking Academy Impact Profile Georgia Education and technology are two of the greatest social equalizers. Education helps people improve their economic opportunities,
More informationAddressing Classroom and Technology Needs
SPLOST IV Addressing Classroom and Technology Needs SPLOST IV The Plan for bringing g Gwinnett s building needs in check by 2014 and for providing technology to support students instructionallyi SPLOST
More informationLakeland, Florida Entitled 44 Acre Site: Retail / Multi-Family
Lakeland, Florida Entitled 44 Acre Site: Retail / Multi-Family Internal street, utilities storm retention system in place hauger Property information Outparcels, Major Retail, and Multi-Family entitled
More informationManaging Energy at Your Small Drinking Water System A Workshop Series for New Hampshire Utilities
Managing Energy at Your Small Drinking Water System A Series for New Hampshire Utilities 2 08/24/16 Lincoln Town Hall, Lincoln, NH Facilitator David R. Tucker This program is made possible under a cooperative
More informationTOWN MANAGER S WEEKLY REPORT
TOWN MANAGER S WEEKLY REPORT UPCOMING MEETINGS & EVENTS Town Council Meeting: Wednesday, May 10, 7:00 PM, Regular Meeting, Town Hall Planning Commission: Wednesday, May 17, 6:00 PM, Town Hall 1. Public
More informationMunicipal Service Park 3 December Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex
Municipal Service Park 3 December 2010 Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex Overview: Operational Challenges and Opportunities South East Connector impacts Opportunities: The South
More informationFRONT RANGE FIRE RESCUE Plan Review and Permit Fee Schedule
Site Square Footage FRONT RANGE FIRE RESCUE Plan Review and Permit Fee Schedule Development Review Deposit Building or Site Plan Review Fire Sprinkler System Fire Alarm System Residential Subdivision Review
More information3. Authorize budget changes as outlined in the Financial Impacts and Budget Actions section of this report.
City Council Report To: From: Mayor and City Council City Council Meeting: March 1, 2016 Agenda Item: 3.B Jory Wolf, Chief Information Officer, Information Systems Department, Broadband Subject: Digital
More informationDESCRIPTION OF COST ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY
Filed: September, 00 EB-00-00 Exhibit G Schedule Page of 0 DESCRIPTION OF COST ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY.0 INTRODUCTION This schedule provides an overview of the cost allocation methodology used to allocate
More informationRATES AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2015
RATES AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2015 RATES AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2015 OFFICE OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS Table of Contents 1....1 2. Intrastate...2 3. Interstate...15 4. Interstate Per-Line Charges...28 5. Message Toll
More informationSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No
SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION No. 16-021 WHEREAS, In Fiscal Year 2015, the San Francisco Juvenile Court adjudicated approximately 819 transit violation citations
More informationTown of Smithfield. Monthly Financial Statements Fiscal Year For the Month Ended August 31, 2015
Town of Smithfield Monthly Financial Statements Fiscal Year 2015-2016 For the Month Ended August 31, 2015 Town of Smithfield Year to Date Revenues For the period ending: August 31, 2015 Remaining Actuals
More informationJil~,il~~iiiiiiii!:ii==~=
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp '. 'I LEGISLA Jil~,il~~iiiiiiii!:ii==~=
More informationSTATE OF ALASKA THE REGULATORY COMMISSION OF ALASKA ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE INCLUSION OF GAS STORAGE FEES IN GAS COST ADJUSTMENT
STATE OF ALASKA THE REGULATORY COMMISSION OF ALASKA Before Commissioners: Robert M. Pickett, Chairman Stephen McAlpine Rebecca L. Pauli Norman Rokeberg Janis W. Wilson In the Matter of the Tariff Revision
More informationS TR EET L IG HT I NG
S TR EET L IG HT I NG ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FISCAL YEARS 214-218 FY 214-218 Capital Improvement Program Priority Description Total Estimated Costs Appropriated Through FY 213 Adopted
