Joint Research Centre

Transcription

1 Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation EURDEP past and on-going collaboration with IRMIS Marc De Cort Konstantins Bogučarskis ITU, E.08 IAEA, Vienna, 6 10 June 2016

2 EURDEP participants 1996: (12) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK 1998: (20) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK,CZ,FR,LU,PL,RO,SK,SI,CH 2002: (22) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK,CZ,FR,LU,PL,RO,SK,SI,CH,HU,IT 2003: (26) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK,CZ,FR,LU,PL,RO,SK,SI,CH,HU,IT,EE,BE,BG,RU 2004: (29) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK,CZ,FR,LU,PL,RO,SK,SI,CH,HU,IT,EE,BE,BG,RU,IS,LT,LV 2005: (30) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK,CZ,FR,LU,PL,RO,SK,SI,CH,HU,IT,EE,BE,BG,RU,IS,LT,LV,HR 2006: (32) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK,CZ,FR,LU,PL,RO,SK,SI,CH,HU,IT,EE,BE,BG,RU,IS,LT,LV,HR,TR,MT 2008: (33) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK,CZ,FR,LU,PL,RO,SK,SI,CH,HU,IT,EE,BE,BG,RU,IS,LT,LV,HR,TR,MT,CY 2011: (34) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK,CZ,FR,LU,PL,RO,SK,SI,CH,HU,IT,EE,BE,BG,RU,IS,LT,LV,HR,TR,MT, CY,RS 2013: (36) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK,CZ,FR,LU,PL,RO,SK,SI,CH,HU,IT,EE,BE,BG,RU,IS,LT,LV,HR,TR,MT, CY,RS,GL,MK 2014: (37) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK,CZ,FR,LU,PL,RO,SK,SI,CH,HU,IT,EE,BE,BG,RU,IS,LT,LV,HR,TR,MT, CY,RS,GL,MK,AZ 2015: (38) AT,SE,FI,GR,NL,PT,DK,DE,IE,NO,ES,UK,CZ,FR,LU,PL,RO,SK,SI,CH,HU,IT,EE,BE,BG,RU,IS,LT,LV,HR,TR,MT, CY,RS,GL,MK,AZ,BY : (41) + UA,BH,AL

3 What s exchanged Ambient Dose Equivalent Rate from about 5000 automated monitoring sites Radioisotope concentrations from about 150 online/offline monitoring sites Meteorological data

4 Legal Basis Euratom Treaty, Chapter III Health and Safety, art Council Decision 87/600 On Community arrangements for the early exchange of information in the event of a radiological emergency (14 December 1987) Recommendation 2000/473/ Euratom on the application of Article 36 of the Euratom Treaty concerning the monitoring of the levels of radioactivity in the environment for the purpose of assessing the exposure of the population as a whole

5 Collaborative framework 2010/398/Euratom Memorandum of Understanding between the European Commission and the International Atomic Energy Agency concerning the EURDEP COMMISSION DECISION C(2013) 5641 of on the conclusion of a Memorandum of Understanding for a partnership between the European Atomic Energy Community and the International Atomic Energy Agency on nuclear safety cooperation

6 EURDEP goals towards IRMIS Enable the global radiation monitoring data exchange ASAP A direct technical support to IRMIS Assistance to IRMIS data providers Become European data HUB for IRMIS Facilitate data submission to IRMIS for European countries Keep running a real-time automated data exchange Keep running related scientific studies Keep informing the general public

7 EURDEP Radiological data EXCHANGE in routine and emergency (de-coupled with ECURIE) Data upload EURDEP 2.1, IRIX 1.0, comma-delimited e.g. Excel Basic visualization and data analysis capabilities. QA of submitted data No limits to share and download data Target users : National Competent Authorities, Scientists, Public IRMIS Primary focus on an established radiological incident/accident (tightly linked with USIE mother->daughter ) Data upload IRIX 1.0, Excel Advanced analytical capabilities and decision making support Data share and downloads moderated Target users: National Competent Authorities

8 Primary steps The European Commission made EURDEP technology and experience available to IAEA, March IAEA evaluated EURDEP as a possible quick solution for IRMIS, This evaluation resulted to establish a suitable data arrangements for IRMIS, end Consultancy Meetings on the establishment of IRMIS in 2013, 2014 and 2015.

9 Challenges Most European countries use EURDEP 2.x format Networks report in different time intervals (5 min -24 hours) Datasets have no strong identification (national data provider) Redundant measurements submitted by many countries Stations shifts and failures due to various reasons e.g. SW failures, exercises, calibrations Number of countries do not submit localities data in each file Many countries do not use either SFTP or WS for data submission

10 The process Mirroring Quality checks Export to IRMIS

11 Mirroring (ensures data availability) EURDEP 2.x Original data obtained from all data providers in 5 min interval Nodes synchronized in 2 hours interval All data available to all data providers via FTP, SFTP, FTPS IRIX 1.0 available to IRMIS via SFTP (IPR, LUX) in 1 hour intervals 30 days retention

12 Quality checks (watchdogs) Data reported Format compliant Stations coordinates High values reported No data available for 48 hours (GAMMA), 7 days (Concentrations) Data format parser errors (IRIX, EURDEP) Monitoring sites shift, maintenance, calibration etc. High values (GAMMA)

13 Automatic notifications by

14 Stations properties correction

15 Measurements correction (only gamma) Revocation modes Dataset revocation Record revocation

16 Export to IRMIS IRIX 1.0 Strong identification, corrections and revocation possible Regular submission interval for all countries 1 Hour Site coordinates controlled No redundant records Mirrored SFTP, IRIX WS possible

17 IRIX support Online convertors from and to IRIX format E.g. Canada, US and China have been guided to introduce properly formatted IRIX 1.0 datasets

18 Visualization capabilities Simple Advanced Expert

19 Ongoing and future work to improve EURDEP Deeper integration with ECURIE PPA and Monitoring sites Common data stream with the REM database air/soil/water Integration with the Atlas of Natural Radiation RN, Terr., Cosmic etc. More integration towards use of DSS systems Rodos, Argos User experience Single Sign On, responsive layout, widgets Collaboration with crowd monitoring networks

20 Advanced Map Atlas of Natural Radiation

21 Modelling capabilities ER&R RODOS Karlsruher Institut fur Technology (KIT) ARGOS PDC - ARGOS Consistent and comprehensive information on the present and future situations. To extent of the benefits and drawbacks of emergency actions and countermeasures. Methodological support for taking decisions on emergency response strategies. Urban Dispersion International Evaluation Exercise (UDINEE) Assessment and validation of modelling tools addressing CBRN releases

22 JRC webpage: EURDEP webpage: