Detecting trails in LiDAR point cloud data
|
|
- Candice Golden
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Detecting trails in LiDAR point cloud data Angela M. Kim and Richard C. Olsen Naval Postgraduate School, Remote Sensing Center, 1 University Circle, Monterey, CA, USA ABSTRACT The goal of this work is to determine methods for detecting trails using statistics of LiDAR point cloud data, while avoiding reliance on a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). Creation of a DEM is a subjective process that requires assumptions be made about the density of the data points, the curvature of the ground, and other factors which can lead to very different results in the final DEM product, with no single correct result. Exploitation of point cloud data also lends itself well to automation. A LiDAR point cloud based trail detection scheme has been designed in which statistical measures of local neighborhoods of LiDAR points are calculated, image processing techniques employed to mask non-trail areas, and a constrained region growing scheme used to determine a final trails map. Results of the LiDAR point cloud based trail detection scheme are presented and compared to a DEM-based trail detection scheme. Large trails are detected fairly reliably with some missing gaps, while smaller trails are detected less reliably. Overall results of the LiDAR point cloud based methods are comparable to the DEM-based results, with fewer false alarms. Keywords: LiDAR, trails, point cloud, statistics 1. INTRODUCTION In this work, we attempt to develop methods for extracting trails based upon the spatial statistics of the LiDAR point cloud data. A common first step when dealing with LiDAR data is to create a Digital Elevation Model (DEM), which gives an estimation of the bare earth surface in the absence of vegetation and man-made structures. Unfortunately, creation of the DEM can be a subjective process, relying on the user to choose parameters which are often ill-defined and which depend on a priori knowledge of the data. To make matters worse, algorithms for creating DEMs are typically proprietary, and so very little information is available about how the data is being processed. We have attempted to make the DEM-processing step unnecessary by working directly with the point cloud data. We hypothesize that statistics of local neighborhoods of points can be analyzed and classified to extract trail features. Similar procedures using statistical properties of the point cloud have been used to extract buildings from LiDAR point cloud data, as presented by Kim et. al 1 and Zhou et. al. 2 Trails present a much more challenging problem - both in physically describing what a trail is, and in separating the trails from a background which is likely very similar to the trail itself. The following characteristics describing trails have been found to be useful in extracting trails from the LiDAR point cloud data: 1. Ground is smooth 2. Area is clear of underbrush (vegetation <20 cm tall) 3. Area is clear of obstacles up to a height of 2 m 4. Trail components are long and skinny 5. Trail components are connected The first three of these features (1-3) can be measured directly using spatial statistics of the LiDAR point cloud data. The last two features (4 and 5) depend upon post-processing of derived raster products using standard image processing techniques. The methods used for processing the point cloud data are discussed in Section 4. Further author information: (Send correspondence to A.M.K.) A.M.K.: amkim@nps.edu, Telephone: R.C.O.: olsen@nps.edu, Telephone: Laser Radar Technology and Applications XVII, edited by Monte D. Turner, Gary W. Kamerman, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8379, SPIE CCC code: X/12/$18 doi: / Proc. of SPIE Vol
2 To qualify the success of the LiDAR point cloud processing methods, a comparison is made to results using an optimized DEM-based extraction process as discussed in Section 5. Although fairly good results are possible using the DEM in this case, it should be noted that these results required significant finessing of parameters and manual interaction. The point cloud processing is much more suited towards automation. The comparison of results from the DEM and LiDAR point cloud processing methods is given in Section PREVIOUS WORK Several theses at the Naval Postgraduate School Remote Sensing Center (Espinoza and Owens, Karatolios and Krougios, Muha, and Harmon) and a 2010 paper by White et al. have demonstrated the feasibility of using LiDAR data for trail detection purposes. 3 7 The work presented here builds on these efforts, with an emphasis placed on dealing with the LiDAR point cloud data rather than DEM-based processes. An approach similar to the work presented here which makes use of features derived from the LiDAR point cloud data is given by David et al., where the authors develop a semi-automated method for detecting pathways in forested areas using features including a normalized Digital Surface Model (ndsm) for height above ground measurements, a measure of altimetric variance, and a LiDAR intensity image. 8 The method works well when the trail is not occluded by canopy, and when trail features are radiometrically different from the background vegetation. Unfortunately, in many forested environments, the trail is hidden by the canopy, and the intensity of the LiDAR returns are not reliably different from the ground returns of non-trail areas. A method presented by Lee et al. specifically deals with detecting trails which are occluded by dense canopies, and also makes use of statistical measures of the LiDAR point cloud including the standard deviation of heights, and the presence of gaps in the space immediately above a trail. 9 In contrast to our methods, however, the point cloud-derived features are used to find seed regions for a visibility-based trail detection scheme. Visibility vectors are assumed to represent possible trail segments; the choice of the actual trail path is chosen as the longest connected set of trail segments. The method depends upon estimating tree trunk locations to filter the open spaces due to trails from the open spaces due to missing LiDAR data. In our work, the features derived from the LiDAR point cloud are the primary input to the trail detection scheme. 3. THE STUDY AREA AND LIDAR DATASET The study area is located in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California s central coast at the Swanton Pacific Ranch, an educational and research facility owned by the Cal Poly Corporation and managed by the Cal Poly State University s College of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences. 7 LiDAR data were collected in March 2010 by Airborne 1 Corporation, El Segundo, CA, using an Optech ALTM 3100 sensor. The average point density for the data subset used in this work is approximately 2.5 pts/m 2. A truth map of trails was hand-digitized based on a visual inspection of the DEM and LiDAR point cloud data products. The hand-digitized trails are overlaid on a Google Earth image in Fig. 1. There are trails which are visible in large open areas in the Google Earth image, but which are not apparent in the DEM or LiDAR point cloud data products - these trail areas are therefore not included in the truth map. The LiDAR point cloud data, colored by elevation, is also displayed in Fig. 1, and shows how the trails in the study area are mostly occluded by canopy. The riverbed or canyon running through the study set adds an additional layer of complexity, as DEM-based processes for trail extraction tend to confuse riverbeds with trails. 3 Proc. of SPIE Vol
