STUDY REPORT #1 ADDENDUM
|
|
- Shawn Sparks
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 STUDY REPORT #1 ADDENDUM 1.0 PURPOSE OF ADDENDUM This document is an addendum to Study Report #1: Sub-System Planning Alternatives. The purpose of this addendum is to bridge the gap between the initial screening recommendations documented in Study Report #1 and the ultimate sub-area transportation plan that will be presented in Study Report #2. Since the initial screening recommendations were made in the first study report, several developments have allowed the study committee to continue to refine the alternatives. The result of gaining this additional information/refining the alternatives has allowed the study committee to screen out additional alternatives before moving into the detailed evaluation of this study, from which a recommended preferred sub-area transportation plan (Study Report #2) will be developed. The following sections of this addendum will review the initial screening recommendations from the first study report, alternative refinements since the initial recommendations, and identify those alternatives that are recommended to be screened out at this stage of the study before the detailed evaluation. 2.0 SUMMARY OF STUDY REPORT #1 SCREENING RECOMMENDATIONS Improvement alternatives selected for further study as a result of the initial screening process were categorized into three distinct groups based on the purpose and need for improvements and included: 1. Base System Improvements This group of alternatives is related to improvement alternatives identified through the study process to improve local continuity, connectivity and accessibility within the study area. Base system improvements include: a. Alternative D North/South Collector (see Study Report #1, Figure 14). 2. Improvements to Accommodate the Airport Master Plan Update This group of alternatives includes roadway realignments to accommodate the proposed airport runway extensions and the development of a future third runway as shown in the Airport Master Plan Update. These include: a. Alternatives A2, A3, A5.1 and A5.2 CSAH 16 West Realignment (see Study Report #1, Figure 11) b. Alternative B1 and B2 CSAH 8 Realignment (see Study Report #1, Figure 12) RIA Sub Area Transportation Study/TH 63 South Corridor Preservation Plan 1
2 3. Improvements related to the transition of TH 63 to a freeway facility This group of alternatives include the following improvements aimed at transitioning TH 63 to a freeway and meeting airport access needs as a result of the updated Airport Master Plan: a. Alternative C1.2, C2 and C3 TH 30 Realignment (See Study Report #1, Figure 13) b. Alternative E CSAH 16 interchange (see Study Report #1, Figure 15). c. Alternative F CSAH 16 east of TH 63 (see Study Report #1, Figure 16). d. Alternative G Local road connections to replace TH 63 access (see Study Report #1, Figure 17) e. Alternative H 60 th Street Overpass (see Study Report #1, Figure 18) f. I-90/TH 63 Alternatives Interim and Full Cloverleaf (see Study Report #1, Figures 23 and 24) g. Airport Access Alternatives i. AAA1 TH 63 Overpass and East Frontage and Backage Road (see Study Report #1, Figure 14 and 19) ii. AAA2 West frontage road along the west side of TH 63 (see Study Report #1, Figure 19). iii. AAA3 87 th Street Folded Diamond Interchange with Auxiliary Lanes (see Study Report #1, Figure 20). iv. AAA4 85 th Street Standard Diamond Interchange with collector/distributor system (see Study Report #1, Figure 21). 3.0 ALTERNATIVE REFINEMENTS SINCE STUDY REPORT #1 3.1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SOURCES Since the time the alternative recommendations outlined in Section 2.0 were included in Study Report #1, the study committee has continued to progress the study and has gathered additional information on the feasibility of these alternatives. This information has been gained through the following sources: Second Public Open House A second project open house was held on August 27, 2009, to gather public input/feedback on the range of alternatives identified and the initial screening recommendations. Jurisdictional/Agency Review Recommendations from Study Report #1 were presented to each of the local jurisdictions including Olmsted County, the Cities of Rochester and Stewartville, and High Forest Township in September of A separate meeting was also held to present this information to environmental resource and referral agencies. Community Advisory Panel Feedback The first Community Advisory Panel (CAP) meeting was held on October 26, 2009, to gather input/feedback on the range of alternatives identified and the initial screening recommendations. RIA Sub Area Transportation Study/TH 63 South Corridor Preservation Plan 2
3 Mn/DOT Geometrics Feedback A meeting was held on November 10, 2009, to review the initial alternatives and to allow for an opportunity for early feedback from Mn/DOT s Geometric Unit on the design workup of alternatives (i.e., general access spacing, general alignments and consideration of the design standards being used). Mn/DOT Aeronautics Input A meeting was held on October 15, 2009, with Mn/DOT Aeronautics, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the Rochester Airport managers/consultants to review roadway alternatives under consideration and to gain an understanding from Mn/DOT Aeronautics and FAA on what is permitted in terms of potential roadway realignments and new roadways within the various runway approach areas and land use safety zones. CSAH 16 Interchange Configurations Several interchange configurations were considered for the CSAH 16 interchange reconstruction by the PSC. These included a standard diamond configuration with traffic signals, a standard diamond configuration with roundabouts, and a folded diamond design. Environmental Path Feedback A response from Mn/DOT Central Office and FHWA indicated they were supportive of the proposal to develop an EA/EAW for improvements to the TH 63 South corridor between I-90 and 48th Street. This would include improvements to replace access to TH 63 as it is transitioned to a freeway in the future, and improvements to the CSAH 16 interchange, the I-90 interchange, and improvements to provide access to the airport (including TH 30). 