ISGAN Feedback to SASGI by Dr Minnesh Bipath 30 March 2016

Transcription

1 ISGAN Feedback to SASGI by Dr Minnesh Bipath 30 March 2016

2 Mérida, Mexico

3 CEM MEMBERSHIP 23 countries and the European Commission 90% Clean energy investment 75% Global CO 2 emissions Saudi Arabia the newest CEM member

4 CEM United States San Francisco, California, June 1-2, 2016 ANNUAL MINISTERIALS CEM United States CEM United Arab Emirates CEM China China 2017 CEM United Kingdom CEM Mexico CEM India CEM Korea

5 INITIATIVES Year-round technical and policy collaboration delivering tangible results Energy Demand Appliances (SEAD) Buildings and Industry (EMWG) Energy Systems & Integration 21 st Century Power (21CPP) Energy Access (Global LEAP) Energy Supply Solar and Wind Bioenergy Electric Vehicles (EVI) Smart Grids (ISGAN) Hydropower Smart Cities (GSCN) Cross-Cutting Support Women in Clean Energy (C3E) Clean Energy Solutions Center

6 INITIATIVES 6

7 Mérida, Mexico Next Steps on Power System Challenge

8 BACKGROUND The Power System Challenge (PSC) campaign was endorsed at CEM6 by 14 countries (Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Norway, South Africa, Sweden, the United Arab Emirates, the United States) and the Directorate-General for Energy of the European Commission. The campaign was launched through a joint statement that contained eight principles for power system transformation and a commitment for endorsing ministries to put forth plans of implementation by CEM7. The Power System Challenge is intended to build community among endorsing countries, to deepen their connection to CEM initiatives, to facilitate collaboration and coordination with a larger body of stakeholders, and to support domestic power sector reform implementation. CEM initiatives expected to contribute to Power System Challenge include: Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group

9 PSC PRINCIPALS 1. Power system transformation is a strategic imperative. 2. Cleaner power systems will improve public health and combat climate change. 3. Markets, prices, and tariffs should be aligned to support power system transformation. 4. Smart grids are a key enabler for power system transformation 5. Renewable energy is a strategic power system resource. 6. Innovation in finance and procurement is essential to accelerating transformation. 7. Power systems should be optimized to interface with other energy systems. 8. Skill and capacity development is critical to 21st century power systems.

10

11

12

13

14

15 Progress Report on Annex 6 ExCo11 / Yokohama, Japan Susanne Ackeby

16 Annex 6 12 member countries: Sweden (lead) Austria Belgium Denmark France India Italy Norway South Africa United States Ireland Canada? Switzerland? Bo Normark (lead) Susanne Ackeby/STRI (OA) Monthly coordination meetings Workshops Work available on the Annex 6 webpage Transmission and Distribution System Interaction (Austria) System Operation Managemen t and Security (Norway) Policy and Regulation (U.S.) Power T&D Systems Technology Development and Demonstration (Sweden) Expansion Planning and Market Analysis (Italy)

17 Progress to date; outcomes achieved Since last ExCo mainly focusing on: Finalizing ongoing discussion papers Collecting five new cases for the coming updated Case Book Preparations for the coming symposium Papers based on Annex 6 work

18 Progress to date; outcomes achieved Discussion Papers Discussion paper Storage and balancing as key elements for future planning and electricity markets Synchrophasor Applications for Wide Area Monitoring and Control Analysis of the Interaction between Expanding Centralized Grids and Microgrids Tools for Power Balancing Assessments Network Integration of Electric Vehicles Status Presidium for approval Presidium for approval Professional copy editing Internal Annex 6 review Final draft almost ready

19 Present work plan Case Book version online version Workshops Collaboration with other initiatives Annex 6 Power T&D Systems Discussion Papers Extended work based on earlier deliverables

20 Upcoming deliverables T&D Case Book SPOTLIGHT ON SMART AND STRONG POWER T&D INFRASTRUC TURE ver. 2.0 Discussion papers Storage and balancing as key elements for future planning and electricity markets Synchrophasor Applications for Wide Area Monitoring and Control The role and interaction of microgrids and centralized grids in developing modern power systems A case review Tools for Power Balancing Assessments Network Integration of Electrical Vehicles TSO DSO interaction: Investigation of the practical implementation of a single marketplace for flexibility Executive summaries