3 Figure 1. (L) Trail features overlaid on a true-color image of the study area from Google Earth ( c 2012 Google). Trail features were extracted based on a visual analysis of the DEM and LiDAR point cloud data products. (R) The LiDAR point cloud colored by elevation. 4. POINT CLOUD PROCESSING The overall goal of this work is to focus on analyzing the LiDAR point cloud for features indicating trails, while minimizing or eliminating any dependence on the DEM raster data product. All of the processing of the point cloud data is accomplished by analyzing local neighborhoods of LiDAR points. Because trail features occur at specific heights, the point cloud is subset into height strata, and point cloud statistics based measures are used to detect trail features. 4.1 Local Neighborhoods The extent of the local neighborhood is based on a user-defined range value that is intuitively defined as the approximate scale of the features being sought. A typical trail is assumed to be about 1 m wide, so a range value of 1 m was used in this case. A restriction on this value in general is the density of the LiDAR point cloud data. The range value must be large enough to so that most local neighborhoods include multiple points in order to create meaningful statistics. To define the local neighborhoods, a regular grid of query points is generated according to the user-defined range value. Neighborhoods around each query point are then defined to completely cover the entire spatial (x, y) extent of the point cloud space (see Fig. 2). For each query point neighborhood, statistics of the LiDAR point cloud are calculated, including: the distance from the query point to each of the LiDAR points in the neighborhood, the number of LiDAR points in the neighborhood, and the vertical distribution of LiDAR points in the neighborhood. These calculations make use of the fast range searching algorithm available in the open source tool OpenTSTool developed by Merkwirth et. al. 10 Proc. of SPIE Vol
4 J0.1 LIDAR Point Query Point O Local Neighborhood Figure 2. An example illustrating the definition of a local neighborhood. A grid of query points is overlaid on the (x, y) extent of the LiDAR point cloud space. The density of the grid is based on a user defined threshold, which should be on the order of the scale of the features to be detected. Neighborhoods around each query point are generated to completely cover the entire point cloud space. 4.2 Height Above Ground Level (AGL) Slices The relevant portion of the LiDAR point cloud for detecting trails based on the characteristics defined in Section 1 can be divided into distinct height strata from the ground up to approximately 2 m above ground level (AGL). The smoothness of the ground and presence of underbrush is measured using the ground points themselves and points within 20 cm of the ground. The region from 10 cm to 2 m AGL should be clear of obstacles on a defined trail to ensure and open space for travel. The canopy above a trail can be open or closed, so the LiDAR point cloud above 2 m AGL cannot be reliably used to indicate the presence of trails. Typically, a LiDAR point cloud is delivered from the vendor having ground points classified; if this is not the case, open-source methods exist for classifying the points. In this work, we make use of the MCC-LiDAR tool developed by Evans and Hudak to classify ground points in the LiDAR data. 11 To extract subsets based on height AGL, an estimate of the ground elevation based on the ground classified points is used to transform the point cloud from elevations to heights AGL. Because the heights AGL measurement is based on a rough estimate of ground elevation, the values are only approximate, but this is sufficient for this work. The height values are only used in segmenting the point cloud data - all processing is completed using the original elevation data. 4.3 Statistics of Local Neighborhoods A variety of statistics are tested to determine their usefulness in detecting trails. Statistics are calculated for each query point neighborhood, with the results of each calculation being stored at the (x, y) location of the query point, thereby creating a regularly gridded image product. Fig. 3 shows results of each of the statistics calculated for the m AGL height slice, including the point density (number of points in a local neighborhood), mean and standard deviation of intensity values, mean and standard deviation of elevations, and the mean horizontal distance between LiDAR points. Note: Although the point cloud is segmented based on height AGL, statistics were calculated using point elevation values. These statistics were also calculated for the m AGL subset, but due to a relatively low point density in that height slice, the results were mostly unilluminating. The single useful measure for the m AGL subset is the point density, which can be used to confirm an open path of travel in the space directly above the trail. A visual inspection of the statistics measures shows that the Standard Deviation of Elevations measurement is the statistic most likely to be useful for trail extraction (Fig. 3e). The statistic looks remarkably similar to the magnitude of the gradient of the DEM (Fig. 9); in both cases, trail features appear darker than the local background. This is an indication of very little ground cover and a smooth ground surface. Proc. of SPIE Vol
5 Figure 3. Local neighborhood statistics for m AGL height slice: a) Point Density, b) Mean Intensity, c) Standard Deviation of Intensity, d) Mean Elevation, e) Standard Deviation of Elevations, f) Mean Horizontal Distance Between Points 4.4 Image Processing to Extract Trails Based on Point-cloud Statistics After creating features based on statistics of the LiDAR point cloud, we apply an image processing scheme to extract trails. A step-wise process applied to the Standard Deviation of Elevations statistic image iteratively rules out non-trail points, resulting in a product which contains only definite trail detections. The step-wise exclusion process incorporates a local and global thresholding scheme, an erosion filter to remove isolated noise, and a shape criterium to exclude any features which don t have the appropriate long and skinny trail shape. The product of the exclusion process will have a very low false alarm rate, but a high rate of missed detections. A region growing scheme is used to reinsert regions which are likely trails. The decision to add points which were previously excluded depends upon two criteria: 1) the points being considered must be connected to a definite trail feature, and 2) the points being considered must have the appropriate long and skinny trail shape Local and Global Thresholding Local and global thresholding methods are used as a first step to extract trail features. In both the local and global cases, the threshold is defined so that the darkest 25% of pixels are captured as possible trail regions. The local thresholding method incorporates pixels within a 10 m square local window, whereas the global threshold method uses all of the pixels in the image. The results from the local and global detection schemes are complementary to each other. In the case of the local threshold, some small trails are detected which are missed when using a global threshold, but there are also a large number of single/few-pixel false detections. In the case of the global threshold, larger trails are captured faithfully but some smaller trails are missed, and there are large regions which are obviously false detections. Combining results from the local and global detection scheme (intersection of results) provides the optimal result, excluding most of the false alarms while retaining most of the valid trail Proc. of SPIE Vol