3.2 REFINEMENT OF INITIAL SCREENING RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the additional information gathered from the sources outlined in Section 3.1 above, the PSC was able to further screen the initial alternatives and eliminate some of these alternatives from further consideration in the detailed evaluation phase of study. This section provides a review of alternatives recommended to be dropped from further consideration. Base System Improvements There are no base system improvements that were recommended to be dropped from further consideration in the detailed phase of evaluation. However, Alternative D, the base system improvement identified as part of this study providing a north/south collector connection east of TH 63 between Stewartville and Rochester, is not essential to the TH 63 improvements, but is assumed as part of the long-range vision. As such it will be assumed to be completed by others in the future when construction is more imminent and will not undergo any further detailed study in the next phase of evaluation. Improvements to Accommodate the Airport Master Plan Update 1. Alternative A CSAH 16 West Realignment Alternative A realigns CSAH 16 west of TH 63 around the proposed Runway 13/31 expansion shown in the Rochester Airport s Preferred Development Alternative RIA Sub Area Transportation Study/TH 63 South Corridor Preservation Plan 3
4 (February 2009). The need for and timing of this realignment is directly tied to the implementation of the Airport Master Plan Update. Therefore, it is not recommended that Alternative A (CSAH 16 West Realignment) be analyzed and evaluated in detail in the next phase of alternative evaluation since the timing of these improvements is unknown. This area may be considered for official mapping by Olmsted County and the City of Rochester as part of the last phase of this project in order to provide some level of protection against incompatible future development, but the PSC agreed the Airport would be responsible for identifying the ultimate alignment for CSAH 16 as long as it fell somewhere within the realignment swaths identified by the PSC. The Airport would also be responsible for the ultimate environmental documentation and funding for the construction of this realignment when needed to implement the Airport s Layout Plan. 2. Alternative B CSAH 8 Realignment Alternative B realigns CSAH 8 around the proposed future runway shown in the Rochester Airport s Preferred Development Alternative (February 2009). The Airport has noted the need for this additional runway is beyond their 20-year planning horizon. However, the future runway will be shown on their final Airport Layout Plan. Two CSAH 8 realignment alternatives were originally considered and documented in Study Report #1. Alternative B1 provided the minimal realignment necessary to accommodate the future runway by realigning CSAH 8 outside of the Object Free Area, but still within the Runway Protection Zone and Safety Zone A. Alternative B2 provided another option for realigning CSAH 8 completely out of the Object Free Area and the Runway Protection Zone, but within Safety Zone A. After meeting with Mn/DOT Aeronautics and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the study committee was advised that for new runways, roadways are not permitted in the Object Free Area or Runway Protection Zone, but are allowed in Safety Zone A. Due to this requirement, Alternative B1 which realigns CSAH 8 through the Runway Protection Zone was determined to be no longer feasible. Therefore, the study committee recommended Alternative B1 be screened out from further consideration. The need for and timing of Alternative B2 is directly tied to the implementation of the Airport Master Plan Update. Therefore, it is not recommended that Alternative B2 (CSAH 8 Realignment) be analyzed and evaluated in detail in the next phase of alternative evaluation since the timing of these improvements is unknown. This area may be considered for official mapping by Olmsted County and the City of Rochester as part of the last phase of this project in order to provide some level of protection against incompatible future development. The PSC agreed the Airport would be responsible for the ultimate environmental documentation and funding for the construction of this realignment when needed to implement the Airport s Layout Plan. 3. Alternative C TH 30 Realignment Three realignment alternatives for TH 30 between CSAH 8 and TH 63 were recommended to be carried forward for further study from Study Report #1. The realignment is necessary to accommodate the proposed runway extension shown in the RIA Sub Area Transportation Study/TH 63 South Corridor Preservation Plan 4
