Commercial Building Energy Efficiency A BEEx & NYSERDA forum. Building Energy Exchange Thursday, January 19, 2017

Transcription

1 Commercial Building Energy Efficiency A BEEx & NYSERDA forum Building Energy Exchange Thursday, January 19, 2017

2 2 Real Time Energy Management Program

3 3 What Real Time Energy Management is NOT? NYSERDA RTEM is not incentivizing: Whole-Building Interval metering Whole-tenant space interval metering Controls Demand Response BMS/BAS In-house only use of an analytics platform

4 4 What is Real Time Energy Management? RTEM is the combination of: 1. Building data collection systems (system, equipment, device, panel level) 2. Data analytics and building data information services RTEM Systems capture discreet energy usage data RTEM Services use the data to develop key insights about building operations and identify opportunities. Value is realized as continuous identification occurs for customers, and improvements are made to operations, interoperability, and capital investments.

5 5 Qualified RTEM System and Service RTEM Systems are defined as the monitoring hardware and software used to extract, process, and store energy usage data. RTEM Services are defined as consulting services that customers contract with to analyze energy usage data and provide, enable, and/or implement actionable items base on the data. RTEM Services cannot solely consist of software as a service, or SaaS. RTEM Services can incorporate SaaS in to the services contract to use as a tool to provide, enable, and/or implement actionable items only.

6 6 RTEM: Analogy Ordinary Chess Player < Computer (assumed) < Grandmaster (traditional) < Supercomputer (Deep Blue) < Computer & Grandmaster (study) < Supercomputer & ordinary player (study) < Supercomputer & Grandmaster (assumed)

7 7

8 8 RTEM Results Customer oriented Clearly identified opportunities Data driven decisions Mills, Evan. "Building commissioning: A golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse-gas emissions." Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2010).

9 9 RTEM in Practice 25% Source Energy Savings 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Mills, Evan. "Building commissioning: A golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse-gas emissions." Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2010).

10 10 RTEM in Practice 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Source Energy Savings Mills, Evan. "Building commissioning: A golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse-gas emissions." Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2010). AtSite: 9 Commercial Buildings, 2.5M Sq Ft $1.4M Total Energy Savings 12% Portfolio Energy Savings Implemented over 100 energy conservation measures that include no-cost operational adjustments, low and medium cost (ex. occupancy sensors, lighting retrofits, variable frequency drives) and a few high cost recommendations

11 11 RTEM in Practice 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Source Energy Savings NorthWrite: Small Commercial > $22,000 / year in Savings 10% in kwh savings 10% in kw demand reduction HVAC optimization and capital improvements through retrofits that better fit the customer s operational needs. Mills, Evan. "Building commissioning: A golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse-gas emissions." Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2010).

12 12 RTEM in Practice 25% 20% Source Energy Savings Enertiv: Major Retail Single no cost solution: > $5,000 / year in Energy Savings 42% in Exhaust hood energy savings 15% 10% 5% 0% Mills, Evan. "Building commissioning: A golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse-gas emissions." Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2010). Discovered that an exhaust hood in one of the kitchens was running continuously. Finding and quickly addressing this issue helped the customer maintain the proper operating schedules for their equipment, and prevent operational drift.

13 13 Incentive: Option A Traditional Procurement Installation & Service Cost Share - Initially capped at $155,000 per site, then drops to $115,000 Applications received Before July 1 st, 2018 Applications received On/After July 1 st, 2018 NYSERDA Cost- Share Cap per Project NYSERDA Cost- Share Cap per Project Systems 30% $75,000 20% $50,000 Service Years % $20,000 20% $15,000 Service Years % $10,000 15% $10,000

14 14 Incentive: Option B - Subscription RTEM as a Service Cost Share - Initially capped at $155,000 per site, then drops to $140,000 Applications received Before July 1 st, 2018 Applications received On/After July 1 st, 2018 NYSERDA Cost- Share Cap per Project NYSERDA Cost- Share Cap per Project Years % $35,000 20% $30,000 Years % $25,000 15% $25,000

