INTRODUCTION OF TOKYO MOU. By Tokyo MOU Secretariat

Transcription

1 INTRODUCTION OF TOKYO MOU By Tokyo MOU Secretariat

2 Tokyo MOU Web site YOU can find/get most of information/material/psc data from our web site on internet: mou.org/ Organization Inspection & Detention Publications About Tokyo MOU FAQ Annual Report Text of the MOU On line detention list Press Release Organizational chart PSC database Deficiency codes Authorities addresses NIR What s new On line query form Under performing ships Code of Good Practice Appeal procedures Links to other site Detention review Criteria for RO responsibility

3 Our vision To eliminate substandard shipping in the Asia Pacific region. Our mission To promote the effective implementation, and the universal and uniform application, of relevant IMO/ILO instruments on ships operating in the region. Our commitment Tokyo MOU strives to: develop and maintain effective and efficient PSC system in the region; enhance status and performance of the MOU; promote joint initiatives and co operation with other regional PSC regimes; and improve transparency, communication and relationship with the industry.

4

5 MEMBERSHIP Russian Federation Korea, Rep. of China Hong Kong, China Thailand Malaysia Philippines Vietnam Japan Marshall Islands Vanuatu Canada Singapore Indonesia Papua New Guinea Fiji Chile Co-operating Member Australia Observer New Zealand Peru Korea, DPR Macao, China Solomon Islands USA ILO, IMO Paris MOU, I-O MOU, Acuerdo Viña del Mar, Black Sea MOU

6 PSC Database

7

8

9

10 Tokyo Tokyo MOU MOU New New Inspection Inspection Regime Regime (NIR) (NIR) cont. Parameters High Risk Ship (HRS) (When sum of weighting points >=4) Ship Risk Profile Standard Risk Ship (SRS) Low Risk Ship (LRS) Flag Recognized Organization Type of Ship Criteria Weighting points Criteria Criteria Chemical tanker, Gas Carrier, Oil tanker, Bulk carrier, Passenger ship Age of Ship All types > 12y 1 - BGW-list 1) Black 1 White VIMSAS 2) - - Yes RO of Tokyo MOU 3) - - Yes Performance 4) Low Company performance 5) Deficiencies Number of deficiencies recorded in each inspection within previous 36 months Very Low Low Very Low How many inspections were there which recorded over 5 deficiencies? 2 1 Neither LRS nor High 2 HRS High No. of inspections which recorded over 5 deficiencies - All inspections have 5 or less deficiencies (at least one inspection within previous 36 months) Detentions Number of Detention within previous 36 months 3 or more detentions 1 No detention

11 Tokyo MOU New Inspection Regime (NIR) cont. Ship Risk Profile Low Risk Ships Standard Risk Ships High Risk Ships Time Window since previous inspection 9 to 18 months 5 to 8 months 2 to 4 months Months HRS PII PI SRS PII PI LRS PII PI Priority I (PI): The ship should be inspected, time window for which has been closed. Priority II (PII): The ship could be inspected, which is within the time window. No Priority: Authority will seek to avoid inspecting the ship. Overriding priority: Regardless of NIR, ships referred to in of the MOU will be inspected.

12 Tokyo MOU New Inspection Regime (NIR) cont. Deficiency Index Deficiency ratio per inspection Above average > 1 above Tokyo MOU average Average Tokyo MOU average +/- 1 Below average > 1 below Tokyo MOU average No. of ISM deficiencies*5 + No. of non-ism deficiencies*1 Deficiency ratio = No. of inspections Detention Index Detention ratio Above average > 1% above Tokyo MOU average Average Tokyo MOU average +/- 1% Below average > 1% below Tokyo MOU average No. of detentions Detention ratio = No. of inspections Detention Index Deficiency Index Company Performance Above average Above average Very Low Above average Average Above average Below average Average Above average Low Below average Above average Average Average Average Below average Medium Below average Average Below average Below average High

13 Measures on Under performing Ships Criteria: Ships detained 3 or more times during previous 12 months. Measures on under performing ships: List of under performing ships is published on the Tokyo MOU web site monthly. Warning letters are issued to the flag State and ISM company of under performing ships. Under performing ships would be inspected at each and every port call within the region.

14 45 Measures on on Under performing Ships cont Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

15 Measures on Under performing Ships cont No. of individual ships involved

16 Measures on Under performing Ships cont. Type of ship Bulk carrier Chemical tanker Container ship Gas carrier General cargo/multipurpose ship High speed passenger craft Livestock carrier Oil tanker Refrigerated cargo carrier Ro Ro cargo ship Ro Ro passenger ship Vehicle carrier Others Total

17 Appeal Procedures

18 Detention Review

19 Annual Report 35,000 PSC Data/Statistics Inspections and Detention (%) 9.00% 30, % 25, % 20,000 15, % 10, % 5, % % No. of inspections Detention rate

20 Training Program Purpose (revise every 5 years) General Training Course (GTC) (4 weeks, once/a year) Training Specialized Training Course (STC) (1 week, twice/a year) Expert Mission (EM) (1 ~ 2 weeks, 3 ~ 4 times/a year) Harmonization Update of knowledge PSCO Exchange (EX) (2 weeks, 9 exchanges/a year) Seminar (SEM) (4 days, once/a year)

21 Press Release Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) CIC on the ISM Code compliance (Jul.~Sep. 1998) CIC on GMDSS requirements (Oct.~Dec. 1999) CIC on the ISM Code compliance (Jul.~Sep. 2002) CIC on Bulk Carrier Safety (Sep.~Nov. 2003) CIC on maritime security (Jul.~Sep. 2004) CIC on Operational Requirements (Sep.~Nov. 2005) CIC on MARPOL Annex I (Feb.~Apr. 2006) CIC on the ISM Code compliance (Sep.~Nov. 2007) CIC on Safety of Navigation (Sep.~Nov. 2008) CIC on Lifeboats (Sep.~Nov. 2009) CIC on Harmful Substances (Sep.~Nov. 2010) CIC on Structural Safety & Load Lines (Sep.~Nov. 2011) CIC on FSS Code (Sep.~Nov. 2012) CIC on Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery (2013) CIC on STCW hours of rest (2014) Crew familiarization & Enclosed space entry (2015)

22 Tokyo MOU Secretariat Our address: Tokyo MOU Secretariat Ascend Shimbashi 8F Shimbashi Minato ku, Tokyo Japan Tel: Fax: E mail: secretariat@tokyo mou.org Our staff: Secretary Technical Officer Deputy Secretary Projects Officer

23 THANK YOU