5 Rochester Airport s Master Plan Update. Alternative C1.2 provided the minimum FAA clearance requirements and provided east/west connectivity/continuity through connection to a TH 63 overpass. Airport access would come from an east frontage/backage road system or interchange for this alternative. Alternative C2 was found to also meet FAA clearance requirements with a runway shift. Airport access in this option would come from a west frontage road system. This alternative does sever east/west local continuity which will need to be evaluated further. Alternative C3 was similar to Alternative C1.2 except that it had a much longer reconstruction length in order to completely avoid encroaching on any designated runway protections zones. While the FAA is likely to support an option with less cost and impact, the PSC felt both C1.2 and C3 were feasible options and agreed to designate a swath between these two areas for further study in the future by others. Since the above recommendation for carrying a swath between Alternatives C1.2 and C3 was made, the PSC has continued discussion about the timing and feasibility of this type of realignment. The committee discussed the need to consider a realignment of TH 30 from TH 63 to CSAH 8 since the timing of the airport s runway expansion plans is unknown. The alternatives identified to reflect this realignment require substantial acres of new right-of-way acquisition and new roadway construction. Since the timing of the runway expansion, which would require the road realignment is unknown, the PSC recommended leaving the TH 30 realignment out of the EA/EAW for this project. The EA/EAW would include the tie in of TH 30 to a West Frontage Road, TH 63 overpass or the 87 th Street interchange. TH 30 west of this tie in point would then remain on the existing alignment from this point to the west to CSAH 8. Based upon this recommendation, Alternatives C1.2, C2 and C3 will not be evaluated in detail in the Task 8 analysis which will be documented in Study Report #2. Improvements Related to the Transition of TH 63 to a Freeway Facility 1. Alternative E CSAH 16 Interchange Configurations The initial screening for Alternative E (CSAH 16 interchange) evaluated a No-Build Alternative along with Alternative E1 which improved the existing CSAH 16/TH 63 interchange to an enhanced diamond interchange to correct the sight distance and skewed alignment issues as well as to provide adequate capacity for The initial screening recommendation was to carry forward Alternative E1 to reconstruct CSAH 16 as an enhanced diamond interchange; however, interchange configurations were not considered at the initial screening stage. Since Study Report #1 was published, the PSC has continued to explore options for the reconstruction of the CSAH 16 interchange. Three interchange configurations were evaluated including a standard diamond interchange with signalized intersections, a standard diamond interchange with roundabouts, and a folded diamond interchange. A preliminary traffic operations analysis and 2040 critical lane volumes were developed to analyze the feasibility of these three interchange configurations. The results of these analyses reveal that all of the configurations are able to handle the projected 2040 volumes and all are under capacity. Therefore, the difference among alternative configurations is really only related to right-of-way impacts. RIA Sub Area Transportation Study/TH 63 South Corridor Preservation Plan 5
6 The PSC considered the impacts of the three configurations and found the standard diamond configuration with signalized intersections had the most right-of-way impacts due to the required ramp intersection spacing for traffic signals. The standard diamond with roundabouts had fewer right-of-way impacts than the standard diamond with signals since the ramp intersections can be spaced closer together under the roundabout alternative and this alternative more closely follows the existing interchange footprint. The folded diamond configuration could work with either signals or roundabouts and has the benefit of allowing a direct connection to the east side frontage/backage road to the ramp intersection. Therefore, based on this discussion and analysis, the PSC recommended dropping the standard diamond configuration with signalized intersections due to the higher right-ofway impacts associated with this option than with the other interchange configurations. Study Report #2 will document the detailed evaluation of the CSAH 16 standard diamond configuration with roundabouts and the folded diamond configuration. 2. Alternative F CSAH 16 East Realignment The initial screening for Alternative F recommended carrying forward Alternative F1 which provided a new alignment for CSAH 16 east of TH 63 to provide for the ability to control access and meet the local access guidelines. The PSC further considered this recommendation and more closely looked at the existing access spacing along CSAH 16 east of TH 63 as well as the projected future traffic volumes in this area. Their conclusion was that the additional cost of correcting the access deficiencies with a new CSAH 16 alignment was not cost effective when considering the few number of accesses that were actually non-conforming. Therefore, the PSC recommended that Alternative F1 be dropped from further consideration. 3. Alternative G Local Road Improvements to Replace Direct Access to TH 63 There are no local road improvements (Alternative G) that were recommended to be dropped from further consideration. Each of these improvements will be considered in the detailed phase of evaluation. 4. Alternative H 60 th Street Overpass The initial screening for Alternative H recommended carrying forward Alternative H1 which provided an overpass to TH 63 at 60 th Street. The 60 th Street overpass provided local roadway connectivity/continuity across TH 63 between interchange access locations at 48 th Street and CSAH 16 for the future when the at-grade accesses to TH 63 are closed as this facility is transitioned to a freeway. Additional design and construction cost information was developed after the Study Report #1 recommendation. The estimated cost to construct this overpass was identified as $6.5 Million. The high construction cost was due to the topography of this area and the fill and retaining wall structures that would be needed to support the overpass. The PSC considered this information along with the estimated future traffic volumes on 60 th Street and determined this was not a cost RIA Sub Area Transportation Study/TH 63 South Corridor Preservation Plan 6