21 ANNEX 3: BENEFIT & COST ANALYSES AND TOOLKITS OA: ENSIEL (ITA) Fabrizio Pilo

22 Summary of activities Task I Assess Current Network Maturity Model and Tools Available focuses on the methods for the evaluation of the level of smartness of electricity networks. Task II Assess Current Benefit-Cost Analytical Methodologies and Tools focuses on the methodology for the evaluation of cost and benefits of smart grids developments and deployment assess current Benefit-Cost Analytical Methodologies and Tools assess current Benefit-Cost Analytical Methodologies and Tools; develop toolkits to evaluate Benefit-Costs at the Technology or Subsystem Level. Task III Develop Toolkits to Evaluate Benefit-Costs at the Technology or Subsystem Level aims at developing toolkits to evaluate benefit-costs at the technology level or subsystem level

23 Brief summary of activities Fabrizio Pilo appointed as new agent (November December 2015) Maurizio Delfanti is still completing the toolkits for CBA analysis (last received March 6) Conference call with ANNEX 3 participants on January 28 Review of all documents and activities by the new Agent completed

24 Progress to date outcomes TASK 1 The questionnaire for the assessment of the level of smartness of T&D networks was updated and modified it has been split into two parts: Preface Questionnaire (PQ); Smartness Questionnaire (SQ). A simple file excel was created to link the answers of PQ to the answers of SQ in order to obtain an overall picture of the maturity level of a network. The questionnaire was applied by mail to: South Korea (KEPCO) Austria Italy India (Power Grid Corporation of India Limited) France (Grid4EU project)

25 Progress to date outcomes TASK 2 A review of existing methods has been published Report on existing benefitcost analyses with recommendations of best practices to be employed future work Update Frequency: by request

26 Progress to date outcomes TASK 3 Six toolkits developed on more developed smart grid technologies 1. Storage on transmission grids 2. Storage on MV distribution grids 3. Storage on LV distribution grid 4. Smart automation system (conventional and smart automation ) 5. Smart Grid (and advanced ICT System) 6. AMI Inputs and services and related benefits identified Three toolkits are being tested within Annex 3 experts.

27 Program of work 1. Dissemination and test of CAB toolkits in international cases 2. Guidelines for the development of an ISGAN system CBA tool. Multi-criteria techniques will be discussed. 3. Workshop to share knowledge and increase the level of involvement of experts 4. Development of a simplified ISGAN system costbenefits analysis tool 5. Extend/generalize the approach to more international cases 6. Activities from Sub Task on Socio economic benefits of smartgrid

28 Annex 5: SIRFN: What is it? The Smart Grid International Research Facility Network (SIRFN, ISGAN Annex 5) is a coordinated network of Smart Grid research and test-bed facilities and selected projects in countries participating in ISGAN. SIRFN s collaborative test and evaluation capabilities can be leveraged by the international community (in particular, ISGAN Participants) to enable improved design and implementation of smart grids. OA: Temp. Coordinator: Kevin Degroat, ANTARES group

29 SIRFN :Participants Country POC Organization(s) Austria European Commission Finland France India Ireland Helfried Brunner Roland Bründlinger TBD Kari Mäki Nouredine Hadjsaid V. Shiva Kumar Joe Durkan Austrian Institute of Technology TBD VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Grenoble Institute of Technology Central Power Research Institute Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland

30 SIRFN: Participants Country POC Organization(s) Italy Korea Maurizio Verga Chung Ha KOH Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico (RSE) Korean Agency for Technology & Standards (KATS) Spain Angel Diaz-Gallo TECNALIA U.S. *Germany* as of Dec. 5 Russ Conklin, Charlie Hanley et al Wolfram Heckmann US DOE and DOE Labs: SNL, BNL, PNNL, ORNL, NREL, ANL Forschungszentrum Jülich and Fraunhofer IWES Countries in Discussion: Japan (AIST), United Kingdom (Univ. of Strathclyde) STRONG Interest in South African participation (SANEDI and ESKOM)

31 SIRFN Niche Target the niche between R&D and commercialization. Be informed by tech. development processes Inform demonstration projects, ideally Do not directly address certification or standards conformance (but inform those processes) Leverage existing research infrastructure world class labs and test beds and their activities Encourage diversity in geography, networks and infrastructures to enhance value of comparisons and sharing of best practices

32 SIRFN:Facility Catalogue Info on each participating facility collected with links to institutions, contact information, etc. Example content: VTT Data and Acquisition Capability Summary Structure intended to make it easy to find technical expertise and related facilities Currently, PDF document, but intended as online tool To be completed once Operating Agent is resolved

33

34

35

36

37

38 Recommendations Isgan has only been in existence since 2011 Went through setup and establishment phase Focus currently is on delivering value Aligned to CEM priorities ISGAN annexure are work in progress Value is in the network Value derived from participation Travel is the expensive part (?) Continue participation is supported Annexure 3, 5, 6, 8 Observe 4, 7

39