VTA Board of Directors: FOR YOUR INFORMATION ONLY
|
|
- Jocelyn Carson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 From: Board.Secretary Sent: Friday, February 05, :48 PM To: VTA Board of Directors Subject: From VTA: Community Working Group February 2016 meetings (agenda and presentation) VTA Board of Directors: FOR YOUR INFORMATION ONLY At last night s Board meeting staff mentioned that the Community Working Groups (CWG) will meet next week. Attached are the agendas and the presentations for your reference. The meeting dates, locations and contact persons are noted below. Downtown/Diridon Community Working Group Tuesday, February 9th, 4-6 PM San Jose Chamber of Commerce 101. W. Santa Clara Street, San Jose Contact: Brent Pearse brent.pearse@vta.org (408) Alum Rock Community Working Group Wednesday, February 10 th, 4-6 PM Mexican Heritage Plaza 1700 Alum Rock Avenue, San Jose Contact: Angela Sipp angela.sipp@vta.org (408) Santa Clara Community Working Group Thursday, February 11th, 4-6 PM Santa Clara Chamber of Commerce 1850 Warburton Avenue, Santa Clara Contact: Angela Sipp angela.sipp@vta.org (408) Thank you. Office of the Board Secretary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority 3331 N. First Street San Jose, CA board.secretary@vta.org
2 VTA Website: Find us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and LinkedIn
3 Alum Rock Community Working Group (CWG) Agenda (Mexican Heritage Plaza, 1700 Alum Rock Avenue, San Jose) February 10, :00-6:00 PM 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Follow-up Items & Work Plan Facilitator a. Follow-up Items b. Phase II Funding Strategies Workshop held 1/20 c. Work Plan shifts and Schedule Update: Leyla Hedayat Topic New Date Original Date Financial Update of BART Phase II (VTA April 2016 February 2016 and Ernst & Young to present) Construction outreach best practices April 2016 February 2016 research summary update Economic Analysis Surrounding BART April Stations (City to present) Process for Evaluating the Proposed East April and West Options for the Downtown San Jose Station Multi-modal Access Planning to Alum Rock Station February 2017 April Economic Analysis Surrounding BART Stations Rosalynn Hughey a. Literature Review Findings b. Developers Forum Update 4. Nelson Nygaard San Jose BART Station Access Planning Wrap-Up Jessica Zenk 5. VTA Projects within BART Corridor John Ristow 6. BART s Station Naming Policy Leyla Hedayat a. Link to the document posted under Phase II CWG Links 7. Announcements Facilitator a. Alum Rock-Santa Clara BRT Construction Overview Today, Mexican Heritage Plaza, 6:00-7:00pm (CWG Members welcome) 8. Next Steps Facilitator a. Next Meeting (April 13, :00-6:00 PM) b. Confirm Action Items c. Review Work Plan
4 VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Alum Rock Community Working Group February 10, Agenda Follow-up Items and Work Plan Economic Analysis Surrounding BART Stations Nelson Nygaard San Jose BART Station Access Planning Wrap-Up VTA Projects within BART Corridor BART s Station Naming Policy Announcements Next Steps 2 1
5 Role of the CWG Be project liaisons Receive briefings on technical areas Receive project updates Build an understanding of the project Collaborate with VTA Contribute to the successful delivery of the project 3 Your Role as a CWG Member Attend CWG meetings Bring your own binder (BYOB) Be honest Provide feedback Get informed Disseminate accurate information Act as conduits for information to community at large 4 2
6 Role of the CWG Team CWG Team Member Eileen Goodwin Angela Sipp Leyla Hedayat Erica Roecks/ Janice Soriano Michael Brilliot Rosalynn Hughey Ray Salvano Jessica Zenk Role Facilitator Primary Outreach Contact Phase II Project Manager Technical Lead City of San Jose Planning Liaison City of San Jose Planning Liaison City of San Jose DOT Liaison City of San Jose DOT Liaison 5 Upcoming Meetings Public Hearings for Draft Environment Document Late May 2016 VTA Board of Directors March 3, 2016 April 7, 2016 May 5, 2016 BART Silicon Valley Program Working Committee March 7, 2016 May 2, 2016 Public meetings on specific technical topics - TBD 6 3
7 Follow-up Items and Work Plan Santa Clara/13 th Street mid-tunnel ventilation structure Ventilation Facility Fact Sheet posted on CWG website under Phase II CWG Links Phase II Funding Strategies Workshop held on 1/20/16 7 Work Plan Shifts and Schedule Update Leyla Hedayat, Phase II Project Manager 8 4
8 Environmental Schedule Update 9 Economic Analysis Surrounding BART Stations Rosalynn Hughey, City of San Jose 10 5
9 ASSESSING POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS OF BART SILICON VALLEY PHASE II DRAFT Review of Study Scope Assessing Potential Development Impacts of BART Silicon Valley Phase II Task 1: Project Initiation and Site Visits Task 2: Literature Review of Property and Development Impacts of Transit Task 3: Prepare Station Area Profiles Task 4: Final Report will compile findings from Tasks
10 ` ` Economic Benefits of Transit ` Summary of Literature on Transit Impacts Large body of literature, but results vary and studies not necessarily comparable to each other Property value impacts depend on variety of factors: Quality of transit Station locations Urban design and pedestrian-friendliness Other external factors may impact transit values on property 14 7
11 Economic Benefits of Transit Property and Business Owners Users Local Government Increased property values Improved development potential Increased retail spending Increased productivity Improved access Reduced traffic congestion on roadways Reduced transportation costs Job creation Business attraction & retention Reduced costs for roads & parking Increased property tax, sales tax and transient occupancy tax 15 ` Examples ` ` 8
12 Example: BART Impacts on Property Values BART contributes an estimated $17.3 billion in added property value to for-sale residential properties in Alameda, Contra Costa, and San Mateo Counties BART Price Premium 15.0% Condominiums Single Family 10.7% 10.4% 9.6% 7.4% 5.4% 4.6% 1.3% Within 1/2 Mile 1/2 to 1 mile 1 to 2 miles 2 to 5 miles Source: Strategic Economics, Example: Benefits of Transit for Office Properties Improved transit access helps attract office tenants Average Occupancy Rates by County and Distance from BART 100% Average Occupancy Rate 80% 60% 40% 20% <1/2 mile 1/2-1 mile 1-2 miles 2-5 miles 0% Alameda County San Mateo County 18 Sources: CoStar, 2Q 2014; Strategic Economics,
13 Example: Benefits of Transit for Office Properties Transit-served office properties achieve higher rents Office Rent Premium Associated with Proximity to BART (East Bay) BART Proximity Premium 20% 16% 12% 8% 4% 0% 18% 11% Within 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2 mile Road Distance to Nearest BART Station 19 Sources: CoStar, 2014; Strategic Economics, Next Steps Complete station area profiles for three station areas: Alum Rock Diridon Downtown San Jose Developers Forum for Alum Rock station area Prepare final report 20 10
14 Nelson Nygaard San Jose BART Station Access Planning Wrap-Up Jessica Zenk, City of San Jose 21 Access & Connectivity Study Today Background Purpose of the Study Study Process How will this study be used? 22 11
15 Access & Connectivity Study Purpose: Integrate BART Stations into the Surrounding Environment Maximize Ridership Connect Seamlessly to Feeder Systems Enhance the Quality of Street Life Encourage Foot Traffic & Business Vitality 23 Access & Connectivity Study 24 12
16 Access & Connectivity Study Study Process Review of Existing Plans & Conditions Walk/Bike Tours, Charette & Open House Initial Consultant Recommendations & Community Feedback (July 15) August 15 Community Working Groups Additional Feedback Consultant Draft Report Recording Recommendations (November 15) Final Report (Early 16) 25 Access & Connectivity Study How will this work be used? Station Access Plans (VTA-led) Understand and pursue partnership opportunities (Community, City, VTA, BART, others) Advance Design and Feasibility Work Pursue Individual Projects (grants, other means) and Policies 26 13
17 VTA Projects within BART Corridor John Ristow, VTA 27 BART Silicon Valley Community Working Group February
18 Presentation Topics Transit Ridership Improvement Program (TRIP) Bus System Light Rail Enhancements Core Connectivity Diridon Station Multi-Modal Station Design 29 VTA Service at a Glance Service Area: Santa Clara County 15 cities 1.8 million residents 70 bus lines 432 buses Approximately 3,800 stops, 800 shelters 3 light rail transit lines 99 light rail vehicles million boardings in FY ,965 average weekday boardings 30 15
19 Transit Ridership Improvement Program TRIP Purpose Improve Ridership Improve Farebox Recovery Rate Connect to Berryessa and Milpitas BART Stations Two-Year Planning and Policy Effort Transit Network Design (FY18-19 Service Plan) Working with Jarrett Walker and Associates 31 Transit Ridership Improvement Program TRIP Elements 1 Assessment of VTA s Current Transit Service 2 Policy Development 3 Partner Education and Involvement 4 Development of VTA s Next Network Changes coming to Light Rail Service Bus Service Core Connectivity 32 16
20 Policy Discussions PRODUCTIVITY COVERAGE GOAL IS RIDERSHIP High demand areas Productive Fast, straight, direct Service for everyone 70% 30% GOAL IS NOT RIDERSHIP Low demand areas Unproductive Meandering Service for those who need it Next Network Development 34 17
21 Next Network Development 35 Light Rail Enhancements New Operating Plan Speed Improvements Downtown North First Street System-wide Slow Speed Zone 36 18
22 Existing System Milpitas BART Station Estimated Ridership BART 10,000 Light Rail 6,400 Transfers 4,100 between BART and Light Rail Milpitas BART Mode of Access 13% Bike/Ped 40% Bus 22% Auto Light Rail 25% Rendering of future Milpitas Station and campus. pedestrian overcrossing connecting Milpitas Station to VTA s Montague Light Rail 38 19
23 Scenario 2 Tasman Express Option New Tasman Line connecting (Peak Period Only) Mountain View to Alum Rock 15 minute frequencies all day No Express service Winchester Mountain View line changes.. Express route in peak periods between Mountain View and Old Ironsides Turns back at Old Ironsides in the off peak Commuter Express service change Loops around Downtown San Jose and returns to Santa Teresa, Peak Period only, 30 minute frequencies Commuter Express Option (Peak Period Only) 20
