A new simple concept for ocean colour remote sensing using parallel polarisation radiance

Transcription

1 Supplement Figures A new simple concept for ocean colour remote sensing using parallel polarisation radiance Xianqiang He 1, 3, Delu Pan 1, 2, Yan Bai 1, 2, Difeng Wang 1, Zengzhou Hao 1 1 State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou, China 2 Institute of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China 3 Department of Ocean Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Supplementary Figure S1: The upward total radiance and PPR (with units of mw/(cm 2 m sr)) at the TOA simulated by PCOART under rough surface with wind speed of 7.0 m/s. The solar zenith angles were taken from 0º to 70º with a step of 1º. It should be noted that the discrete peaks were caused by the interpolation, and the actual value should be a continuous curve. (a) The total radiance at 443 nm, (b) PPR at 443 nm, (c) total radiance at 670 nm, (d) PPR at 670 nm. Supplementary Figure S2: Comparisons of the I, Q and U at the TOA simulated by PCOART between the two-layer model atmosphere and mixed-layer atmosphere. In the simulations, the wavelength is 443nm; the solar zenith angle is 30º; the wind speed is 7.0 m/s; aerosol model is the maritime aerosol with 90% relative humidity, and aerosol optical thickness is 0.2. Supplementary Figure S3: Same as Fig.S2, but for the solar zenith angle of 60º. Supplementary Figure S4:Comparison of the normalised water-leaving radiance (Lwn) retrieved by the total radiance (upper row) and the PPR (bottom row) from POLDER data on 10 July 2003 under the 1th observing angle. The red areas are the regions masked by sun glint. (a) Lwn at 443nm retrieved by the total radiance, (b) Lwn at 670nm retrieved by the total radiance, (c) Lwn at 443nm retrieved by the PPR, (d) Lwn at 670nm retrieved by the PPR. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S5: Same as Fig. S4, but for the 2th observing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S6: Same as Fig. S4, but for the 3th observing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S7: Same as Fig. S4, but for the 4th observing angle. The maps were

2 generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S8: Same as Fig. S4, but for the 5th observing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S9: Same as Fig. S4, but for the 6th observing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S10: Same as Fig. S4, but for the 7th observing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S11: Same as Fig. S4, but for the 8th observing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S12: Same as Fig. S4, but for the 9th observing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S13: Same as Fig. S4, but for the 10th observing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S14: Same as Fig. S4, but for the 11th observing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S15: Same as Fig. S4, but for the 12th observing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and Supplementary Figure S16: Comparison of the normalized water-leaving radiances at 443nm (unit of mw/(cm 2 m sr)) retrieved by the total radiance and the PPR at the TOA from different observing angles of the POLDER data on 10 July Supplementary Figure S17: Same as Fig. S16, but for the 670nm.

3 Supplementary Figure S1: The upward total radiance and PPR (with units of mw/(cm 2 m sr)) at the TOA simulated by PCOART under rough surface with wind speed of 7.0 m/s. The solar zenith angles were taken from 0º to 70º with a step of 1º. It should be noted that the discrete peaks were caused by the interpolation, and the actual value should be a continuous curve. (a) The total radiance at 443 nm, (b) PPR at 443 nm, (c) total radiance at 670 nm, (d) PPR at 670 nm.

4 Supplementary Figure S2: Comparisons of the I, Q and U at the TOA simulated by PCOART between the two-layer model atmosphere and mixed-layer atmosphere. In the simulations, the wavelength is 443nm; the solar zenith angle is 30º; the wind speed is 7.0 m/s; aerosol model is the maritime aerosol with 90% relative humidity, and aerosol optical thickness is 0.2. Supplementary Figure S3: Same as Fig.S1, but for the solar zenith angle of 60º.

5 Supplementary Figure S4: Comparison of the normalized water-leaving radiance (Lwn) retrieved by the total radiance (upper row) and PPR (bottom row) from POLDER data on 10 July 2003 under the 1th observing angle. The red areas are the regions masked by sun glints. (a) Lwn at 443nm retrieved by the total radiance, (b) Lwn at 670nm retrieved by the total radiance, (c) Lwn at 443nm retrieved by the PPR, (d) Lwn at 670nm retrieved by the PPR. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

6 Supplementary Figure S5: Same as the supplementary Figure S4, but for the 2th viewing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

7 Supplementary Figure S6: Same as the supplementary Figure S4, but for the 3th viewing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

8 Supplementary Figure S7: Same as the supplementary Figure S4, but for the 4th viewing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

9 Supplementary Figure S8: Same as the supplementary Figure S4, but for the 5th viewing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

10 Supplementary Figure S9: Same as the supplementary Figure S4, but for the 6th viewing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

11 Supplementary Figure S10: Same as the supplementary Figure S4, but for the 7th viewing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

12 Supplementary Figure S11: Same as the supplementary Figure S4, but for the 8th viewing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

13 Supplementary Figure S12: Same as the supplementary Figure S4, but for the 9th viewing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

14 Supplementary Figure S13: Same as the supplementary Figure S4, but for the 10th viewing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

15 Supplementary Figure S14: Same as the supplementary Figure S4, but for the 11th viewing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

16 Supplementary Figure S15: Same as the supplementary Figure S4, but for the 12th viewing angle. The maps were generated by the Microsoft Visual C and

17 Supplementary Figure S16: Comparison of the normalized water-leaving radiances at 443nm (unit of mw/(cm 2 m sr)) retrieved by total radiance and PPR for different observing angles of the POLDER data on 10 July Color bars show the point densities.

18 Supplementary Figure S17: Same as the supplementary Figure S16, but for the 670nm.