Aggregation of Crosstalk in Backplanes
|
|
- Merry Ward
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DesignCon 2008 Aggregation of Crosstalk in Backplanes Atul Gupta, InspireSys Corporation Henry Wong, Gennum Corporation
2 Abstract As the serial data rate increases in the backplane interconnect, dielectric and skin loss, reflections due to vias, and connectors and crosstalk are becoming major obstacles. Loss and reflection can be addressed by equalization, however crosstalk becomes a major bottleneck in the backplane performance. The IEEE 802.3ap standard is a good example of specifications which take crosstalk into account. This paper will provide more insight into the crosstalk utilizing time domain analysis and attempt to answer such questions as when to consider crosstalk as a bounded signal, and when to consider it white noise and unbounded. Author(s) Biography Atul K. Gupta has recently started a design service company, InspireSys Corp., focusing on signal integrity issues in high data rate systems. Before this venture he was the Director of Advanced Development, Analog & Mixed Signal Division, for Gennum Corporation. Past experience includes equalizer, clock and data recovery (CDR) and SerDes design. Mr. Gupta holds several patents, has published papers in IEEE journals, and has presented papers and participated in panel discussions at various standards bodies. He holds a bachelor s degree in electrical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology in Kanpur, India, and a master s degree in science from University of Calgary. Henry Wong is a Senior Systems Engineer in Advanced Development, Analog & Mixed Signal Division for Gennum Corporation, and is responsible for high-speed system design. He has more than14 years of industrial experience in digital communications, high-speed transceivers design, and signal processing. He has worked as a team leader and principal engineer on ADSL, cable, and wireless broadband (WiMAX) modems design at Nortel, Cadence, and a series of start-ups. He holds a bachelor s degree and a doctorate in electrical engineering, and has offered graduate courses and seminars in universities.
3 1. Background of backplane crosstalk aggregation After dielectric losses and reflections are addressed by equalization, crosstalk noise becomes the main bottleneck in high-speed backplane interconnect. This paper does not describe how to cancel the crosstalk, but rather describes a method to accurately predict the effect of crosstalk on the bit error rate (BER). This paper addresses this problem by quantifying the probability distribution using realistic measurements. From this, one can draw conclusions on its realistic impact on backplane system design. Crosstalk noise arises from many sources in the interconnect, due to inductive and capacitive coupling. The challenge has always been on linking BER and crosstalk. When there are multiple channels, it is even more difficult to accurately predict the BER performance. In data communications applications, the BER target is 1e-12, which means that one can only use statistical models to predict performance. To address this statistical problem, we derive rigorous statistical distributions of each crosstalk and the aggregate crosstalk. The main results are: Probability density function of individual NEXT and FEXT Probability density function of aggregate crosstalk Figure of merit to describe its difference/resemblance of a Gaussian density function Worst-case condition vs. optimistic result as a function of bit patterns Probability of occurrence for a realistic concern for system evaluation From these results, we can answer questions such as: How do we characterize complex backplane crosstalk problem using statistics? How do we simplify time-domain crosstalk measurements in lab yet generate statisticalsignificant results? How can we simulate worst-case scenarios without running hours and hours of simulations, and yet avoid the pitfall of short simulations? 2. Raw NEXT/FEXT data and statistical modeling 2.1 Raw NEXT and FEXT measurements The backplane setup used for measuring crosstalk is for a typical 10G backplane application. One model of this application can be found in Healey [2]. In this application, the total thru trace originates from the daughter card on the line card, through the backplane interconnect, and then to a switch card. Time-domain measurements of NEXT and FEXT were made in the lab by capturing step response with about 30 ps rise/fall, which is typical of a 10G SerDes. Impulse and pulse responses are then derived for post-processing. Examples of typical NEXT and FEXT measurements that relate to the IEEE KR spec can be found in Oganessyan et al [5] and Peters et
4 al [6]. In the KR spec, measurements of the total crosstalk are upper bounded by the crosstalk mask (see D Ambrosia et al [3, 4]). The insertion-loss-to-crosstalk (ICR) ratio is lower bounded by the ICR mask (see IEEE KR Spec [1], D Ambrosia [3]). 2.2 PDF calculation for each crosstalk In the time domain, crosstalk is captured as a step response and is used to derive the pulse response. The pulse response represents the interference of a bit through the transmit driver and coupled to the victim. A pattern of bits therefore gives rise to a sequence of pulse responses with delay of 1 UI in succession. The combined effect represents the total crosstalk effect on the victim, due to one aggressor, on 1 bit. The goal here is to calculate the probability of such crosstalk effect from billions of bit-pattern combinations. The end result is captured in a PDF function. Casper et al [9] and Moore [11, 12] have both calculated crosstalk PDF using this method. Treat each bit in the aggressor as a random variable (RV), and since the Tx bits are scrambled, any two RVs are independent. Consider only these 2 RVs, the summed effect has a density function which is the convolution of each density function according to Papoulis [14]. Let x be one crosstalk cursor in the pulse response, and y be another crosstalk cursor, then the sum of the 2 crosstalk cursors on the victim is the convolution of individual PDF: ( ) f ( z) = f z y f ( y) dy x Since we are dealing with discrete type, the PDF should be expressed as probability mass function (PMF) as: ( ) = ( ) ( ) P n P n k P k z x y k = For convenience of notation, the rest of the paper refers PDF and PMF collectively as PDF since the notation and understanding are now known to the reader. Now consider a pattern of independent bits in the aggressor. The combined crosstalk effect of this aggressor on the victim can be characterized by the convoluted PDF as: y f ( x) = f ( x) f ( x) L f ( x) 1 2 N where N is the number of bits in a pattern in the aggressor. This forms the PDF of an aggressor. The method of calculating PDF from individual cursors in general can be found in Ahmad [7, 8], Casper [9], and Stojanovic [10].
5 2.3 PDF calculation for aggregate crosstalk In backplane interconnect applications, multiple aggressors aggregate and impact the victim in a statistical manner. The challenge is how to model such aggregation in a tractable, yet accurate manner. Questions arise around whether the addition of aggressors will be constructive, or whether they will cancel each other and product only minimal effect. Due to its statistical nature, the best way to tackle this complex matter is through the use of PDF calculation. The PDF of the aggregate crosstalk can be again calculated through the use of PDF convolution. In Section 3, we will see results for a total of 4 aggressors, 2 NEXT and 2 FEXT. In this case, the aggregate is the summation of four crosstalks, with aggregate PDF as: f ( x) = f ( x) f ( x) f ( x) f ( x) aggregate NEXT1 NEXT 2 FEXT1 FEXT 2 More PDF convolution means that crosstalk noise can aggregate to a very large amplitude and distort the eye opening (peak distortion) extensively. But such an occurrence has a very low probability, due to the coherent destructive effect from each aggressor happening at the same time. The aggregate PDF faggregate( x ) directly addresses these 2 factors: (1) noise amplitude A, and (2) probability of having combined noise larger than this amplitude, i.e., Pr( A> A o ) (tail integration), on the current bit of the victim. With this equation, we can calculate BER due to the impact of each type or combined aggressor, providing significant insight into the backplane system evaluation. 3. Lumped crosstalk PDFs vs Gaussian PDF 3.1 Crosstalk measurements and calculated PDFs Figure 1 shows the pulse response of 2 NEXT and 2 FEXT that have been derived from the captured step responses, respectively. Figure 2 shows the corresponding calculated PDF, with Gaussian PDF overlaid as a comparison. To calculate the PDF, a bit pattern of 35 is used. This pattern is chosen because it represents slightly worse than PRBS31, which is standard for 10G Ethernet traffic and also yields close to 1e-12 BER rate.