24 BART s Station Naming Policy Leyla Hedayat, VTA 42 21
25 Phase II Station Naming Overview Review and confirm the station names with the Phase II CWGs Review BART Naming Policy and Procedures BART policy and procedures on CWG website: Under Phase II CWG Links VTA timeline and process for potential station name change 43 BART Station Naming Policy and Guidelines Overall helpfulness to the passenger Informativeness Geographical significance Brevity How well it sounds Distinctiveness Ease of pronunciation Historical basis Prominence in the area Overall appeal 44 22
26 BART Station Naming Policy and Guidelines Transit System Context Simplicity For quick recognition and retention Brief and distinctive Easy to pronounce and understand Station Area Context Historical basis Geographically significant Not named after private or commercial enterprises 45 Station Naming Process for Phase II Stations February 9 th, 10 th, 11 th CWG Meeting review the process for proposing a new station name, provide overview of BART Station Naming Policy and Procedure. February 26th VTA/BART Coordination Meeting provide an update to BART on status and determine their review and information to their board. March 7 th PWC Meeting present the process for station naming and guidelines from BART station Naming Policy and Procedure. April 7 th VTA Board Meeting Present process for station naming under Phase II project update
27 Station Naming Process for Phase II Stations April 12 th, 13 th and 14 th CWG Meetings recap naming process and guidelines. Conduct a silent poll of the CWG members. The facilitator will select the top 2 or 3 preferred names for further discussion. Weeks of April 18 th and 25 th meet with City staff to review CWG recommendations. City staff to meet with City manager and provide recommendation to VTA. May 2 nd PWC Meeting present the final recommended name for all station for VTA Silicon Valley Phase II. June 9 th Board Meeting present final recommended names under the PWC Chair report. 47 Announcements Alum Rock-Santa Clara BRT Construction Overview Today, February 10, 2016, 6:00-7:00PM at Mexican Heritage Plaza CWG Members Welcome 48 24
28 Discussion Eileen Goodwin, Facilitator 49 Next Steps Next meeting: Wednesday, April 13, 2016~ 4:00-6:00 PM, Mexican Heritage Plaza ~ BYOB Financial Update of BART Phase II (VTA and Ernst & Young to present) Economic Analysis Surrounding BART Stations (City to present) Construction Outreach Best Practices Research Summary Update Environmental process (Draft SEIS/SEIR, public meetings, how to comment) Process for Evaluating the Proposed East and West Options for the Downtown Station Action Items 50 25
29 Santa Clara Community Working Group (CWG) Agenda (Santa Clara Chamber of Commerce, 1850 Warburton Avenue, Santa Clara) February 11, :00-6:00 PM 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Follow-up Items & Work Plan Facilitator a. Follow-up Items b. Phase II Funding Strategies Workshop held 1/20 c. Work Plan Shifts and Schedule Update: Topic New Date Original Date Financial Update of BART Phase II (VTA April 2016 February 2016 and Ernst & Young to present) Construction outreach best practices research April 2016 February 2016 summary update Process for Evaluating the Proposed East and April West Options for the Downtown San Jose Station Mission Town Center Project (CSC to April present) Multi-modal Access Planning to Santa Clara Station February 2017 April Caltrain Electrification Update Casey Fromson 4. High Speed Rail Update Ben Tripousis 5. VTA Projects within BART Corridor John Ristow 6. BART s Station Naming Policy Facilitator a. Link to the document posted under Phase II CWG Links 7. Next Steps Facilitator a. Next Meeting (April 12, :00-6:00 PM) b. Confirm Action Items c. Review Work Plan
30 VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Santa Clara Community Working Group February 11, Agenda Follow-up Items and Work Plan Caltrain Electrification Update High Speed Rail Update VTA Projects within BART Corridor BART s Station Naming Policy Next Steps 2 1
31 Role of the CWG Be project liaisons Receive briefings on technical areas Receive project updates Build an understanding of the project Collaborate with VTA Contribute to the successful delivery of the project 3 Your Role as a CWG Member Attend CWG meetings Bring your own binder (BYOB) Be honest Provide feedback Get informed Disseminate accurate information Act as conduits for information to community at large 4 2
32 Role of the CWG Team CWG Team Member Eileen Goodwin Angela Sipp Leyla Hedayat Erica Roecks/ Janice Soriano John Davidson Role Facilitator Primary Outreach Contact Phase II Project Manager Technical Lead City of Santa Clara Planning Liaison 5 Upcoming Meetings Public Hearings for Draft Environment Document Late May 2016 VTA Board of Directors March 3, 2016 April 7, 2016 May 5, 2016 BART Silicon Valley Program Working Committee March 7, 2016 May 2, 2016 Public meetings on specific technical topics - TBD 6 3
33 Follow-up Items and Work Plan How many cars are taken off the road when BART headways drop from 15 minutes to 12 minutes? answer not available Information on Section 106 process Tom Fitzwater (VTA Environmental) will update when available VTA Environmental and SCU meeting on archaeological information meeting scheduled with Tom Fitzwater and Chris Shay Phase II Funding Strategies Workshop held on 1/20/16 7 Work Plan Shifts and Schedule Update Eileen Goodwin, Facilitator 8 4
34 Environmental Schedule Update 9 Caltrain Electrification Update Casey Fromson, Caltrain 10 5
35 Caltrain Modernizaton Update BART Phase II Community Working Groups February 2016 Caltrain Today Weekday Ridership: 63,000+ weekday Average Ride: 20+ miles Choice Riders: 60 percent 12 6
36 Ridership Growth 60,000 55,000 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 42,354 34,611 36,232 33,691 31,507 34,120 26,794 29,728 29,178 29,760 26,028 26,533 24,597 25,577 23,947 47,060 37,779 52,611 58, Regional Transportation Needs US 101 and Interstate 280 Congested Corridor supports growing economy 14% CA GDP; 52% CA patents; 20% CA tax revenue Caltrain Commuter Coalition (formed 2014) 14 7
37 Caltrain Modernization Program Advanced Signal System: CBOSS PTC (2016) Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (2020) 15 Project Description Area Project Service 51+ miles Electrification: Up to 79 mph Overhead Contact Service Increase San Francisco System (OCS) 6 trains / hour / direction to San Jose Traction Power (Tamien Station) More station stops / reduced travel Facilities time Electric Multiple Units (EMUs) 75 percent Restore Atherton & Broadway service Mixed-fleet service (interim period) Cont. tenant service 6 8
38 Key Regional Benefits (2040) Note: 2013 BAC Report, generates $2.5B economic activity and 9,600 jobs 17 Service Benefits Metric Today PCEP Trains / peak hour / 5 6 direction Passengers / peak hour / direction 5,100 6,300 Example Baby Bullet Train Retain 5-6 stops 60 minutes 45 minutes Retain SF to SJ 60 minutes 6 stops 13 stops Example Redwood City Station Train stops / peak hour
39 Schedule Issued RFP Electrification Award Infrastructure Contract (FEB) (Summer / Fall) Environmental Clearance Design / Build / Test 2020 Service Issued RFP Electric Trains (AUGUST) Award Contract (TBD 2016) 19 Corridor Investments State of Good Repair Annual Needs CalMod Program CBOSS PTC 2016 Corridor Electrification 2020 (75% fleet conversion) Capacity Increase (CalMod 2.0) Full Fleet Conversion SF - SJ Longer Platforms / Trains Level Boarding System Performance Improve reliability / speed in congested areas Station Improvements Improve access needs / connectivity Safety Enhancements 40 at-grade crossings Funded by JPB Partners Mostly Funded Funding TBD Note: HSR Blended System and Downtown Extension Projects not included, led by other agencies 20 10
40 Partnerships / Collaboration Boards / Elected Officials Joint Powers Board (JPB); Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG); City Councils / Committees Advisory Committees Citizen Advisory Committee; Bicycle Advisory Committee; Caltrain Accessibility Advisory Committee Staff City / County Staff Coordination Group; Peninsula Corridor Working Group Community Leaders / Advocacy Organizations Caltrain Commuter Coalition; Friends of Caltrain 21 Questions For more information website: calmod@caltrain.com 22 11
41 High Speed Rail Update Ben Tripousis, High Speed Rail Authority 23 A TRANSFORMATIVE INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA S FUTURE BART Community Working Group High Speed Rail Update Meeting February
42 CONNECTING CALIFORNIA: Northern California Improves Mobility & Upgrades Bay Area Transportation Infrastructure Connects Bay Area to Central Valley Blended System Along Peninsula Multi-Model Transportation Hubs» Transbay Transit Center» Millbrae Transit Center» San Jose Diridon Station» Gilroy Station 25 BLENDED SYSTEM: SAN FRANCISCO TO SAN JOSE 51-Mile Corridor Blended Service on Electrified Caltrain Corridor Stations Being Studied:»4 th and King»Millbrae-SFO»Mid-Peninsula Option»San Jose (Diridon) 26 13
43 THE BLENDED SYSTEM: What It Means For You Reduced Costs Increased Ridership Capacity & Service» Primarily Shared Two Track System on Caltrain Corridor Environmental Benefits:» Improved Regional Air Quality» Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Improved Safety» Positive Train Control» Early Earthquake Warning System» Quad Gates, Fencing & Grade Separations 27 THE BLENDED SYSTEM: How We Got Here 2004: Early Planning for a Shared Corridor 2009: Planning Advanced to Identify Specific Improvements & Design 2012: Revised 2012 Business Plan Featured Blended Service: The proposed blended system for the San Francisco Peninsula is primarily a two-track system that will be shared by Caltrain, high-speed rail service, and current rail tenants. Initial investigations show that blended operations as currently envisioned for the corridor are costeffective solutions on both a capital and operating basis
