Snyder leads by 5%, Peters leads by 14% Snyder 48% - Schauer 43% Peters 52% - Land 38%
|
|
- Lee Edwards
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 P R E S S R E L E A S E FOR RELEASE AFTER 6:30 PM October 28, 2014: Contact: Steve Mitchell Snyder leads by 5%, Peters leads by 14% Snyder 48% - Schauer 43% Peters 52% - Land 38% EAST LANSING, Mich. Governor Rick Snyder has extended his lead from two percent out to five percent over Democratic challenger Mark Schauer, while Congressman Gary Peters increased his lead from thirteen percent to fourteen percent over former Michigan Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land in the U.S. Senate race according to a new Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell Poll of Michigan. In the poll, Snyder has 48%, Schauer 43%, Libertarian Mary Buzuma 2%, U.S. Tax Payers Mark McFarlin 1%, and Green Party Paul Homeniuk 0.4%. Five percent are undecided. In the U.S. Senate Race Peters has 52%, Land 38%, Libertarian Jim Fulner 3%, U.S. Tax Payers Richard Matkin 1%, and Green Party Chris Wahmhoff 1%. Five percent are undecided. The automated survey of 1,159 likely voters in November s General Election was conducted on Oct. 27, 2014 by Mitchell Research & Communications, Inc. for Fox 2 News (WJBK-TV) in Detroit and has a Margin of Error + or 2.88% at the 95% level of confidence. Governor Snyder s support has stayed the same at 48% since our poll last week while Mark Schauer has dropped three percent down to 43%. The Governor seems to be moving away from Schauer and it looks as though Republicans are more engaged. However, Schauer leads by 10% among those who have already voted by absentee ballot (17% of all voters) and he leads by 19% with those who say they will vote by absentee ballot (7% of all voters). Snyder leads by 11% with those who will be voting on Election Day (74%) of all voters. Republicans seem to be getting more engaged than Democrats as we head into the last week. At the same time, Peters also is pulling away from Land, Steve Mitchell CEO of Mitchell Research & Communications said.
2 Page 2 of 10 Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell Poll Press Release 10/28/14 50% 48% 46% 44% 42% 40% Snyder Schauer 38% 36% September 14 of 14 Sept 29 of 14 Oct. 9 of 14 Oct. 12 of 14 Oct. 19 of 14 Oct. 27 of 14 The chart above shows the race for Governor in the five most recent Mitchell Research/Fox 2 (WJBK-TV) Detroit Polls. Peters lead over Land remains in double digits and he has been above 50% in our last two polls. Unless there is a major change, Peters is on path to replace retiring U.S. Senator Carl Levin, said Mitchell. 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Land Peters 10% 0% September 14 of 14 Sept 29 of 14 Oct. 9 of 14 Oct. 12 of 14 Oct. 19 of 14 Oct. 27 of 14
3 Page 3 of 10 Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell Poll Press Release 10/28/14 Governor Snyder s favorability (49% favorable- 41% unfavorable) is down slightly from last week (50%-38%). His Job approval is also down 2 percent to 54 percent. Schauer s favorable/unfavororable (42%-38%) is very similar to last week (40%-37%), Mitchell said. [Note: Poll must be referred to as Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell Poll] FIELD COPY AGGREGATE PERCENTAGES Survey of the State of Michigan Likely November 2014 General Election Voters Conducted October 27, 2014 (N=1159) Margin of Error +/-2.88 Hi, we re conducting a survey of Michigan voters for TV and radio stations on the Governor s Race and other issues. 1. If you are a registered voter at the household we are calling please press 1. If you re not, press 2. Yes 100% 2. Thinking about the upcoming November General Election for U.S. Senate and Governor, if you have already voted by absentee ballot press 1, if you are planning to vote by absentee ballot press 2, if you are definitely voting on Election Day press 3, probably voting on Election Day press 4, not sure yet if you are voting press 5, or definitely not voting press 6. Voted by Absentee 17% Will vote Absentee 7 Definitely voting 74 Probably Voting 1 If you have already voted, please continue and answer questions the way you voted. Before statewide ballot questions, four quick questions for statistical purposes: 3. What is your age? If you are: 4. If you are a male press 1 or a female press press 8% press press press press or older press 18 Male 48% Female 52
4 5. If you are white/caucasian press 1, African-American press 2, Hispanic press 3, Asian or something else press 4. White 84% African-American 12 Hispanic 1 Asian other 4 6. If you are a: Democrat or lean Democrat press 42% Republican or lean Republican press 38 Another party press 7 Or, Independent press 13 Now I m going to read you a few names. For each, please tell me if you have heard of that name. If you have heard of that name let me know if you have a favorable or unfavorable impression of that person. If you don t know the name, or don t know enough about them to say favorable or unfavorable, you can give me that answer too. 7. Rick Snyder. If you are not aware of Rick Snyder Press 1. Aware with a favorable impression Press 2. Aware with an unfavorable impression Press 3. If you are aware, but don t know enough to say favorable or unfavorable Press 4, and if you are not sure Press 5. Not Aware 5% Favorable 49 Unfavorable 41 Aware/No Impression Mark Schauer. If you are not aware of Mark Schauer Press 1. Aware with a favorable impression Press 2. Aware with an unfavorable impression Press 3. If you are aware, but don t know enough to say favorable or unfavorable Press 4, and if you are not sure Press 5. Not Aware 9% Favorable 42 Unfavorable 38 Aware/No Impression Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as President? If you strongly approve press 1, somewhat approve press 2, somewhat disapprove press 3, strongly disapprove press 4, or if you are not sure press 5. Strongly Approve 26% Somewhat Approve 21 48% Somewhat Disapprove 8 51% Strongly Disapprove 43 2