6 cha NEXT1 cha NEXT2 cha FEXT1 cha FEXT2 Fig. 1: Pulse response of 2 NEXT & 2 FEXT aggressors, for the victim Channel A. Step response was captured in lab and transformed to pulse response for calculation. Red: Gaussian overlaid same sigma sigma = 2.38 sigma = 2.23 cha NEXT1 cha NEXT WC = WC = sigma = 1.37 sigma = 0.88 cha FEXT1 cha FEXT WC = WC = Fig. 2: PDF of 2 NEXT & 2 FEXT aggressors, for the victim Channel A. Gaussian PDF is plotted using the same sigma as calculated from each xtalk PDF. The worst-case xtalk amplitude in each aggressor is also shown. The worst case corresponds to PRBS35.
7 3.2 Figure of merit for comparison with Gaussian PDF It is important to understand the difference between crosstalk noise PDF and the wideband noise Gaussian PDF. It is equally important to see the progressive approximation of the aggregate crosstalk PDF to the Gaussian shape. Unlike Gaussian noise, crosstalk noise is bounded and is a function of the coupling and data pattern of the aggressor. However, as we will see in Section 3.3, the resemblance to the Gaussian shape is more and more obvious when more aggregation is performed. There are several methods to evaluate the differences between each crosstalk PDF and the Gaussian function. For example, Papoulis [14] describes an error term between a PDF and Gaussian with respect to moments and Hermite polynomials. Another method plots the data using a normal probability plot, where a straight line gives perfect Gaussian, and any deviation is represented by the skewness factor. We propose a third way to describe the difference, with respect to a communications problem as the way BER is calculated. Using this, the tail difference can be seen clearly. In a communications channel under Gaussian noise with rms value = σ, BER = 1e-12 occurs when amplitude of the signal at eye center is at least 7.03σ from the decision threshold. That is, Pr( A> 7.03 σ ) = 1e 12 We can interpret A in one of the two ways: (1) A is the noise amplitude in a Gaussian noise PDF, or (2) A is the signal amplitude at eye center at least with a distance dmin = 7.03σ from the decision threshold. We can transfer this formulation to the crosstalk noise PDF. We first calculate the rms of the crosstalk and then integrate the tail of the PDF such that the probability in the tail is 1e-12. Mathematically, Pr( A> Kσ ) = 1e 12 The rms value of the crosstalk noise PDF is calculated as: σ B x 2 f x B crosstalk = ( ) where x is the x-axis variable of the PDF fcrosstalk ( x ), and B is the bounded value of the crosstalk noise, which can be revealed in the PDF after cursors convolution as described in Section 2.2. With this interpretation, we define the figure of merit to indicate how different the crosstalk PDF from Gaussian as:
8 FOM = σ = K σ K The σ that is calculated from the crosstalk noise PDF is used in Gaussian noise PDF. Both are identical and after cancellation, the FOM is a simple ratio. Intuitively K < 7.03 because crosstalk noise is bounded while Gaussian noise is unbounded. Therefore, FOM 1. As crosstalk noise gets aggregated and its PDF is approaching Gaussian, FOM 1. When crosstalk noise is perfectly Gaussian, FOM = 1. If the FOM = 1.25, and the Gaussian approximation is used, crosstalk will be overestimated by 25%. For ideal FOM = 1, the Gaussian approximation is just as accurate as the PDF calculations. Integration of Gaussian PDF tail can be carried out using the Q function as QAσ ( / ) where 2 1 x 2 QA ( / σ ) = e dx A σ 2π or using the complementary error function which is readily available as a function or macro in computing packages as: 1 A QAσ ( / ) = erfc 2 2σ or simply by means of integration. The integration of crosstalk PDF is carried out by means of direct tail integration. Figure 3 shows the results for NEXT1, NEXT2, FEXT1, and FEXT2. FOM is between 1.55 and 1.65 for NEXT, and about 2.0 for FEXT. The difference in the tail from Gaussian is clearly seen in these plots and in the FOM. This says that it is not accurate to assume individual crosstalk PDF as Gaussian. The analysis is 55% to 100% pessimistic.
9 cha NEXT1 cha NEXT2 Gaussian Xtalk 1e-12 FOM=1.65 1e-12 FOM=1.55 cha FEXT1 cha FEXT2 1e-12 FOM=2.00 1e-12 FOM=1.97 Fig. 3: Probability (tail integration of PDF) for each xtalk, and its comparison with Gaussian PDF. FOM is defined in Section 3.2. This plot examines how much tail difference is, between xtalk and Gaussian PDF, more clearly. 3.3 Lumped crosstalk PDF Using the derivation in Section 2.3, we can now aggregate each of the four crosstalks in sequence. Figure 4 shows the aggregation of NEXT1 and NEXT2, forming a larger rms value. The worst-case noise amplitude is apparently the sum of individual crosstalk worst-case noise amplitude. Figure 5 further aggregates with FEXT1, and Figure 6 performs the last aggregation with FEXT2, forming the total aggregation of data from the four crosstalks. The calculated FOM = 1.23, and we can see from Figure 7 that the tail approaches Gaussian. Table 1 summarizes the growth of σ and max noise amplitude (worst-case noise amplitude). Although the worst-case noise amplitude is a rare event, it is real. It is the tail of this aggregate PDF that gives rise to transmission bit errors at 1e-12 to 1e-15 error rate.
10 Lump NEXT1 & 2 Red: Gaussian overlaid sigma = WC = Fig. 4: Aggregation of NEXT1 and NEXT2 through PDF convolution. Larger sigma and longer tail are the results. Lump NEXT1,2 & FEXT1 Red: Gaussian overlaid sigma = WC = Fig. 5: Aggregation of NEXT1, NEXT2, and FEXT1 through PDF convolution. Larger sigma and longer tail are the results.
11 Lump NEXT1,2 & FEXT1,2 Red: Gaussian overlaid sigma = WC = (see next figure for zoom in) Fig. 6: Aggregation of NEXT1, NEXT2, FEXT1, and FEXT2 through PDF convolution. Larger sigma and longer tail are the results. Red: Gaussian overlaid cha NEXT1, NEXT2, FEXT1, FEXT2 Very close to Gaussian sigma = WC = Fig. 7: Aggregation of 4 xtalk PDFs, forming a PDF that is very close to Gaussian distribution.
