Founded in 1981 Hometown Stockholm Focus on Air Traffic Management Si ATM own products

Transcription

1 Founded in 1981 Hometown Stockholm Focus on Air Traffic Management Si ATM own products Operational ATM systems Simulators ATM related tools Christer Schörling Managing Director

2 Moscow ATC centre, the 80 ths Area, Approach, Aerodromes and Simulator Life prolongation updates The system is still operational

3 New Hong Kong ATM System, UFS

4 ATRACC ATM system Riga FIR Area, Approach, Aerodromes and Simulator First contract 1996 Developed in close cooperation with user

5 New Hong Kong ATM System, ARES; UFS ATM Radar Emergency System Systems to Zagreb, Pula, Zadar, Split & Dubrovnik

6 Teheran BATMAS FDPS for Bahrain FIR Kuwait Riyad Dammam Bahrain Muscat Doha Jeddah Abu Dabi Previous Next Return

7 MAATS Moldavian Advanced Air Traffic Management System Centralised Multi Sesnor Tracker Enhanced Mode-S, ADS-B, MLAT Fully Automatic FDP Complete Safety Nets Full OLDI CFMU / IFPS Controller HMI Redundant Architecture Latest Equipment Technology CPDLC = Controller Pilot Data Link Com. Test and Development System SESAR Compliant Operational 2013

8 New Functionality ongoing developments CPDLC Free Route Airspace Expanded OLDI Network Manager FSA, AFP, CPR LARA / PRISMIL AIXM 5.1 AMAN DMAN CDM SESAR Compliance in general, EC 716/2014

9

10 ATC Simulators

11

12

13 Quality & Safety Management ISO certified since Work in accordance with EC regulations: No 1032/2006 (OLDI) No 633/2007 (FMTP) No 73/2010 (AIXM 5.1) No 1206/2011 (Mode-S) No 29/2009 (CPDLC, ATN) No 482/2008 (SW Safety Ass.) Eurocontrol ESARR 6 No 716/2014 and and other relevant standards.

14 Fallback / Contingency Systems

15 London-wide air traffic control failure was caused by an unprecedented computer fault

16 The Independent Saturday 13 December 2014 The computer error that caused the skies over London to be cleared of planes had never been seen by engineers before, according to the company in charge of the system. Air traffic control firm NATS said the computer error had restricted air traffic controllers ability to deal with high volumes of aircraft. NATS said its systems were up and running again last night but that knock-on effects were still affecting airports today. Travel problems continue into weekend after glitch at air traffic control centre that transport secretary calls unacceptable!

17 General on FBS Main purpose of FBS is to perform in case of: 1) Emergency; Failure in main 2) Planned shorter switch-off of main 3) Longer unavailability of main 4) Replacement of main

18 Requirements on FBS Constantly available Not fail when main fails Aligned operational context Sufficient functionality Functionality & HMI similar as main Easily maintainable Use the working positions of main Possible to develop further

19 Si ATM solution Reuse of well-proven Si ATM products Software different from main Same surveillance input Functionality; MST, SNET, CWP, FDP. Emulate HMI of main Main FBS connection KVM switch Redundant, Si ATM advanced functions

20 Contingency Systems 1) Clear the skies UFS Hong Kong 2) Continued reduced operations ARES Croatia 3) Continued full operations To be discussed

21 Hong Kong Ultimate Fallback System (UFS) Clear the sky One operational system and one test configuration Single servers Online system with 86 CWP + 6 tech. supervisors Voice recording and playback

22 Surveillance data STCA MSAW APW APM MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL AIDC Data Link ATS Units SDP MST Full FPLs FDP AFTN/ AMHS CWPs

23 Surveillance data Surveillance data AT3 STCA MSAW APW APM MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL AIDC Data Link ATS Units SDP MST Full FPLs FDP AFTN/ AMHS Alignment CWPs SDP MST Mini FPLs FDP STCA MSAW APW APM UFS

24 Surveillance data Surveillance data STCA MSAW APW APM MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL Data Link ATS Units SDP MST Full FPLs FDP AFTN/ AMHS CWPs SDP MST Mini FPLs FDP STCA MSAW APW APM UFS IFPL,ICHG, ICNL,IDLA IAPL,IACH

25 UFS Overview No software, computers or network equipment in common with the main system - but uses the same monitors, keyboards, mouses and loudspeakers. Each controller can individually select which system; main, fallback or UFS, that shall provide information on his/her monitors using a KVMA-switch

26 UFS Overview (contimued) Surveillance data; dual serial lines + network connections. 5 radar stations and two ADS-B feeds, True multi-sensor tracking Weather data; from radars Flight information; is continuously fed from the main systems keeping a database of abbreviated flight plans up to date. QNH; direct from met-office. Safety Nets; STCA, MSAW, APW, and APM Controller HMI; adapted to AT3 Recording; of data for playback and recording of voice from main VCS and from the Direct Radio Communication System (DRCS) for playback. Monitoring and control using SNMP