5 10. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Rick Snyder is doing as Governor? If you strongly approve press 1, somewhat approve press 2, somewhat disapprove press 3, strongly disapprove press 4, or if you are not sure press 5. Strongly Approve 30% Somewhat Approve 24 54% Somewhat Disapprove 17 44% Strongly Disapprove If the November 2014 General Election for Governor of Michigan was being held today, would you be voting for Rick Snyder the Republican, Mark Schauer the Democrat, Mary Buzuma the Libertarian, Mark McFarlin the U.S. Tax Payers, or Paul Homeniuk the Green Party Candidate? If you are voting for or lean towards Rick Snyder press 1, if you are voting for or lean towards Mark Schauer press 2, if you are voting for or lean towards Mary Buzuma press 3, if you are voting for or lean towards Mark McFarlin press 4, if you are voting for or lean towards Paul Homeniuk press 5, and if you re not sure yet press 6. Snyder 48% Schauer 43 Buzuma 2 McFarlin 1 Homeniuk < If the November 2014 General Election for U.S. Senator of Michigan was being held today, would you be voting for Terri Lynn Land the Republican, Gary Peters the Democrat, Jim Fulner the Libertarian, Richard A. Matkin the U.S. Tax Payers, or Chris Wahmhoff the Green Party Candidate? If you are voting for or lean towards Terri Lynn Land press 1, if you are voting for or lean towards Gary Peters press 2, if you are voting for or lean towards Jim Fulner press 3, if you are voting for or lean towards Richard A. Matkin press 4, if you are voting for or lean towards Chris Wahmhoff press 5, and if you re not sure yet press 6. Land 38% Peters 52 Fulner 3 Matkin 1 Wahmhoff You must answer the last question or none of your answers will count. What area do you live in? If you live in the: City of Detroit press 6% Wayne County outside of Detroit 13 Oakland County 14 Macomb County 8 Flint, Saginaw, Bay City, Thumb Monroe, Washtenaw, Lansing, Jackson, Mid-Michigan West Michigan 20 Northern Michigan/U.P. 9
6 N= Total 11. Gov Ballot Yes Snyder Schauer Buzuma McFarlin Homeniuk Total % 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV % 41.0% 51.0% 2.0% 1.5% 0.0% 4.5% 17.3% 14.6% 20.3% 16.0% 25.0% 0.0% 16.7% Will Vote AV % 36.6% 56.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.3% 7.1% 5.4% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% Definitely Voting % 51.3% 40.8% 2.4% 0.9% 0.5% 4.1% 74.4% 78.9% 70.0% 84.0% 66.7% 80.0% 64.8% Probably Voting % 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 6.7% 6.7% 26.7% 1.3% 1.1% 0.6% 0.0% 8.3% 20.0% 7.4%
7 N= Total 11. Gov Ballot Yes Snyder Schauer Buzuma McFarlin Homeniuk Total % 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age % 44.2% 49.5% 2.1% 0.0% 1.1% 3.2% 8.2% 7.5% 9.3% 8.0% 0.0% 20.0% 5.6% % 62.4% 26.2% 2.7% 3.4% 0.0% 5.4% 12.9% 16.6% 7.8% 16.0% 41.7% 0.0% 14.8% % 43.1% 46.6% 3.0% 0.0% 0.4% 6.9% 20.0% 17.9% 21.5% 28.0% 0.0% 20.0% 29.6% % 48.1% 43.6% 2.6% 1.5% 0.8% 3.4% 23.0% 22.9% 23.1% 28.0% 33.3% 40.0% 16.7% % 45.9% 48.3% 1.9% 0.0% 0.5% 3.4% 17.9% 17.0% 19.9% 16.0% 0.0% 20.0% 13.0% % 48.6% 44.3% 0.5% 1.4% 0.0% 5.2% 18.1% 18.2% 18.5% 4.0% 25.0% 0.0% 20.4% Total % 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male % 52.8% 38.9% 2.9% 0.4% 0.5% 4.5% 47.9% 52.3% 42.9% 64.0% 16.7% 60.0% 46.3% Female % 44.2% 47.5% 1.5% 1.7% 0.3% 4.8% 52.1% 47.7% 57.1% 36.0% 83.3% 40.0% 53.7%
8 N= Total 11. Gov Ballot Yes Snyder Schauer Buzuma McFarlin Homeniuk Total % 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White % 53.8% 38.3% 2.0% 1.2% 0.4% 4.3% 83.8% 93.2% 74.0% 76.0% 100.0% 80.0% 77.8% African-American % 8.1% 83.7% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 11.6% 2.0% 22.5% 12.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.8% Hispanic % 38.5% 38.5% 23.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 0.9% 1.0% 12.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian Other % 55.0% 32.5% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% 10.0% 3.5% 3.9% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 7.4% Total % 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat % 14.4% 78.0% 1.0% 0.4% 0.4% 5.7% 42.0% 12.5% 75.5% 20.0% 16.7% 40.0% 51.9% Republican % 88.9% 5.9% 1.4% 2.0% 0.2% 1.6% 38.0% 69.8% 5.2% 24.0% 75.0% 20.0% 13.0% Another party % 30.1% 41.0% 15.7% 0.0% 1.2% 12.0% 7.2% 4.5% 6.8% 52.0% 0.0% 20.0% 18.5% Independent % 49.7% 42.3% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 6.0% 12.9% 13.2% 12.5% 4.0% 8.3% 20.0% 16.7%
9 N= Total 11. Gov Ballot Yes Snyder Schauer Buzuma McFarlin Homeniuk Total % 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit % 20.0% 75.4% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 5.6% 2.3% 9.7% 8.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% Wayne % 55.5% 41.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 1.9% 13.4% 15.4% 12.9% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 5.6% Oakland % 50.6% 39.6% 2.4% 0.0% 1.2% 6.1% 14.2% 14.8% 12.9% 16.0% 0.0% 40.0% 18.5% Macomb % 60.2% 26.9% 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 10.8% 8.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 18.5% Thumb % 39.7% 49.4% 3.2% 3.8% 0.6% 3.2% 13.5% 11.1% 15.3% 20.0% 50.0% 20.0% 9.3% Mid-Michigan % 47.5% 42.4% 2.5% 0.5% 0.0% 7.1% 17.1% 16.8% 16.7% 20.0% 8.3% 0.0% 25.9% West Michigan % 49.3% 42.4% 3.5% 0.9% 0.0% 3.9% 19.8% 20.2% 19.3% 32.0% 16.7% 0.0% 16.7% Northern MI/U.P % 53.5% 41.4% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 2.0% 8.5% 9.5% 8.2% 4.0% 8.3% 20.0% 3.7%