12 cha Aggregate xtalk PDF Gaussian pdf sigma = sigma x 7.03 = for Gaussian Compare to conv xtalk PDF Pr (A > ) = 1e-12 Very close to Gaussian FOM=1.23 Fig. 8: Probability (tail integration of PDF) for the aggregate xtalk, and its comparison with Gaussian PDF. For perfect resemblance of Gaussian, FOM = 1. More aggregation of xtalk approach to this more and more. Table 1: Show the growth in σ and max amplitude after each convolution. Crosstalk σ, Max amplitude, NEXT NEXT FEXT FEXT Lump NEXT1, NEXT Lump NEXT1, 2, FEXT Lump all Table 1 illustrates two interesting outcomes:
13 (1) Variance of convoluted PDF is equal to the sum of individual variance, that is, σ = σ + σ + L + σ aggregate N (2) Max amplitude of convoluted PDF is equal to the sum of individual max amplitude A = A + A + L + A max( aggregate) max(1) max(2) max( N ) The bounded value of the crosstalk noise amplitude increases quickly with convolutions. As the FOM and Section 3.4 both show, this is closer and closer to the Gaussian distribution. 3.4 Theoretical distribution and central limit theorem The central limit theorem is well described in many texts such as Papoulis [14], so rather than repeat this, this section will show an interesting way to quantify the FOM that was calculated earlier in Section 3.3. In Section 3.3, individual FOM for NEXT ranges from 1.55 to 1.65, for FEXT about 2.0. After convolving four crosstalk PDFs, the resulting FOM is Let s use uniform PDF as individual PDF to do convolution in this section to compare the FOM obtained earlier. From this, we have an idea what these FOM values represent. A uniform PDF can be thought as extreme case of bounded noise. Figure 9 shows the convolution of 1, 2, 4, and 16 uniform PDFs, and Gaussian is overlaid on the results. The difference between the uniform PDF and Gaussian is remarkable, and the resemblance is remarkable after convolving the uniform PDF just a few times. Though Figure 9 shows the remarkable resemblance at the center of the PDF, we are more interested in the tail difference. Since the PDF does not show enough detail at the tails, we will use the BER-like curve to illustrate the differences at the tails. Figure 10 shows the corresponding FOMs and adds the result for 32 uniform PDFs. As N increases, FOM approaches 1.0. Table 2 summarizes the FOM values. By comparing the FOM = 1.23 due to aggregate crosstalk and the FOM = 1.22 due to the convolution of 16 uniform PDFs, we can conclude that the aggregate crosstalk is indeed very similar to Gaussian even in the tail. And of course the PDF due to the aggregate crosstalk is clipped to the max value = as shown in Table 1.
14 Red: Gaussian overlaid 1 uniform conv 2 uniforms conv 4 uniforms conv 16 uniforms Fig. 9: Illustrating concept of central limit theorem convolution of 1, 2, 4, and 16 uniform distributions and studying their resemblances to Gaussian PDF. Fig. 10: Probability (tail integration of PDF) for each case of convolution, of a number of uniform PDFs convolutions.
15 Table 2: Compare FOM from actual measurements with uniform PDF convolutions. The following compares the Gaussian nature of the crosstalk measurements: Crosstalk FOM NEXT NEXT FEXT1 2.0 FEXT Lump all uniforms uniforms uniforms Worst-case vs. optimistic scenarios A crosstalk coupling by itself may not indicate how much of an impact it will have on a a timedomain signal at a certain time. The severity of its impact depends on the bit pattern in the aggressor. In this section we will study what the worst-case noise amplitude would be by deriving the worst-case bit pattern. The worst-case pattern may happen rarely but the probability is finite and it is real. The advantage of deriving the worst-case pattern is that we do not need to exercise the simulation indefinitely long in order to wait for this to happen. We will also study crosstalk impact by using a random pattern. Depending on the number of simulations carried out, the results can be optimistic. The two scenarios, namely, using worstcase pattern and a short random pattern, provide a sharp contrast to each other. It should also be noted that depending on the signature of the crosstalk, the worst-case pattern will be unique for every aggressor and victim coupling. One worst-case pattern cannot be used for all channels. This drives to a conclusion that a more realistic backplane system evaluation is needed to consider the probability of events. The aggregate PDF directly provides such information, and this is the subject of discussion in Section NEXT measurement Figure 11 shows a channel with NEXT to be amplified by a factor of 4 to try to match the total crosstalk noise mask. The quality of the matching is not the focus here. In reality, a number of crosstalk aggregate as shown in Section 3, but here, for the sake of illustration, one NEXT is scaled up by factor of 4 so that the dramatic effect on the victim can be shown.
16 chd NEXT1 Fig. 11: One NEXT is amplified by 4 to try to show the effect on the victim channel. The intent is to show a relative but observable difference between the use of a WC pattern and a random pattern. 4.2 Derivation of worst-case crosstalk using worst-case pattern Worst-case crosstalk here means the largest crosstalk noise is at the eye center;,.in other words, the smallest eye trace is caused due to a particular bit pattern. Using the pulse response, the precursor, main cursor, and postcursor are known and that determines the future, current, and past bits of the aggressor, which together give the maximum destructive interference to the current bit in the victim. Using the NEXT as shown in Figure 11, the derived 35-bit pattern (future 4 bits, current 1 bit, and past 30 bits) is determined. Going from past bits to future bits: Worst-case bit pattern = [ ] Clearly, any filters including transmit de-emphasis and receive filters are part of the crosstalk end-to-end channel so a change in the parameters will effect a corresponding change to the worst-case bit pattern. 4.3 Comparison of worst-case scenario with short simulation The worst-case crosstalk pattern as derived in Section 4.2 is embedded in the PRBS7 pattern and the crosstalk thus generated is used as an aggressor added to the receiver input. Figure 12 shows the worst-case crosstalk with an amplitude of -47. The ideal 1 signal, due to ISI of the channel, is further pulled down by the crosstalk noise to UI. Whereas on the right, random crosstalk which merely has UI produces a minor noise effect on the received signal.
17 With WC xtalk generated by WC pattern pessimistic but can be real Before equalization, supposed a 1 With random xtalk short-simulation scenario -47 WC xtalk effect Only -8 random xtalk UI Fig. 12: Comparison of effect of worst-case xtalk and random xtalk. WC xtalk is generated from WC pattern, derived from the knowledge of pulse response. Random xtalk is generated from a random pattern. The difference is significant between these 2 extremes. Figure 13 compares the eye diagram obtained after DFE equalization. On the right when there is no crosstalk noise, the inner eye opening is 216 mvppd with an eye area of 11.8 V.ps. With worst-case crosstalk applied, the inner eye is degraded to 130 mvppd (4.4 db penalty), and eye area to 6.1 V.ps (5.7 db penalty). DFE equalization does not deal with crosstalk noise reduction and therefore about the same amount of noise exists after equalization. This impacts performance by 5 to 6 db and that is the maximum SNR margin we can lose.
18 After DFE equalization reference chd NEXT1 4.4 db penalty in Eye Vert 5.7 db penalty in Eye Area No xtalk With WC xtalk Eye metrics: 85/216/11.8 Eye metrics: 73/130/6.1 Diff in Eye Vert = = 86 mvppd 86 / 2 = 43 close to 47 WC xtalk added Fig. 13: Comparison of no xtalk (left) with added worst-case xtalk (right). Both results are obtained after DFE equalization. WC xtalk amplitude = 47. After equalization, it reduces eye size by 43. Jitter is more and eye area is seriously affected by 5.7 db. Figure 14(a) compares 3 cases in the time domain: no crosstalk, worst-case crosstalk, and random crosstalk. The difference in impact is clearly seen. The signal has been equalized by a DFE. The corresponding eye diagrams are shown in Figure 14(b). Random crosstalk, which is generated using the same crosstalk pulse response but with a random bit pattern, produces <1 db of degradation to the eye, as opposed to 5 to 6 db via the WC pattern. From this, we can see that: Simulations need not run indefinitely long. We simply need to derive the WC pattern to find the WC crosstalk effect. Probability of the occurrence of such an event can be calculated easily. Running short simulations may not convey the right result. As in the case of using a random pattern, optimistic results can be misleading, and can be off by as much as 4 to 5 db when compared to the worst case. These results could be very frustrating because significantly more errors will be seen at the prototype stage of the product. Instead of focusing on the two extremes of the spectrum, in Section 5 we consider events with probability. We answer system evaluation questions by attaching probability and one of the best tools for this is the aggregate crosstalk PDF that we have generated in Section 3.
