ALMA Correlator Enhancement

Transcription

1 ALMA Correlator Enhancement Technical Perspective Rodrigo Amestica, Ray Escoffier, Joe Greenberg, Rich Lacasse, J Perez, Alejandro Saez Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array

2 Outline Motivation Short technical description Summary of performance gains Cost guesstimates 2

3 Motivation Potential benefits to science Technology has evolved Over a decade since hardware was designed Order of magnitude improvement possible without major disruption?? Moore s Law 3

4 Some Technical Details - cost versus design node There are significant trade-offs in designing a new ASIC Cost versus design node: (source: EE Times web blog, FPGA as ASIC alternative, April 21, 2014) 4

5 Some Technical Details - example trade-offs Power versus design node (one example): (source: Nick Kepler, SuVolta Corp. Rethinking the Pursuit of Moore s Law) 5

6 Some Technical Details - change in available technologies Industry as a whole is a mixed bag (source: EE Times web blog, FPGA as ASIC alternative, April 21, 2014) 6

7 Some Technical Details - finding the sweet spot Have talked with various experts to try to find sweet spot (reasonable cost and power with significant performance enhancement) From what we ve learned so far, a factor of 32 density improvement with a factor of 8 resolution improvement at the 45/40 nm node seems to be the sweet spot. Preliminary quotes: Part POWER EST NRE Parts Cost Quan Total Custom Chip (esilicon, 40nm) 18.5 W $2,275,000 $30 10,000 $2,575,000 Custom Chip (esilicon, 28nm) 17 W $3,175,000 $20 10,000 $3,375,000 Custom Chip (isine) W $2,000,000 $50 10,000 $2,500,000 Custon Chiop (STM, 40nm) 6.4/3.45 W $1,377,600 $83 10,000 $2,206,400 7

8 Some Technical Details The Big Picture and Main Thrust of the Proposal: Resolution can be enhanced by replacing custom correlator Integrated Circuit (IC) It follows that we must replace the correlator cards and everything downstream to handle more data. Provide detailed plan and costing Bandwidth can be enhanced by doubling the clock rate on most cards and hoping the backplane can handle the resulting traffic. Requires replacing cards in data path in front of correlator card. Provide road map (i.e., not as much detail!) 8

9 Some Technical Details architecture ALMA-1 ALMA-2 9

10 Some Technical Details - number of cards goes down dramatically CURRENT (4 cards per plane ) PROPOSED (1 card per plane ) 10

11 Some Technical Details - architecture and data rates 11

12 Road map to bandwidth enhancement Current chips run at 125 MHz. New chips could be designed to run at > 250 MHz This would be part of what is needed to double the correlator bandwidth. However, the front end of the correlator (Station Racks) would also need to be redesigned to make this possible. It is not clear, at this time, whether or not this is affordable We are currently testing whether or not the existing backplanes can run at 250 MHz. This would allow the upgrade to involve only changing cards and a few cables. Having to replace the motherboards would be more expensive and disruptive. 12

13 Impact on ALMA Operations Resolution enhancement is not a major perturbation to ALMA operations There are significant challenges in chip, firmware, and software design and test, but these can mostly be done off-line. No racks to rip out No change in power and clock distribution No change in cooling requirements From the hardware point of view, it s mostly a matter of swapping cards and adding some cables. 13

14 Performance Enhancements - frequency and time resolution, and sensitivity X8 enhancement in frequency resolution. Spectral resolution for every FDM mode increases by a factor of eight for integration times of 128 msec and greater. For example, from Table 2 of the correlator specification (next slide) ( Time resolution enhancement for auto and cross products And if you don t need either improved frequency or time resolution, there is still something in it for you: higher sensitivity or shorter observing times can be obtained using 4-bit x 4-bit modes and/or double Nyquist mode (95% efficiency versus 85% including the effect of the 3-bit sampler). This is equivalent to adding about 8 antennas to the array or cutting integration times down by 12%! True only for BW < 2 GHz. See comparison of modes 2 and 53 on the next slide 14

15 Mode Table Changes Mode # Number of subchannel filters Total Bandwidth Number of Spectral Points Spectral Resolution (KHz) Correlation Sampling Sensitivity (x 0.96) Current Proposed Current Proposed GHz bit x 2-bit Nyquist GHz bit x 2-bit Twice Nyquist GHz bit x 4-bit Nyquist GHz bit x 2-bit Nyquist GHz bit x 2-bit Twice Nyquist GHz bit x 4-bit Nyquist GHz bit x 4-bit Twice Nyquist MHz bit x 2-bit Nyquist MHz bit x 2-bit Twice Nyquist MHz bit x 4-bit Nyquist MHz bit x 4-bit Twice Nyquist MHz bit x 2-bit Nyquist MHz bit x 2-bit Twice Nyquist MHz bit x 4-bit Nyquist MHz bit x 4-bit Twice Nyquist MHz bit x 2-bit Nyquist MHz bit x 2-bit Twice Nyquist MHz bit x 4-bit Nyquist MHz bit x 4-bit Twice Nyquist MHz bit x 2-bit Nyquist MHz bit x 2-bit Twice Nyquist MHz bit x 4-bit Nyquist MHz bit x 4-bit Twice Nyquist MHz bit x 2-bit Twice Nyquist MHz bit x 4-bit Twice Nyquist

16 Performance Enhancements - time resolution details The current implementation has time resolution of 1 msec for auto products and 16 msec for cross-products. The addition of RAM to the correlator chip makes it possible to trade time resolution for spectral resolution on auto and cross-products, a new feature (is this useful??): Time Resolution (msec) Spectral Points (per baseband)

17 Costs, very preliminary Big ticket item is surely the cost of the first chip (NRE), ~$2.5M. But it s cheaper than buying a ton of big FPGAs which, at first seems like the obvious solution. Hardware costs in addition to ships ~ $1.25M Labor about 4 FTE-years (hardware + software) Contingency + overhead Bottom line is that it could be done with a fraction of ALMA development funds over 2 to 3 years. 17

18 Summary We are proposing to study an upgrade of the ALMA correlator. The upgrade would provide a factor of eight improvement in spectral resolution as well as improvements in time resolution. Improved spectral resolution could be traded for improved sensitivity. We will also provide a roadmap to doubling the bandwidth We have applied for an ALMA study proposal in this call. We would be interested in some feedback from the scientific community. Further reading: Enhancing the Performance of the 64-antenna ALMA Correlator (Escoffier, Lacasse, Saez, John Webber, Rodrigo Amestica, Alain Baudry) 18

19 Backup Slides 19

20 Motivation Technology has evolved Over a decade since hardware was designed Order of magnitude improvement possible without major disruption?? Moore s Law 20

21 Some Technical Details - cost versus design node There are significant trade-offs in designing a new ASIC Cost versus design node: (source: EE Times web blog, FPGA as ASIC alternative, April 21, 2014) 21

22 Some Technical Details - example trade-offs Power versus design node (one example): (source: Nick Kepler, SuVolta Corp. Rethinking the Pursuit of Moore s Law) 22

23 Some Technical Details - change in available technologies Industry as a whole is a mixed bag (source: EE Times web blog, FPGA as ASIC alternative, April 21, 2014) 23