6 points (Fig. 4). In the threshold result, some smaller trails are lost completely, but in many cases, a small portion of the trail remains, and when the region growing process is applied, these smaller trails can be detected. Figure 4. (Left) Local threshold result. Points which are in the darkest 25% of pixels within the local 10x10 m region are classified as trails. (Center) Global threshold result. Points which are in the darkest 25% of pixels in the image are classified as trails. (Right) Combined local and global threshold result (Local threshold Global threshold) Open Spaces Masking To ensure the space above the trail on the ground is clear of obstacles, the portion of the data containing points between m AGL is examined for open spaces. As before, a regular (x, y) grid of points is overlaid on the flattened point cloud (z-values are ignored). If a grid query point has no LiDAR points in the local neighborhood, it is marked as an open space. The result of this measurement is shown on the left in Fig. 5. By itself, this product is not useful for detecting trails because there are many open spaces which do not correspond to trails. In combination with the other products, however, it is useful for ensuring the trail is free from obstacles from m AGL. The open spaces mask is combined with the previous results using intersection (Fig. 5). Figure 5. (Left) Open spaces detected in the LiDAR point cloud from m AGL. (Right) Result of incorporating the open spaces mask in the trail detection scheme (Local threshold Global threshold Open spaces mask) Erosion Filtering The next step is to remove the single/few-pixel points which represent noise in the detection result so far. A morphological erosion filter removes foreground pixels smaller than the erosion kernel, and erodes the edges of larger objects. The kernel is chosen so that only the smallest groups of points are removed, and erosion of edges is minimized (Fig. 6). We use a 3x3 pixel cross-shaped erosion kernel, having physical dimensions of 1x1 m. Proc. of SPIE Vol
7 UO1SOJ3 IUJN Figure 6. Trail detection result after applying the morphological erosion kernel, and an illustration of the erosion kernel Shape-based Filtering The final step used to exclude regions relies on a shape-based criterium. A bounding ellipse is drawn around each of the connected components in the image, and those which are too small in size are discarded. Excluding the smallest components reduces the noise in the result. A threshold based on the ellipticity of the bounding ellipse is defined to exclude objects which do not have the appropriate long and skinny trail shape. Figure 7. (Left) Ellipses drawn around each component, with those ellipses which satisfy user-defined ellipticity threshold shown in green. (Right) Definite Trails remaining after completion of the point-cloud based processing Region Growing Each of the steps described in Sections through excludes points that do not have the highest probability of being trails. By design, the product created by this process has a large number of missed detections. Some of the excluded points should in fact be included in the trails classification product. By stepping through each of the products previously created, this time in reverse, components can be iteratively reinserted assuming they satisfy two criteria: 1. Candidate components must be connected to a definite trail 2. Candidate components must have a long and skinny shape The region growing process is repeated until no more regions can be added. Some of the smaller trail regions are recovered, but sometimes regions are overgrown, resulting in added false alarms (Fig. 8). The user may decide to halt the region growing process where appropriate. In this case, the best result seems to be at step 3, and this result is chosen as the final trail map and compared to results using the DEM-based trail detection process. Proc. of SPIE Vol
8 Figure 8. Automatic region growing process applied to the LiDAR point-cloud processing trail extraction result. Step 3 (top right) is chosen as the most appropriate final trail map. Steps 4 and 5 contain false alarms due to overgrown regions. 5. DEM PROCESSING The creation of a DEM is a subjective process, with different processing routines leading to different DEMs. It is for this reason that we have attempted to define methods which depend solely on the LiDAR point cloud data. Regardless of the difficulties of creating a DEM however, the benefit of the information is undeniable, and methods which are robust against small differences in DEMs would be useful. The DEM-based process defined here works well in this case, but further work is needed to determine the robustness of the routine against small differences in DEMs. A gaussian smoothing filter is applied to eliminate small peaks or sinks in the DEM. This smoothing process does not degrade the trail features unnecessarily. After smoothing, the gradient of the image, f(x, y), is calculated using: f(x, y) = f x î + f y ĵ (1) To create a single image product, the magnitude of the gradient is taken as: ( f ) 2 f(x, y) = + x ( ) 2 f (2) y The magnitude of the gradient of the DEM is shown in Fig. 9. Flat regions have a value close to zero. Note how this image is similar to the standard deviation of elevations image created by calculating statistics of local neighborhoods of LiDAR points (Fig. 3e). In both cases, trails appear dark compared to the local background, and this characteristic can be exploited to extract trail regions algorithmically. Proc. of SPIE Vol
9 Figure 9. Magnitude of the gradient of the DEM. The DEM-based trail extraction process mirrors the point-cloud based process, with the magnitude of the gradient of the DEM image being used as the input image. Results from a local and global threshold are combined, an erosion filter is used to eliminate isolated noise, and shape based filters are used to extract long and skinny trail-shaped objects. The steps of this process are showing in Fig. 10, with the final trail map displayed in the bottom right corner. Region growing was not used in the DEM-based process. Figure 10. DEM-based trail detection. (Top Left) Local threshold result. Points in the darkest 25% of pixels within a local 10x10 m region are classified as trails. (Top Center) Global threshold result. Points in the darkest 25% of pixels in the image are classified as trails. (Top Right) Combined local and global threshold (Local threshold Global threshold). (Bottom Left) Result after applying erosion filter. (Bottom Right) Result of shape based filtering - DEM-based final trail map. Proc. of SPIE Vol