19 After DFE equalization No xtalk With WC xtalk With random xtalk WC can make situation pessimistic, but is real Random can make situation optimistic Only 6 effect = 43 WC xtalk always remained Only = 6 random xtalk Fig. 14(a): Comparison of time-domain signal, for no xtalk, worst-case xtalk, and random xtalk addition. It is a comparison of pessimistic (using WC pattern) vs. optimistic (short simulation) results. However, the pessimistic scenario is real. After DFE equalization No xtalk With WC xtalk With random xtalk V eye = 108 x 2 = 216 mvppd V eye = 65 x 2 = 130 V eye = 102 x 2 = 204 reference 4.4 db penalty in vert 5.7 db penalty in area 0.6 db penalty in vert 0.9 db penalty in area Eye metrics: 85/216/ /130/6.1 79/204/10.6 Fig. 14(b): Comparison of eye, for no xtalk, worst-case xtalk, and random xtalk addition. WC xtalk impacts the most with 5.7 db penalty in eye area, vs. a merely 0.9 db with random xtalk. The small penalty often leads to wrong conclusions in backplane evaluation.
20 5. Realistic scenarios a matter of probability tc12 NEXT1, NEXT2, FEXT1, FEXT2 sigma = sigma x 7.03 = for Gaussian Compare to Xtalk PDF Pr (A > ) = 1e-12 not far from Gaussian Pr (A > ) = 1e-12 Pr (A = ) = 7.7e WC = Fig. 15: PDF of aggregate crosstalk, focusing on the probability having WC amplitude, and the noise amplitude at which probability = 1e-12. Figure 15 demonstrates that the WC noise amplitude of the aggregate crosstalk can happen, but does so very rarely with a probability of only 7.7e-43. Since we are mostly interested in 1e-12 BER, WC is too pessimistic. In the case of single channel we recommended using the WC pattern. In the case of aggregate crosstalk, we recommend using the PDF and the crosstalk estimate related to 1e-12 occurrence. This will be a relevant amount of crosstalk. From a communications point of view, this means that as more crosstalk aggregates, in order to maintain the same BER = 1e-12, more transmit signal power is needed to cover the SNR margin loss. Or in terms of PDF interpretation, d min needs to be larger (farther away from the decision threshold) in order to maintain the same BER. There are two ways to keep d min larger: (1) higher transmission power, or (2) lower-noise receiver design. Since crosstalk will also increase with the larger transmit signal in a symmetrical backplane, only a lower noise receiver design helps.
21 6. PRBS7 validity for lab measurements In lab measurements, running billions of different bit patterns can take a long time, and the analysis of the measurements can take even longer. Because of this, PRBS7 pattern is often used as a substitute. Here we investigate the validity of using PRBS7, and how time-domain methods using the same tools as needed for BER tests and debugging (a high-speed scope and a BERT) can fully characterize the system without the need of a VNA (Vector Network Analyzer), which is generally used for frequency domain or S parameters of a system. A VNA is not going to be used for any other purpose in an all data-communication lab. We prefer the time-domain method as it eliminated the need for unnecessary equipment, and thus lowers costs. It also provides deeper insights into the system characteristics and is more accurate. This is due to the fact that no frequency-magnitude and frequency-phase data must be transformed into the time domain where small truncation errors can result in unrealistic behavior. Table 3 shows that the σ obtained from just using PRBS7. It is not that different from using the step response and PDF method, despite the fact that the max noise amplitude can be quite different because the PDF contains the WC bit pattern result. Table 3 also shows that when the four crosstalks aggregate, the σ obtained are also comparable with each other. This says that once σ is obtained, by the use of central limit theorem, the statistic of the crosstalk noise distribution is largely governed by the Gaussian PDF. And that PRBS7 therefore is a valid pattern to find this statistic. By measuring σ using PRBS7 method, one does not have to capture the step response and compute PDF. This way the measurement can be very short yet very accurate. The example shows only 3% inaccuracy. Table 3: Compare σ obtained from using the crosstalk PDF and using the time-domain PRBS7 simulations. σ, Using PDF, Using PRBS7, NEXT NEXT FEXT FEXT Aggregate
22 7. Conclusions There are 6 main conclusions from this statistical analysis using realistic crosstalk measurements: 1. It is rigorous to use the aggregate crosstalk PDF to predict performance of a complex backplane interconnect system. 2. The aggregate crosstalk PDF is close to a Gaussian PDF; the more aggregation, the more Gaussian it will become. 3. When using just the Gaussian PDF with the same σ to predict BER performance, a 23 % overestimation (pessimistic) of error rate occurred. Our example, though realistic, used just four channels for predicting 1e-12 BER. In a real backplane, there will be upwards of 10 channels adding to the crosstalk. Though it is hard to say that all backplanes will exhibit the same characteristics, it can be said that it is very likely that the results will be similar due to central limit theorem. 4. Using only a PRBS7 pattern and standard lab equipment (high-speed BERT/scope) and not VNA, we can measure σ for individual crosstalk and aggregate the results. In the chosen example, the prediction underestimated crosstalk within the range of 3 % when compared to the PDF method. We used the same method on several other channels and found very similar results. 5. The advantage of (4) above is that we can save cost (equipment/engineering) and time (data collection/analysis). With calibration, results can be obtained and analyzed in a time window that is several orders of magnitude faster than traditional methods. 6. Overall, if we use PRBS7 in time-domain lab measurements, assume the presence of multiple sources of crosstalk, and use the Gaussian assumption, the prediction of performance will be within ~20% on the pessimistic side. However, faster lab decisions can be made with appropriate calibration and without the need for PDF calculation in each run, while keeping rigorous PDF calculations as presented in this paper for post-processing as needed. Acknowledgement The authors wish to thank Gurpreet Bhullar of Gennum Corporation for his input and timedomain lab measurements on crosstalk aggregation using a generic backplane at 10GHz data rate.
23 References [1] IEEE 802.3ap KR Specifications. Part 3: Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications. Amendment: Ethernet Operations over Electrical Backplanes. [2] Adam Healey, Epsilon-point reference model discussion, IEEE 802.3ap, June [3] John D Ambrosia, Joel Goergen, Adam Healey, Proposal for changes to NEXT/FEXT mask, IEEE 802.3ap September, [4] John D Ambrosia, Rich Mellitz, dambrosia_01_0505 informative model methodology update, IEEE 802.3ap, May, [5] Gourgen Oganessyan, David Brearley, FR408 Backplane: Enhanced 1 M Channels, IEEE 802.3ap, July, [6] William Peters, Ed Gong, Chite Chen, Hyunjun Kim, Improved HVM ATCA measurement data, IEEE 802.3ap, June, [7] B. Ahmad, J. Cain, Performance evaluation of high speed serial links, DesignCon [8] B. Ahmad, Performance Specification of Interconnects, DesignCon [9] B. K. Casper et al, An accurate and efficient analysis method for multi-gb/s chip-to-chip signaling schemes, IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, June 2002, pp [10] Vladmir Stojanovic, Channel-Limited High-Speed Links: Modeling, Analysis, and Design, Stanford Ph.D. dissertation, September [11] Charles Moore, Specifying Crosstalk, IEEE 802.3ap, March, [12] Charles Moore, Computing effect of cross talk using convolution, IEEE 802.3ap, March, [13] Charles Moore, Root power sum of energy integrals, IEEE 802.3ap, May, [14] Athanasios Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, 2 nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 1984.
Specifying Crosstalk. Adam Healey Agere Systems May 4, 2005
Specifying Crosstalk Adam Healey Agere Systems May 4, 2005 Proposal Use the power-sum crosstalk (MDNEXT and MDFEXT) limits proposed by D Ambrosia et al. [1] as the normative specification for crosstalk.