44 THE BLENDED SYSTEM: What We Need to Do Continue Planning & Environmental Studies for:»passing Tracks»Curve Straightening»Safety Improvements»Station Areas»Light Maintenance Facility Minimized Impacts:»Majority of Work within Caltrain Right of Way Next Steps:»Continue Community & Stakeholder Engagement»Conduct Technical Studies & Environmental Analysis 29 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: Main Topics Timeline Project Definition Impacts to Current Caltrain Service Traffic & Noise Impacts Diesel or Electric Trains Right of Way Impacts Projected Costs 30 15
45 SAN JOSE TO MERCED PROJECT SECTION 84-Mile Corridor Central Valley Wye Portion Being Studied Separately Primarily Follows Monterey Highway, Highway 101 and Highway 152 through the Pacheco Pass Stations Being Studied:» San Jose (Diridon)» Gilroy 31 SAN JOSE TO MERCED PROJECT SECTION: History 2009: Scoping and Early Planning Underway 2010: Alternatives Analysis Released 2011: Supplemental Alternatives Released 2015: Planning and Environmental Work Continues 32 16
46 SAN JOSE TO MERCED: What We Need to Do Continue Planning & Environmental Studies:»Conduct Detailed Technical Studies»Refine Alignment Concepts»Evaluate Station Locations Next Steps:»Continue Community & Stakeholder Engagement»Conduct Technical Studies & Environmental Analysis 33 ONGOING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES State/Federal Elected Offices Briefings City Manager Meetings, Local Policymaker Group Council Workshops, Policy Maker Meetings, Briefings Early Technical Studies Community Working Groups Corridor Cities City, County, Advisory Group Meetings, One-on-ones Stakeholder Working Groups Corridor/Community Benefits Safety & Air Quality Ongoing Activities: presentations, activity centers, neighborhood & stakeholder outreach, etc. Public Meetings/Open Houses Board Meeting/Hearing 34 17
47 COMMUNITY APPROACH -- ONGOING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Development of Draft Environmental Document» Continued Community Working Group meetings» Use of CSCG/LPMG on the Peninsula» Ongoing reporting of technical work» Stakeholder briefings Community Connections» Identify and prioritize opportunities for all communities Multiple Outreach Opportunities 35 COMMUNITY INTEGRATION: Balancing Needs, Increasing Benefits Identify and Prioritize Opportunities for local Communities The Environment» Air quality, tree planting, adaptive reuse, sustainability Access & Mobility» Improve connections between all systems» Identify first and last mile opportunities Safety» Access, Quad Gates, Fencing Congestion Relief» Increase Capacity» Reduce Congestion in the 101 Corridor Stations» New and Expanded Multi-Modal Connections 36 18
48 COMMUNITY INTEGRATION PROCESS Establish working groups where appropriate Describe goals/objectives/strategies Describe projects that improve service Determine implementation strategy Invite regular community participation» Timeline» Local Participants 37 COMMUNITY INTEGRATION PARTICIPANTS Stakeholder Working Groups--Corridor agencies/organizations clarify universe of projects City, County and Local Policymaker Working Groups--Describe potential list of projects to achieve Blended Service and identify coordination opportunities (Grade Seps, Safety Improvements) Prioritize projects/opportunities parallel with formal environmental process 38 19
49 PROACTIVE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT A KEY ASPECT OF PROCESS January 2016 City, County Working Group #1 January 2016 Local Policymaker Working Group #1 TBD TBD Public Scoping Meetings, Open House Meetings 39 STAY INVOLVED Website: Helpline: (408) northern.california@hsr.ca.gov Northern California Regional Office California High-Speed Rail Authority 100 Paseo De San Antonio, Suite 206 San Jose, CA instagram.com/cahsra facebook.com/californiahighspeedrail twitter.com/cahsra youtube.com/user/cahighspeedrail 40 20
50 VTA Projects within BART Corridor John Ristow, VTA 41 BART Silicon Valley Community Working Group February
51 Presentation Topics Transit Ridership Improvement Program (TRIP) Bus System Light Rail Enhancements Core Connectivity Diridon Station Multi-Modal Station Design 43 VTA Service at a Glance Service Area: Santa Clara County 15 cities 1.8 million residents 70 bus lines 432 buses Approximately 3,800 stops, 800 shelters 3 light rail transit lines 99 light rail vehicles million boardings in FY ,965 average weekday boardings 44 22
52 Transit Ridership Improvement Program TRIP Purpose Improve Ridership Improve Farebox Recovery Rate Connect to Berryessa and Milpitas BART Stations Two-Year Planning and Policy Effort Transit Network Design (FY18-19 Service Plan) Working with Jarrett Walker and Associates 45 Transit Ridership Improvement Program TRIP Elements 1 Assessment of VTA s Current Transit Service 2 Policy Development 3 Partner Education and Involvement 4 Development of VTA s Next Network Changes coming to Light Rail Service Bus Service Core Connectivity 46 23
53 Policy Discussions PRODUCTIVITY COVERAGE GOAL IS RIDERSHIP High demand areas Productive Fast, straight, direct Service for everyone 70% 30% GOAL IS NOT RIDERSHIP Low demand areas Unproductive Meandering Service for those who need it Next Network Development 48 24
54 Next Network Development 49 Light Rail Enhancements New Operating Plan Speed Improvements Downtown North First Street System-wide Slow Speed Zone 50 25
55 Existing System Milpitas BART Station Estimated Ridership BART 10,000 Light Rail 6,400 Transfers 4,100 between BART and Light Rail Milpitas BART Mode of Access 13% Bike/Ped 40% Bus 22% Auto Light Rail 25% Rendering of future Milpitas Station and campus. pedestrian overcrossing connecting Milpitas Station to VTA s Montague Light Rail 52 26
56 Scenario 2 Tasman Express Option New Tasman Line connecting (Peak Period Only) Mountain View to Alum Rock 15 minute frequencies all day No Express service Winchester Mountain View line changes.. Express route in peak periods between Mountain View and Old Ironsides Turns back at Old Ironsides in the off peak Commuter Express service change Loops around Downtown San Jose and returns to Santa Teresa, Peak Period only, 30 minute frequencies Commuter Express Option (Peak Period Only) 27
57 BART s Station Naming Policy Eileen Goodwin, Facilitator 56 28
58 Phase II Station Naming Overview Review and confirm the station names with the Phase II CWGs Review BART Naming Policy and Procedures BART policy and procedures on CWG website: Under Phase II CWG Links VTA timeline and process for potential station name change 57 BART Station Naming Policy and Guidelines Overall helpfulness to the passenger Informativeness Geographical significance Brevity How well it sounds Distinctiveness Ease of pronunciation Historical basis Prominence in the area Overall appeal 58 29
59 BART Station Naming Policy and Guidelines Transit System Context Simplicity For quick recognition and retention Brief and distinctive Easy to pronounce and understand Station Area Context Historical basis Geographically significant Not named after private or commercial enterprises 59 Station Naming Process for Phase II Stations February 9 th, 10 th, 11 th CWG Meeting review the process for proposing a new station name, provide overview of BART Station Naming Policy and Procedure. February 26th VTA/BART Coordination Meeting provide an update to BART on status and determine their review and information to their board. March 7 th PWC Meeting present the process for station naming and guidelines from BART station Naming Policy and Procedure. April 7 th VTA Board Meeting Present process for station naming under Phase II project update
60 Station Naming Process for Phase II Stations April 12 th, 13 th and 14 th CWG Meetings recap naming process and guidelines. Conduct a silent poll of the CWG members. The facilitator will select the top 2 or 3 preferred names for further discussion. Weeks of April 18 th and 25 th meet with City staff to review CWG recommendations. City staff to meet with City manager and provide recommendation to VTA. May 2 nd PWC Meeting present the final recommended name for all station for VTA Silicon Valley Phase II. June 9 th Board Meeting present final recommended names under the PWC Chair report. 61 Discussion Eileen Goodwin, Facilitator 62 31
61 Next Steps Next meeting: Thursday, April 14~ 4:00-6:00 PM, Santa Clara Chamber of Commerce~ BYOB Financial Update of BART Phase II (VTA and Ernst & Young to present) Mission Town Center Project (City to present) Construction Outreach Best Practices Research Summary Update Environmental process (Draft SEIS/SEIR, public meetings, how to comment) Process for Evaluating the Proposed East and West Options for the Downtown Station Action Items 63 32
62 Downtown/Diridon Community Working Group (CWG) Agenda (San Jose/SV Chamber of Commerce, 101 W. Santa Clara Street, San Jose) February 9, :00-6:00 PM 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Follow-up Items & Work Plan Facilitator a. Follow-up Items b. Phase II Funding Strategies Workshop held 1/20 c. Work Plan Shifts and Schedule Update: Leyla Hedayat Topic New Date Original Date Financial Update of BART Phase II (VTA April 2016 February 2016 and Ernst & Young to present) Construction outreach best practices April 2016 February 2016 research summary update Economic Analysis Surrounding BART April Stations (City to present) Multi-modal Access Planning to February 2017 April 2016 Downtown/Diridon Station Cut and Cover Construction Technique Options February Caltrain Electrification Update Casey Fromson 4. High Speed Rail Update Ben Tripousis 5. Economic Analysis Surrounding BART Stations Rosalynn Hughey a. Economic Analysis Findings b. Developers Forum 6. Nelson Nygaard San Jose BART Station Access Planning Wrap-Up Jessica Zenk 6. Additional Information about Downtown Crossover Krishna Davey 7. VTA Projects within BART Corridor John Ristow 8. BART s Station Naming Policy Leyla Hedayat a. Link to the document posted under Phase II CWG Links 9. Next Steps Facilitator a. Next Meeting (April 12, :00-6:00 PM) b. Parking Lot Items c. Confirm Action Items d. Review Work Plan
63 VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Downtown-Diridon Community Working Group February 9, Agenda Follow-up Items and Work Plan Caltrain Electrification Update High Speed Rail Update Economic Analysis Surrounding BART Stations Nelson Nygaard San Jose BART Station Access Planning Wrap-Up Additional Information About Downtown Crossover VTA Projects within BART Corridor BART s Station Naming Policy Next Steps 2 1
