Vibration and Shock Testing. for the. Optima EPS Corporation Rack (70 x 19 W x 36 L, 500 lbs lbs)

Transcription

1 MET Laboratories, Inc. Safety Certification - EMI - Telecom Environmental Simulation 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE! BALTIMORE, MARYLAND ! PHONE (410) ! FAX (410) Vibration and Shock Testing for the Optima EPS Corporation Tested Under Customer Purchase Order #50460 and MET Report: ESL19436-GEN April 17, 2006 Prepared For: Optima EPS Corporation 2166 Mountain Industrial Blvd Tucker, GA Prepared By: MET Laboratories, Inc. 914 West Patapsco Avenue Baltimore, Maryland Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of MET Laboratories, Inc. While use of the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) letters or the NVLAP Logo, the Standards Council of Canada Logo, A2LA or the Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) Letters in this report reflects MET Accreditation under these programs, these letters, logo, or statements do not claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any Agency of the U.S. Government.

2 Test Report for the Optima EPS Corporation Tested Under Customer Purchase Order #50460 and Testing Performed By: Report Prepared By: Hadid Jones Test Engineer Molly Sunderland Documentation Department Lab Manager Todd Talbot Environmental Lab Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of MET Laboratories, Inc. MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page ii of v

3 Report Status Sheet Revision Report Date Reason for Revision April 17, 2006 Initial Issue. MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page iii of v

4 Table of Contents Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 II. EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION... 3 A. OVERVIEW... 4 B. REFERENCES... 4 C. TEST SITE... 5 III. VIBRATION TEST METHODS... 6 METHOD 514.5, VIBRATION... 7 IV. SHOCK TEST METHODS METHOD 516.4, SHOCK V. TEST EQUIPMENT MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page iv of v

5 Table of Contents List of Photographs Photograph 1. Vibration, Vertical Axis Test Setup Photograph 2. Vibration, Longitudinal Axis Test Setup Photograph 3. Vibration, Transverse Axis Test Setup Photograph 4. Shock, Vertical Axis Test Setup Photograph 5. Shock, Longitudinal Axis Test Setup Photograph 6. Shock, Transverse Axis Test Setup List of Plots Plot 1. Vibration, Vertical Axis Control... 8 Plot 2. Vibration, Longitudinal Axis Control... 9 Plot 3. Vibration, Transverse Axis Control Plot 4. Shock, Vertical Axis Positive Control Plot 5. Shock, Vertical Axis Negative Control Plot 6. Shock, Longitudinal Axis Positive Control Plot 7. Shock, Longitudinal Axis Negative Control Plot 8. Shock, Transverse Axis Positive Control Plot 9. Shock, Transverse Axis Negative Control List of Tables Table 1. Shock Pulse Levels MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page v of v

6 Executive Summary I. Executive Summary MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 1 of 27

7 Executive Summary MET Laboratories, Inc. was contracted by Optima EPS Corporation to perform acceptance testing to criteria on the under the Optima EPS Corporation purchase order number The tests were based on. The results obtained relate only to the item(s) tested. Vibration Test Methods The EUT was subjected to a vibration test in accordance with the procedures of. The visual inspection of the EUT revealed the EUT was compliant with the requirement after minor adjustments were made. (see vibrations section for details). Shock Test Methods The EUT was subjected to a shock test in accordance with. The visual inspection of the EUT revealed the EUT was compliant with the requirement(s). No anomalies noted. MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 2 of 27

8 Vibration Test Methods II. Equipment Configuration MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 3 of 27

9 Vibration Test Methods A. Overview This document describes the test setups, test methods, required test equipment, and the test limit criteria used to perform an Acceptance Test of the Optima EPS Corporation,. The tests were based on. The tests described in this document were formal tests as described with the objective of the testing was to verify compliance of the Equipment Under Test (EUT) to the requirements of the aforementioned specifications. Model(s) Tested: Model(s) Covered: Cabinet Load 90 lbs per shelf (540 lbs total) Specifications: Primary Power: Secondary Power: N/A N/A Analysis: Lab Environmental Test Conditions: Evaluated by: The results obtained relate only to the item(s) tested. Temperature: 15-35º C Relative Humidity: 30-60% Barometric Pressure: mbar Hadid Jones Date: April 17, 2006 B. References ISO : 1992 (E) SR-3580 Quality Assurance Requirements for Measuring Equipment Department of Defense Test Method Standard for Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests Bellcore Special Report, Network Equipment-Building System (NEBS) Criteria Levels MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 4 of 27

10 Vibration Test Methods C. Test Site All testing was performed in a limited access test laboratory. This facility is located at MET Laboratories, Inc., 914 W. Patapsco Avenue, Baltimore, MD All testing was conducted in the Environmental Simulation Lab at MET Laboratories, Inc. All equipment used in making physical determinations is accurate and bears recent traceability to the National Standards and Technology. MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 5 of 27