10 6. COMPARISON OF RESULTS The magnitude of the gradient of the DEM and the standard deviation of elevations images are used to handdigitize a map of expected trail locations. While this is not ground truth, it is a best estimate of what a human analyst would extract from the image as trails (Fig. 11, Center). Results from each of the trail-detection processes are shown in Fig. 11, with correctly identified regions shown in grey, commission errors in black, and omission errors in white. The LiDAR point cloud-based result correctly identifies the majority of the larger trails with some gaps. The DEM-based result also correctly identifies the larger trails, but with a larger number of false alarms. Comparison with the Google Earth imagery indicates that these false alarms in the DEM-based result are due to a natural depression such as a riverbed or canyon in the scene. Detection of the smaller trails is more challenging. In both cases, portions of the smaller trails are detected but with large missing gaps. Note: the presence of commission/omission errors along the edges of trails may not be true errors, but rather inaccuracies in the hand-digitized truth map..a.'\.is _ '\ Figure 11. Comparison of trail detection maps created using the LiDAR point cloud data (left) and the DEM-based detection schemes (right), with the hand-drawn annotation of expected trail detections (center). Commission errors are shown in black, omission errors are shown in white, and correctly classified areas are shown in grey. 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS A method is shown for extracting trails from LiDAR point cloud data based on statistics of local neighborhoods of points. Several statistics are calculated, but the standard deviation of elevations is found to be most useful statistic for detecting trails. Dividing the point cloud based on heights AGL allows exploitation of multiple trail characteristics. An iterative scheme to exclude all but the most likely trail regions, followed by a region growing process, creates a fairly reliable trail map. The main benefit of the method is that it relies solely on point cloud data and intuitively defined threshold values. The process does not require creation of a DEM. The LiDAR point cloud based trail detection process produces a result that is comparable to results from a DEM-based trail extraction, but with fewer false trail detections. 8. FUTURE WORK We have attempted to demonstrate the feasibility of working exclusively with LiDAR point cloud data, while intentionally excluding information present in the DEM product. This was motivated by the assumption that creation of a DEM is a subjective process, and so it should not be used as the basis of the trail detection scheme. It is clear, at least in the case presented here, that combining information from statistics of the LiDAR point cloud with the DEM could be useful for producing a more reliable trail detection map. Further work is needed to determine the reliability of DEM-based processing for trail extraction and to understand the impact of small differences in DEMs due to different DEM creation processes. Proc. of SPIE Vol
11 REFERENCES 1. A. M. Kim, F. A. Kruse, R. C. Olsen, and C. C. Clasen, Extraction of Rooftops from LiDAR and Multispectral Imagery, in Proceedings Optical Remote Sensing of the Environment (ORS), June 2012, (Monterey, CA, USA), In press. 2. Q. Y. Zhou and U. Neumann, Fast and Extensible Building Modeling from Airborne LiDAR Data, in Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, University of Southern California, Jan F. Espinoza and R. E. Owens, Identifying Roads and Trails Hidder Under Canopy Using LiDAR, Master s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, A. Karatolios and P. Krougios, Extracting Hidden Trails and Roads Under Canopy Using LiDAR, Master s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, S. L. Muha, Evaluation of LiDAR for Automating Recognition of Roads and Trails Beneath Forest Canopy, Master s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, C. F. Harmon, Automating Identification of Roads and Trails Under Canopy Using LiDAR, Master s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, R. A. White, B. C. Dietterick, T. Mastin, and R. Strohman, Forest Roads Mapped Using LiDAR in Steep Forested Terrain, Remote Sensing 2, pp , Apr N. David, C. Mallet, T. Pons, A. Chauve, and F. Bretar, Pathway detection and geometrical description from ALS data in forested moutaneous area, Laser Scanning 2009, IAPRS XXXVIII, pp , Sept H. Lee, K. C. Slatton, and H. Jhee, Detecting Forest Trails Occluded by Dense Canopies Using ALSM Data, Proceedings of IGARSS 05 5, pp , Oct C. Merkwirth, U. Parlitz, I. Wedekind, D. Engster, and W. Lauterborn, OpenTStool User Manual. Drittes Physikalisches Institut, Universitat Gottingen, 1.2 ed., Feb J. S. Evans and A. T. Hudak, A Multiscale Curvature Algorithm for Classifying Discrete Return LiDAR in Forested Environments, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 45, pp , Apr Proc. of SPIE Vol
Methods for LiDAR point cloud classification using local neighborhood statistics
Methods for LiDAR point cloud classification using local neighborhood statistics Angela M. Kim, Richard C. Olsen, Fred A. Kruse Naval Postgraduate School, Remote Sensing Center and Physics Department,
More informationTerrain categorization using LIDAR and multi-spectral data
Terrain categorization using LIDAR and multi-spectral data Angela M. Puetz, R. C. Olsen, Michael A. Helt U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, 833 Dyer Road, Monterey, CA 93943 ampuetz@nps.edu, olsen@nps.edu
More informationSIMULATED LIDAR WAVEFORMS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF LIGHT PROPAGATION THROUGH A TREE CANOPY
SIMULATED LIDAR WAVEFORMS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF LIGHT PROPAGATION THROUGH A TREE CANOPY Angela M. Kim and Richard C. Olsen Remote Sensing Center Naval Postgraduate School 1 University Circle Monterey, CA
More informationABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION
Correlation between lidar-derived intensity and passive optical imagery Jeremy P. Metcalf, Angela M. Kim, Fred A. Kruse, and Richard C. Olsen Physics Department and Remote Sensing Center, Naval Postgraduate
More informationGenerate Digital Elevation Models Using Laser Altimetry (LIDAR) Data. Christopher Weed
Generate Digital Elevation Models Using Laser Altimetry (LIDAR) Data Christopher Weed Final Report EE 381K Multidimensional Digital Signal Processing December 11, 2000 Abstract A Laser Altimetry (LIDAR)
More informationImprovement of the Edge-based Morphological (EM) method for lidar data filtering
International Journal of Remote Sensing Vol. 30, No. 4, 20 February 2009, 1069 1074 Letter Improvement of the Edge-based Morphological (EM) method for lidar data filtering QI CHEN* Department of Geography,
More informationMonterey, CA, USA ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION. phone ; fax ; nps.edu/rsc
Application of image classification techniques to multispectral lidar point cloud data Chad I. Miller* a,b, Judson J. Thomas b, Angela M. Kim b, Jeremy P. Metcalf b, Richard C. Olsen b b SAIC, 1710 SAIC
More informationAutomated Extraction of Buildings from Aerial LiDAR Point Cloud and Digital Imaging Datasets for 3D Cadastre - Preliminary Results
Automated Extraction of Buildings from Aerial LiDAR Point Cloud and Digital Imaging Datasets for 3D Pankaj Kumar 1*, Alias Abdul Rahman 1 and Gurcan Buyuksalih 2 ¹Department of Geoinformation Universiti