64 Role of the CWG Be project liaisons Receive briefings on technical areas Receive project updates Build an understanding of the project Collaborate with VTA Contribute to the successful delivery of the project 3 Your Role as a CWG Member Attend CWG meetings Bring your own binder (BYOB) Be honest Provide feedback Get informed Disseminate accurate information Act as conduits for information to community at large 4 2
65 Role of the CWG Team CWG Team Member Eileen Goodwin Brent Pearse Leyla Hedayat Kevin Kurimoto Michael Brilliot Rosalynn Hughey Ray Salvano Jessica Zenk Role Facilitator Primary Outreach Contact Phase II Project Manager Technical Lead City of San Jose Planning Liaison City of San Jose Planning Liaison City of San Jose DOT Liaison City of San Jose DOT Liaison 5 Upcoming Meetings Public Hearings for Draft Environment Document Late May 2016 VTA Board of Directors March 3, 2016 April 7, 2016 May 5, 2016 BART Silicon Valley Program Working Committee March 7, 2016 May 2, 2016 Diridon Joint Policy Advisory Board March 18, 2016 at 3:00 PM Public meetings on specific technical topics - TBD 6 3
66 Follow-up Items and Work Plan Site plans in 10/13/15 Downtown/Diridon CWG Presentation updated and posted on website Responses to 10/13/15 questions on RDA parcels see attached responses from Mike Smith Tunnel Boring Machine animation posted on CWG website under Phase II CWG Links Cut & Cover Construction Techniques topic February 2017 Crossover Location topic to be discussed today VTA s Diridon Intermodal Study Scope will provide when available Link to Ernst & Young materials will provide when available Phase II Funding Strategies Workshop held on 1/20/16 7 Work Plan Shifts and Schedule Update Leyla Hedayat, Phase II Project Manager 8 4
67 Environmental Schedule Update 9 Caltrain Electrification Update Casey Fromson, Caltrain 10 5
68 Caltrain Modernizaton Update BART Phase II Community Working Groups February 2016 Caltrain Today Weekday Ridership: 63,000+ weekday Average Ride: 20+ miles Choice Riders: 60 percent 12 6
69 Ridership Growth 60,000 55,000 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 42,354 34,611 36,232 33,691 31,507 34,120 26,794 29,728 29,178 29,760 26,028 26,533 24,597 25,577 23,947 47,060 37,779 52,611 58, Regional Transportation Needs US 101 and Interstate 280 Congested Corridor supports growing economy 14% CA GDP; 52% CA patents; 20% CA tax revenue Caltrain Commuter Coalition (formed 2014) 14 7
70 Caltrain Modernization Program Advanced Signal System: CBOSS PTC (2016) Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (2020) 15 Project Description Area Project Service 51+ miles Electrification: Up to 79 mph Overhead Contact Service Increase San Francisco System (OCS) 6 trains / hour / direction to San Jose Traction Power (Tamien Station) More station stops / reduced travel Facilities time Electric Multiple Units (EMUs) 75 percent Restore Atherton & Broadway service Mixed-fleet service (interim period) Cont. tenant service 6 8
71 Key Regional Benefits (2040) Note: 2013 BAC Report, generates $2.5B economic activity and 9,600 jobs 17 Service Benefits Metric Today PCEP Trains / peak hour / 5 6 direction Passengers / peak hour / direction 5,100 6,300 Example Baby Bullet Train Retain 5-6 stops 60 minutes 45 minutes Retain SF to SJ 60 minutes 6 stops 13 stops Example Redwood City Station Train stops / peak hour
72 Schedule Issued RFP Electrification Award Infrastructure Contract (FEB) (Summer / Fall) Environmental Clearance Design / Build / Test 2020 Service Issued RFP Electric Trains (AUGUST) Award Contract (TBD 2016) 19 Corridor Investments State of Good Repair Annual Needs CalMod Program CBOSS PTC 2016 Corridor Electrification 2020 (75% fleet conversion) Capacity Increase (CalMod 2.0) Full Fleet Conversion SF - SJ Longer Platforms / Trains Level Boarding System Performance Improve reliability / speed in congested areas Station Improvements Improve access needs / connectivity Safety Enhancements 40 at-grade crossings Funded by JPB Partners Mostly Funded Funding TBD Note: HSR Blended System and Downtown Extension Projects not included, led by other agencies 20 10
73 Partnerships / Collaboration Boards / Elected Officials Joint Powers Board (JPB); Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG); City Councils / Committees Advisory Committees Citizen Advisory Committee; Bicycle Advisory Committee; Caltrain Accessibility Advisory Committee Staff City / County Staff Coordination Group; Peninsula Corridor Working Group Community Leaders / Advocacy Organizations Caltrain Commuter Coalition; Friends of Caltrain 21 Questions For more information website: calmod@caltrain.com 22 11
74 High Speed Rail Update Ben Tripousis, High Speed Rail Authority 23 A TRANSFORMATIVE INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA S FUTURE BART Community Working Group High Speed Rail Update Meeting February
75 CONNECTING CALIFORNIA: Northern California Improves Mobility & Upgrades Bay Area Transportation Infrastructure Connects Bay Area to Central Valley Blended System Along Peninsula Multi-Model Transportation Hubs» Transbay Transit Center» Millbrae Transit Center» San Jose Diridon Station» Gilroy Station 25 BLENDED SYSTEM: SAN FRANCISCO TO SAN JOSE 51-Mile Corridor Blended Service on Electrified Caltrain Corridor Stations Being Studied:»4 th and King»Millbrae-SFO»Mid-Peninsula Option»San Jose (Diridon) 26 13
76 THE BLENDED SYSTEM: What It Means For You Reduced Costs Increased Ridership Capacity & Service» Primarily Shared Two Track System on Caltrain Corridor Environmental Benefits:» Improved Regional Air Quality» Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Improved Safety» Positive Train Control» Early Earthquake Warning System» Quad Gates, Fencing & Grade Separations 27 THE BLENDED SYSTEM: How We Got Here 2004: Early Planning for a Shared Corridor 2009: Planning Advanced to Identify Specific Improvements & Design 2012: Revised 2012 Business Plan Featured Blended Service: The proposed blended system for the San Francisco Peninsula is primarily a two-track system that will be shared by Caltrain, high-speed rail service, and current rail tenants. Initial investigations show that blended operations as currently envisioned for the corridor are costeffective solutions on both a capital and operating basis
77 THE BLENDED SYSTEM: What We Need to Do Continue Planning & Environmental Studies for:»passing Tracks»Curve Straightening»Safety Improvements»Station Areas»Light Maintenance Facility Minimized Impacts:»Majority of Work within Caltrain Right of Way Next Steps:»Continue Community & Stakeholder Engagement»Conduct Technical Studies & Environmental Analysis 29 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: Main Topics Timeline Project Definition Impacts to Current Caltrain Service Traffic & Noise Impacts Diesel or Electric Trains Right of Way Impacts Projected Costs 30 15
78 SAN JOSE TO MERCED PROJECT SECTION 84-Mile Corridor Central Valley Wye Portion Being Studied Separately Primarily Follows Monterey Highway, Highway 101 and Highway 152 through the Pacheco Pass Stations Being Studied:» San Jose (Diridon)» Gilroy 31 SAN JOSE TO MERCED PROJECT SECTION: History 2009: Scoping and Early Planning Underway 2010: Alternatives Analysis Released 2011: Supplemental Alternatives Released 2015: Planning and Environmental Work Continues 32 16
79 SAN JOSE TO MERCED: What We Need to Do Continue Planning & Environmental Studies:»Conduct Detailed Technical Studies»Refine Alignment Concepts»Evaluate Station Locations Next Steps:»Continue Community & Stakeholder Engagement»Conduct Technical Studies & Environmental Analysis 33 ONGOING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES State/Federal Elected Offices Briefings City Manager Meetings, Local Policymaker Group Council Workshops, Policy Maker Meetings, Briefings Early Technical Studies Community Working Groups Corridor Cities City, County, Advisory Group Meetings, One-on-ones Stakeholder Working Groups Corridor/Community Benefits Safety & Air Quality Ongoing Activities: presentations, activity centers, neighborhood & stakeholder outreach, etc. Public Meetings/Open Houses Board Meeting/Hearing 34 17
80 COMMUNITY APPROACH -- ONGOING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Development of Draft Environmental Document» Continued Community Working Group meetings» Use of CSCG/LPMG on the Peninsula» Ongoing reporting of technical work» Stakeholder briefings Community Connections» Identify and prioritize opportunities for all communities Multiple Outreach Opportunities 35 COMMUNITY INTEGRATION: Balancing Needs, Increasing Benefits Identify and Prioritize Opportunities for local Communities The Environment» Air quality, tree planting, adaptive reuse, sustainability Access & Mobility» Improve connections between all systems» Identify first and last mile opportunities Safety» Access, Quad Gates, Fencing Congestion Relief» Increase Capacity» Reduce Congestion in the 101 Corridor Stations» New and Expanded Multi-Modal Connections 36 18
81 COMMUNITY INTEGRATION PROCESS Establish working groups where appropriate Describe goals/objectives/strategies Describe projects that improve service Determine implementation strategy Invite regular community participation» Timeline» Local Participants 37 COMMUNITY INTEGRATION PARTICIPANTS Stakeholder Working Groups--Corridor agencies/organizations clarify universe of projects City, County and Local Policymaker Working Groups--Describe potential list of projects to achieve Blended Service and identify coordination opportunities (Grade Seps, Safety Improvements) Prioritize projects/opportunities parallel with formal environmental process 38 19
82 PROACTIVE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT A KEY ASPECT OF PROCESS January 2016 City, County Working Group #1 January 2016 Local Policymaker Working Group #1 TBD TBD Public Scoping Meetings, Open House Meetings 39 STAY INVOLVED Website: Helpline: (408) northern.california@hsr.ca.gov Northern California Regional Office California High-Speed Rail Authority 100 Paseo De San Antonio, Suite 206 San Jose, CA instagram.com/cahsra facebook.com/californiahighspeedrail twitter.com/cahsra youtube.com/user/cahighspeedrail 40 20