15 15 How to apply Vendors Start by applying to the RTEM RFQ 3164 and become an RTEM Qualified Vendor Customers Select an RTEM Vendor from NYSERDA s website Or select your own RTEM Vendor, and have them apply to the RTEM RFQ Proof of SBC payment (utility bill) Other programmatic specifics listed in PON 3309 More information: commercialprograms@nyserda.ny.gov

16 16 Commercial Tenant Program

17 17 Commercial Tenant Program 1 Market activation Tenant 2 engagement Design 3 enhancement Cost 4 effectiveness Capacity 5 Building Stimulate energy efficiency improvements in tenant spaces Encourages building owners and tenants to work together to achieve energy efficiency in commercial buildings Push design of high performing office spaces and achieve energy savings above code Demonstrate a cost-effective and replicable approach to deliver energy efficient, high performance office spaces Build experience of A&E engineers modeling tenant spaces

18 18 Commercial Tenant Program (PON 3308) Program Opportunity Notice 3308 $5.75 million in available funds First-come, first-serve dependent on funding availability Statewide Through July 31, 2019 SBC contribution required (electric)

19 19 Offering Cost-share energy modeling and development of energy efficiency packages: Energy model List of energy conservation recommendations (above code) Financial analysis

20 Participants 20 Tenant undergoing lease negotiations (new or renewal) or renovating an existing space Building Owner focused on tenant engagement & increasing performance of tenant spaces A&E must meet qualifications criteria. Integral part of team.

21 Energy Efficiency Packages 21 CUSTOM Tenant driven Customized model for specific tenant space up to 50% cost-share GENERIC Owner/manager driven Standardized model for all tenant spaces in a building up to 50% cost-share COMBINED Customized tenant model + modified version for other generic tenant spaces up to 50% custom package and 100% generic package

22 22 Additional information Installation: No requirement to install. No incentives provided for installation. Sq/Ft: No minimum sq ft requirement Systems: Package must include measures that exceed current ECCC requirements for at least two building systems: lighting, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), service water heating, unregulated loads and process loads, or building envelope. Renovations: If the tenant is renovating a space, renovation must be significant enough to require permits for New York State ECCC compliance M&V: Tenants who install at least one measure must provide available utility data and access to the space for monitoring and verification (M&V) for at least one year. (No additional cost for M&V and no risk to incentive).

23 23 How to apply Commercial Tenant Project Application Proof of SBC payment (utility bill) Proof of qualifications of Modeling Entity Letter of commitment from the Tenant or Building Owner Proposed Budget application and completed documents to

24 24 Contact Information Sophie Cardona Joshua Clyburn x3590, x3071, Program mailbox [for inquiries and project applications] Mayra Lujan , [outreach lead for Commercial Tenant Program]

25 Rudin Management Company, Inc. NYSERDA / NRDC High Performance Tenant Program 1/19/2017 John Gilbert and Luis Rios

26 Rudin Management Company Rudin Portfolio Overview Corporate HQ Renovation Planning Stages Corporate Commitment High Performance Space NRDC / NYSERDA High Performance Tenant Demonstration Project Pilot Early 2015

27 Rudin Management Company HPDP - Program Experience: Objectives Energy Savings & Market Transformation Model early and inform the design. Value Engineer proposed designed to make a case for any changes to base systems. Create Energy Model for 345 Park Avenue & Rudin space. Ability to use the Rudin energy model for future tenant buildouts within 345 Park Avenue. Process -Simple Collaboration Meeting between Rudin, OLA, & NYSERDA Early Adaptation OLA issued report with proposed ECM s. ECM consideration / implementation. OLA Project Engineer involved throughout the construction process. Incentive

28 Rudin Management Company Technology Connected interactive Space Controls Visibility Nantum-Demo Building Operating System Tenant Fractal Q/A?