More informationAn Overview of High-Speed Serial Bus Simulation Technologies
An Overview of High-Speed Serial Bus Simulation Technologies Asian IBIS Summit, Beijing, China September 11, 27.25.2.15.1.5 -.5 -.1 Arpad Muranyi arpad_muranyi@mentor.com Vladimir Dmitriev-Zdorov -.15
More informationOn the Modeling and Analysis of Jitter in ATE Using Matlab
On the Modeling and Analysis of Jitter in ATE Using Matlab Kyung Ki Kim, Jing Huang, Yong-Bin Kim, Fabrizio Lombardi Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Northeastern University, Boston, MA,
More informationCharacterize and Debug Crosstalk Issues with Keysight Crosstalk Analysis App
Chong Min-Jie Characterize and Debug Crosstalk Issues with Crosstalk Analysis App Page Characterize and Debug Crosstalk Issues with Crosstalk Analysis App Min-Jie Chong HPS Product Manager & Planner Oscilloscope
More informationAdvanced Jitter Analysis with Real-Time Oscilloscopes
with Real-Time Oscilloscopes August 10, 2016 Min-Jie Chong Product Manager Agenda Review of Jitter Decomposition Assumptions and Limitations Spectral vs. Tail Fit Method with Crosstalk Removal Tool Scope
More informationWhat the Dual-Dirac Model is and What it is Not
What the Dual-Dirac Model is and What it is Not Ransom Stephens October, 006 Abstract: The dual-dirac model is a simple tool for estimating total jitter defined at a bit error ratio, TJ(BER), for serial
More information5 GT/s and 8 GT/s PCIe Compared
5 GT/s and 8 GT/s PCIe Compared Bent Hessen-Schmidt SyntheSys Research, Inc. Copyright 2008, PCI-SIG, All Rights Reserved 1 Disclaimer The material included in this presentation reflects current thinking
More informationSimulation Results for 10 Gb/s Duobinary Signaling
Simulation Results for 10 Gb/s Duobinary Signaling Populating the Signaling Ad Hoc Spreadsheet IEEE 802.ap Task Force Atlanta March 15-17, 2005 802.AP Backplane Ethernet Contributors Vitesse Majid Barazande-Pour
More informationKeysight Technologies IBIS-AMI Based Link Analysis of Realistic 56G PAM4 Channels
Keysight Technologies IBIS-AMI Based Link Analysis of Realistic 56G PAM4 Channels White Paper This white paper was first published at DesignCon in January, 2016. Reprinted with permission from DesignCon.
More informationIBIS-AMI Model Simulations Over Six EDA Platforms
IBIS-AMI Model Simulations Over Six EDA Platforms Romi Mayder, romi.mayder@xilinx.com Ivan Madrigal, ivan.madrigal@xilinx.com Brandon Jiao, brandon.jiao@xilinx.com Hongtao Zhang, hongtao.zhang@xilinx.com
More informationHigh-Speed Jitter Testing of XFP Transceivers
White Paper High-Speed Jitter Testing of XFP Transceivers By Andreas Alpert Abstract Jitter is a key performance factor in high-speed digital transmission systems, such as synchronous optical networks/synchronous
More informationComparison of BER Estimation Methods which Account for Crosstalk
Comparison of BER Estimation Methods which Account for Crosstalk As presented at DesignCon 2009 Co-authored by: Michael Steinberger, Signal Integrity Software, Inc. msteinb@sisoft.com Barry Katz, Signal
More informationValidation of Quasi-Analytical and Statistical Simulation Techniques for Multi-Gigabit Interconnect Channels
DesignCon 2010 Validation of Quasi-Analytical and Statistical Simulation Techniques for Multi-Gigabit Interconnect Channels Chad Morgan, Tyco Electronics chad.morgan@tycoelectronics.com, 717-649-4129 Abstract
More information10GBASE-KR for 40G Backplane
1GBASE-KR for 4G Backplane Nov 7 Technology Hiroshi Takatori Hiroshi.Takatori@.us 1 Outline This contribution discusses, - Performance based on 1GBASE-KR Std - Theoretical Limit (Saltz SNR) and Time Domain
More informationEDA365. DesignCon Impact of Backplane Connector Pin Field on Trace Impedance and Vertical Field Crosstalk
DesignCon 2007 Impact of Backplane Connector Pin Field on Trace Impedance and Vertical Field Crosstalk Ravi Kollipara, Rambus, Inc. ravik@rambus.com, (650) 947-5298 Ben Chia, Rambus, Inc. Dan Oh, Rambus,
More informationT10 Technical Committee From: Barry Olawsky, HP Date: 13 January 2005 Subject: T10/05-025r1 SFF8470 Crosstalk Study
To: T10 Technical Committee From: Barry Olawsky, HP (barry.olawsky@hp.com) Date: Subject: T10/ Revision History Revision 0 (5 January 2005) First revision Revision 1 () Second revision Further clarify
More informationReceiver Modeling for Static Functional Crosstalk Analysis
Receiver Modeling for Static Functional Crosstalk Analysis Mini Nanua 1 and David Blaauw 2 1 SunMicroSystem Inc., Austin, Tx, USA Mini.Nanua@sun.com 2 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mi, USA Blaauw@eecs.umich.edu
More informationBER- and COM-Way of Channel- Compliance Evaluation: What are the Sources of Differences?
DesignCon 016 BER- and COM-Way of Channel- Compliance Evaluation: What are the Sources of Differences? Vladimir Dmitriev-Zdorov, Mentor Graphics vladimir_dmitriev-zdorov@mentor.com, 70-494-1196 Cristian
More informationAgilent Technologies EZJIT and EZJIT Plus Jitter Analysis Software for Infiniium Series Oscilloscopes
Agilent Technologies EZJIT and EZJIT Plus Jitter Analysis Software for Infiniium Series Oscilloscopes Data Sheet Features of the EZJIT Plus software that optimize jitter analysis include: Easy-to-use jitter
More informationAgilent Technologies Advanced Signal Integrity
Agilent Technologies Advanced Signal Integrity Measurements for Next Generation High Speed Serial Standards Last Update 2012/04/24 (YS) Appendix VNA or TDR Scope? ENA Option TDR Overview USB 3.0 Cable/Connector
More informationKeysight Technologies EZJIT Plus Jitter Analysis Software for Infiniium Oscilloscopes. Data Sheet
Keysight Technologies EZJIT Plus Jitter Analysis Software for Infiniium Oscilloscopes Data Sheet 02 Keysight EZJIT Plus Jitter Analysis Software for Infiniium Oscilloscopes - Data Sheet Table of Contents
More informationAn Innovative Simulation Workflow for Debugging High-Speed Digital Designs using Jitter Separation
An Innovative Simulation Workflow for Debugging High-Speed Digital Designs using Jitter Separation C. Chastang, A. Amédéo V. Poisson, P. Grison, F. Demuynck C. Gautier, F. Costa Thales Communications &
More informationAnalyzing Digital Jitter and its Components
2004 High-Speed Digital Design Seminar Presentation 4 Analyzing Digital Jitter and its Components Analyzing Digital Jitter and its Components Copyright 2004 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Agenda Jitter Overview
More informationA novel method to reduce differential crosstalk in a highspeed
DesignCon 5 A novel method to reduce differential crosstalk in a highspeed channel Kunia Aihara, Hirose Electric kaihara@hirose.com Jeremy Buan, Hirose Electric jbuan@hirose.com Adam Nagao, Hirose Electric
More informationChannels for Consideration by the Signaling Ad Hoc