83 Economic Analysis Surrounding BART Stations Rosalynn Hughey, City of San Jose 41 ASSESSING POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS OF BART SILICON VALLEY PHASE II DRAFT 21
84 Review of Study Scope Assessing Potential Development Impacts of BART Silicon Valley Phase II Task 1: Project Initiation and Site Visits Task 2: Literature Review of Property and Development Impacts of Transit Task 3: Prepare Station Area Profiles Task 4: Final Report will compile findings from Tasks ` ` Economic Benefits of Transit ` 22
85 Summary of Literature on Transit Impacts Large body of literature, but results vary and studies not necessarily comparable to each other Property value impacts depend on variety of factors: Quality of transit Station locations Urban design and pedestrian-friendliness Other external factors may impact transit values on property 45 Economic Benefits of Transit Property and Business Owners Users Local Government Increased property values Improved development potential Increased retail spending Increased productivity Improved access Reduced traffic congestion on roadways Reduced transportation costs Job creation Business attraction & retention Reduced costs for roads & parking Increased property tax, sales tax and transient occupancy tax 46 23
86 ` Examples ` ` Example: BART Impacts on Property Values BART contributes an estimated $17.3 billion in added property value to for-sale residential properties in Alameda, Contra Costa, and San Mateo Counties BART Price Premium 15.0% Condominiums Single Family 10.7% 10.4% 9.6% 7.4% 5.4% 4.6% 1.3% Within 1/2 Mile 1/2 to 1 mile 1 to 2 miles 2 to 5 miles Source: Strategic Economics,
87 Example: Benefits of Transit for Office Properties Improved transit access helps attract office tenants Average Occupancy Rates by County and Distance from BART 100% Average Occupancy Rate 80% 60% 40% 20% <1/2 mile 1/2-1 mile 1-2 miles 2-5 miles 0% Alameda County San Mateo County 49 Sources: CoStar, 2Q 2014; Strategic Economics, Example: Benefits of Transit for Office Properties Transit-served office properties achieve higher rents Office Rent Premium Associated with Proximity to BART (East Bay) BART Proximity Premium 20% 16% 12% 8% 4% 0% 18% 11% Within 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2 mile Road Distance to Nearest BART Station 50 Sources: CoStar, 2014; Strategic Economics,
88 Next Steps Complete station area profiles for three station areas: Alum Rock Diridon Downtown San Jose Developers Forum for Alum Rock station area Prepare final report 51 Nelson Nygaard San Jose BART Station Access Planning Wrap-Up Jessica Zenk, City of San Jose 52 26
89 Access & Connectivity Study Today Background Purpose of the Study Study Process How will this study be used? 53 Access & Connectivity Study Purpose: Integrate BART Stations into the Surrounding Environment Maximize Ridership Connect Seamlessly to Feeder Systems Enhance the Quality of Street Life Encourage Foot Traffic & Business Vitality 54 27
90 Access & Connectivity Study Study Process Review of Existing Plans & Conditions Walk/Bike Tours, Charette & Open House Initial Consultant Recommendations & Community Feedback (July 15) August 15 Community Working Groups Additional Feedback Consultant Draft Report Recording Recommendations (November 15) Final Report (Early 16) 55 Access & Connectivity Study How will this work be used? Station Access Plans (VTA-led) Understand and pursue partnership opportunities (Community, City, VTA, BART, others) Advance Design and Feasibility Work Pursue Individual Projects (grants, other means) and Policies 56 28
91 Additional Information about Downtown Crossover Krishna Davey, VTA 57 Crossovers What is a Crossover? A pair of switches arranged to permit a train to cross from one track to another Locations are determined through performing train simulations for the operational headway requirements. Why do we need Crossovers? Operating efficiencies Crossovers permit single tracking during a contingency event. What defines where we have Crossovers? BART Standards Crossovers must be located as close to a station platform as possible near end of lines and within tunnel areas. Final determination of the location of crossovers made by BART About mid point in the tunnel 58 29
92 History of the Selection of the Crossover Location Multiple options proposed in Conceptual Engineering (2002) Determination of Crossover location/configuration made during the 65% Engineering phase (2007) after extensive analysis Engineering studies resulted in: Shorter crossover length Reduced cut and cover box length 59 VTA Projects within BART Corridor John Ristow, VTA 60 30
93 BART Silicon Valley Community Working Group February 2016 Presentation Topics Transit Ridership Improvement Program (TRIP) Bus System Light Rail Enhancements Core Connectivity Diridon Station Multi-Modal Station Design 62 31
94 VTA Service at a Glance Service Area: Santa Clara County 15 cities 1.8 million residents 70 bus lines 432 buses Approximately 3,800 stops, 800 shelters 3 light rail transit lines 99 light rail vehicles million boardings in FY ,965 average weekday boardings 63 Transit Ridership Improvement Program TRIP Purpose Improve Ridership Improve Farebox Recovery Rate Connect to Berryessa and Milpitas BART Stations Two-Year Planning and Policy Effort Transit Network Design (FY18-19 Service Plan) Working with Jarrett Walker and Associates 64 32
95 Transit Ridership Improvement Program TRIP Elements 1 Assessment of VTA s Current Transit Service 2 Policy Development 3 Partner Education and Involvement 4 Development of VTA s Next Network Changes coming to Light Rail Service Bus Service Core Connectivity 65 Policy Discussions PRODUCTIVITY COVERAGE GOAL IS RIDERSHIP High demand areas Productive Fast, straight, direct Service for everyone 70% 30% GOAL IS NOT RIDERSHIP Low demand areas Unproductive Meandering Service for those who need it 33
96 Next Network Development 67 Next Network Development 68 34
97 Light Rail Enhancements New Operating Plan Speed Improvements Downtown North First Street System-wide Slow Speed Zone 69 Existing System 35
98 Milpitas BART Station Estimated Ridership BART 10,000 Light Rail 6,400 Transfers 4,100 between BART and Light Rail Milpitas BART Mode of Access 13% Bike/Ped 40% Bus 22% Auto Light Rail 25% Rendering of future Milpitas Station and campus. pedestrian overcrossing connecting Milpitas Station to VTA s Montague Light Rail 71 Scenario 2 Tasman Express Option New Tasman Line connecting (Peak Period Only) Mountain View to Alum Rock 15 minute frequencies all day No Express service Winchester Mountain View line changes.. Express route in peak periods between Mountain View and Old Ironsides Turns back at Old Ironsides in the off peak Commuter Express service change Loops around Downtown San Jose and returns to Santa Teresa, Peak Period only, 30 minute frequencies Commuter Express Option (Peak Period Only) 36
99
100 BART s Station Naming Policy Leyla Hedayat, VTA 75 Phase II Station Naming Overview Review and confirm the station names with the Phase II CWGs Review BART Naming Policy and Procedures BART policy and procedures on CWG website: Under Phase II CWG Links VTA timeline and process for potential station name change 76 38
101 BART Station Naming Policy and Guidelines Overall helpfulness to the passenger Informativeness Geographical significance Brevity How well it sounds Distinctiveness Ease of pronunciation Historical basis Prominence in the area Overall appeal 77 BART Station Naming Policy and Guidelines Transit System Context Simplicity For quick recognition and retention Brief and distinctive Easy to pronounce and understand Station Area Context Historical basis Geographically significant Not named after private or commercial enterprises 78 39
102 Station Naming Process for Phase II Stations February 9 th, 10 th, 11 th CWG Meeting review the process for proposing a new station name, provide overview of BART Station Naming Policy and Procedure. February 26th VTA/BART Coordination Meeting provide an update to BART on status and determine their review and information to their board. March 7 th PWC Meeting present the process for station naming and guidelines from BART station Naming Policy and Procedure. April 7 th VTA Board Meeting Present process for station naming under Phase II project update. 79 Station Naming Process for Phase II Stations April 12 th, 13 th and 14 th CWG Meetings recap naming process and guidelines. Conduct a silent poll of the CWG members. The facilitator will select the top 2 or 3 preferred names for further discussion. Weeks of April 18 th and 25 th meet with City staff to review CWG recommendations. City staff to meet with City manager and provide recommendation to VTA. May 2 nd PWC Meeting present the final recommended name for all station for VTA Silicon Valley Phase II. June 9 th Board Meeting present final recommended names under the PWC Chair report
103 Discussion Eileen Goodwin, Facilitator 81 Next Steps Next meeting: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 ~ 4:00-6:00 PM, San Jose/SV Chamber of Commerce ~ BYOB Financial Update of BART Phase II (VTA and Ernst & Young to present) Economic Analysis Surrounding BART Stations (City to present) Construction Outreach Best Practices Research Summary Update Process for Evaluating the Proposed East and West Options for the Downtown Station Environmental process (Draft SEIS/SEIR, public meetings, how to comment) Parking Management in the Diridon Specific Plan (City to present) Parking Validation Action Items 82 41
104 From: Board.Secretary Sent: Friday, February 05, :52 PM To: VTA Board of Directors; VTA Advisory Committee Members Subject: From VTA: Metro Magazine Jan VTA's BART SV Article VTA Board of Directors and VTA Advisory Committee Members: Attached is Metro Magazine s comprehensive piece on VTA s BART Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension. This is a good reference and overview for anyone wanting more information or an update on the project. Please feel free to share the information with your constituents or interested parties. For more information about VTA s BART Silicon Valley Project, please visit: For questions, please reply to this . Thank you. Office of the Board Secretary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority 3331 N. First Street San Jose, CA board.secretary@vta.org VTA Website: Find us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and LinkedIn