More informationBUILDING DETECTION AND STRUCTURE LINE EXTRACTION FROM AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA
BUILDING DETECTION AND STRUCTURE LINE EXTRACTION FROM AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA C. K. Wang a,, P.H. Hsu a, * a Dept. of Geomatics, National Cheng Kung University, No.1, University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan. China-
More informationDIGITAL HEIGHT MODELS BY CARTOSAT-1
DIGITAL HEIGHT MODELS BY CARTOSAT-1 K. Jacobsen Institute of Photogrammetry and Geoinformation Leibniz University Hannover, Germany jacobsen@ipi.uni-hannover.de KEY WORDS: high resolution space image,
More informationChapters 1 7: Overview
Chapters 1 7: Overview Photogrammetric mapping: introduction, applications, and tools GNSS/INS-assisted photogrammetric and LiDAR mapping LiDAR mapping: principles, applications, mathematical model, and
More informationNATIONWIDE POINT CLOUDS AND 3D GEO- INFORMATION: CREATION AND MAINTENANCE GEORGE VOSSELMAN
NATIONWIDE POINT CLOUDS AND 3D GEO- INFORMATION: CREATION AND MAINTENANCE GEORGE VOSSELMAN OVERVIEW National point clouds Airborne laser scanning in the Netherlands Quality control Developments in lidar
More informationFOOTPRINTS EXTRACTION
Building Footprints Extraction of Dense Residential Areas from LiDAR data KyoHyouk Kim and Jie Shan Purdue University School of Civil Engineering 550 Stadium Mall Drive West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA {kim458,
More informationMasking Lidar Cliff-Edge Artifacts
Masking Lidar Cliff-Edge Artifacts Methods 6/12/2014 Authors: Abigail Schaaf is a Remote Sensing Specialist at RedCastle Resources, Inc., working on site at the Remote Sensing Applications Center in Salt
More informationCover Page. Abstract ID Paper Title. Automated extraction of linear features from vehicle-borne laser data
Cover Page Abstract ID 8181 Paper Title Automated extraction of linear features from vehicle-borne laser data Contact Author Email Dinesh Manandhar (author1) dinesh@skl.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp Phone +81-3-5452-6417
More informationAlgorithms for GIS csci3225
Algorithms for GIS csci3225 Laura Toma Bowdoin College LiDAR data in GIS LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) Each point records: its geographic location x,y its height z the number of returns in its pulse
More informationGenerate Digital Elevation Models Using Laser Altimetry (LIDAR) Data
Generate Digital Elevation Models Using Laser Altimetry (LIDAR) Data Literature Survey Christopher Weed October 2000 Abstract Laser altimetry (LIDAR) data must be processed to generate a digital elevation
More informationPresented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey
Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey Evangelos MALTEZOS, Charalabos IOANNIDIS, Anastasios DOULAMIS and Nikolaos DOULAMIS Laboratory of Photogrammetry, School of Rural
More informationAUTOMATED 3-D FEATURE EXTRACTION FROM TERRESTRIAL AND AIRBORNE LIDAR
AUTOMATED 3-D FEATURE EXTRACTION FROM TERRESTRIAL AND AIRBORNE LIDAR D. W. Opitz, R. Rao, J. S. Blundell Visual Learning Systems, Inc., 1719 Dearborn, Missoula, Montana 59801 USA opitz@vls-inc.com, rrao@vls-inc.com
More informationObject Classification Using Tripod Operators
Object Classification Using Tripod Operators David Bonanno, Frank Pipitone, G. Charmaine Gilbreath, Kristen Nock, Carlos A. Font, and Chadwick T. Hawley US Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave.
More informationA DATA DRIVEN METHOD FOR FLAT ROOF BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION FROM LiDAR POINT CLOUDS
A DATA DRIVEN METHOD FOR FLAT ROOF BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION FROM LiDAR POINT CLOUDS A. Mahphood, H. Arefi *, School of Surveying and Geospatial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran,
More informationIMPROVED TARGET DETECTION IN URBAN AREA USING COMBINED LIDAR AND APEX DATA
IMPROVED TARGET DETECTION IN URBAN AREA USING COMBINED LIDAR AND APEX DATA Michal Shimoni 1 and Koen Meuleman 2 1 Signal and Image Centre, Dept. of Electrical Engineering (SIC-RMA), Belgium; 2 Flemish
More informationSECTION 5 IMAGE PROCESSING 2
SECTION 5 IMAGE PROCESSING 2 5.1 Resampling 3 5.1.1 Image Interpolation Comparison 3 5.2 Convolution 3 5.3 Smoothing Filters 3 5.3.1 Mean Filter 3 5.3.2 Median Filter 4 5.3.3 Pseudomedian Filter 6 5.3.4
More informationFiles Used in this Tutorial
Generate Point Clouds and DSM Tutorial This tutorial shows how to generate point clouds and a digital surface model (DSM) from IKONOS satellite stereo imagery. You will view the resulting point clouds
More informationAn Introduction to Lidar & Forestry May 2013
An Introduction to Lidar & Forestry May 2013 Introduction to Lidar & Forestry Lidar technology Derivatives from point clouds Applied to forestry Publish & Share Futures Lidar Light Detection And Ranging
More informationAPPENDIX E2. Vernal Pool Watershed Mapping
APPENDIX E2 Vernal Pool Watershed Mapping MEMORANDUM To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service From: Tyler Friesen, Dudek Subject: SSHCP Vernal Pool Watershed Analysis Using LIDAR Data Date: February 6, 2014
More informationEVOLUTION OF POINT CLOUD
Figure 1: Left and right images of a stereo pair and the disparity map (right) showing the differences of each pixel in the right and left image. (source: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17607312/difference-between-disparity-map-and-disparity-image-in-stereo-matching)
More information[Youn *, 5(11): November 2018] ISSN DOI /zenodo Impact Factor
GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND RESEARCHES AUTOMATIC EXTRACTING DEM FROM DSM WITH CONSECUTIVE MORPHOLOGICAL FILTERING Junhee Youn *1 & Tae-Hoon Kim 2 *1,2 Korea Institute of Civil Engineering
More informationDetection of Rooftop Regions in Rural Areas Using Support Vector Machine
549 Detection of Rooftop Regions in Rural Areas Using Support Vector Machine Liya Joseph 1, Laya Devadas 2 1 (M Tech Scholar, Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering Munnar, Kerala) 2 (Associate
More informationHEURISTIC FILTERING AND 3D FEATURE EXTRACTION FROM LIDAR DATA
HEURISTIC FILTERING AND 3D FEATURE EXTRACTION FROM LIDAR DATA Abdullatif Alharthy, James Bethel School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 1284 Civil Engineering Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907
More informationExercise 4: Extracting Information from DEMs in ArcMap
Exercise 4: Extracting Information from DEMs in ArcMap Introduction This exercise covers sample activities for extracting information from DEMs in ArcMap. Topics include point and profile queries and surface
More informationPedestrian Detection Using Correlated Lidar and Image Data EECS442 Final Project Fall 2016
edestrian Detection Using Correlated Lidar and Image Data EECS442 Final roject Fall 2016 Samuel Rohrer University of Michigan rohrer@umich.edu Ian Lin University of Michigan tiannis@umich.edu Abstract
More informationGeometric Accuracy Evaluation, DEM Generation and Validation for SPOT-5 Level 1B Stereo Scene
Geometric Accuracy Evaluation, DEM Generation and Validation for SPOT-5 Level 1B Stereo Scene Buyuksalih, G.*, Oruc, M.*, Topan, H.*,.*, Jacobsen, K.** * Karaelmas University Zonguldak, Turkey **University