27 UFS, Controller Functions Same track symbols as in AT3, labels configurable Automatic and manual coupling Flight jurisdiction Coordination between sectors Flight lists (inbound/outbound), configurable SNET alerts same presentation as in AT3 Prediction lines Separation probe QDM Weather radar presentation Presentation filters Maps Pointer symbol communication Status of interfaces

28 UFS Context

29 UFS Flight Plan Data Main Active Main Standby Fallback Active Fallback Standby Aircraft Identity Status EOBT ADEP ADES Assigned SSR-code Aircraft type Wake turbulence Owner (controlling sector) CFL RVSM status FIR exit point FIR exit level UFS CWP Coordination target Coordinated level Arrival runway Notes

30 Databases synchronization At connection; clear database and download Operative flight plans. After the initial establishment of the connection, the AT3 system will send a Flight Data Message any time a new flight is created with a Flight Plan State of Operative, when a flight s Flight Plan State changes to Operative, when an existing Operative flight s data is modified or a flight s Flight Plan State changes to Cancelled. A flight plan becomes Operative when either the EOBT or the FIR entry time is within this VSP time of current system time.

31 Croatia ATM Radar Emergency System (ARES) Clear the sky and continued reduced operations Five operational installations + one test configuration Two redundant configurations and four with single servers Zagreb online with 55 CWP + one technical supervisor

32 ATM Radar Emergency System (ARES) Croatia COOPANS AFTN Zagreb Test Zagreb ONL Pula ONL Zadar ONL Split ONL Dubrov ONL Radars, ADS-B and Multilateration

33 Surveillance data Surveillance data COOPANS STCA MSAW APW APM MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL OLDI Data Link ATS Units SDP MST Full FPLs FDP AFTN/ AMHS Alignment CWPs SDP MST Reduced FPLs FDP AFTN/ AMHS STCA MSAW APW APM ARES IFPL,ICHG, ICNL,IDLA IAPL,IACH

34 Surveillance data Surveillance data STCA MSAW APW APM MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL Data Link ATS Units SDP MST Full FPLs FDP AFTN/ AMHS CWPs SDP MST Reduced FPLs FDP AFTN/ AMHS STCA MSAW APW APM ARES IFPL,ICHG, ICNL,IDLA IAPL,IACH IFPL,ICHG, ICNL,IDLA IAPL,IACH

35 ARES Surveillance Data Processing ARES is dimensioned for 8 surveillance sources via network or serial ports. Currently six connected and seven configured simultaneous fully labeled aircraft targets plots or ADS-B reports per second True multi-sensor tracking Track broadcasted to external systems (e.g. SASS-C)

36 ARES Functional Overview Flight Data Processing Essential flight data from COOPANS and AFTN (ADEXP) HMI similar to main system Safety Nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW) Area Proximity Warning (APW)

37 ARES Functional Overview (continued) Information data processing QNH from METAR/SPECI Map data handling (editing, etc) Operational supervisor functions Center configuration similar as main system TSA management Recording and playback System data recording and playback System monitoring and control Centralized monitoring from Zagreb based upon SNMP

38 ARES, Controller Functions Same track symbols as in main system, labels configurable Automatic and manual coupling Flight jurisdiction same as main system Coordination between sectors same as in main system Coordination with next FIR Flight lists (FPL and Sector), configurable SNET alerts same presentation as in main system Separation probe Prediction lines (speed vector) QDM Presentation filters Maps Status of interfaces

39 ARES Context CroATMS FIXER I_Logs External clients I_TrackOut I_XML Sensors Radar WAM ADS-B I_Sensors ARES I_AFTN AFTN I_NTP NTP servers I_KVM Operational supervisor ATC Controller Technical supervisor

40 ARES Connection to Main System Manually open channel from technical supervisor Show main system status Manually start synchronizing Deletes all flight plans Insert flight plans from main system Synch ready message When synchronized All changes in main system sends update data. Controlling sector not included in the data

41 ARES Flight Plan Data

42 Full operational contingency Continued full operations To be discussed referencing the figures.

43 ICAO & ADEXP, Flow, etc Full FPLs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Surveillance data AFTN/ AMHS ATS Units MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL FDP Data Link CWPs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Full FPLs FDP Surveillance data Alignment AFTN/ AMHS MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL OLDI Full Cont.

44 Full FPLs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Surveillance data AFTN/ AMHS ATS Units MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL FDP Data Link CWPs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Full FPLs FDP Surveillance data Alignment? AFTN/ AMHS MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL ATS Units Data Link Full Cont.

45 Conclusions Contingency systems are becoming mandatory Si ATM has solutions for all the three levels Si ATM has plug-and-play solution for COOPANS