105
106
107
108
109
110 From: Board.Secretary Sent: Wednesday, February 03, :43 PM To: VTA Board of Directors Subject: VTA Information: Ridership Memo for December 2015 VTA Board of Directors: Attached is a memorandum from Chief Operating Officer Inez Evans regarding VTA ridership for December Thank you. Office of the Board Secretary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority 3331 N. First Street San Jose, CA board.secretary@vta.org
111
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Alum Rock Community Working Group February 10, 2016 1 Agenda Follow-up Items and Work Plan Economic Analysis Surrounding BART Stations Nelson Nygaard San Jose
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Downtown-Diridon Community Working Group February 9, 2016 1 Agenda Follow-up Items and Work Plan Caltrain Electrification Update High Speed Rail Update Economic
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project San Jose Downtown Association
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project San Jose Downtown Association August 24, 2017 THANK YOU! San Jose Downtown Association for inviting us & San Jose First United Methodist Church for
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Santa Clara Community Working Group
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Santa Clara Community Working Group June 16, 2016 Agenda Follow-up Items, Project Updates and Work Plan Construction Methodology Joint Development Construction
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Santa Clara Community Working Group September 15, 2016 Agenda Follow-up Items and Work Plan City Related Project Update: City Place FTA Process: New Starts
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Alum Rock Community Working Group September 14, 2016 1 Agenda Follow-up Items and Work Plan SPUR and the BART Corridor FTA Process: New Starts Funding Impact
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project Downtown/Diridon Community Working Group April 4, 2017 1 Agenda Follow-up Items June Phase I Tour Details Federal Involvement & Financial Update Draft
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Downtown-Diridon Community Working Group September 13, 2016 1 Agenda Follow-up Items and Work Plan SPUR and the BART Corridor FTA Process: New Starts Funding
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project Santa Clara Community Working Group November 16, 2017 1 Agenda Follow-up Items Phase I Update Phase II Update San Jose Diridon Integrated Station Concept
More informationSAN JOSE COMMUNITY WORKING GROUP. San Jose City Hall August 16, 2018 San Jose, CA
SAN JOSE COMMUNITY WORKING GROUP San Jose City Hall August 16, 2018 San Jose, CA INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Boris Lipkin, Acting Northern California Regional Director 2 AGENDA Welcome, Introductions and
More informationBoard of Directors April 25, BART The Next 40 Years BART Metro Vision Update Enhancing Service, Capacity and Coverage
Board of Directors April 25, 2013 BART The Next 40 Years BART Metro Vision Update Enhancing Service, Capacity and Coverage Agenda Project background Update on progress of study Review evaluation process
More informationMETRO SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY Executive Summary May 2009 DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS
METRO SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2010 2014 2014 Executive Summary May 2009 DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS OVERVIEW Purpose of Metro SRTP Develop multi year strategic plan to improve transit quality,
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project Santa Clara Community Working Group February 9, 2017 1 Agenda Follow-up Items & Work Plan Measure B Update Next Network Transit Redesign Update Embark!
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Alum Rock Community Working Group
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Alum Rock Community Working Group June 15, 2016 1 Agenda Follow-up Items, Project Updates, and Work Plan Developers Forum Debrief Joint Development Construction
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project Downtown/Diridon Community Working Group February 7, 2017 1 Agenda Follow-up Items & Work Plan Measure B Update Next Network Transit Redesign Update
More informationDowntown Boise Multimodal Center
Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment June 2009 Prepared by the Federal Transit Administration and Valley Regional Transit. U.S. Department
More informationNovember 28, 2012 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING
November 28, 2012 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING Project Background Description of the Project Alternatives Analysis Process Project Progress Activity Stations Comments Adjourn 2 VIA spent 2 years
More informationThe Blue Line Extension
The Blue Line Extension NORTH CAROLINA JOINT TRANSPORTATION OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Presented by Carolyn Flowers CATS Chief Executive Officer Raleigh, NC February 10, 2012 Overview Charlotte Area Transit System
More informationSPECIAL MEETING AGENDA PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD Bacciocco Auditorium, 2 nd Floor 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos CA 94070
BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2018 October 4, 2018 Thursday SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD Bacciocco Auditorium, 2 nd Floor 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos CA 94070 JEANNIE BRUINS,
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project Downtown/Diridon Community Working Group April 24, 2018 1 Agenda Follow-up Items & Work Plan Phase II Update Government Affairs Update New Member Process
More informationSanta Clara County. San Francisco City and County. Marin County. Napa County. Solano County. Contra Costa County. San Mateo County
Marin County Santa Clara County San Francisco City and County Sonoma County Napa County Contra Costa County San Mateo County Solano County Alameda County ABAG History In 1961, Bay Area leaders recognized
More informationImplementation Plan FY
Implementation Plan FY 2013 2015 January 18, 2012 Financial Integrity - Address the District's Structural Deficit - Financially support the District's reinvention of its family of services - Promote funding
More informationTransportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan WELCOME TO COMMUNITY MEETING #2 AGENDA 5:30 6:10 PM Presentation, including Q&A 6:10 PM Open House 6:30 PM Meeting Adjourns Please sign in and fill out a comment
More informationProject Overview/Update: Advanced Signal System CBOSS PTC
Project Overview/Update: Advanced Signal System CBOSS PTC Board of Directors September 5, 2013 CBOSS PTC - What is it? Communications Based Overlay Signal System Positive Train Control Fiber Optic Network
More informationMARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018
MARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018 TODAY S AGENDA o Key driver of the program o Recommended plan o Project summaries o Next steps 2 KEY DRIVER: PUBLIC INPUT o Atlanta City Design o Atlanta s Transportation
More informationCore Capacity Transit Study. San Francisco County Transportation Authority October 17, 2017
Core Capacity Transit Study San Francisco County Transportation Authority October 17, 2017 1 Study Purpose Multi-agency effort focused on increasing transit capacity to the San Francisco Core PROJECT MANAGER
More informationCouncil of State Governments. Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing. October 28, 2013
Council of State Governments Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing October 28, 2013 Takoma Langley Transit Center Purpose and Need Provide a safe, attractive and efficient facility
More informationTransportation & Mobility
Transportation & Mobility October 11, 2017 October 11, 2017 Community Dialogue Series Session 3: Transportation & Mobility YOU ARE NOT STUCK IN TRAFFIC. YOU ARE TRAFFIC. October 11, 2017 Community Dialogue
More informationCrystal Springs Upland School Transportation Demand Management Plan. March 2016
Crystal Springs Upland School Transportation Demand Management Plan March 06 CONTENTS Introduction... Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program.... Background/Survey of Existing Student Commuting
More informationReston Town Center North Development. Community Update
Reston Town Center North Development Community Update May 31, 2017 1 Presentation Agenda Project Overview Site and Current Property Ownerships Development Plan/Grid of Streets Proposed Ownership Comprehensive
More informationAgenda Overview. Process Update Overview of Revised Goals Transportation Trends Small Group Breakout Questions and Comments Next Steps Meeting Close
Agenda Overview Process Update Overview of Revised Goals Transportation Trends Small Group Breakout Questions and Comments Next Steps Meeting Close 2 1. Welcome and Meeting Overview 1. Process Update 3
More informationPalm Beach TPA TAC September 5, 2018
Palm Beach TPA TAC September 5, 2018 STEVE ANDERSON, AICP Palm Tran Project Manager ADAMS CONSULTING GROUP TINDALE OLIVER Project Team 1996 Palm Tran 2 1996 County Population: 900,000 people Gas: $0.97
More informationCorridor Management Committee. December 17, 2014
Corridor Management Committee December 17, 2014 1 Today s Topics Technical Issues/Issue Resolution Process Environmental Consultant Contract Update Advisory Committees Community Advisory Committee Business
More informationA TRANSFORMATIVE INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA S FUTURE
A TRANSFORMATIVE INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA S FUTURE Ben Tripousis, Northern Regional Director An Overview of the High-Speed Rail Construction Project Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Small Business
More informationBusiness Advisory Committee. October 1, 2013
Business Advisory Committee October 1, 2013 1 Today s Topics Hennepin County Community Works Update Project Development Update Ridership Next Steps Success Measures Update Member and Committee Reports/Public
More informationMeeting attendees are now required to go through security screenings upon entering the building. Please allow for extra time.