10 N= Total 12. US Senate Ballot Yes Land Peters Fulner Matkin Wahmhoff Total % 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV % 34.5% 57.5% 2.5% 1.0% 1.0% 3.5% 17.3% 15.6% 19.0% 13.5% 22.2% 28.6% 11.7% Will Vote AV % 29.3% 58.5% 1.2% 0.0% 1.2% 9.8% 7.1% 5.4% 7.9% 2.7% 0.0% 14.3% 13.3% Definitely Voting % 40.0% 50.9% 3.6% 0.5% 0.5% 4.5% 74.4% 78.2% 72.6% 83.8% 44.4% 57.1% 65.0% Probably Voting % 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 40.0% 1.3% 0.7% 0.5% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 10.0%
11 N= Total 12. US Senate Ballot Yes Land Peters Fulner Matkin Wahmhoff Total % 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age % 27.4% 65.3% 3.2% 1.1% 0.0% 3.2% 8.2% 5.9% 10.2% 8.1% 11.1% 0.0% 5.0% % 44.3% 47.0% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.9% 15.0% 11.6% 35.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 35.3% 52.2% 3.4% 0.9% 0.9% 7.3% 20.0% 18.6% 20.0% 21.6% 22.2% 28.6% 28.3% % 39.8% 50.0% 2.6% 0.8% 1.1% 5.6% 23.0% 24.0% 22.0% 18.9% 22.2% 42.9% 25.0% % 40.1% 54.1% 1.9% 0.5% 0.5% 2.9% 17.9% 18.8% 18.5% 10.8% 11.1% 14.3% 10.0% % 37.1% 51.0% 1.0% 1.4% 0.5% 9.0% 18.1% 17.7% 17.7% 5.4% 33.3% 14.3% 31.7% Total % 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male % 42.2% 48.8% 3.1% 0.7% 0.4% 4.9% 47.9% 53.1% 44.8% 45.9% 44.4% 28.6% 45.0% Female % 34.3% 55.3% 3.3% 0.8% 0.8% 5.5% 52.1% 46.9% 55.2% 54.1% 55.6% 71.4% 55.0%
12 N= Total 12. US Senate Ballot Yes Land Peters Fulner Matkin Wahmhoff Total % 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White % 42.5% 47.4% 3.4% 0.8% 0.5% 5.4% 83.8% 93.7% 76.0% 89.2% 88.9% 71.4% 86.7% African-American % 7.4% 86.7% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 4.4% 11.6% 2.3% 19.3% 0.0% 0.0% 28.6% 10.0% Hispanic % 30.8% 46.2% 23.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 0.9% 1.0% 8.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian Other % 35.0% 55.0% 2.5% 2.5% 0.0% 5.0% 3.5% 3.2% 3.6% 2.7% 11.1% 0.0% 3.3% Total % 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat % 5.5% 89.7% 0.4% 0.2% 0.6% 3.5% 42.0% 6.1% 72.2% 5.4% 11.1% 42.9% 28.3% Republican % 81.1% 9.3% 3.0% 0.9% 0.7% 5.0% 38.0% 81.0% 6.8% 35.1% 44.4% 42.9% 36.7% Another party % 20.5% 47.0% 18.1% 3.6% 1.2% 9.6% 7.2% 3.9% 6.4% 40.5% 33.3% 14.3% 13.3% Independent % 26.8% 59.1% 4.7% 0.7% 0.0% 8.7% 12.9% 9.1% 14.5% 18.9% 11.1% 0.0% 21.7%
13 N= Total 12. US Senate Ballot Yes Land Peters Fulner Matkin Wahmhoff Total % 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit % 13.8% 80.0% 3.1% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 5.6% 2.0% 8.6% 5.4% 0.0% 28.6% 0.0% Wayne % 32.9% 59.4% 5.2% 0.0% 0.6% 1.9% 13.4% 11.6% 15.2% 21.6% 0.0% 14.3% 5.0% Oakland % 38.4% 53.0% 2.4% 0.6% 0.0% 5.5% 14.2% 14.3% 14.4% 10.8% 11.1% 0.0% 15.0% Macomb % 49.5% 33.3% 2.2% 3.2% 0.0% 11.8% 8.0% 10.4% 5.1% 5.4% 33.3% 0.0% 18.3% Thumb % 31.4% 57.1% 5.1% 0.6% 0.0% 5.8% 13.5% 11.1% 14.7% 21.6% 11.1% 0.0% 15.0% Mid-Michigan % 37.9% 53.5% 2.5% 0.5% 0.5% 5.1% 17.1% 17.0% 17.5% 13.5% 11.1% 14.3% 16.7% West Michigan % 45.4% 43.2% 3.5% 1.3% 0.9% 5.7% 19.8% 23.6% 16.4% 21.6% 33.3% 28.6% 21.7% Northern MI/U.P % 44.4% 49.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 5.1% 8.5% 10.0% 8.1% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 8.3%
14 N= Total 10. Snyder Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total % 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV % 51.5% 46.5% 2.0% 17.3% 16.6% 18.2% 14.8% Will Vote AV % 45.1% 52.4% 2.4% 7.1% 6.0% 8.4% 7.4% Definitely Voting % 54.9% 43.0% 2.1% 74.4% 76.2% 72.6% 66.7% Probably Voting % 53.3% 26.7% 20.0% 1.3% 1.3% 0.8% 11.1%
15 N= Total 10. Snyder Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total % 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age % 38.9% 61.1% 0.0% 8.2% 6.0% 11.4% 0.0% % 75.8% 24.2% 0.0% 12.9% 18.2% 7.0% 0.0% % 45.7% 50.0% 4.3% 20.0% 17.1% 22.7% 37.0% % 51.1% 46.2% 2.6% 23.0% 21.9% 24.1% 25.9% % 52.2% 46.9% 1.0% 17.9% 17.4% 19.0% 7.4% % 57.6% 38.6% 3.8% 18.1% 19.5% 15.9% 29.6% Total % 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male % 56.2% 42.5% 1.3% 47.9% 50.2% 46.2% 25.9% Female % 51.2% 45.5% 3.3% 52.1% 49.8% 53.8% 74.1%
16 N= Total 10. Snyder Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total % 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White % 57.7% 40.2% 2.2% 83.8% 90.2% 76.3% 77.8% African-American % 23.7% 71.9% 4.4% 11.6% 5.2% 19.0% 22.2% Hispanic % 53.8% 46.2% 0.0% 1.1% 1.1% 1.2% 0.0% Asian Other % 55.0% 45.0% 0.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 0.0% Total % 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat % 24.2% 73.5% 2.3% 42.0% 19.0% 70.1% 40.7% Republican % 88.2% 10.0% 1.8% 38.0% 62.5% 8.6% 29.6% Another party % 37.3% 53.0% 9.6% 7.2% 5.0% 8.6% 29.6% Independent % 56.4% 43.6% 0.0% 12.9% 13.5% 12.7% 0.0%
17 N= Total 10. Snyder Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total % 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit % 29.2% 64.6% 6.2% 5.6% 3.1% 8.2% 14.8% Wayne % 61.3% 38.7% 0.0% 13.4% 15.3% 11.7% 0.0% Oakland % 61.6% 37.8% 0.6% 14.2% 16.3% 12.1% 3.7% Macomb % 63.4% 30.1% 6.5% 8.0% 9.5% 5.5% 22.2% Thumb % 44.9% 51.3% 3.8% 13.5% 11.3% 15.7% 22.2% Mid-Michigan % 53.5% 44.9% 1.5% 17.1% 17.1% 17.4% 11.1% West Michigan % 52.4% 45.0% 2.6% 19.8% 19.3% 20.2% 22.2% Northern MI/U.P % 51.5% 47.5% 1.0% 8.5% 8.2% 9.2% 3.7%
18 N= Total 7. Snyder ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total % 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV % 8.0% 41.0% 43.0% 5.5% 2.5% 17.3% 29.6% 14.3% 18.3% 31.4% 18.5% Will Vote AV % 7.3% 36.6% 51.2% 1.2% 3.7% 7.1% 11.1% 5.2% 8.9% 2.9% 11.1% Definitely Voting % 3.4% 52.8% 39.2% 2.4% 2.2% 74.4% 53.7% 79.4% 71.9% 60.0% 70.4% Probably Voting % 20.0% 40.0% 26.7% 13.3% 0.0% 1.3% 5.6% 1.0% 0.9% 5.7% 0.0%