More informationReston Town Center North Development. Community Update
Reston Town Center North Development Community Update May 31, 2017 1 Presentation Agenda Project Overview Site and Current Property Ownerships Development Plan/Grid of Streets Proposed Ownership Comprehensive
More informationEnergy Benchmarking and Disclosure
That enforce branding Emerging Best Practices: Energy Benchmarking and Disclosure in U.S. Cities Caroline Keicher Program Manager, Building Energy Performance Policy Institute for Market Transformation
More informationMonthly Indicators + 1.4% + 6.4% % Activity Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price
Monthly Indicators 2018 Last year, U.S. consumers seemed to be operating with a renewed but cautious optimism. The stock market was strong, wages were edging upwards and home buying activity was extremely
More informationMEDIA RELEASE. For Immediate Release: Contact: David Ginsborg May 20, 2013 (408)
County of Santa Clara Office of the County Assessor County Government Center, East Wing 70 West Hedding Street San Jose, California 95110-1770 1-408-299-5500 FAX 1-408-297-9526 E-Mail: david.ginsborg@asr.sccgov.org
More informationEnvironmental Impact Questionnaire
Community Development Department 11 English Street Petaluma, CA 94952 Phone: 707-778-4301 Email: cdd@ci.petaluma.ca.us Web: www.cityofpetaluma.net/cdd Building Geographic Information Systems Housing Neighborhood
More informationPACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 1 Original Page 4-1 ACCESS SERVICE. 4.5 Payment Arrangements and Credit Allowances 4-4
Original Page 4-1 Page No. N 4. END USER 4.1 General Description 4-2 4.2 Limitations 4-2 4.3 Undertaking of the Telephone Company 4-2 4.4 Obligations of the End User 4-3 4.5 Payment Arrangements and Credit
More informationCOUNTY OF PERTH. Corporate Services Department. Archives Division (Stratford-Perth Archives) Business Plan.
COUNTY OF PERTH Corporate Services Department Archives Division (Stratford-Perth Archives) 2017-2019 Business Plan September, 2016 This document is available in alternate formats upon request. This document
More informationDowntown Boise Multimodal Center
Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment June 2009 Prepared by the Federal Transit Administration and Valley Regional Transit. U.S. Department
More informationGORE BUILDING. 238 N. Massachusetts Avenue, Lakeland, FL 33801
GORE BUILDING 238 N. Massachusetts Avenue, Lakeland, FL 33801 CDB LOCATION REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT MUNN PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT INCENTIVES AVAILABLE ADJACENT PARKING INCLUDED BK698301 Phone: (863) 683-3425
More informationBreaking. Ground. New State of the Utilities Report
Breaking New Ground 2015 State of the Utilities Report Breaking New Ground for the Future This year marked 75 years of service for Huntsville Utilities. It also marked a year of planning and preparing
More informationProposed FY 06 Project Development Program and FY 05 Project Development Program Update
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Proposed FY 06 Project Development Program and FY 05 Project Development Program Update Presented to the Board of Directors: P D E C Planning & Development
More informationTerri Egan, Co-Chair Ken Ringler, Co-Chair. Presented to:
20/20 Advisory Committee Terri Egan, Co-Chair Ken Ringler, Co-Chair Presented to: Bethlehem Town Board June 24, 2009 Formed by Town Board in January 2008 Consider strategic direction of Town government,
More informationSchools and Libraries (E-rate) Program FCC Form 474 (SPI) User Guide
Schools and Libraries (E-rate) Program FCC Form 474 (SPI) User Guide 1 Universal Service Administrative Company FCC Form 474 (SPI) User Guide TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Filing FCC Form 474... 3 Service
More informationSMARTATL. A Smart City Overview and Roadmap. Evanta CIO Executive Summit 1
SMARTATL A Smart City Overview and Roadmap Evanta CIO Executive Summit 1 Southeast USA Overview Evanta CIO Executive Summit 2 Metro Atlanta Overview Evanta CIO Executive Summit 3 Permits, New Units under
More information