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE OF RE-SCHEDULED BOARD MEETINGS This is notice that the re-scheduled meetings of the Board of Directors of the New Jersey Transit Corporation, NJ Transit Rail Operations,
More informationThe Maryland Transit Administration. A Plan to Connect Baltimore
The Maryland Transit Administration A Plan to Connect Baltimore 1 What We ve Heard Over 1,100 stakeholder comments submitted through the Bus Network Improvement Project (BNIP) Six workshops, three pop-up
More informationMoving Forward with Transit Oriented Communities
Moving Forward with Transit Oriented Communities Planning & Development Committee October 7, 2014 Packet Pg. 33 History of TOD at RTD Mid 1990s - Local jurisdictions start planning for TOD 2000 RTD hires
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 7, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 7, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT TO UPDATE TITLE 10, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AND TITLE 19, ZONING ORDINANCE, WEST HOLLYWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE TRANSPORTATION
More informationMinneapolis Clean Energy Partnership Energy Vision Advisory Committee (EVAC) 4/16/2015
Minneapolis Clean Energy Partnership Energy Vision Advisory Committee (EVAC) 4/16/2015 Agenda 3:00 Welcome & Introductions 3:15 Update on EVAC co-chair 3:20 CEP Background & Charge 3:35 EVAC Structure
More informationI-20 EAST TEXAS CORRIDOR STUDY. TxDOT Planning Conference, Corpus Christi June 4 th, 2014
I-20 EAST TEXAS CORRIDOR STUDY TxDOT Planning Conference, Corpus Christi June 4 th, 2014 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3-5 2 I-20 East Texas Corridor Advisory Committee 6-10 3 Study Schedule 11-12 4
More informationStakeholder Engagement Summary Report
Stakeholder Engagement Summary Report South Shore Corridor Project 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview Port Metro Vancouver s South Shore Trade Area is of critical importance to Canadian trade. One of
More informationOpportunity: BaltimoreLink
Opportunity: BaltimoreLink Cities and Transit: Reimagined, Redesigned, and Reborn Rail~Volution October 11, 2016 Joshua B Diamond 51 Monroe St, Suite 1103 Rockville, MD 20850 301-774-4566 X 410 jdiamond@foursquareitp.com
More informationC Line Rapid Bus 90% Design
C Line Rapid Bus 90% Design Karyssa Jackson, Community Outreach Coordinator Shawn Walding, Senior Engineer Metro Transit TAAC August 2, 2017 1 Today s Discussion Informational Feedback from February Project
More informationCorridor Management Committee. January 12, 2017
Corridor Management Committee January 12, 2017 1 Today s Topics Chair s Remarks 2017 Project Activity Overview Updated Corridor Flyover Video: Preview 2017 Meeting Schedule 2 3 Chair s Update 2016 Major
More informationPROJECT TIMELINE. Next steps. Plan. Start of Service
PROJECT TIMELINE 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 WE ARE HERE Plan Develop Build Develop design options for termini, station locations, and transit operations Conduct environmental research Assess funding
More informationCaltrain Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) Meeting. Agenda
Caltrain Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) Meeting Thursday, January 25, 2018 6:00 p.m. 7:30 p.m. SamTrans Offices Bacciocco Auditorium 2nd Floor 1250 San Carlos Ave., San Carlos Agenda 1. LPMG Chair Report
More informationCommunity Update. May 31, 2011
Community Update May 31, 2011 Presented to: Leaside Community Presented by: Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Minister of Transportation Councillor Karen Stintz, Chair, Toronto Transit Commission Eglinton-Scarborough
More informationElectrification - Infrastructure Construction activities in Segment 2:
Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP) Q1 Quarterly Update #12 July 1 September 30, 2017 JPB Board Meeting November 2, 2017 Agenda Item # 8a Electrification - Infrastructure Construction activities
More informationGirard Siding Environmental Assessment (EA) Public Meeting. May 23, 2013
Girard Siding Environmental Assessment (EA) Public Meeting May 23, 2013 1 Agenda» Program Overview» Girard Siding Project EA» Auburn to Shipman Track Improvement Project» Public Involvement Opportunities
More informationRFP Information Security/Cybersecurity Services Pre-proposal Conference
RFP 17-11 Information Security/Cybersecurity Services Pre-proposal Conference November 28, 2017 Information Security/Cybersecurity Services General Project Information Owner: Transbay Joint Powers Authority
More informationNorthern Virginia Transportation Authority
IV Northern Virginia Transportation Authority March 23, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation 66 Outside the Beltway Project Scope Multimodal improvements to
More informationNorth Metro Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Public Hearings. December 9 & 10, 2009
North Metro Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Public Hearings December 9 & 10, 2009 1 Welcome & Introductions 2 3 What Are We Doing Here Tonight? Public Hearing for RTD North Metro Corridor
More informationSystem Expansion Implementation Plan. Board Meeting, April 2017
System Expansion Implementation Plan Board Meeting, April 2017 2016: A record-breaking year Opened 3 new light rail stations. Completed tunneling for 3 more. Broke ground on our longest extension to date.