19 N= Total 7. Snyder ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total % 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age % 16.8% 49.5% 33.7% 0.0% 0.0% 8.2% 29.6% 8.2% 6.8% 0.0% 0.0% % 2.0% 66.4% 25.5% 6.0% 0.0% 12.9% 5.6% 17.3% 8.1% 25.7% 0.0% % 3.0% 43.5% 47.8% 3.4% 2.2% 20.0% 13.0% 17.6% 23.6% 22.9% 18.5% % 1.5% 48.1% 43.2% 4.1% 3.0% 23.0% 7.4% 22.3% 24.5% 31.4% 29.6% % 2.4% 48.3% 45.9% 1.4% 1.9% 17.9% 9.3% 17.5% 20.2% 8.6% 14.8% % 9.0% 46.7% 37.6% 1.9% 4.8% 18.1% 35.2% 17.1% 16.8% 11.4% 37.0% Total % 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male % 6.3% 53.0% 38.0% 1.1% 1.6% 47.9% 64.8% 51.3% 44.9% 17.1% 33.3% Female % 3.1% 46.2% 42.9% 4.8% 3.0% 52.1% 35.2% 48.7% 55.1% 82.9% 66.7%
20 N= Total 7. Snyder ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total % 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White % 5.0% 53.6% 37.1% 2.8% 1.5% 83.8% 90.7% 90.8% 76.6% 77.1% 55.6% African-American % 3.0% 17.0% 68.1% 4.4% 7.4% 11.6% 7.4% 4.0% 19.6% 17.1% 37.0% Hispanic % 0.0% 46.2% 46.2% 0.0% 7.7% 1.1% 0.0% 1.0% 1.3% 0.0% 3.7% Asian Other % 2.5% 60.0% 30.0% 5.0% 2.5% 3.5% 1.9% 4.2% 2.6% 5.7% 3.7% Total % 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat % 5.5% 16.4% 71.5% 3.7% 2.9% 42.0% 50.0% 14.0% 74.0% 51.4% 51.9% Republican % 3.9% 83.4% 8.4% 3.0% 1.4% 38.0% 31.5% 64.0% 7.9% 37.1% 22.2% Another party % 8.4% 59.0% 26.5% 1.2% 4.8% 7.2% 13.0% 8.6% 4.7% 2.9% 14.8% Independent % 2.0% 51.7% 42.3% 2.0% 2.0% 12.9% 5.6% 13.4% 13.4% 8.6% 11.1%
21 N= Total 7. Snyder ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total % 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit % 10.8% 21.5% 56.9% 4.6% 6.2% 5.6% 13.0% 2.4% 7.9% 8.6% 14.8% Wayne % 1.3% 57.4% 37.4% 1.3% 2.6% 13.4% 3.7% 15.5% 12.3% 5.7% 14.8% Oakland % 3.0% 51.2% 39.6% 3.7% 2.4% 14.2% 9.3% 14.7% 13.8% 17.1% 14.8% Macomb % 5.4% 62.4% 29.0% 0.0% 3.2% 8.0% 9.3% 10.1% 5.7% 0.0% 11.1% Thumb % 13.5% 29.5% 48.1% 7.1% 1.9% 13.5% 38.9% 8.0% 16.0% 31.4% 11.1% Mid-Michigan % 2.5% 51.0% 42.9% 2.0% 1.5% 17.1% 9.3% 17.6% 18.1% 11.4% 11.1% West Michigan % 1.7% 57.2% 35.4% 3.5% 2.2% 19.8% 7.4% 22.9% 17.2% 22.9% 18.5% Northern MI/U.P % 5.1% 50.5% 42.4% 1.0% 1.0% 8.5% 9.3% 8.7% 8.9% 2.9% 3.7%
22 N= Total 8. Schauer ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total % 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV % 16.0% 45.0% 31.0% 6.0% 2.0% 17.3% 31.4% 18.5% 14.1% 10.9% 18.2% Will Vote AV % 9.8% 43.9% 25.6% 17.1% 3.7% 7.1% 7.8% 7.4% 4.8% 12.7% 13.6% Definitely Voting % 6.6% 41.4% 40.8% 9.4% 1.7% 74.4% 55.9% 73.5% 80.2% 73.6% 68.2% Probably Voting % 33.3% 20.0% 26.7% 20.0% 0.0% 1.3% 4.9% 0.6% 0.9% 2.7% 0.0%
23 N= Total 8. Schauer ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total % 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age % 27.4% 48.4% 24.2% 0.0% 0.0% 8.2% 25.5% 9.5% 5.2% 0.0% 0.0% % 2.7% 34.9% 47.7% 14.8% 0.0% 12.9% 3.9% 10.7% 16.2% 20.0% 0.0% % 6.9% 45.7% 35.8% 10.3% 1.3% 20.0% 15.7% 21.8% 18.9% 21.8% 13.6% % 9.0% 38.7% 41.0% 9.8% 1.5% 23.0% 23.5% 21.2% 24.8% 23.6% 18.2% % 6.3% 46.9% 34.3% 10.1% 2.4% 17.9% 12.7% 20.0% 16.2% 19.1% 22.7% % 9.0% 39.0% 39.0% 8.1% 4.8% 18.1% 18.6% 16.9% 18.7% 15.5% 45.5% Total % 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male % 10.5% 39.1% 39.1% 10.3% 1.1% 47.9% 56.9% 44.7% 49.4% 51.8% 27.3% Female % 7.3% 44.5% 36.8% 8.8% 2.6% 52.1% 43.1% 55.3% 50.6% 48.2% 72.7%
24 N= Total 8. Schauer ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total % 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White % 8.9% 37.3% 41.9% 10.2% 1.8% 83.8% 84.3% 74.5% 92.7% 90.0% 77.3% African-American % 7.4% 74.1% 10.4% 4.4% 3.7% 11.6% 9.8% 20.6% 3.2% 5.5% 22.7% Hispanic % 7.7% 46.2% 46.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 1.0% 1.2% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% Asian Other % 12.5% 45.0% 30.0% 12.5% 0.0% 3.5% 4.9% 3.7% 2.7% 4.5% 0.0% Total % 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat % 10.1% 72.3% 8.4% 7.8% 1.4% 42.0% 48.0% 72.4% 9.3% 34.5% 31.8% Republican % 8.0% 7.7% 71.6% 10.2% 2.5% 38.0% 34.3% 7.0% 71.8% 40.9% 50.0% Another party % 10.8% 50.6% 31.3% 4.8% 2.4% 7.2% 8.8% 8.6% 5.9% 3.6% 9.1% Independent % 6.0% 38.9% 38.3% 15.4% 1.3% 12.9% 8.8% 11.9% 13.0% 20.9% 9.1%
25 N= Total 8. Schauer ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total % 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit % 15.4% 64.6% 10.8% 4.6% 4.6% 5.6% 9.8% 8.6% 1.6% 2.7% 13.6% Wayne % 2.6% 45.8% 38.1% 12.3% 1.3% 13.4% 3.9% 14.6% 13.4% 17.3% 9.1% Oakland % 5.5% 37.2% 46.3% 11.0% 0.0% 14.2% 8.8% 12.6% 17.3% 16.4% 0.0% Macomb % 11.8% 28.0% 52.7% 4.3% 3.2% 8.0% 10.8% 5.3% 11.2% 3.6% 13.6% Thumb % 14.7% 41.0% 32.1% 10.3% 1.9% 13.5% 22.5% 13.2% 11.4% 14.5% 13.6% Mid-Michigan % 7.6% 42.4% 37.4% 10.6% 2.0% 17.1% 14.7% 17.3% 16.9% 19.1% 18.2% West Michigan % 7.0% 44.1% 37.6% 8.7% 2.6% 19.8% 15.7% 20.8% 19.6% 18.2% 27.3% Northern MI/U.P % 14.1% 37.4% 38.4% 9.1% 1.0% 8.5% 13.7% 7.6% 8.7% 8.2% 4.5%
26 N= Total 9. Obama Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total % 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV % 59.0% 39.5% 1.5% 17.3% 21.4% 13.4% 17.6% Will Vote AV % 54.9% 41.5% 3.7% 7.1% 8.2% 5.8% 17.6% Definitely Voting % 44.5% 54.3% 1.2% 74.4% 69.6% 79.3% 58.8% Probably Voting % 33.3% 60.0% 6.7% 1.3% 0.9% 1.5% 5.9%
27 N= Total 9. Obama Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total % 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age % 45.3% 54.7% 0.0% 8.2% 7.8% 8.8% 0.0% % 43.6% 53.7% 2.7% 12.9% 11.8% 13.6% 23.5% % 46.1% 51.7% 2.2% 20.0% 19.4% 20.3% 29.4% % 46.2% 53.8% 0.0% 23.0% 22.3% 24.2% 0.0% % 54.6% 44.0% 1.4% 17.9% 20.5% 15.4% 17.6% % 48.1% 49.5% 2.4% 18.1% 18.3% 17.6% 29.4% Total % 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male % 46.3% 52.3% 1.4% 47.9% 46.6% 49.2% 47.1% Female % 48.8% 49.7% 1.5% 52.1% 53.4% 50.8% 52.9%
