ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A)

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A)"

Junior Stafford
5 years ago
Views:

1 ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N Document Type: Title: Source: Requested Action: Summary of Voting Summary of Voting on JTC 1 N Text for ISO/IEC PDTR , - Information Technology - Accessibility Considerations for People with Disabilities - Part 3: Guidance on User Needs Mapping JTC 1 Secretariat For consideration at the June 2008 SWG-A meeting and PDTR Parts 1-3 ballot resolution meeting. JTC 1 SWG on Accessibility Secretariat ITI/INCITS 1250 Eye Street NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC jgarner@itic.org

2 ISO/IEC JTC 1 N ISO/IEC JTC 1 Information Technology Document Type: Summary of Voting/Table of Replies Document Title: Summary of Voting on JTC 1 N 8820 Text for ISO/IEC PDTR , - Information Technology - Accessibility Considerations for People with Disabilities - Part 3: Guidance on User Needs Mapping - Document Source: JTC 1 Secretariat Reference: Document Status: As per the results of this ballot, the request has passed and will be forwarded to ITTF for processing. Action ID: Information Due Date: No. of Pages: 6 Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1, American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036; Telephone: ; Facsimile: ; lrajchel@ansi.org

3 Result of voting Ballot Information: Ballot reference: Ballot type: Ballot title: JTC001-N-8820 DTR Text for ISO/IEC PDTR , - Information Technology - Accessibility Considerations for People with Disabilities - Part 3: Guidance on User Needs Mapping - Opening date: Closing date: Note: This document is circulated to JTC 1 National Bodies for PDTR ballot.national Bodies are asked to vote and submit their comments via theon-line balloting system by the due date indicated. In accordance with JTC1 Gold Coast resolution 36, JTC 1 accepts the offer of the SWG-A toconduct the ballot resolution meeting, should one be necessary, tentativelyscheduled for June 2008 in Japan. Member responses: Votes cast (23) Australia (SA) Finland (SFS) Germany (DIN) United Kingdom (BSI)

4 Comments submitted (0) Votes not cast (17) Algeria (IANOR) Belgium (NBN) Côte-d'Ivoire (CODINORM) Ecuador (INEN) Iran, Islamic Republic of (ISIRI) Jamaica (BSJ) Kazakhstan (KAZMEMST) Kenya (KEBS) Malaysia (DSM) Nigeria (SON) Pakistan (PSQCA) Philippines (BPS) Saudi Arabia (SASO) Slovenia (SIST) Turkey (TSE) Uruguay (UNIT) Venezuela (FONDONORMA) Questions: Q.1 "Does your National Body approve the attached DTR to go forward to publication?" Q.2 "If you approve the DTR Text with comments, would you please indicate which type? (General, Technical or Editorial)" Q.3 "If you Disappove the Draft, would you please indicate if you accept to change your vote to Approval if the reasons and appropriate changes will be accepted?" Answers to Q.1: "Does your National Body approve the attached DTR to go forward to publication?" 15 x Approval as presented Australia (SA) 6 x Abstention Finland (SFS)

5 2 x Approval with comments 0 x Disapproval of the draft Germany (DIN) United Kingdom (BSI) Answers to Q.2: "If you approve the DTR Text with comments, would you please indicate which type? (General, Technical or Editorial)" 21 x Ignore Australia (SA) Finland (SFS) 1 x All Germany (DIN) 1 x General United Kingdom (BSI) 0 x Editorial 0 x Technical Answers to Q.3: "If you Disappove the Draft, would you please indicate if you accept to change your vote to Approval if the reasons and appropriate changes will be accepted?" 22 x Ignore Australia (SA) Finland (SFS) Germany (DIN)

6 1 x Yes United Kingdom (BSI) 0 x No Comments from Voters Member: Comment: Date: Germany (DIN) Comment File :58:57 CommentFiles/Germany(DIN).doc United Kingdom (BSI) WIth regard to 6b Column B: Category Comment :02:27 Cells in this column contain the category number from the "Category" column in the User Needs Summary. NOTE This supports sorting the User Needs Mappings. The UK suggests that the provision of category cross references in the output, rather than having to cross refer another document, would make the document easier for the reader to use. Comments from Commenters Member: Comment: Date:

7 Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: Document: ISO/IEC PDTR (3) 4 5 (6) (7) MB 1 Clause No./ Subclause No./ Annex (e.g. 3.1) Paragraph/ Figure/Table/ Note (e.g. Table 1) Type of comment 2 Comment (justification for change) by the MB Proposed change by the MB Secretariat observations on each comment submitted DE 6 first par. ed While it is a good approach to have an up-to-date template available online for the user needs mapping, it would be helpful for the reader to have a template (reflecting the state of the standard) included in the TR as an appendix. DE 6 first par. te There seems to be no user needs template posted at currently. Anyway, providing a template as part of a zip file (which needs to be downloaded and unzipped by the user) is deemed to not be user-friendly. Add appendix with user needs mapping template. This should include a note hinting at the up-to-date online version of the template. Provide a direct link to the up-to-date user needs template in the TR. 1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory. ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version page 1 of 1

ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A)

ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N 303 2008-03-04 Document Type: Title: Source: Requested Action: Summary of Voting Summary of Voting on JTC 1 N 8819 - Text for