More informationMetrobus 30s Line Enhancements
Customer Service, Operations and Safety Committee Action Item III-C February 14, 2008 Metrobus 30s Line Enhancements Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority Board Action/Information Summary
More informationPublic Outreach Overview Tuesday, September 27. COTA William J. Lhota Building 33 N. High St. Columbus, OH 43215
Public Outreach Overview Tuesday, September 27 COTA William J. Lhota Building 33 N. High St. Columbus, OH 43215 Project Overview Goals and Overview Create a community vision for the future of public transportation
More informationCorridor Management Committee. January 14, 2016
Corridor Management Committee January 14, 2016 1 Today s Topics 2 Regional METRO System Overview 2016 Project Overview: Key Activities and Milestones Municipal Consent Schedule Design Resolution Schedule
More informationManaged Lane owner decision needed San Mateo County s options Understanding revenues & costs Pros & cons of County s options Proposed next steps
San Mateo County Transportation Authority Meeting August 2, 2018 1 OVERVIEW Managed Lane owner decision needed San Mateo County s options Understanding revenues & costs Pros & cons of County s options
More informationSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 12 DIVISION: Sustainable Streets BRIEF DESCRIPTION: SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Endorsing proposed legislation amending the Planning Code to adopt
More informationTRANSIT CENTER DISTRICT PLAN
TRANSIT CENTER DISTRICT PLAN Informational Presentation Planning Commission 04.19.2012 San Francisco Planning Department In partnership with: San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Transbay Joint Powers Authority
More informationDulles Area Transportation Association
Dulles Area Transportation Association February 8, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation Transform 66: Outside the Beltway 2 Project Scope Multimodal improvements
More informationGirard Siding Environmental Assessment (EA) Public Meeting. May 23, 2013
Girard Siding Environmental Assessment (EA) Public Meeting May 23, 2013 1 Agenda» Program Overview» Girard Siding Project EA» Auburn to Shipman Track Improvement Project» Public Involvement Opportunities
More informationBus Circulator Feasibility Study Scope of Work March 12, 2018
The City of Hyattsville Comprehensive Transportation and Infrastructure Study Bus Circulator Feasibility Study Scope of Work March 12, 2018 Project Approach At the request of the City of Hyattsville, Toole
More informationDOWNTOWN TUNNEL / MIDTOWN TUNNEL / MLK EXTENSION PROJECT PROCUREMENT PROCESS
Commonwealth of Virginia Office of Transportation P3 s Dusty Holcombe, Deputy Director DOWNTOWN TUNNEL / MIDTOWN TUNNEL / MLK EXTENSION PROJECT PROCUREMENT PROCESS September 20, 2011 Virginia: DT / MT
More informationBicycle Access & Parking Plan Project List Review
Bicycle Access & Parking Plan Project List Review Bicycle Advisory Committee September 19th, 2013 Strategy Overview New Bicycle Issues and Ideas (BAC, staff, public) Funding External Agency Lead BAPP s
More informationCommunity Update. June 21, 2011
Community Update June 21, 2011 Presented at Beth Sholom Synagogue Presented by: Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Minister of Transportation Councillor Karen Stintz, Chair, Toronto Transit Commission Eglinton-Scarborough
More informationGDOT PowerPoint Title Page MMPT. Technical Committee April 6, 2010
GDOT PowerPoint Title Page MMPT Technical Committee April 6, 2010 Introduction Senate Bill 200, enacted in May2009, revamped existing P3 enabling legislation This new legislative direction provides an
More informationNext Steps. Investing in the Future of. MASTER DEVELOPER PROCUREMENT OVERVIEW October 2016 July Chicago Union Station Chicago Union Station
Investing in the Future of Chicago Union Station Chicago Union Station MASTER DEVELOPER PROCUREMENT OVERVIEW October 2016 July 2015 Next Steps 1 Chicago Union Station Operations 4 th busiest station in
More informationCommunity Update. June 8, 2011
Community Update June 8, 2011 Presented to: Scarborough Community Presented by: Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Minister of Transportation Councillor Karen Stintz, Chair, Toronto Transit Commission Eglinton-Scarborough
More informationTHE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9
THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9 History & Background Began in 2001 as a Major Investment Study (MIS), Schematic, and Environmental
More informationTHE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9
THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9 History & Background Began in 2001 as a Major Investment Study (MIS), Schematic, and Environmental
More informationOrganizational Structure of the Toronto Environment Office
STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY Organizational Structure of the Toronto Environment Office Date: April 20, 2007 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Parks and Environment Committee Richard Butts, Deputy City
More informationFigure 1: Summary Status of Actions Recommended in June 2016 Committee Report. Status of Actions Recommended # of Actions Recommended
Chapter 3 Section 3.05 Metrolinx Regional Transportation Planning Standing Committee on Public Accounts Follow-Up on Section 4.08, 2014 Annual Report In November 2015, the Standing Committee on Public
More informationLooking Ahead. A Context for the Next Twenty Year Needs Assessment. July 2013
Looking Ahead A Context for the Next Twenty Year Needs Assessment July 2013 A Larger Context for Twenty Year Needs Growing transit demand and complexity of travel paths and times Growing economy changing
More informationSubject YRRTC Accomplishments and Highlights
Date May 17, 2018 To Members of York Region Council From Mary-Frances Turner, York Region Rapid Transit Corporation, President Subject 2014-2018 YRRTC Accomplishments and Highlights Ref: Edocs #8410552
More informationA G E N D A. 1. Greetings and Introductions Review Agenda
RUSSIAN RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP MEETING February 12, 2019, 10:30 AM 12:30 PM Windsor Town Council Chambers 9291 Old Redwood Highway, Windsor, CA 95492 A G E N D A 1. Greetings
More informationBike Sharing Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan 2012
Source: Nice Ride (Twin Cities MN) Source: Capital Bikeshare (Washington, DC) City of Cleveland Bike Sharing Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan 2012 November 20, 2013 Toole Design Group BrownFlynn,
More informationMaximizing Asset ROI for Self & Clients in a Public Sector Setting. July 16 th San Diego
Maximizing Asset ROI for Self & Clients in a Public Sector Setting July 16 th San Diego State of Washington Population: 7.53 M Area: 71,303 Sq. Miles Population density: 107 population/mi² Puget Sound
More informationLAWRENCE-DOUGLAS COUNTY INTELLIGENT JOURNEY
LAWRENCE-DOUGLAS COUNTY INTELLIGENT JOURNEY L-DC REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE AND STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Lawrence-Douglas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (L- DC MPO) has
More informationLos Angeles County One Gateway Plaza 2i3.g Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA metro.net
Metro Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza 2i3.g22.2000 Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 metro.net PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE JULY 14,2010 SUBJECT: BUENA VISTA
More informationRegion of Waterloo Corporate Services Facilities & Fleet Management
Region of Waterloo Corporate Services Facilities & Fleet Management To: Chair Tom Galloway and Members of the Planning & Works Committee Date: February 14, 2017 File Code: Subject: King-Victoria Transit
More information10.1 BIBLIOGRAPHY Noise and Vibration Study Yard and
10 Bibliography 10.1 BIBLIOGRAPHY ATS Consulting, Noise and Vibration Study Yard and Shops Segment, March 31, 2006. ATS Consulting, Station Noise Mitigation and Acoustical Treatment Study, January 28,
More informationMVTA-Prior Lake-Shakopee Merger. SCALE Presentation, October 10, 2014
MVTA-Prior Lake-Shakopee Merger SCALE Presentation, October 10, 2014 MVTA Commitment Our Vision The Minnesota Valley Transit Authority is a trusted partner in transportation, serving as an innovative leader
More informationTRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Business Plan
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 2018 Business Plan Today s Agenda Mission Department Overview Planning Initiatives Commission Priorities and 2018 Budget Requests Five-year Plan Department of Transportation Mission
More information12 Approval of a New PRESTO Agreement Between York Region and Metrolinx
Clause 12 in Report No. 7 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on April 20, 2017. 12 Approval of a New PRESTO
More informationCLAYTON COUNTY TRANSIT INITIATIVE. Technical Advisory Committee/ Stakeholder Advisory Committee Webinar August 29, 2017
CLAYTON COUNTY TRANSIT INITIATIVE Technical Advisory Committee/ Stakeholder Advisory Committee Webinar August 29, 2017 AGENDA Welcome! Introduction of Speakers Webinar Housekeeping Project Overview & Status
More informationIntegrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017 Chattanooga 2045 RTP Chattanooga 2045 RTP addresses both transportation supply and demand Continued
More informationClick to edit Master title style Click to edit Master title style
Southwest Chief & Front Range Passenger Rail Commission Overview for Transportation Legislative Review Committee November 2, 2017 Presented by: Sal Pace Jacob Riger, AICP November 2, 2017 FIRST WE WERE
More informationRedesigning the Baltimore Transit Network
Redesigning the Baltimore Transit Network Paul W. Comfort, Esq., Administrator and CEO Route 5: Reimagining Your Agency s Transit Services APTA Bus and Para-transit Conference Charlotte, North Carolina
More informationRail Division Update. Presented to Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation. Paul C. Worley, CPM Rail Division Director February 28, 2013
Rail Division Update Presented to Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation Paul C. Worley, CPM Rail Division Director February 28, 2013 0 Rail in North Carolina Over 3,500 miles of rail lines.
More informationConstruction Phase Public Outreach Plan
Construction Phase Public Outreach Plan Updated: Jan. 16, 2018 Hennepin County Metro Transit City of Minneapolis 1. Public Engagement Phase Overview Construction of the C Line / Penn Avenue Improvements
More informationCONNECTING AND TRANSFORMING CALIFORNIA. Frank Vacca, Chief of Rail Operations UNLV Symposium October 17, 2018 Las Vegas, Nevada
CONNECTING AND TRANSFORMING CALIFORNIA Frank Vacca, Chief of Rail Operations UNLV Symposium October 17, 2018 Las Vegas, Nevada CONNECTING CALIFORNIA: Scope of Work Phase I:» 520 Miles» San Francisco to
More informationCommunity Advisory Committee. June 5, 2017
Community Advisory Committee June 5, 2017 1 Today s Topics Call to Order/Introductions Approval of Minutes Project Overview Traffic Signal Coordination 60% Plans Update Advanced Construction: Bassett Creek
More informationProvo-Orem Bus Rapid Transit
Provo-Orem Bus Rapid Transit and Timpanogos Maintenance Facility Expansion Procurements Informational Meeting August 18, 2014 Agenda Topic Presenter Time Introduction of key project personnel Project history
More informationDoug Couto Texas A&M Transportation Technology Conference 2017 College Station, Texas May 4, 2017
Cyber Concerns of Local Government and What Does It Mean to Transportation Doug Couto Texas A&M Transportation Technology Conference 2017 College Station, Texas May 4, 2017 Transportation and Infrastructure
More informationApproval of Navy Yard Chiller Joint Development Agreement
Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item V B July 9, 2015 Approval of Navy Yard Chiller Joint Development Agreement Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information
More informationCommunity Update. June 30, Presented at: York Civic Centre
Community Update June 30, 2011 Presented at: York Civic Centre Presented by: Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Minister of Transportation MPP Laura Albanese Councillor Frances Nunziata, Councillor Frank Di Giorgio
More informationSection 4: Citizen s Guide to SDEIS
Section 4: Citizen s Guide to SDEIS Improving mobility Record Page 40 Easing congestion Strengthening our communities Central Corridor Light Rail Transit Citizens Guide to the Supplemental Draft State
More informationIllinois Tollway Diversity Advisory Council. Gustavo Giraldo, Chief of the Department of Diversity and Strategic Development April 12, 2017
Illinois Tollway Diversity Advisory Council Gustavo Giraldo, Chief of the Department of Diversity and Strategic Development April 12, 2017 Diversity Report recommendations Technical Assistance Program
More informationGATEWAY. Action Plan JULY Gateway Action Plan DRAFT - July Portland Development Commission
GATEWAY Action Plan JULY 2016 1 Gateway Action Plan DRAFT - July 2016 - Portland Development Commission INTRODUCTION: The City of Portland, the Portland Development Commission (PDC), and their many partners
More information