28 N= Total 9. Obama Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total % 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White % 41.3% 57.1% 1.6% 83.8% 72.6% 93.9% 94.1% African-American % 92.6% 7.4% 0.0% 11.6% 22.6% 1.7% 0.0% Hispanic % 38.5% 53.8% 7.7% 1.1% 0.9% 1.2% 5.9% Asian Other % 52.5% 47.5% 0.0% 3.5% 3.8% 3.2% 0.0% Total % 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat % 89.7% 8.8% 1.4% 42.0% 79.2% 7.3% 41.2% Republican % 6.6% 92.7% 0.7% 38.0% 5.3% 69.2% 17.6% Another party % 44.6% 51.8% 3.6% 7.2% 6.7% 7.3% 17.6% Independent % 32.9% 64.4% 2.7% 12.9% 8.9% 16.3% 23.5%
29 N= Total 9. Obama Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total % 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit % 84.6% 15.4% 0.0% 5.6% 10.0% 1.7% 0.0% Wayne % 53.5% 45.8% 0.6% 13.4% 15.0% 12.0% 5.9% Oakland % 54.9% 45.1% 0.0% 14.2% 16.3% 12.5% 0.0% Macomb % 31.2% 68.8% 0.0% 8.0% 5.3% 10.8% 0.0% Thumb % 43.6% 55.8% 0.6% 13.5% 12.3% 14.7% 5.9% Mid-Michigan % 44.9% 52.0% 3.0% 17.1% 16.1% 17.5% 35.3% West Michigan % 42.4% 54.6% 3.1% 19.8% 17.6% 21.2% 41.2% Northern MI/U.P % 41.4% 56.6% 2.0% 8.5% 7.4% 9.5% 11.8%
30 N= Total 6. Party Yes Democrat Republican Another party Independent Total % 42.0% 38.0% 7.2% 12.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV % 54.0% 34.5% 6.0% 5.5% 17.3% 22.2% 15.7% 14.5% 7.4% Will Vote AV % 45.1% 36.6% 2.4% 15.9% 7.1% 7.6% 6.8% 2.4% 8.7% Definitely Voting % 39.3% 38.9% 7.7% 14.2% 74.4% 69.6% 76.1% 79.5% 81.9% Probably Voting % 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 1.3% 0.6% 1.4% 3.6% 2.0%
31 N= Total 6. Party Yes Democrat Republican Another party Independent Total % 42.0% 38.0% 7.2% 12.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age % 31.6% 18.9% 26.3% 23.2% 8.2% 6.2% 4.1% 30.1% 14.8% % 32.2% 38.9% 8.1% 20.8% 12.9% 9.9% 13.2% 14.5% 20.8% % 47.0% 37.1% 6.5% 9.5% 20.0% 22.4% 19.5% 18.1% 14.8% % 40.6% 39.8% 5.6% 13.9% 23.0% 22.2% 24.1% 18.1% 24.8% % 48.8% 37.2% 3.4% 10.6% 17.9% 20.7% 17.5% 8.4% 14.8% % 43.3% 45.2% 4.3% 7.1% 18.1% 18.7% 21.6% 10.8% 10.1% Total % 42.0% 38.0% 7.2% 12.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male % 36.6% 39.8% 9.4% 14.2% 47.9% 41.7% 50.2% 62.7% 53.0% Female % 47.0% 36.3% 5.1% 11.6% 52.1% 58.3% 49.8% 37.3% 47.0%
32 N= Total 6. Party Yes Democrat Republican Another party Independent Total % 42.0% 38.0% 7.2% 12.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White % 34.7% 43.3% 7.7% 14.3% 83.8% 69.2% 95.5% 90.4% 93.3% African-American % 91.9% 5.2% 1.5% 1.5% 11.6% 25.5% 1.6% 2.4% 1.3% Hispanic % 61.5% 23.1% 15.4% 0.0% 1.1% 1.6% 0.7% 2.4% 0.0% Asian Other % 45.0% 25.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.5% 3.7% 2.3% 4.8% 5.4%
33 N= Total 6. Party Yes Democrat Republican Another party Independent Total % 42.0% 38.0% 7.2% 12.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit % 84.6% 6.2% 3.1% 6.2% 5.6% 11.3% 0.9% 2.4% 2.7% Wayne % 47.1% 27.1% 9.0% 16.8% 13.4% 15.0% 9.5% 16.9% 17.4% Oakland % 48.2% 42.1% 1.2% 8.5% 14.2% 16.2% 15.7% 2.4% 9.4% Macomb % 26.9% 47.3% 6.5% 19.4% 8.0% 5.1% 10.0% 7.2% 12.1% Thumb % 40.4% 38.5% 2.6% 18.6% 13.5% 12.9% 13.6% 4.8% 19.5% Mid-Michigan % 44.9% 33.3% 7.6% 14.1% 17.1% 18.3% 15.0% 18.1% 18.8% West Michigan % 27.9% 45.9% 16.6% 9.6% 19.8% 13.1% 23.9% 45.8% 14.8% Northern MI/U.P % 39.4% 50.5% 2.0% 8.1% 8.5% 8.0% 11.4% 2.4% 5.4%
Clinton Leads Trump in Michigan by 10% (Clinton 49% - Trump 39%)
P R E S S R E L E A S E FOR RELEASE: August 16, 2016 Contact: Steve Mitchell 248-891-2414 Clinton Leads Trump in Michigan by 10% (Clinton 49% - Trump 39%) EAST LANSING, Michigan --- The latest Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell
More informationColorado Results. For 10/3/ /4/2012. Contact: Doug Kaplan,
Colorado Results For 10/3/2012 10/4/2012 Contact: Doug Kaplan, 407-242-1870 Executive Summary Following the debates, Gravis Marketing, a non-partisan research firm conducted a survey of 1,438 likely voters
More informationSpring FREQUENCIES
Survey Information: Random Selection, Landline and Cell Telephone Survey Number of Adult Wisconsin Residents: 401 Interview Period: 3/24 4/3, 2014 Margin of Error: +/- 5% at the 95% confidence level. Spring
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Survey of California Likely Voters about the 2016 Presidential
More informationThe Growing Gap between Landline and Dual Frame Election Polls
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2010 Republican Share Bigger in -Only Surveys The Growing Gap between and Dual Frame Election Polls FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Keeter Director of Survey Research Michael
More informationSpring (percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding)
Spring 2016 Survey Information: Registered Voters, Random Selection, Landline and Cell Telephone Survey Number of Adult Wisconsin Registered Voters: 616 Interview Period: 4/12-4/15, 2016 Margin of Error
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Survey of California Likely Voters about the 2016 Presidential
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Field Poll Survey of California Registered Voters About
More informationVoters and Mail. 5 Insights to Boost Campaign Impact. A United States Postal Service and American Association of Political Consultants (AAPC) study
Voters and Mail 5 Insights to Boost Campaign Impact A United States Postal Service and American Association of Political Consultants (AAPC) study Voters are waiting for you at the mailbox. The American
More informationQ1. Do you have a cellphone, or not? 1. Yes 2. No [SHOW IF Q1=1] Q2. Do you have a cellphone that connects to the Internet and can have apps, or does your phone only receive calls and text messages? 1.