7 effective alternative for the low volumes projected to use the connection. Therefore, the PSC recommended that Alternative H1 be dropped from further consideration. 5. Airport Access Alternatives The initial screening for the Airport Access Alternatives documented in Study Report #1 recommended carrying forward a TH 63 overpass alternative (AAA1), a West Frontage Road alternative (AAA2), an 87 th Street Folded Diamond Interchange with Auxiliary Lanes (AAA3), and an 85 th Street Standard Diamond Interchange with a Collector- Distributor System (AAA4). Since the initial screening, the PSC further expanded upon potential options for a West Frontage Road alternative. Currently, there is insufficient space between TH 63 and the Object Free Area of Runway 13/31 for an at-grade West Frontage Road; in fact, the existing southbound lanes of TH 63 currently encroach upon a small corner of the Object Free Area. To address this issue, the study committee decided to study options for a West Frontage Road tunnel, an at-grade West Frontage Road alternative that shifts the southbound TH 63 lanes east, completely out of the Object Free Area and into the existing TH 63 median, and an option that would shift Runway 13/31 to the northwest to provide adequate width for an at-grade West Frontage Road outside of the Object Free Area. At the writing of this document, the PSC was further evaluating the benefits and costs of each of these West Frontage Road alternatives. The evaluation and recommendations of these options will be documented in Study Report #2. However, the study committee did receive additional information regarding the 85 th Street Standard Diamond Interchange with the Collector-Distributor (CD) System. After meeting with staff from Mn/DOT Aeronautics and FAA, it became apparent that this interchange location was not feasible since it would place structures within the Object Free Area and Runway Protection Zone of Runway 13/31. Therefore, the PSC recommended this alternative be dropped from further consideration in the detailed phases of study. In conclusion, the initial screening recommended carrying forward a TH 63 overpass, West Frontage Road, and 87 th Street and 85 th Street interchanges for future airport access consideration. However, as a result of additional information gained through meetings with Mn/DOT Aeronautics and FAA, the study committee agreed to carry forward the following airport access alternatives: TH 63 Overpass West Frontage Road Options o Tunnel o TH 63 Shift o Runway 13/31 Shift 87 th Street Folded Diamond Interchange with Auxiliary Lanes RIA Sub Area Transportation Study/TH 63 South Corridor Preservation Plan 7
8 6. TH 63/I-90 Alternatives The initial screening for the TH 63/I-90 Alternatives recommended carrying forward both an interim and an ultimate interchange configuration for this location. The interim improvement concept provides improved geometrics for north and south at-grade crossovers and ramp merges in the northwest and southeast quadrants. The eastbound I-90 to northbound TH 63 ramp is shown as merging onto northbound TH 63 at a point where northbound TH 63 traffic would be transitioned into one lane to allow for this merge condition. However, since Study Report #1 was adopted, Mn/DOT has further reviewed the interim concept for this interchange and has recommended only carrying forward the ultimate solution. Mn/DOT has identified the TH 63 bridges over I-90 as being replaced sooner than originally anticipated, therefore making the ultimate (full cloverleaf) interchange option more feasible. 4.0 NEXT STEPS The next step in this study is to complete the detailed alternative evaluation process on the remaining alternatives in order to identify a recommended preferred alternative plan for the sub area. The detailed evaluation and identification of a recommended alternative plan will be documented in Study Report #2: TH 63 South Corridor/Rochester Airport Sub Area Transportation Plan. Below is a summary of the alternatives that will be evaluated in detail in the alternative evaluation process: Alternative E CSAH 16 Interchange Options o Standard Diamond with Roundabouts o Folded Diamond Alternative G Local Road Improvements to Replace TH 63 At-Grade Access o North of CSAH 16, east of TH 63 o North of CSAH 16, west of TH 63 o South of CSAH 16 Airport Access Alternatives o West Frontage Road (TH 63 Shift) o West Frontage Road (Runway 13/31 Shift) o West Frontage Road (Tunnel) o TH 63 Overpass with East Frontage Road o TH 63 Overpass with East Backage Road o 87 th Street Interchange TH 63/I-90 Ultimate Interchange (Full Cloverleaf) Alternative RIA Sub Area Transportation Study/TH 63 South Corridor Preservation Plan 8
Feasibility Study Downtown Moorhead Railroad Grade Separation Moorhead, Minnesota July 2008
Feasibility Study Downtown Moorhead Railroad Grade Separation Moorhead, Minnesota July 2008 INTRODUCTION The City of Moorhead (City), along with the Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments (FM
More informationCITY OF KIRKLAND TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