Channels for Consideration by the Signaling Ad Hoc John D Ambrosia Tyco Electronics Adam Healey, Agere Systems IEEE P802.3ap Signaling Ad Hoc September 17, 2004 Two-Connector Topology N2 H B September,
More informationQ2 QMS/QFS 16mm Stack Height Final Inch Designs In PCI Express Applications Generation Gbps. Revision Date: February 13, 2009
Q2 QMS/QFS 16mm Stack Height Final Inch Designs In PCI Express Applications Generation 2 5.0 Gbps Revision Date: February 13, 2009 Copyrights and Trademarks Copyright 2009 Samtec, Inc. Developed in conjunction
More informationPCI Express 4.0. Electrical compliance test overview
PCI Express 4.0 Electrical compliance test overview Agenda PCI Express 4.0 electrical compliance test overview Required test equipment Test procedures: Q&A Transmitter Electrical testing Transmitter Link
More informationSAS-2 Zero-Length Test Load Characterization (07-013r7) Barry Olawsky Hewlett Packard (8/2/2007)
SAS-2 Zero-Length Test Load Characterization (07-013r7) Barry Olawsky Hewlett Packard (8/2/2007) 07-013r7 SAS-2 Zero-Length Test Load Characterization 1 Zero-Length Test Load Provides ideal connection
More informationHOME :: FPGA ENCYCLOPEDIA :: ARCHIVES :: MEDIA KIT :: SUBSCRIBE
Page 1 of 8 HOME :: FPGA ENCYCLOPEDIA :: ARCHIVES :: MEDIA KIT :: SUBSCRIBE FPGA I/O When To Go Serial by Brock J. LaMeres, Agilent Technologies Ads by Google Physical Synthesis Tools Learn How to Solve
More information100GEL C2M Channel Analysis Update
100GEL C2M Channel Analysis Update Jane Lim, Cisco Pirooz Tooyserkani, Cisco Upen Reddy Kareti, Cisco Joel Goergen, Cisco Marco Mazzini, Cisco 9/5/2018 IEEE P802.3ck 100Gb/s, 200Gb/s, and 400Gb/s Electrical
More informationWeek 7: The normal distribution and sample means
Week 7: The normal distribution and sample means Goals Visualize properties of the normal distribution. Learning the Tools Understand the Central Limit Theorem. Calculate sampling properties of sample
More informationCrosstalk Measurements for Signal Integrity Applications. Chris Scholz, Ph.D. VNA Product Manager R&S North America
Crosstalk Measurements for Signal Integrity Applications Chris Scholz, Ph.D. VNA Product Manager R&S North America Outline ı A brief history of crosstalk ı Introduction to crosstalk Definition of crosstalk
More informationUNDERSTANDING IBIS-AMI SIMULATIONS
UNDERSTANDING IBIS-AMI SIMULATIONS Track 6, Session TH4 Douglas Burns dburns@sisoft.com John Madsen jmadsen@sisoft.com Signal Integrity Software, Inc. Signal Integrity Software, Inc. Todd Westerhoff Signal
More informationEthernet SFF-8431 SFP+ SFF-8635 QSFP+ Compliance and Debug Testing. Anshuman Bhat Product Manager
Ethernet SFF-8431 SFP+ SFF-8635 QSFP+ Compliance and Debug Testing Anshuman Bhat Product Manager Agenda QSFP+ SFP+ Technology Overview Testing challenges Performing TWDPc Measurements Solution for Debug
More informationQ Pairs QTE/QSE-DP Final Inch Designs In PCI Express Applications 16 mm Stack Height
Application Note Q Pairs QTE/QSE-DP Final Inch Designs In PCI Express Applications 16 mm Stack Height Copyrights and Trademarks Copyright 2004 Samtec, Inc. Developed in conjunction with Teraspeed Consulting
More informationHigh Speed and High Power Connector Design
High Speed and High Power Connector Design Taiwan User Conference 2014 Introduction High speed connector: Electrically small Using differential signaling Data rate >100Mbps High power connector: Static
More informationAN 608: HST Jitter and BER Estimator Tool for Stratix IV GX and GT Devices
AN 608: HST Jitter and BER Estimator Tool or Stratix IV GX and GT Devices July 2010 AN-608-1.0 The high-speed communication link design toolkit (HST) jitter and bit error rate (BER) estimator tool is a
More informationRiseUp RU8-DP-DV Series 19mm Stack Height Final Inch Designs in PCI Express Applications. Revision Date: March 18, 2005
RiseUp RU8-DP-DV Series 19mm Stack Height Final Inch Designs in PCI Express Applications Revision Date: March 18, 2005 Copyrights and Trademarks Copyright 2005 Samtec, Inc. Developed in conjunction with
More informationUnit 5: Estimating with Confidence
Unit 5: Estimating with Confidence Section 8.3 The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Unit 5 Estimating with Confidence 8.1 8.2 8.3 Confidence Intervals: The Basics Estimating
More informationCircuit Model for Interconnect Crosstalk Noise Estimation in High Speed Integrated Circuits
Advance in Electronic and Electric Engineering. ISSN 2231-1297, Volume 3, Number 8 (2013), pp. 907-912 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/aeee.htm Circuit Model for Interconnect Crosstalk
More informationChapter 5. Track Geometry Data Analysis
Chapter Track Geometry Data Analysis This chapter explains how and why the data collected for the track geometry was manipulated. The results of these studies in the time and frequency domain are addressed.
More informationCopyright 2011 by Dr. Andrew David Norte. All Rights Reserved.
Near-End Crosstalk Considerations For Coupled Microstriplines David Norte, PhD www.the-signal-and-power-integrity-institute.com Thornton, Colorado, 80234, USA Abstract This paper addresses the impact of
More informationDisplayPort 1.4 Webinar
DisplayPort 1.4 Webinar Test Challenges and Solution Yogesh Pai Product Manager - Tektronix 1 Agenda DisplayPort Basics Transmitter Testing Challenges DisplayPort Type-C Updates Receiver Testing Q and
More information40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Clause 86 40GBASE-SR4 and 100GBASE-SR10 PMD Test Suite v0.1 Technical Document
40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Clause 86 40GBASE-SR4 and 100GBASE-SR10 PMD Test Suite v0.1 Technical Document Last Updated: March 26, 2013 10:00am 40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology
More informationVerification of ICN Usability in Characterizing System Crosstalk
Asian IBIS Summit Shanghai, P.R. China November 9, 212 Verification of ICN Usability in Characterizing System Crosstalk Dongxiaoqing, Huangchunxing www.huawei.com HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. ICN Definition
More informationSequence Estimators with Block Termination in the presence of ISI
Hardware implementation i of Sequence Estimators with Block Termination in the presence of ISI Presentation to IEEE 802.3bj Arash Farhood Cortina Systems Joel Goergen Cisco Elizabeth Kochuparambil - Cisco
More informationDSL Consortium. VDSL2 Rate vs. Reach Interoperability Test Suite (V2RR) Version Last Updated: March 24, 2008
Test Suite (V2RR) Version 1.2.0 Last Updated: March 24, 2008 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 University of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824 Phone: +1-603-862-2911 Fax: +1-603-862-4181 www.iol.unh.edu 2006
More informationReceiver Tolerance Testing With Crosstalk Aggressors TT-MA2. ArvindA. Kumar, Intel Corporation Martin Miller Ph.D., LeCroy Corporation.