More informationFigure 1: Workflow of object-based classification
Technical Specifications Object Analyst Object Analyst is an add-on package for Geomatica that provides tools for segmentation, classification, and feature extraction. Object Analyst includes an all-in-one
More informationDIGITAL SURFACE MODELS OF CITY AREAS BY VERY HIGH RESOLUTION SPACE IMAGERY
DIGITAL SURFACE MODELS OF CITY AREAS BY VERY HIGH RESOLUTION SPACE IMAGERY Jacobsen, K. University of Hannover, Institute of Photogrammetry and Geoinformation, Nienburger Str.1, D30167 Hannover phone +49
More informationHuman Motion Detection and Tracking for Video Surveillance
Human Motion Detection and Tracking for Video Surveillance Prithviraj Banerjee and Somnath Sengupta Department of Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur,
More informationStructural Analysis of Aerial Photographs (HB47 Computer Vision: Assignment)
Structural Analysis of Aerial Photographs (HB47 Computer Vision: Assignment) Xiaodong Lu, Jin Yu, Yajie Li Master in Artificial Intelligence May 2004 Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Edge-Preserving
More informationAUTOMATIC EXTRACTION OF LARGE COMPLEX BUILDINGS USING LIDAR DATA AND DIGITAL MAPS
AUTOMATIC EXTRACTION OF LARGE COMPLEX BUILDINGS USING LIDAR DATA AND DIGITAL MAPS Jihye Park a, Impyeong Lee a, *, Yunsoo Choi a, Young Jin Lee b a Dept. of Geoinformatics, The University of Seoul, 90
More informationGENERAL AUTOMATED FLAW DETECTION SCHEME FOR NDE X-RAY IMAGES
GENERAL AUTOMATED FLAW DETECTION SCHEME FOR NDE X-RAY IMAGES Karl W. Ulmer and John P. Basart Center for Nondestructive Evaluation Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University
More informationReality Check: Processing LiDAR Data. A story of data, more data and some more data
Reality Check: Processing LiDAR Data A story of data, more data and some more data Red River of the North Red River of the North Red River of the North Red River of the North Introduction and Background
More informationTools, Tips, and Workflows Automatic Ground Classification of Dense Point Clouds in LP360
Automatic Ground Classification of Dense Point Clouds LP360, versions 2014.1 and above Lewis Graham Revision 1.0 The density of point clouds (usually expressed as points per square meter) is increasing
More informationEE795: Computer Vision and Intelligent Systems
EE795: Computer Vision and Intelligent Systems Spring 2012 TTh 17:30-18:45 WRI C225 Lecture 04 130131 http://www.ee.unlv.edu/~b1morris/ecg795/ 2 Outline Review Histogram Equalization Image Filtering Linear
More informationNew Requirements for the Relief in the Topographic Databases of the Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya
New Requirements for the Relief in the Topographic Databases of the Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya Blanca Baella, Maria Pla Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain Abstract Since 1983 the
More informationImproved Applications with SAMB Derived 3 meter DTMs
Improved Applications with SAMB Derived 3 meter DTMs Evan J Fedorko West Virginia GIS Technical Center 20 April 2005 This report sums up the processes used to create several products from the Lorado 7
More informationProf. Jose L. Flores, MS, PS Dept. of Civil Engineering & Surveying
Prof. Jose L. Flores, MS, PS Dept. of Civil Engineering & Surveying Problem One of the challenges for any Geographic Information System (GIS) application is to keep the spatial data up to date and accurate.
More informationQUALITY CONTROL METHOD FOR FILTERING IN AERIAL LIDAR SURVEY
QUALITY CONTROL METHOD FOR FILTERING IN AERIAL LIDAR SURVEY Y. Yokoo a, *, T. Ooishi a, a Kokusai Kogyo CO., LTD.,Base Information Group, 2-24-1 Harumicho Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-0057, JAPAN - (yasuhiro_yokoo,
More informationTools, Tips and Workflows Geiger-Mode LIDAR Workflow Review GeoCue, TerraScan, versions and above
GeoCue, TerraScan, versions 015.005 and above Martin Flood August 8, 2016 Geiger-mode lidar data is getting a lot of press lately as the next big thing in airborne data collection. Unlike traditional lidar
More informationThe Processing of Form Documents
The Processing of Form Documents David S. Doermann and Azriel Rosenfeld Document Processing Group, Center for Automation Research University of Maryland, College Park 20742 email: doermann@cfar.umd.edu,
More informationIMAGINE Objective. The Future of Feature Extraction, Update & Change Mapping
IMAGINE ive The Future of Feature Extraction, Update & Change Mapping IMAGINE ive provides object based multi-scale image classification and feature extraction capabilities to reliably build and maintain
More informationREFINEMENT OF FILTERED LIDAR DATA USING LOCAL SURFACE PROPERTIES INTRODUCTION
REFINEMENT OF FILTERED LIDAR DATA USING LOCAL SURFACE PROPERTIES Suyoung Seo, Senior Research Associate Charles G. O Hara, Associate Research Professor GeoResources Institute Mississippi State University
More informationAirborne Laser Scanning: Remote Sensing with LiDAR
Airborne Laser Scanning: Remote Sensing with LiDAR ALS / LIDAR OUTLINE Laser remote sensing background Basic components of an ALS/LIDAR system Two distinct families of ALS systems Waveform Discrete Return
More informationNEXTMap World 10 Digital Elevation Model
NEXTMap Digital Elevation Model Intermap Technologies, Inc. 8310 South Valley Highway, Suite 400 Englewood, CO 80112 10012015 NEXTMap (top) provides an improvement in vertical accuracy and brings out greater
More informationFingerprint Image Enhancement Algorithm and Performance Evaluation
Fingerprint Image Enhancement Algorithm and Performance Evaluation Naja M I, Rajesh R M Tech Student, College of Engineering, Perumon, Perinad, Kerala, India Project Manager, NEST GROUP, Techno Park, TVM,
More informationCS 223B Computer Vision Problem Set 3
CS 223B Computer Vision Problem Set 3 Due: Feb. 22 nd, 2011 1 Probabilistic Recursion for Tracking In this problem you will derive a method for tracking a point of interest through a sequence of images.
More informationREGISTRATION OF AIRBORNE LASER DATA TO SURFACES GENERATED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MEANS. Y. Postolov, A. Krupnik, K. McIntosh
REGISTRATION OF AIRBORNE LASER DATA TO SURFACES GENERATED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MEANS Y. Postolov, A. Krupnik, K. McIntosh Department of Civil Engineering, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa,
More informationAUTONOMOUS IMAGE EXTRACTION AND SEGMENTATION OF IMAGE USING UAV S
AUTONOMOUS IMAGE EXTRACTION AND SEGMENTATION OF IMAGE USING UAV S Radha Krishna Rambola, Associate Professor, NMIMS University, India Akash Agrawal, Student at NMIMS University, India ABSTRACT Due to the
More informationModel-based segmentation and recognition from range data
Model-based segmentation and recognition from range data Jan Boehm Institute for Photogrammetry Universität Stuttgart Germany Keywords: range image, segmentation, object recognition, CAD ABSTRACT This
More informationTerrestrial Laser Scanning: Applications in Civil Engineering Pauline Miller
Terrestrial Laser Scanning: Applications in Civil Engineering Pauline Miller School of Civil Engineering & Geosciences Newcastle University Overview Laser scanning overview Research applications geometric
More informationLIDAR and Terrain Models: In 3D!