11 Vibration Test Methods III. Vibration Test Methods MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 6 of 27

12 Vibration Test Methods Method 514.5, Vibration Test Requirement(s): This procedure utilizes standard laboratory vibration exciters driving the test item directly or through a local fixture. Test Procedure: A. The cabinet was loaded with 90 lbs on 6 shelves for a total of 540 lbs. B. The test item is supported by a test frame independent of the vibration exciters. C. Select the specific exciters based on size and mass of the test items and fixtures, frequency range, and low frequency stoke length required. Test Results: Test Engineer(s): During the vibration a few screws backed out and had to be refastened with Lock-Tite. After this correction, no damage or deterioration of functional performance was noted. Hadid Jones Test Date(s): March 21 28, 2006 MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 7 of 27

13 Vibration Test Methods (gn)²/hz control(f)_c0 high-abort(f) high-alarm(f) low-abort(f) low-alarm(f) profile(f) E Frequency (Hz) Plot 1. Vibration, Vertical Axis Control MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 8 of 27

14 Vibration Test Methods db (gn)²/hz control(f)_0 profile(f)_0 high-abort(f)_0 high-alarm(f)_0 low-abort(f)_0 low-alarm(f)_ Frequency (Hz) Plot 2. Vibration, Longitudinal Axis Control MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 9 of 27

15 Vibration Test Methods (gn)²/hz profile(f) high-abort(f) low-abort(f) high-alarm(f) low-alarm(f) control(f) 1.00E E E Frequency (Hz) Plot 3. Vibration, Transverse Axis Control MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 10 of 27

16 Vibration Test Methods Photograph 1. Vibration, Vertical Axis Test Setup MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 11 of 27

17 Vibration Test Methods Photograph 2. Vibration, Longitudinal Axis Test Setup MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 12 of 27

18 Vibration Test Methods Photograph 3. Vibration, Transverse Axis Test Setup MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 13 of 27

19 Shock Test Methods IV. Shock Test Methods MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 14 of 27

20 Shock Test Methods Method 516.4, Shock Test Requirement(s): The equipment shall not sustain any damage or deteriorate in functional performance during or after it has been exposed to the environment described in MIL-STD-810E. Test Procedure: A. The cabinet was loaded with 90lbs on 6 shelves for a total of 540lbs. B. A dummy load and an input (control) accelerometer were mounted to the table of the shock machine. C. Calibration shocks were performed until two consecutive shock pulses produced waveforms that met or exceeded the shock profile. D. The EUT was installed on the vibration test fixture. E. The proper operation of the EUT was verified. Unless otherwise noted the EUT was in an operational mode during testing. F. The EUT was subjected to three shock pulses, in each direction of each axis, at the test levels on Table 1. Input Profile Duration 100 m/s 2 11ms Table 1. Shock Pulse Levels Test Duration. 3 pulses/direction/axis G. Before, during, and after the shock test, the performance of the EUT was evaluated. Test Results: Test Engineer(s): The EUT is compliant with the requirement(s). No damage or deterioration of functional performance was noted as a result of this test. The functionality of the EUT was evaluated before and after the test with no anomalies noted. Hadid Jones Test Date(s): March 21, 2006 MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 15 of 27

21 Shock Test Methods gn Time (Seconds) profile(t) high-abort(t) low-abort(t) control(t) 0.02 Plot 4. Shock, Vertical Axis Positive Control MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 16 of 27

22 Shock Test Methods gn profile(t) high-abort(t) low-abort(t) control(t) Time (Seconds) 0.07 Plot 5. Shock, Vertical Axis Negative Control MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 17 of 27

23 Shock Test Methods gn control(t)_2 high-abort(t) low-abort(t) profile(t) Time (Seconds) 0.02 Plot 6. Shock, Longitudinal Axis Positive Control MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 18 of 27

24 Shock Test Methods gn profile(t) high-abort(t) low-abort(t) control(t) Time (Seconds) 0.02 Plot 7. Shock, Longitudinal Axis Negative Control MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 19 of 27

25 Shock Test Methods gn profile(t) high-abort(t) low-abort(t) control(t) Time (Seconds) 0.02 Plot 8. Shock, Transverse Axis Positive Control MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 20 of 27

26 Shock Test Methods gn profile(t) high-abort(t) low-abort(t) control(t) Time (Seconds) 0.02 Plot 9. Shock, Transverse Axis Negative Control MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 21 of 27

27 Shock Test Methods Photograph 4. Shock, Vertical Axis Test Setup MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 22 of 27

28 Shock Test Methods Photograph 5. Shock, Longitudinal Axis Test Setup MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 23 of 27

29 Shock Test Methods Photograph 6. Shock, Transverse Axis Test Setup MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 24 of 27

30 Test Equipment MIL-STD 810F V. Test Equipment MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 25 of 27

31 Test Equipment MIL-STD 810F MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 2T5663 SHAKER SYSTEM UNHOLTZ DICKIE NONE NO CAL REQUIRED 2T5757 VIBRATION CONTROLLER DACTRON NONE 4/6/2006 4/6/2007 2T5605 ACCELEROMETER AMP. DYTRAN NONE 4/25/2005 4/25/2006 2T5535 ACCELEROMETER PCB NONE 8/15/2005 8/15/2006 2T5307 ACCELEROMETER DYTRAN NONE 8/15/2005 8/15/2006 2T5895 ACCELEROMETER PCB PIEZOTRONICS NONE 11/16/ /16/2006 MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 26 of 27

32 End of Report End of Report MET Report: ESL19436-GEN 2006, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 27 of 27