Receiver Tolerance Testing With Crosstalk Aggressors TT-MA2 ArvindA. Kumar, Intel Corporation Martin Miller Ph.D., LeCroy Corporation 1 Agenda Receiver compliance testing fundamentals Generating stress
More informationPCI Express 1.0a and 1.1 Add-In Card Transmitter Testing
Abstract PCI Express 1.0a and 1.1 Add-In Card Transmitter Testing Joan Gibson November 2006 SR-TN062 Add-in cards designed for PCI Express require numerous tests to assure inter-operability with different
More informationIMAGE DE-NOISING IN WAVELET DOMAIN
IMAGE DE-NOISING IN WAVELET DOMAIN Aaditya Verma a, Shrey Agarwal a a Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India - (aaditya, ashrey)@iitk.ac.in KEY WORDS: Wavelets,
More informationFiltering Images. Contents
Image Processing and Data Visualization with MATLAB Filtering Images Hansrudi Noser June 8-9, 010 UZH, Multimedia and Robotics Summer School Noise Smoothing Filters Sigmoid Filters Gradient Filters Contents
More informationSerial Link Analysis and PLL Model
25. July 2007 Serial Link Analysis and PLL Model September 11, 2007 Asian IBIS Summit, Beijing China Huang Chunxing huangchunxing@huawei.com www.huawei.com HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Co., Ltd. Agenda High-speed
More informationApplication Note. PCIE-RA Series Final Inch Designs in PCI Express Applications Generation GT/s
PCIE-RA Series Final Inch Designs in PCI Express Applications Generation 3-8.0 GT/s Copyrights and Trademarks Copyright 2012, Inc. COPYRIGHTS, TRADEMARKS, and PATENTS Final Inch is a trademark of, Inc.
More informationApplication Note. PCIE-EM Series Final Inch Designs in PCI Express Applications Generation GT/s
PCIE-EM Series Final Inch Designs in PCI Express Applications Generation 3-8.0 GT/s Copyrights and Trademarks Copyright 2015, Inc. COPYRIGHTS, TRADEMARKS, and PATENTS Final Inch is a trademark of, Inc.
More informationAMI Applications in High-speed Serial Channel Analysis and Measurement Correlation
AMI Applications in High-speed Serial Channel Analysis and Measurement Correlation Jia Wei, Sunanbing, Zhu ShunLin Jia.wei@zte.com.cn, sun.anbing@zte.com.cn, Zhu.shunlin@zte.com.cn High-Speed System Lab,ZTE
More informationStatistical Timing Analysis Using Bounds and Selective Enumeration
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. 22, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2003 1243 Statistical Timing Analysis Using Bounds and Selective Enumeration Aseem Agarwal, Student
More informationIBIS-AMI Modeling and Simulation of 56G PAM4 Link Systems
IBIS-AMI Modeling and Simulation of 56G PAM4 Link Systems Hongtao Zhang, hongtao@xilinx.com Fangyi Rao, fangyi_rao@keysight.com Xiaoqing Dong, dongxiaoqing82@huawei.com Geoff Zhang, geoffz@xilinx.com Outline
More informationWhite Paper Compromises of Using a 10-Gbps Transceiver at Other Data Rates
White Paper Compromises of Using a 10-Gbps Transceiver at Other Data Rates Introduction Many applications and designs are adopting clock data recovery-based (CDR) transceivers for interconnect data transfer.
More informationCHAPTER 2 NEAR-END CROSSTALK AND FAR-END CROSSTALK
24 CHAPTER 2 NEAR-END CROSSTALK AND FAR-END CROSSTALK 2.1 INTRODUCTION The high speed digital signal propagates along the transmission lines in the form of transverse electromagnetic (TEM) waves at very
More informationFUTURE communication networks are expected to support
1146 IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, VOL 13, NO 5, OCTOBER 2005 A Scalable Approach to the Partition of QoS Requirements in Unicast and Multicast Ariel Orda, Senior Member, IEEE, and Alexander Sprintson,
More informationA Study on various Histogram Equalization Techniques to Preserve the Brightness for Gray Scale and Color Images
A Study on various Histogram Equalization Techniques to Preserve the Brightness for Gray Scale Color Images Babu P Balasubramanian.K Vol., 8 Abstract:-Histogram equalization (HE) wors well on singlechannel
More informationAssembly dynamics of microtubules at molecular resolution
Supplementary Information with: Assembly dynamics of microtubules at molecular resolution Jacob W.J. Kerssemakers 1,2, E. Laura Munteanu 1, Liedewij Laan 1, Tim L. Noetzel 2, Marcel E. Janson 1,3, and
More informationIntroduction. Communication Systems Simulation - I. Monte Carlo method. Simulation methods
Introduction Communication Systems Simulation - I Harri Saarnisaari Part of Simulations and Tools for Telecommunication Course First we study what simulation methods are available Use of the Monte Carlo
More informationPerformance Evaluation of Transcoding and FEC Schemes for 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable
Performance Evaluation of Transcoding and FEC Schemes for 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable IEEE 802.3bj Task Force Atlanta, November 8-10, 2011 Roy Cideciyan - Outline Error models at RS decoder input
More informationProposal for modeling advanced SERDES
Proposal for modeling advanced SERDES IBM, Cadence June 2006 1 CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. Presenters, Contributors Presenters / Contributors 1. Joe Abler IBM Systems & Technology Group High Speed Serial
More informationFeasibility of 40/100G Heterogeneous System based on Channel Data
Feasibility of 40/100G Heterogeneous System based on Channel Data Jan 2008 Technology Hiroshi Takatori Hiroshi.Takatori@.us 1 Outline Generalized methodology for feasibility analysis of heterogeneous (electro-optical)
More informationVirtex-6 FPGA GTX Transceiver Characterization Report
Virtex-6 FPGA GTX Transceiver Characterization Report PCI Express 2.0 (2.5 and 5.0 Gb/s) Electrical Standard Xilinx is disclosing this user guide, manual, release note, and/or specification (the Documentation
More informationWhite Paper. Abstract
Keysight Technologies Sensitivity Analysis of One-port Characterized Devices in Vector Network Analyzer Calibrations: Theory and Computational Analysis White Paper Abstract In this paper we present the
More informationEPSON. Technical Note. Oscillator Jitter and How to Measure It. Introduction. Jitter. Cycle-Cycle Jitter
1960 E. Grand Ave., 2 nd Floor El Segundo, California 90245 Phone: 310.955.5300 Fax: 310.955.5400 Technical Note Oscillator Jitter and How to Measure It Introduction Jitter is a term that is becoming widely
More informationAgenda. Time Module Topics Covered. 9:30 11:00 Wireless Technologies that Enable the Connected Car
Agenda Time Module Topics Covered 9:30 11:00 Wireless Technologies that Enable the 11:00 12:00 V2X: Car-to-X Communication (802.11 and LTE-V) Cellular, Wifi, Automotive Radar, BlueTooth, GNSS, NFC, WPC/TPS/RKE
More informationSerDes Channel Simulation in FPGAs Using IBIS-AMI
White Paper: Virtex-6 FPGA Family WP382 (v10) December 9, 2010 SerDes Channel Simulation in FPGAs Using IBIS-AMI By: Romi Mayder The IBIS Algorithmic Modeling Interface (IBIS-AMI) was developed to enable
More informationImage Restoration and Reconstruction
Image Restoration and Reconstruction Image restoration Objective process to improve an image, as opposed to the subjective process of image enhancement Enhancement uses heuristics to improve the image
More informationCOMMITTEE T1 TELECOMMUNICATIONS Working Group T1E1.4 (DSL Access) Baltimore; August 25-26, 1999
COMMITTEE T1 TELECOMMUNICATIONS Working Group T1E1. (DSL Access) Baltimore; August 5-6, 1999 T1E1./99-371 CONTRIBUTION TITLE: SOURCE: PROJECT: ISDN, HDSL, and HDSL Adaptation and SNR with Short-Term Stationary
More informationSEAM-RA/SEAF-RA Series Final Inch Designs in PCI Express Applications Generation GT/s
SEAM-RA/SEAF-RA Series Final Inch Designs in PCI Express Applications Generation 3-8.0 GT/s Copyrights and Trademarks Copyright 2011 Samtec, Inc. Developed in conjunction with Teraspeed Consulting Group