LIDAR and Terrain Models: In 3D! Stuart.green@teagasc.ie http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/lidar-analysis-forestry.pdf http://www.csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/_/pdf/refinement_of_topographic_lidar_to_create_a_bare_e
More informationINFRARED AUTONOMOUS ACQUISITION AND TRACKING
INFRARED AUTONOMOUS ACQUISITION AND TRACKING Teresa L.P. Olson and Harry C. Lee Teresa.Lolson@lmco.com (407) 356-7109 Harrv.c.lee@lmco.com (407) 356-6997 Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control - Orlando
More informationA QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF AIRBORNE LASER SCANNER DATA
A QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF AIRBORNE LASER SCANNER DATA E. Ahokas, H. Kaartinen, J. Hyyppä Finnish Geodetic Institute, Geodeetinrinne 2, 243 Masala, Finland Eero.Ahokas@fgi.fi KEYWORDS: LIDAR, accuracy, quality,
More informationAutomatic DTM Extraction from Dense Raw LIDAR Data in Urban Areas
Automatic DTM Extraction from Dense Raw LIDAR Data in Urban Areas Nizar ABO AKEL, Ofer ZILBERSTEIN and Yerach DOYTSHER, Israel Key words: LIDAR, DSM, urban areas, DTM extraction. SUMMARY Although LIDAR
More informationN.Priya. Keywords Compass mask, Threshold, Morphological Operators, Statistical Measures, Text extraction
Volume, Issue 8, August ISSN: 77 8X International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering Research Paper Available online at: www.ijarcsse.com A Combined Edge-Based Text
More informationCS 4758: Automated Semantic Mapping of Environment
CS 4758: Automated Semantic Mapping of Environment Dongsu Lee, ECE, M.Eng., dl624@cornell.edu Aperahama Parangi, CS, 2013, alp75@cornell.edu Abstract The purpose of this project is to program an Erratic
More informationComparison GRASS-LiDAR modules TerraScan with respect to vegetation filtering
Comparison GRASS-LiDAR modules TerraScan with respect to vegetation filtering Sara Lucca sara.lucca@mail.polimi.it Maria Antonia Brovelli - maria.brovelli@polimi.it LiDAR system Detection system by a laser
More informationAUTOMATIC GENERATION OF DIGITAL BUILDING MODELS FOR COMPLEX STRUCTURES FROM LIDAR DATA
AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF DIGITAL BUILDING MODELS FOR COMPLEX STRUCTURES FROM LIDAR DATA Changjae Kim a, Ayman Habib a, *, Yu-Chuan Chang a a Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Canada - habib@geomatics.ucalgary.ca,
More informationCOMPONENTS. The web interface includes user administration tools, which allow companies to efficiently distribute data to internal or external users.
COMPONENTS LASERDATA LIS is a software suite for LiDAR data (TLS / MLS / ALS) management and analysis. The software is built on top of a GIS and supports both point and raster data. The following software
More informationMATLAB Tools for LIDAR Data Conversion, Visualization, and Processing
MATLAB Tools for LIDAR Data Conversion, Visualization, and Processing Xiao Wang a, Kaijing Zhou a, Jie Yang a, Yilong Lu *a a Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798 ABSTRACT
More informationAdvanced point cloud processing
Advanced point cloud processing George Vosselman ITC Enschede, the Netherlands INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION Laser scanning platforms Airborne systems mounted
More informationINTEGRATION OF TREE DATABASE DERIVED FROM SATELLITE IMAGERY AND LIDAR POINT CLOUD DATA
INTEGRATION OF TREE DATABASE DERIVED FROM SATELLITE IMAGERY AND LIDAR POINT CLOUD DATA S. C. Liew 1, X. Huang 1, E. S. Lin 2, C. Shi 1, A. T. K. Yee 2, A. Tandon 2 1 Centre for Remote Imaging, Sensing
More informationImage Segmentation Techniques for Object-Based Coding
Image Techniques for Object-Based Coding Junaid Ahmed, Joseph Bosworth, and Scott T. Acton The Oklahoma Imaging Laboratory School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Oklahoma State University {ajunaid,bosworj,sacton}@okstate.edu
More informationHAWAII KAUAI Survey Report. LIDAR System Description and Specifications
HAWAII KAUAI Survey Report LIDAR System Description and Specifications This survey used an Optech GEMINI Airborne Laser Terrain Mapper (ALTM) serial number 06SEN195 mounted in a twin-engine Navajo Piper
More informationUsing LiDAR (Light Distancing And Ranging) data to more accurately describe avalanche terrain
International Snow Science Workshop, Davos 009, Proceedings Using LiDAR (Light Distancing And Ranging) data to more accurately describe avalanche terrain Christopher M. McCollister, and Robert H. Comey,
More informationAUTOMATIC EXTRACTION OF BUILDING OUTLINE FROM HIGH RESOLUTION AERIAL IMAGERY
AUTOMATIC EXTRACTION OF BUILDING OUTLINE FROM HIGH RESOLUTION AERIAL IMAGERY Yandong Wang EagleView Technology Cor. 5 Methodist Hill Dr., Rochester, NY 1463, the United States yandong.wang@ictometry.com
More informationData: a collection of numbers or facts that require further processing before they are meaningful
Digital Image Classification Data vs. Information Data: a collection of numbers or facts that require further processing before they are meaningful Information: Derived knowledge from raw data. Something
More informationThe Reference Library Generating Low Confidence Polygons
GeoCue Support Team In the new ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data, low confidence areas within LIDAR data are defined to be where the bare earth model might not meet the overall
More informationEquation to LaTeX. Abhinav Rastogi, Sevy Harris. I. Introduction. Segmentation.