CITY OF KIRKLAND TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES SEPA TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY - ROAD IMPACT FEES Introduction Revised February 2004 These guidelines describe how to prepare a traffic study, or Traffic
More informationENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 3 REFINED MLT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 3 REFINED MLT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Final Report Prepared for Maricopa County Department of Transportation Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 STUDY
More informationMunicipal Service Park 3 December Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex
Municipal Service Park 3 December 2010 Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex Overview: Operational Challenges and Opportunities South East Connector impacts Opportunities: The South
More informationDallas City Council August 2, Jody Puckett, Assistant City Manager (I) City Manager s Office
Trinity Parkway Alternative 3C Dallas City Council August 2, 2017 Jody Puckett, Assistant City Manager (I) City Manager s Office Presentation Overview Provide background on Trinity Parkway Alternative
More informationCorridor Management Committee. January 12, 2017
Corridor Management Committee January 12, 2017 1 Today s Topics Chair s Remarks 2017 Project Activity Overview Updated Corridor Flyover Video: Preview 2017 Meeting Schedule 2 3 Chair s Update 2016 Major
More informationTHE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9
THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9 History & Background Began in 2001 as a Major Investment Study (MIS), Schematic, and Environmental
More informationTHE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9
THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9 History & Background Began in 2001 as a Major Investment Study (MIS), Schematic, and Environmental
More informationKansas Division. January 31, 2018
Division January 31, 6111 SW 29 th, Suite 100 Topeka, 66614 (785) 273-2600 (785) 273-2620 (fax) www.fhwa.dot.gov/ksdiv/index.htm Catherine M. Patrick, P.E. State Transportation Engineer Department of Transportation
More informationCouncil of State Governments. Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing. October 28, 2013
Council of State Governments Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing October 28, 2013 Takoma Langley Transit Center Purpose and Need Provide a safe, attractive and efficient facility
More informationMemorandum CITY OF DALLAS
Memorandum DATE February 22, 2019 CITY OF DALLAS TO Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council SUBJECT February 27, 2019 City Council Agenda Item #19 On Wednesday, February 27, 2019 you will be presented
More informationWork Type Definition
Work Type Definition Pages 1-3 detail the work type definition. In order to become pre-qualified for this work type, please see the Work Type Submittal Requirements on pages 4-6. I. Description Refer to
More informationS-03-SegB: South Federal Way to Fife LRT
Project Number S-03-SegB Subarea South King/Pierce Primary Mode Light Rail Facility Type Corridor Length 4.0 miles Version ST Board Workshop Date Last Modified 11-25-2015 PROJECT AREA AND REPRESENTATIVE
More informationSIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF ARTERIAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ALONG THE US 61 CORRIDOR IN BURLINGTON, IOWA FINAL REPORT
SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF ARTERIAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ALONG THE US 61 CORRIDOR IN BURLINGTON, IOWA FINAL REPORT Principal Investigator Tom Maze Principal Contributor Ali Kamyab Sponsored by the Engineering
More informationROARING BROOK COMMUNITY INFORMATIONAL MEETING TACONIC STATE PARKWAY (TSP) AT PUDDING STREET INTERCHANGE
ROARING BROOK COMMUNITY INFORMATIONAL MEETING TACONIC STATE PARKWAY (TSP) AT PUDDING STREET INTERCHANGE Town of Putnam Valley, Putnam County February 7, 2018 1 2 MEETING AGENDA Introductions (5 minutes)
More informationReston Town Center North Development. Community Update
Reston Town Center North Development Community Update May 31, 2017 1 Presentation Agenda Project Overview Site and Current Property Ownerships Development Plan/Grid of Streets Proposed Ownership Comprehensive
More information# 7. Date of Meeting: March 13, 2018 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FINANCE/GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE ACTION ITEM SUBJECT:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FINANCE/GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting: March 13, 2018 # 7 SUBJECT: ELECTION DISTRICT: Contract Award/Roadway and Civil Design
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Shotwell Road Residential Clayton, NC
Shotwell Road Residential Clayton, NC TABLE O CONTENTS 1. INTROUCTION...1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area...1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access...2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses...2 1.4. Existing Roadways...2
More informationPROJECT TIMELINE. Next steps. Plan. Start of Service
PROJECT TIMELINE 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 WE ARE HERE Plan Develop Build Develop design options for termini, station locations, and transit operations Conduct environmental research Assess funding
More informationBicycle Access & Parking Plan Project List Review
Bicycle Access & Parking Plan Project List Review Bicycle Advisory Committee September 19th, 2013 Strategy Overview New Bicycle Issues and Ideas (BAC, staff, public) Funding External Agency Lead BAPP s
More informationAPPENDIX E TRANSPORTATION
APPENDIX E TRANSPORTATION 2011 PATRON SURVEYS VISSIM MODEL CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION Environmental and Planning Consultants 440 Park Avenue South 7th Floor New York, NY 10016 tel: 212 696-0670 fax:
