Exemption 5: DeliberativeExemption 5: DeliberativeExemption 5: DeliberativeExemption 5: Deliberative Exemption 5: Deliberative

Transcription

1 Schary, Claire From: Sent: To: Subject: Keenan, Dru Thursday, August 01, :55 AM Schary, Claire Response to 2nd NWEA FOIA From: Bott, Dustan Sent: Tuesday, May 28, :50 PM To: Keenan, Dru; Schary, Claire Cc: Park, Chae; Poulsom, Susan; Ogle, Kimberly Subject: RE: WQ Trading Buyers Compliance history discussion Dru and company, Dustan Bott Inspection and Enforcement Management Unit th Avenue, MS OCE-184 Seattle, WA Phone: (206) Fax (206) From: Keenan, Dru Sent: Tuesday, May 28, :33 AM To: Schary, Claire Cc: Bott, Dustan; Park, Chae; Poulsom, Susan Subject: RE: WQ Trading Buyers Compliance history discussion Claire, thanks for sending Dustan s comment Exemption 5: Deliberative Exemption 5 De iberative Exemption 5 De iberative Exemption 5 Del berative Exemption 5 Del berative Exemption 5: Deliberative 1 Exemption 5 Deliberative Exemption 5 Deliberative

2

3

4 Dustan Bott Inspection and Enforcement Management Unit th Avenue, MS OCE-184 Seattle, WA Phone: (206) Fax (206) From: Schary, Claire Sent: Monday, May 20, :37 AM To: Carrie Sanneman Cc: Bobby Cochran; Bott, Dustan; Keenan, Dru; Park, Chae; Poulsom, Susan; Psyk, Christine; Rose, Bob; Stewart, William C. Subject: RE: Draft Best Practices, Follow-up from Workshop #1, Review by 5/22 Carrie, Here are my brief comments on the last two documents I had to review the April meeting summary and the Draft Guiding Principles. I have only one comment on each. For the meeting notes, I want a little more explanation of what we were looking for in more robust NRCS standards, to avoid misinterpretation as a criticism of NRCS standards. In the Guiding Principles document, I suggest a word to be added to make a sentence in the last paragraph on the first page read properly. -- Claire Claire Schary schary.claire@epa.gov / (206) From: Carrie Sanneman [mailto:sanneman@willamettepartnership.org] Sent: Friday, May 10, :23 AM To: hbre461@ecy.wa.gov; mgil461@ecy.wa.gov; marti.bridges@deq.idaho.gov; Michael.Mcintyre@deq.idaho.gov; Ranei Nomura; Schary, Claire; FOSTER Eugene P Cc: Bobby Cochran; Joe Furia; Karin Power; Neil Mullane; Tim Wigington; Todd Gartner; David Primozich Subject: Draft Best Practices, Follow-up from Workshop #1, Review by 5/22 Good morning! Attached are documents representing the follow-up from Workshop #1. Please review and send us your feedback by Wednesday, 5/22. All documents are posted on the project website. Here's what we have: Final Meeting Summary - incorporating feedback from the version distributed on 4/19 Revised draft of the JRA 2-pager with tracked changes Revised draft of the Guiding Principles with tracked changes Draft Best Practices from Workshop #1 - these represent our best attempt to synthesize points of consensus we heard on the Workshop #1 topics during and since the workshop. The intention is that we continue to revise this document until all are satisfied and we can consider upgrading them to Pilot Best Practices come November. 4

5 As usual, I have included only the core project team on this so that you may distribute within your agency as most appropriate. Please follow up with questions, and enjoy your weekend. Finally - for those participating in the BMP call next week - please look for an agenda and brief materials from me by this afternoon. Best, Carrie 5