More informationEmbedded SRAM Technology for High-End Processors
Embedded SRAM Technology for High-End Processors Hiroshi Nakadai Gaku Ito Toshiyuki Uetake Fujitsu is the only company in Japan that develops its own processors for use in server products that support
More informationChallenge Problem 5 - The Solution Dynamic Characteristics of a Truss Structure
Challenge Problem 5 - The Solution Dynamic Characteristics of a Truss Structure In the final year of his engineering degree course a student was introduced to finite element analysis and conducted an assessment
More informationModulation-Aware Energy Balancing in Hierarchical Wireless Sensor Networks 1
Modulation-Aware Energy Balancing in Hierarchical Wireless Sensor Networks 1 Maryam Soltan, Inkwon Hwang, Massoud Pedram Dept. of Electrical Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA
More informationUsing Statistical Techniques to Improve the QC Process of Swell Noise Filtering
Using Statistical Techniques to Improve the QC Process of Swell Noise Filtering A. Spanos* (Petroleum Geo-Services) & M. Bekara (PGS - Petroleum Geo- Services) SUMMARY The current approach for the quality
More informationLearner Expectations UNIT 1: GRAPICAL AND NUMERIC REPRESENTATIONS OF DATA. Sept. Fathom Lab: Distributions and Best Methods of Display
CURRICULUM MAP TEMPLATE Priority Standards = Approximately 70% Supporting Standards = Approximately 20% Additional Standards = Approximately 10% HONORS PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS Essential Questions &
More informationChannel Based Methods for Signal Integrity Evaluation COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC. Taipei Server Business Aug 13, 2013
Channel Based Methods for Signal Integrity Evaluation COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC. Taipei Server Business Aug 13, 2013 Agenda Evolution of Signal Integrity Evaluation Review of Industrial Specification Foundation
More informationImage Quality Assessment Techniques: An Overview
Image Quality Assessment Techniques: An Overview Shruti Sonawane A. M. Deshpande Department of E&TC Department of E&TC TSSM s BSCOER, Pune, TSSM s BSCOER, Pune, Pune University, Maharashtra, India Pune
More informationImage Restoration and Reconstruction
Image Restoration and Reconstruction Image restoration Objective process to improve an image Recover an image by using a priori knowledge of degradation phenomenon Exemplified by removal of blur by deblurring
More informationA Path Decomposition Approach for Computing Blocking Probabilities in Wavelength-Routing Networks
IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, VOL. 8, NO. 6, DECEMBER 2000 747 A Path Decomposition Approach for Computing Blocking Probabilities in Wavelength-Routing Networks Yuhong Zhu, George N. Rouskas, Member,
More informationJitKit. Operator's Manual
JitKit Operator's Manual March, 2011 LeCroy Corporation 700 Chestnut Ridge Road Chestnut Ridge, NY, 10977-6499 Tel: (845) 578-6020, Fax: (845) 578 5985 Internet: www.lecroy.com 2011 by LeCroy Corporation.
More informationHEURISTIC OPTIMIZATION USING COMPUTER SIMULATION: A STUDY OF STAFFING LEVELS IN A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING LABORATORY
Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference D.J. Medeiros, E.F. Watson, J.S. Carson and M.S. Manivannan, eds. HEURISTIC OPTIMIZATION USING COMPUTER SIMULATION: A STUDY OF STAFFING LEVELS IN A
More informationLecture 6: Arithmetic and Threshold Circuits
IAS/PCMI Summer Session 2000 Clay Mathematics Undergraduate Program Advanced Course on Computational Complexity Lecture 6: Arithmetic and Threshold Circuits David Mix Barrington and Alexis Maciel July
More informationJitter Basics Lab Using SDAIII & Jitter Sim
Jitter Basics Lab Using SDAIII & Jitter Sim TUTORIAL August 1, 2012 Summary JitterSim is a math function, enabled by the Serial Data Analysis option, which allows various aspects of jitter to be simulated
More informationCpk: What is its Capability? By: Rick Haynes, Master Black Belt Smarter Solutions, Inc.
C: What is its Capability? By: Rick Haynes, Master Black Belt Smarter Solutions, Inc. C is one of many capability metrics that are available. When capability metrics are used, organizations typically provide
More informationACS/WFC Crosstalk after Servicing Mission 4
Instrument Science Report ACS 2010-02 ACS/WFC Crosstalk after Servicing Mission 4 Anatoly Suchkov, Norman Grogin, Marco Sirianni, Ed Cheng, Augustyn Waczynski, & Marcus Loose March 10, 2010 ABSTRACT The
More informationCrosstalk Analysis Application
Crosstalk Analysis Application User's Guide Notices Keysight Technologies, Inc. 2009-2017 No part of this manual may be reproduced in any form or by any means (including electronic storage and retrieval
More information100G Signaling Options over Backplane Classes
100G Signaling Options over Backplane Classes IEEE P802.3bj January 2012 Newport Beach FutureWei Hiroshi Takatori Hiroshi.Takatori@huawei.com Contributors and Supporters Albert Vareljian Sanjay Kasturia,
More informationAgilent N5393C PCI Express Electrical Performance and Compliance Software Release Notes
Agilent N5393C PCI Express Electrical Performance and Compliance Software Release Notes Agilent N5393C Software Version 03.34 Released Date: 19 May 2014 File Name: SetupInfPCIExpress0334.exe Improved algorithm
More informationEdge and local feature detection - 2. Importance of edge detection in computer vision
Edge and local feature detection Gradient based edge detection Edge detection by function fitting Second derivative edge detectors Edge linking and the construction of the chain graph Edge and local feature
More informationSTA Rev. F Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives (Cont.) Module 3 Descriptive Measures
STA 2023 Module 3 Descriptive Measures Learning Objectives Upon completing this module, you should be able to: 1. Explain the purpose of a measure of center. 2. Obtain and interpret the mean, median, and
More informationFMA901F: Machine Learning Lecture 6: Graphical Models. Cristian Sminchisescu
FMA901F: Machine Learning Lecture 6: Graphical Models Cristian Sminchisescu Graphical Models Provide a simple way to visualize the structure of a probabilistic model and can be used to design and motivate
More informationChapter 6. The Normal Distribution. McGraw-Hill, Bluman, 7 th ed., Chapter 6 1
Chapter 6 The Normal Distribution McGraw-Hill, Bluman, 7 th ed., Chapter 6 1 Bluman, Chapter 6 2 Chapter 6 Overview Introduction 6-1 Normal Distributions 6-2 Applications of the Normal Distribution 6-3
More informationEffortless Burst Separation
DDR Debug Toolkit Key Features Read/Write burst separation with a push of a button Simultaneous analysis of four different measurement views View up to 10 eye diagrams with mask testing and eye measurements
More informationComparison Between Equalization, COM Package Models, and COM For 100G Base KR Channels
Comparison Between Equalization, COM Package Models, and COM For 100G Base KR Channels Richard Mellitz, Samtec September 018 1 Table of Contents Experiment using seven 100G-Base-KR channel models For three
More informationBoard Design Guidelines for PCI Express Architecture
Board Design Guidelines for PCI Express Architecture Cliff Lee Staff Engineer Intel Corporation Member, PCI Express Electrical and Card WGs The facts, techniques and applications presented by the following
More informationPredicting BER with IBIS-AMI: experiences correlating SerDes simulations and measurement
Predicting BER with IBIS-AMI: experiences correlating SerDes simulations and measurement Todd Westerhoff (SiSoft) Mike Steinberger (SiSoft) Walter Katz (SiSoft) Barry Katz (SiSoft) Adge Hawes (IBM) Kent
More information