More informationDakota County Transportation CIP Process Requests from cities/townships
City of Apple Valley Letter: e-mail w/traffic Engineer City of Apple Valley Engineer coordinating CIP Project County Traffic Staff is in the process of assessing Requests directly with Dakota County Traffic
More informationMinistry of Transportation and Infrastructure jurisdiction (337 km) Federal Parks Canada jurisdiction (103 km)
nfrastructure jurisdiction (337 km) HGHWAY 1 KAMLOOPS TO ALBERTA FOUR-LANNG PROGRAM Welcome Thank you for attending this community engagement on the Trans- Canada Highway 1 West Project, part of the Highway
More informationDATE: April 8, 2013 REPORT NO. CD TYPE OF REPORT CONSENT ITEM [ ] ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION [ X ]
DATE: April 8, 2013 REPORT NO. CD2013-040 TO: FROM: Chair and Members Committee of the Whole Community Services Gregory Dworak, General Manager Community Services 1.0 TYPE OF REPORT CONSENT ITEM [ ] ITEM
More informationEngaging Maryland toward CAV advancements Christine Nizer, Administrator
Engaging Maryland toward CAV advancements Christine Nizer, Administrator Maryland Department of Transportation Motor Vehicle Administration Maryland CAV activities Overall goal: Maryland is open for business
More informationNorth Metro Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Public Hearings. December 9 & 10, 2009
North Metro Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Public Hearings December 9 & 10, 2009 1 Welcome & Introductions 2 3 What Are We Doing Here Tonight? Public Hearing for RTD North Metro Corridor
More informationRecord of Public Comment on Central Corridor SDEIS
Executive Summary Page 1 Executive Summary Project Background The Ramsey County Regional Rail Authority (RCRRA) initiated the Central Corridor scoping process in 2001 and conducted the Alternatives Analysis
More information8a: Road Projects Time Horizon 1: (Funded TIP) Page 81
8a: Road Projects Time Horizon 1: 2016-2020 (Funded TIP) Page 81 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Highway OR Non-Highway TIP Route/Facility Name Description From Cross Street To Amount Programmed
More informationCorridor Management Committee. December 17, 2014
Corridor Management Committee December 17, 2014 1 Today s Topics Technical Issues/Issue Resolution Process Environmental Consultant Contract Update Advisory Committees Community Advisory Committee Business
More informationI-20 EAST TEXAS CORRIDOR STUDY. TxDOT Planning Conference, Corpus Christi June 4 th, 2014
I-20 EAST TEXAS CORRIDOR STUDY TxDOT Planning Conference, Corpus Christi June 4 th, 2014 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3-5 2 I-20 East Texas Corridor Advisory Committee 6-10 3 Study Schedule 11-12 4
More informationPUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
PUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART C-108 Actual 2012-13 Adopted Year-End Estimated 2014-15 2015-16 PROGRAM EXPENSES/REVENUES Salaries & Benefits $ 1,725,030 $ 1,855,980 $ 1,676,130 $ 1,956,510 $ 1,979,470
More informationCedar Rapids ITS Deployment Project
Cedar Rapids ITS Deployment Project Concept of Operations July 29, 2011 Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction Purpose Goal of ITS Deployments Section 2 Needs Assessment General Background Stakeholders
More informationMAJOR PROJECTS STRATEGY
MAJOR PROJECTS STRATEGY Texas Transportation Commission October 25, 2017 Outline and Goals Current TexasClearLanes initiatives to mitigate congestion for non-tolled projects Review Unified Transportation
More informationNorthwest Needs Improvements Survey
PW5 NW 107th Ave One thousand feet N of NW 122nd St Okeechobee Rd Widen bridge over Miami Canal PW6 NW 82nd Ave NW 8th St NW 12th St Construct new 4-lane road PW7 NW 87 Ave NW 36th St NW 58th St Add 2-lanes
More informationSECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 198 Van Buren Street, Suite 300 Herndon, Virginia 20170 JANUARY 2017 Introduction The
More informationExecutive Summary. City of Goodyear. Prepared for: Prepared by: November, 2008 Copyright 2008, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Goodyear Intelligent Transportation Systems Strategic Plan Executive Summary Prepared for: City of Goodyear Prepared by: 191376000 Copyright 2008, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. I. INTRODUCTION The City
More informationOverview September 7, 2017
Overview September 7, 2017 Purpose The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of the changes to the required deliverables and workflow for developing plans and models for Illinois DOT projects
More informationAppendix D Supportive Transportation Materials
Appendix D Supportive Transportation Materials D.1. Stakeholder Input and Coordination As noted in Section 1.7 of the main Master Plan document, there have been several opportunities for stakeholders to
More informationEXTENDING RED/PURPLE LINE REVENUE SERVICE TO EAST SIDE OF DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES/ARTS DISTRICT
16 One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.2000 Tel metro. net PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE MARCH 18, 2015 SUBJECT: ACTION: EXTENDING RED/PURPLE LINE REVENUE SERVICE TO EAST SIDE OF
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of December 12, 2015 DATE: December 1, 2015 SUBJECT: SP-84-U-15-1 USE PERMIT ASSOCIATED WITH A SITE PLAN for a telecommunications facility; located
More informationDOWNTOWN TUNNEL / MIDTOWN TUNNEL / MLK EXTENSION PROJECT PROCUREMENT PROCESS