More informationNew Jersey economic issues poll April 5-14, 2018 Stockton Polling Institute Weighted frequencies
New Jersey economic issues poll April 5-14, 2018 Stockton Polling Institute Weighted frequencies Q1. How would you rate the U.S. economy: Frequency Valid Valid Excellent 47 6.6 6.6 6.6 Good 302 42.1 42.1
More informationMarquette Law School Poll September 25-28, 2014 Results for Likely Voters
Marquette Law School Poll September 25-28, 2014 Results for Likely Voters (ages are rounded to whole numbers for reporting of results. Values ending in.5 are rounded to even whole numbers. Frequencies
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 4153925763 Tabulations From a Field Poll Survey of California Likely Voters in the June
More informationSurvey Questions and Methodology
Survey Questions and Methodology Spring Tracking Survey 2012 Data for March 15 April 3, 2012 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American Life Project
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Survey of California Registered Voters About the Overall
More informationUser Manual. Last updated 1/19/2012
User Manual Last updated 1/19/2012 1 Table of Contents Introduction About VoteCast 4 About Practical Political Consulting 4 Contact Us 5 Signing In 6 Main Menu 7 8 Voter Lists Voter Selection (Create New
More informationx_ APPROVED BY CLIENT
POLL (SEPTEMBER '99) - project Registration # OMNIBUS (POLL) SEPTEMBER '99 Gallup Canada, Inc. Josephine Mazzuca, Analyst/ SOM September, 999 x_ APPROVED BY CLIENT DATE-, -.,... -:: Copyright, Gallup Canada,
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Survey of Californians Likely to Vote in the June 2016 Presidential
More informationDes Moines Area Regional Transit Non Rider Survey
Moines Area Regional Transit Non Rider Survey helping organizations make better decisions since 1982 Findings Report Submitted to the Moines Area Regional Transit Authority by: ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier
More informationMobile-only web survey respondents
Vol. 9, Issue 4, 2016 Mobile-only web survey respondents Peter Lugtig *, Vera Toepoel, Alerk Amin * Institution: Utrecht University Institution: Utrecht University Institution: RAND Corporation Abstract
More informationMarquette Law School Poll May 15-18, 2014
Marquette Law School Poll May 15-18, 2014 (ages are rounded to whole numbers for reporting of results. Values ending in.5 are rounded to even whole numbers. Frequencies have been rounded to whole numbers
More informationPoll Results: American Voters Views on Police Body Cameras. August 2015
Poll Results: American Voters Views on Police Body Cameras August 215 Sample Size: n=1, completed interviews random nationwide Sample: Provided by Labels & Lists; drawn proportionally nationwide Eligibility:
More informationAugust Tracking Survey 2011 Final Topline 8/30/2011
August Tracking Survey 2011 Final Topline 8/30/2011 Data for July 25 August 26, 2011 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American Life Project Sample:
More informationTelephone Survey Response: Effects of Cell Phones in Landline Households
Telephone Survey Response: Effects of Cell Phones in Landline Households Dennis Lambries* ¹, Michael Link², Robert Oldendick 1 ¹University of South Carolina, ²Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
More informationVision Services Application Overview
The Georgia Lions Lighthouse is a 501(c)3 nonprofit. Our mission is to provide vision and hearing services through education, detection, prevention, and treatment. The services we provide are made possible
More informationTopline Questionnaire
24 Topline Questionnaire HOME4NW Do you currently subscribe to internet service at HOME? 3 Based on all internet users [N=1,740] YES NO DON T KNOW REFUSED Current 84 16 * 0 April 2015 89 11 * 0 September
More information2013 Local Arts Agency Salary & Benefits Summary EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR / PRESIDENT / CEO
Local Arts Agency Salary & Benefits Summary EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR / PRESIDENT / CEO PRIVATE LAAS ONLY PUBLIC LAAS ONLY The Executive Director / President / Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is the chief staff
More informationSurvey Questions and Methodology
Survey Questions and Methodology Winter Tracking Survey 2012 Final Topline 02/22/2012 Data for January 20 February 19, 2012 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center
More informationSample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:
Survey Questions Spring 2013 Tracking Survey Final Topline 5/21/2013 Data for April 17-May 19, 2013 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American
More informationSmartphone Ownership 2013 Update
www.pewresearch.org JUNE 5, 2013 Smartphone Ownership 2013 Update 56% of American adults now own a smartphone of some kind; Android and iphone owners account for half of the cell phone user population.
More informationGALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS
GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS -- FINAL TOPLINE -- Timberline: 937008 IS: 727 Princeton Job #: 16-05-006 Jeff Jones, Lydia Saad May 4-8, 2016 Results are based on telephone
More informationPractical Issues in Conducting Cell Phone Polling
Practical Issues in Conducting Phone Polling for DC-AAPOR April 16, 2009 Michael Dimock, Leah Christian & Scott Keeter Pew Research Center Frame Surveys at Pew 14 full dual frame surveys in 2008 ~22,000
More informationTHE AP/AOL POLL CONDUCTED BY IPSOS PUBLIC AFFAIRS PROJECT # ONLINE VIDEO STUDY
1101 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 463-7300 Interview dates: July 27-30, August 1-3, & August 7-9, 2006 Interviews: 3003 adults, 1347 online video watchers Margin of error:
More informationInformed Delivery. June 2018
Informed Delivery June 2018 Informed Delivery offers an integrated marketing approach to meet today s consumer demands. 1 https://www. BeyondCubicle.com What is Informed Delivery? e Informed Delivery users
More informationIT Web and Software Developer Occupation Overview
IT Web and Software Developer Occupation Overview Emsi Q1 2018 Data Set March 2018 Western Technical College 400 Seventh Street La Crosse, Wisconsin 54601 608.785.9200 Emsi Q1 2018 Data Set www.economicmodeling.com
More informationThe Rise of the Connected Viewer
JULY 17, 2012 The Rise of the Connected Viewer 52% of adult cell owners use their phones while engaging with televised content; younger audiences are particularly active in these connected viewing experiences
More informationPETER D. HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. Study #7006--page 1 May 2003 OMB No
PETER D. HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. Study #7006--page 1 1724 Connecticut Avenue, NW Interviews: 760 respondents Washington, DC 20009 Dates: May 19-20, 2003 (202) 234-5570 FINAL Study #7006 OMB No.
More informationBOARD APPROVES STATE FUNDING MATCH FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CAREER TECHNOLOGY CENTER
Contact: Joe Verkennes, Director of Marketing, (734) 384-4207 January 24, 2011 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BOARD APPROVES STATE FUNDING MATCH FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CAREER TECHNOLOGY CENTER MONROE, Mich. At its
More informationL2 VoterMapping - Display Options
L2 VoterMapping - Display Options In L2 VoterMapping, there are six ways to control the display of voter data and each can provide you with valuable information for visual analysis: Map Type, Boundaries,
More informationAnnual Gadgets Survey Final Topline 4/21/06
Annual Gadgets Survey Final Topline 4/21/06 Data for February 15 April 6, 2006 1 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Internet & American Life Project Sample: n = 4,001 adults
More informationStudents Preferences for Receiving Communication from the University: A Report from the Student Life Survey
Preferences for Receiving Communication from the University: A Report from the Student Life Survey Center for the Study of Student Life March 2017 INTRODUCTION This report explores questions on the Student
More information2017 PIT Summary: Boulder County
A Point-in-Time (PIT) count provides a snapshot of homelessness by interviewing those who are homeless at a particular time. The Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative (MDHI) conducted a PIT study of
More informationSample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:
Survey Questions Spring 2013 Tracking Survey Final Topline 5/21/2013 Data for April 17-May 19, 2013 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American
More informationN.J. drivers continue to roll the dice with safety
For immediate release Mon., Aug. 6, 2012 7 pp. Contacts: Dan Cassino 973.896.7072 Zach Hosseini (NJ DHTS) 609.984.2529 Rich Higginson 908.213.1971 N.J. drivers continue to roll the dice with safety Despite
More informationSTAT10010 Introductory Statistics Lab 2
STAT10010 Introductory Statistics Lab 2 1. Aims of Lab 2 By the end of this lab you will be able to: i. Recognize the type of recorded data. ii. iii. iv. Construct summaries of recorded variables. Calculate
More informationPurpose. Symptom. Cause. March 4, 2008
March 4, 2008 To: From: AVC Advantage Customers using series 9.0 firmware Joe McIntyre, Senior Project/Account Manager Re: WinEDS Technical Product Bulletin - AVC Advantage Party Turnout Issue / Operator
More informationElectrical and Computer Engineering Technology Occupation Overview
Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Occupation Overview Emsi Q1 2018 Data Set March 2018 Western Technical College 400 Seventh Street La Crosse, Wisconsin 54601 608.785.9200 Emsi Q1 2018 Data
More informationWhat Clicks? A Technology Study for The Minneapolis Institute of Arts Baseline Research. August-September, 2002
THE MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS What Clicks? A Technology Study for The Minneapolis Institute of Arts Baseline Research August-September, 2002 Cincinnatus Minneapolis, Minnesota 612-331-9007 Table of
More information2017 PIT Summary: Jefferson County
A Point-in-Time (PIT) count provides a snapshot of homelessness by interviewing those who are homeless at a particular time. The Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative (MDHI) conducted a PIT study of
More informationTYPES OF VARIABLES, STRUCTURE OF DATASETS, AND BASIC STATA LAYOUT
PRIMER FOR ACS OUTCOMES RESEARCH COURSE: TYPES OF VARIABLES, STRUCTURE OF DATASETS, AND BASIC STATA LAYOUT STEP 1: Install STATA statistical software. STEP 2: Read through this primer and complete the
More informationOccupation Overview. Western Technical College. Emsi Q Data Set. March Seventh Street La Crosse, Wisconsin
Occupation Overview Emsi Q1 2017 Data Set March 2017 Western Technical College 400 Seventh Street La Crosse, Wisconsin 54601 608.785.9200 Emsi Q1 2017 Data Set www.economicmodeling.com 1 Parameters Occupations
More informationZogby Analytics Online Survey of Adults 11/9/16-11/10/16 MOE +/- 2.8 Percentage Points
11/9/16-11/1/16 MOE +/- 2.8 age Points 1. Are you planning to purchase any internet-connected devices this holiday season, such as fitness trackers, televisions, video cameras, home appliances or wearables?