Equation to LaTeX Abhinav Rastogi, Sevy Harris {arastogi,sharris5}@stanford.edu I. Introduction Copying equations from a pdf file to a LaTeX document can be time consuming because there is no easy way
More informationSOME stereo image-matching methods require a user-selected
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, VOL. 3, NO. 2, APRIL 2006 207 Seed Point Selection Method for Triangle Constrained Image Matching Propagation Qing Zhu, Bo Wu, and Zhi-Xiang Xu Abstract In order
More informationA Method to Create a Single Photon LiDAR based Hydro-flattened DEM
A Method to Create a Single Photon LiDAR based Hydro-flattened DEM Sagar Deshpande 1 and Alper Yilmaz 2 1 Surveying Engineering, Ferris State University 2 Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic
More informationTerrain Modeling and Mapping for Telecom Network Installation Using Scanning Technology. Maziana Muhamad
Terrain Modeling and Mapping for Telecom Network Installation Using Scanning Technology Maziana Muhamad Summarising LiDAR (Airborne Laser Scanning) LiDAR is a reliable survey technique, capable of: acquiring
More informationLidar and GIS: Applications and Examples. Dan Hedges Clayton Crawford
Lidar and GIS: Applications and Examples Dan Hedges Clayton Crawford Outline Data structures, tools, and workflows Assessing lidar point coverage and sample density Creating raster DEMs and DSMs Data area
More informationEffects Of Shadow On Canny Edge Detection through a camera
1523 Effects Of Shadow On Canny Edge Detection through a camera Srajit Mehrotra Shadow causes errors in computer vision as it is difficult to detect objects that are under the influence of shadows. Shadow
More informationABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DATA
Spectral LiDAR Analysis for Terrain Classification Charles A. McIver, Jeremy P. Metcalf, Richard C. Olsen* Naval Postgraduate School, 833 Dyer Road, Monterey, CA, USA 93943 ABSTRACT Data from the Optech
More informationCS 231A Computer Vision (Fall 2012) Problem Set 3
CS 231A Computer Vision (Fall 2012) Problem Set 3 Due: Nov. 13 th, 2012 (2:15pm) 1 Probabilistic Recursion for Tracking (20 points) In this problem you will derive a method for tracking a point of interest
More informationAUTOMATIC BUILDING DETECTION FROM LIDAR POINT CLOUD DATA
AUTOMATIC BUILDING DETECTION FROM LIDAR POINT CLOUD DATA Nima Ekhtari, M.R. Sahebi, M.J. Valadan Zoej, A. Mohammadzadeh Faculty of Geodesy & Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology,
More informationFiles Used in this Tutorial
RPC Orthorectification Tutorial In this tutorial, you will use ground control points (GCPs), an orthorectified reference image, and a digital elevation model (DEM) to orthorectify an OrbView-3 scene that
More informationKeywords: Thresholding, Morphological operations, Image filtering, Adaptive histogram equalization, Ceramic tile.
Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013 ISSN: 2277 128X International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering Research Paper Available online at: www.ijarcsse.com Blobs and Cracks
More informationA New Algorithm for Detecting Text Line in Handwritten Documents
A New Algorithm for Detecting Text Line in Handwritten Documents Yi Li 1, Yefeng Zheng 2, David Doermann 1, and Stefan Jaeger 1 1 Laboratory for Language and Media Processing Institute for Advanced Computer
More informationLiDAR Remote Sensing Data Collection: Yaquina and Elk Creek Watershed, Leaf-On Acquisition
LiDAR Remote Sensing Data Collection: Yaquina and Elk Creek Watershed, Leaf-On Acquisition Submitted by: 4605 NE Fremont, Suite 211 Portland, Oregon 97213 April, 2006 Table of Contents LIGHT DETECTION
More informationResearch on-board LIDAR point cloud data pretreatment
Acta Technica 62, No. 3B/2017, 1 16 c 2017 Institute of Thermomechanics CAS, v.v.i. Research on-board LIDAR point cloud data pretreatment Peng Cang 1, Zhenglin Yu 1, Bo Yu 2, 3 Abstract. In view of the
More informationAutomatic bridge detection in airborne laser scanned data. Master of Science Thesis DANIEL FORSBERG
Automatic bridge detection in airborne laser scanned data Master of Science Thesis DANIEL FORSBERG Chalmers University of Technology University of Gothenburg Department of Computer Science and Engineering
More informationFiles Used in this Tutorial
RPC Orthorectification Tutorial In this tutorial, you will use ground control points (GCPs), an orthorectified reference image, and a digital elevation model (DEM) to orthorectify an OrbView-3 scene that
More informationIRIS SEGMENTATION OF NON-IDEAL IMAGES
IRIS SEGMENTATION OF NON-IDEAL IMAGES William S. Weld St. Lawrence University Computer Science Department Canton, NY 13617 Xiaojun Qi, Ph.D Utah State University Computer Science Department Logan, UT 84322
More informationTree height measurements and tree growth estimation in a mire environment using digital surface models
Tree height measurements and tree growth estimation in a mire environment using digital surface models E. Baltsavias 1, A. Gruen 1, M. Küchler 2, P.Thee 2, L.T. Waser 2, L. Zhang 1 1 Institute of Geodesy
More informationLecture 6: GIS Spatial Analysis. GE 118: INTRODUCTION TO GIS Engr. Meriam M. Santillan Caraga State University
Lecture 6: GIS Spatial Analysis GE 118: INTRODUCTION TO GIS Engr. Meriam M. Santillan Caraga State University 1 Spatial Data It can be most simply defined as information that describes the distribution
More informationIntroduction to digital image classification
Introduction to digital image classification Dr. Norman Kerle, Wan Bakx MSc a.o. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION Purpose of lecture Main lecture topics Review
More informationIntroduction to LiDAR
Introduction to LiDAR Our goals here are to introduce you to LiDAR data. LiDAR data is becoming common, provides ground, building, and vegetation heights at high accuracy and detail, and is available statewide.
More informationAirborne LiDAR Data Acquisition for Forestry Applications. Mischa Hey WSI (Corvallis, OR)
Airborne LiDAR Data Acquisition for Forestry Applications Mischa Hey WSI (Corvallis, OR) WSI Services Corvallis, OR Airborne Mapping: Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Thermal Infrared Imagery 4-Band
More informationLab 10: Raster Analyses
Lab 10: Raster Analyses What You ll Learn: Spatial analysis and modeling with raster data. You will estimate the access costs for all points on a landscape, based on slope and distance to roads. You ll
More informationAutomatic urbanity cluster detection in street vector databases with a raster-based algorithm
Automatic urbanity cluster detection in street vector databases with a raster-based algorithm Volker Walter, Steffen Volz University of Stuttgart Institute for Photogrammetry Geschwister-Scholl-Str. 24D
More information