Commonwealth of Virginia Office of Transportation P3 s Dusty Holcombe, Deputy Director DOWNTOWN TUNNEL / MIDTOWN TUNNEL / MLK EXTENSION PROJECT PROCUREMENT PROCESS September 20, 2011 Virginia: DT / MT
More informationDowntown Boise Multimodal Center
Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Downtown Boise Multimodal Center Environmental Assessment June 2009 Prepared by the Federal Transit Administration and Valley Regional Transit. U.S. Department
More informationSWLRT Community Advisory Committee Meeting. June 27, 2013
SWLRT Community Advisory Committee Meeting June 27, 2013 Today s Topics Welcome and Introductions Hennepin County Works Update: TSAAP Open House Summary Mind-Mixer Demonstration Focus Group Outreach Technical
More informationROCKSIDE WOODS BLVD. INDEPENDENCE, OHIO 44131
DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY: Available for Sale along Rockside Woods Blvd. and Brecksville Road (Route 21) are (7) seven development ready sites. These sites can serves a variety of uses including
More informationPRIME FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) offer a quick reference to getting the most effective use of PRIME. FAQs can be accessed under the Support menu located on the PRIME Navigation Bar. Accounts and Data
More informationAPPENDIX C SOURCES & REFERENCES CITED
APPENDIX C SOURCES & REFERENCES CITED Sources & References Cited Chapter 1 City of Minneapolis. 2007. Access Minneapolis Ten Year Transportation Action Plan. Connetics Transportation Group. 2012. Transit
More informationRecommendation to Board. Final Action
MOTION NO. M2017-59 City of Seattle Center City Mobility Plan Agreement MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Operations and Administration Committee PROPOSED ACTION 05/04/2017 05/25/2017 Recommendation
More information2045 DEMOGRAPHIC FORECAST SURFACE TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL COMMITTEE APRIL 28, 2017
2045 DEMOGRAPHIC FORECAST SURFACE TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL COMMITTEE APRIL 28, 2017 BACKGROUND The demographic forecasts provide a common base for regional planning and resource allocations. The forecasts
More informationTraffic Impact Study for the Girard Winery Project
October 16, 2014 Ms. Heather McCollister 1512 D Street Napa, CA 94559 Traffic Impact Study for the Girard Winery Project Dear Ms. McCollister; Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. (W-Trans) has completed
More informationDallas Streetcar Central Link Locally Preferred Alternative Selection
Dallas Streetcar Central Link Locally Preferred Alternative Selection Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure & Sustainability Committee August 28, 2017 Tanya Brooks, Assistant Director Mobility and Street
More informationSTATEWIDE CENTERLINE INITIATIVE EDITED: MAY 17, 2013
STATEWIDE CENTERLINE INITIATIVE EDITED: MAY 17, 2013 WHAT IS THE CENTERLINE INITIATIVE? The Centerline Initiative is a joint effort between the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Minnesota
More informationDowntown to NAIT LRT Concept Plan Attachment 4 Public Involvement Summary
north, lrt, light, transit, rail, track, line, closure, close, road, interuption, partial, lane, construction, bulletin, NAIT, line, motorist, pedestrian, map, metro, line,downtown to NAIT LRT Concept
More informationVTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project San Jose Downtown Association
VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project San Jose Downtown Association August 24, 2017 THANK YOU! San Jose Downtown Association for inviting us & San Jose First United Methodist Church for
More informationBEVRLYRLY STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: August 4, 2015 Item Number: To: From:
BEVRLYRLY STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: August 4, 215 Item Number: To: From: Honorable Mayor & City Council Mark Cuneo, City Engineer Aaron Kunz, Deputy Director of Transportation Subject: Update on Metro
More informationIntelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Systems Engineering (SE) Requirement Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) means electronics, communications, or information processing used singly or in combination
More informationProposed FY 06 Project Development Program and FY 05 Project Development Program Update
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Proposed FY 06 Project Development Program and FY 05 Project Development Program Update Presented to the Board of Directors: P D E C Planning & Development
More informationAnchorage Land Use Plan Map Update Vision
Anchorage Land Use Plan Map Update Vision Carol Wong Manger, Tom Davis Project Manager and many others working hard to listen to the community. Hal Hart AICP Planning Director May 9 th 2017 1 Vision: the
More informationBOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2017 TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2017 TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM Date of Meeting: # 9 SUBJECT: ELECTION DISTRICTS: STAFF CONTACTS: Public and Private Infrastructure Improvements Adjacent to the Dulles
More informationMULTIJURISDICTIONAL TOLLING AND COOPERATION THE 91 EXPRESS LANES EXPANSION. ITS California Annual Meeting October 16, 2014
MULTIJURISDICTIONAL TOLLING AND COOPERATION THE 91 EXPRESS LANES EXPANSION ITS California Annual Meeting October 16, 2014 91 Project Extends the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County Line to I 15 in
More informationSystem Expansion Implementation Plan. Board Meeting, April 2017
System Expansion Implementation Plan Board Meeting, April 2017 2016: A record-breaking year Opened 3 new light rail stations. Completed tunneling for 3 more. Broke ground on our longest extension to date.