29 Rudin Management Company Implemented ECM Strategies: Improved Air Distribution VAV / Induction Units Individual Temperature Control / Sensors Plug Load Control Lighting Density & Control ½ W/PSF HE Supplemental Cooling Window Film Technology Nantum Tenant Fractal

30 ECMs for High Performing Tenant Space Jack Jenkins RDA Energy and Sustainability January 2017

31 Case Study 1 Plant Type Energy Saving Measure

32 9 Floor Law Office

33 3 floors had a Dual Duct System - Inefficient

34 Engineer suggested replacing with VAV system

35 BUT.. there is an upfront cost to replace the system;

36 AND.. the system is owned by the building NOT the tenant VS. energy savings will go to the building NOT the tenant

37 Energy Model of the Tenant Space

38 RESULT - for the building 25% reduction in costs for energy to service tenant s space savings will payback cost within about 1 year

39 RESULT - for the tenant No Energy Savings; but Less ductwork required saving tenant $90,000 on cost of build-out

40 RESULT - overall GHG emissions cut by 350 metric tons of CO 2 e per year

41 Case Study 2 Process Type Energy Saving Measure

42 Occupancy sensor based lighting controls 20 a delay of up to 30 minutes is allowed by code

43 Could lighting be turned off straight away?

44 BUT.. what if the lights turn off when someone is still there?

45 BUT.. what if the lights turn off when someone is still there?

46 Solution 1: high density of sensors VS

47 Solution 2: find a compromise 10 minutes

48 Energy Model of the Tenant Space

49 RESULT - for the tenant no additional cost to reduce the delay time, as sensors and controls were already being installed. doing this will cut the tenant s energy costs by more than 5% 2.5%

50 RESULT - for the building the building will see a small reduction in cooling energy; but also a small increase in heating energy. 0.75% adding to a 1.5% net reduction in energy costs to service the tenant s space

51 RESULT - overall GHG emissions cut by metric tons of CO 2 e per year

52 Case Study 3 People Type Energy Saving Measure

53 Late working keeps systems on

54 (1) What if we group late-workers together?

55 this would let us turn-off other space

56 BUT: what if some people don t play ball

57 (2) Flexible workspace for after-hours work

58 again allowing us turn-off other space

59 BUT: some may still be unhappy

60 (3) Incentivize use of designated space

61 9 Floor Law Office is this worth doing?

62 Energy Model of the Tenant Space

63 RESULT - for the tenant Aim to turn-off all but 1 floor in evenings and at weekends doing this will cut the tenant s energy costs by 9%

64 RESULT - for the building This may also reduce energy use by the building s HVAC systems cutting the building s energy costs, in servicing this tenant s space, by up to 9%

65 RESULT - overall GHG emissions cut by up to 4,965 metric tons of CO 2 e over the 20 year lease term

66 Summary

67 9 floor law office: tenant savings of up to 45%

68 Project selected better package of savings

69 Energy saving of over $7.5 million over lease term

70 thankyou CONTACT: Jack Jenkins Energy and Sustainability 19 West 44 th Street, New York, NY Direct:

71 Key NYC energy code changes relevant to common ECMs ECM 2014 NYCECC (old) 2016 NYCECC (new) Occupancy Controls for Lighting Automatic Daylight Responsive Controls Lighting Power Density (LPD) space by space method Automatic Receptacle Controls Max delay: 30 mins Not required (unless project chose ASHRAE compliance path) Office (open plan): 1.0 Office (enclosed): 1.1 Conference Room: 1.2 Corridor: 0.7 Not required (unless project chose ASHRAE compliance path) Max delay: 20 mins Now also required in: open office and print/copy rooms Required for day-lit spaces with 150 Watts or more of lighting Office (open plan): 0.90 Office (enclosed): 1.0 Conference Room: 1.23 Corridor: 0.66 Not required (unless project chooses ASHRAE compliance path) HVAC Efficiency i.e. WSHP EER: 12.0 i.e. WSHP EER: 13.0

72