More informationDistracted Driving Education for High School Students. Despina Stavrinos, PhD & Benjamin McManus
Distracted Driving Education for High School Students Despina Stavrinos, PhD & Benjamin McManus The Problem Still an epidemic 153.3 billion text messages are sent in the US every month (CTIA) Slight decrease
More informationSAMPLE Treatment Perceptions Survey (TPS) Report. XXXXXX County, N=239. (Not Real Data) All Substance Use Treatment Programs Surveyed.
Perceptions Survey (TPS) Report XXXXXX County, N=239 (Not Real Data) All Substance Use s Surveyed November 2017 Prepared by the University of California, Los Angeles Integrated Substance Abuse s *For county
More informationTAFDC, EAEDC and SNAP Voter Registration Mailing
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Department of Transitional Assistance 600 Washington Street Boston, MA 02111 DEVAL L. PATRICK Governor TIMOTHY P. MURRAY Lieutenant
More informationAlmost half of all internet users now use search engines on a typical day
Data Memo BY: Senior Research Fellow Deborah Fallows CONTACT: Associate Director Susannah Fox (202-419-4500) RE: Search Engine Use August 6, 2008 Almost half of all internet users now use search engines
More informationFIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Survey of California Likely Voters Measuring Voter Preferences
More informationVOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATION
VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATION Powered by PresidentialElection.com You are not registered until you: Print, sign, stamp, and mail complete form. INSTRUCTIONS 1 Print and Sign the form. You must sign the
More informationAMERICANS USE OF THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: AN AARP BULLETIN SURVEY
AMERICANS USE OF THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: AN AARP BULLETIN SURVEY APRIL 2013 AMERICANS USE OF THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: AN AARP BULLETIN SURVEY Report Prepared by Alicia Williams Copyright 2013 AARP Research
More informationTo start, please type the ID number from your invitation letter here, then click Log in.
ANES 2016 Time Series Web Screening Questionnaire [PROGRAMMING: Define preload variable PRESELECTED. Set PRESELECTED=0 for all cases (meaning there is no pre-selected person, meaning that the household
More informationParents Names Mom Cell/Work # Dad Cell/Work # Parent List the Math Courses you have taken and the grade you received 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4th
Full Name Phone # Parents Names Birthday Mom Cell/Work # Dad Cell/Work # Parent email: Extracurricular Activities: List the Math Courses you have taken and the grade you received 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4th Turn
More informationSpring Change Assessment Survey 2010 Final Topline 6/4/10 Data for April 29 May 30, 2010
Spring Change Assessment Survey 2010 Final Topline 6/4/10 Data for April 29 May 30, 2010 for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American Life Project Sample: n= 2,252 national adults, age 18 and older,
More informationElection Night Reporting Quick Start Guide
Election Night Reporting Quick Start Guide The Election Night Reporting (ENR) display provides extensive details on election results. Web visitors can view which candidates are leading for a contest as
More informationNovember 2016 G. Oscar Anderson, Senior Research Advisor AARP Research
November 2016 G. Oscar Anderson, Senior Research Advisor AARP Research https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00140.001 AARP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, with a membership of nearly 38 million that
More informationƒ % ƒ % ƒ %
4. Under Vermont law, the use of marijuana is illegal, including for medical purposes. Currently in the Vermont Legislature, there is a bill pending that would allow people with cancer, AIDS, and other
More informationFull download all chapters instantly please go to Solutions Manual, Test Bank site: testbanklive.com
Thinking Mathematically 6th Edition Blitzer Test Bank Full Download: http://testbanklive.com/download/thinking-mathematically-6th-edition-blitzer-test-bank/ MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative
More informationElection Night Reporting. DuPage County Election Commission
Last Updated: 01/21/2018 Table of Contents 1 Overview of Election Night Reporting... 3 2 Home Page... 4 3 Site Synopsis... 4 4 Results... 5 5 Navigation Categories... 5 6 My Favorite Races... 6 7 Contest
More informationAPPENDIX G: Biennial Exhibition Device Survey Questions
APPENDIX G: Biennial Exhibition Device Survey Questions STANDARD DEVICE QUESTIONS Did you use Whitney s Audio Guide to access the Museum s audio guide tour during today s visit? If so, please take a few
More informationImplementing Optional Gmail Service
Quick Survey #508 Report #393 Implementing Optional Gmail Service By Susan Zhang, SARI JUNE 2008 Student Affairs Research & Information University of California, Davis One Shields Ave. Davis, CA 95616
More informationElection Night Reporting Guidebook. County of Santa Clara Barry Garner Registrar of Voters
Election Night Reporting Guidebook County of Santa Clara Barry Garner Registrar of Voters Last Updated: October 16, 2012 Table of Contents Overview of Santa Clara County Election Night Reporting... 3 How
More informationTRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Young Drivers Report the Highest Level of Phone Involvement in Crash or Near-Crash Incidences. Research Note
TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS Research Note DOT HS 811 611 April 2012 Young Drivers Report the Highest Level of Phone Involvement in Crash or Near-Crash Incidences In the first nationally representative telephone
More informationOEMC 2016 Budget Statement of Executive Director Gary W. Schenkel to the Committee on Budget and Operations September 30, 2015
OEMC 2016 Budget Statement of Executive Director Gary W. Schenkel to the Committee on Budget and Operations September 30, 2015 Good morning, Chairman Austin, Vice Chairman Ervin and members of the City
More informationContents. 1. Survey Background and Methodology. 2. Summary of Key Findings. 3. Survey Results. 4. Appendix
Mobile Trends 2014 Contents 1. Survey Background and Methodology 2. Summary of Key Findings 3. Survey Results 4. Appendix 2 Research Methodology Method Sample Size Online survey programmed and hosted by
More informationSPRING 2014 PENN STATE POLL
SPRING 2014 PENN STATE POLL Report of Methods Prepared by: Center for Survey Research May 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 METHODOLOGY...2 Instrument Development...2 Sample Design...2 RDD Landline
More information2014 AARP Connecticut Telecommunications Survey
2014 AARP Connecticut Telecommunications Survey Residents Age 50+ Support Oversights and Protections for All Telecommunication Customers Nearly all Connecticut residents age 50 and older (96%) surveyed
More informationHOW CANADIANS BANK. Annual tracking study on Canadian attitudes and behaviours towards banking. Prepared for:
HOW CANADIANS BANK Annual tracking study on Canadian attitudes and behaviours towards banking Prepared for: 2016 METHODOLOGY Data collection method Hybrid phone/online survey methodology. 817 interviews
More informationITSMR Research Note KEY FINDINGS. Crash Analyses: Ticket Analyses:
December 2018 KEY FINDINGS Crash Analyses: 2013-2017 Less than 1% of police-reported fatal and personal injury (F & PI) crashes involved the use of a cell phone over the five years, 2013-2017. 15 persons
More informationDynamic Documents. David Allen University of Kentucky. July 30, Presented at TUG 2014
Dynamic Documents David Allen University of Kentucky July 30, 2014 Presented at TUG 2014 1 Introduction A generic definition of a dynamic document from Wikipedia: A living document or dynamic document
More informationThe XYZ of ABC 2007 Citizen Survey
2007 Citizen Survey Please complete this questionnaire if you are the adult (age 18 or older) in the household who most recently had a birthday. The adult's year of birth does not matter. Please circle
More informationInternet, Science & Tech RESEARCH AREAS. Mobile Fact Sheet MORE FACT SHEETS: INTERNET/BROADBAND SOCIAL MEDIA
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING YOUR WORLD ABOUT FOLLOW US Search Internet, Science & Tech MENU RESEARCH AREAS FACT SHEET JANUARY 12, 217 Mobile Fact Sheet MORE FACT SHEETS: INTERNET/BROADBAND SOCIAL
More informationTHE MISSING AGENDA THE IMPORTANCE OF CYBER SECURITY TO U.S. VOTERS
THE MISSING AGENDA THE IMPORTANCE OF CYBER SECURITY TO U.S. VOTERS This election season voters have heard promises to make the U.S. great again and how we re stronger together. But they have yet to hear
More informationITHAKA S+R ASERL: DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION
ITHAKA S+R ASERL: DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION Katherine Daniel and Roger Schonfeld November 30, 2017 Thank you to the following institutions for their participation Auburn University Clemson University
More informationSurvey questions. Winter Tracking Survey 2012 Final Topline 02/22/2012 Data for January 20 February 19, p e w i n t e r n e t.
Survey questions Winter Tracking Survey 2012 Final Topline 02/22/2012 Data for January 20 February 19, 2012 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American
More informationAPPLICATION FORMS. For. Certified Prevention Specialist (IC&RC reciprocal) CPS
Michigan Certification Board for Addiction Professionals APPLICATION FORMS For Certified Prevention Specialist (IC&RC reciprocal) CPS Directions for Submitting Application Completion of this packet of
More informationSample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:
Survey Questions Spring 2013 Tracking Survey Final Topline 5/21/2013 Data for April 17-May 19, 2013 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center s Internet & American
More informationMail Ballot Management Undeliverable Mail Ballots
Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State Elections Division Mail Ballot Management Undeliverable Mail Ballots Minnesota Rule 8210.3000, subpart 7 stipulates the treatment of mail ballot envelopes returned
More informationElection Night Reporting User Guide. Don Gray Sangamon County Clerk
Election Night Reporting User Guide Don Gray Sangamon County Clerk Updated 10-20-2018 Table of Contents Overview of Election Night Reporting... 3 When and How Often will the Results be Updated... 3 How
More informationNassau County Voter Data Request Packet. Vicki P. Cannon Supervisor of Elections
Nassau County Voter Data Request Packet Vicki P. Cannon Supervisor of Elections James S. Page Governmental Complex 96135 Nassau Place, Suite 3, Yulee, Florida 32097 Phone: 904.491.7500 Toll Free: 1.866.260.4301
More informationThings you ll know (or know better to watch out for!) when you leave in December: 1. What you can and cannot infer from graphs.
1 2 Things you ll know (or know better to watch out for!) when you leave in December: 1. What you can and cannot infer from graphs. 2. How to construct (in your head!) and interpret confidence intervals.
More informationGVU s WWW User Surveys
GVU s WWW User Surveys Jim Pitkow & Colleen Kehoe Georgia Tech - CoC - GVU Special thanks to: CNS, Randy Carpenter, Kipp Jones, Mike Mealling, Dr. James Foley, GVU, Sun Microsystems GVU s WWW User Surveys
More informationCumulative Report - Unofficial MARTIN COUNTY, TEXAS - GENERAL ELECTION - November 06, 2018
Page 1of6 Total Number of Voters: 2, 177 of 2,970 = 73.30% Precincts Reporting 8 of 8 = 100.00% I Party Candidate Absentee Early Election Total.i Straight Party, Vote For 1 Republican Party 34 79.07% 455
More informationMobile Messaging Apps Study : India. August 2014
Mobile Messaging Apps Study : India August 2014 Contents 1. Research Objectives & Methodology 2. Key Findings 3. Mobile Consumption Behavior 4. Message Apps Usage & Behaviors Download Intent App Awareness
More information2013 ISACA IT Risk/Reward Barometer Mexico Consumer Results. October
2013 ISACA IT Risk/Reward Barometer Mexico Consumer Results October 2013 www.isaca.org/risk-reward-barometer Media Inquiries: Kristen Kessinger, ISACA, +1.847.660.5512, news@isaca.org Carina Bustamente,
More informationT he Inbox Report 2017
Search Inbox Sent 1 Fluent LLC to me 2:10 Drafts Spam Trash T he Inbox Report 2017 CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS OF EMAIL loading... REVEAL MORE Click here to Reply Inbox Report 2017 Page 1
More informationStation Community Engagement Survey Results
Station Community Engagement Survey Results Report Example Report Prepared for: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 0 McNair Ingenuity Research Pty Ltd ACN. 096 437 991 Level 4, 270 Pacific Highway, Crows Nest, NSW, 2065
More informationMobile Access July 7, 2010 Aaron Smith, Research Specialist.
Mobile Access 2010 Six in ten Americans go online wirelessly using a laptop or cell phone; African-Americans and 18-29 year olds lead the way in the use of cell phone data applications, but older adults
More informationHow to Save the Smart Home from Cyber Invasion. IoT DevCon 2017 Art Swift, President, prpl Foundation
How to Save the Smart Home from Cyber Invasion Art Swift, President, prpl Foundation Smart Home Security Report 2016 Research Findings Smart device adoption has reached a tipping point - the smart home
More informationEligibility Application for ENP Certification
Eligibility Application for ENP Certification Please fill in the following information as indicated. NENA Member $ Non-Member $ Re-Certification $ Re-Examination $1 Type of payment included: Check enclosed
More information2013 ISACA IT Risk/Reward Barometer India Consumer Results. October
ISACA IT Risk/Reward Barometer India Consumer Results October www.isaca.org/risk-reward-barometer Media Inquiries: Kristen Kessinger, ISACA, +1.847.660.5512, news@isaca.org Rachel D souza, Ketchum Sampark,
More information2013 ISACA IT Risk/Reward Barometer US Consumer Results. October
2013 ISACA IT Risk/Reward Barometer US Consumer Results October 2013 www.isaca.org/risk-reward-barometer Media Inquiries: Kristen Kessinger, ISACA, +1.847.660.5512, news@isaca.org Aaron Berger, Ketchum,
More information