More informationThe Piedmont Corridor
Richard E. Mullinax, PE, PTOE, CPM 27 March 2018 Piedmont Corridor Part of Federal Southeast Corridor 1992 Federal Railroad Administration designated Southeast High Speed Rail Corridor Important Freight
More informationNEW TxDOT CONGESTION RELIEF PROGRAM
NEW TxDOT CONGESTION RELIEF PROGRAM REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL January 14, 2016 BACKGROUND Expedite congestion relief projects TxDOT to allocate $1.0 billion -$1.3 billion statewide Need early construction
More information5 Servicing Capacity Assignment for Aurora, East Gwillimbury and Newmarket
Clause 5 in Report No. 11 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on June 28, 2018. 5 Servicing Capacity Assignment
More informationThe Blue Line Extension
The Blue Line Extension NORTH CAROLINA JOINT TRANSPORTATION OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Presented by Carolyn Flowers CATS Chief Executive Officer Raleigh, NC February 10, 2012 Overview Charlotte Area Transit System
More informationApproval of Medical Center New Entrance Agreement
Finance & Administration Committee Action Item III-A February 14, 2013 Approval of Medical Center New Entrance Agreement Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary
More informationAGENDA ITEM # 1. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION FORM
AGENDA ITEM # 1. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION FORM FROM: Joel Rae, Director of Public Safety (ext. 113) THROUGH: Deb Hinsvark, Interim City Manager (ext. 228) DATE: December 18, 2012 RE: Police and Fire
More informationAccess Field Entrance Other Constructed Yes (Type)
APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL OR FIELD ACCESS PERMIT SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 600 Country Trail East Jordan, MN 55352-9339 Phone 952-496-8487 Fax 952-496-8365 Permit No. Permit
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Memorandum of Understanding: Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (I-80 ICM) Project
Office of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR May 1, 2012 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, Interim City Manager Submitted by: Andrew Clough, Director, Public Works
More information# I-2. Date of Meeting: May 2, 2017 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING INFORMATION ITEM. Quarterly Metrorail Construction Status Report
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING INFORMATION ITEM Date of Meeting: May 2, 2017 # I-2 SUBJECT: Quarterly Metrorail Construction Status Report ELECTION DISTRICTS: Ashburn/Broad Run STAFF CONTACTS: Alan
More information2017 STP PROJECT APPLICATION (OREGON)
Project Title Section 1. Applicant Information Name of Lead Agency/ Organization Address Phone Number Name & Title of Contact Person Email Address Certified Local Public Agency (Yes/No) Section 2. Project
More informationGRID. Geospatial Roadway Inventory Database. Michael Chamberlain, TxDOT. TPP Planning Conference Houston, TX
GRID Geospatial Roadway Inventory Database Michael Chamberlain, TxDOT TPP Planning Conference - 2016 Houston, TX Topics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 History (pre GRID) 3-6 GIS Resources 7-8 The Project 9-11 Assets
More informationMoving Forward with Transit Oriented Communities
Moving Forward with Transit Oriented Communities Planning & Development Committee October 7, 2014 Packet Pg. 33 History of TOD at RTD Mid 1990s - Local jurisdictions start planning for TOD 2000 RTD hires
More informationDulles Area Transportation Association
Dulles Area Transportation Association February 8, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation Transform 66: Outside the Beltway 2 Project Scope Multimodal improvements
More informationROADWAY LIGHTING CURFEW
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS Rhode Island Department of Transportation ROADWAY LIGHTING CURFEW IMPLEMENTATION PLAN March 25, 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRUDUCTION/OVERVIEW... 1 1.1. ANTICIPATED
More informationSITE DESCRIPTION. Vicinity
SITE DESCRIPTION Vicinity The Montrose Shopping Center is located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Randolph Road and Rockville Pike (MD 355). The existing building (formally known as the
More informationNORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3
NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3 Varuna A. Singh August 17, 2018 NHHIP OVERVIEW Project divided into three segments: Segment 1: I-45: from Beltway 8 to I-610 (9 mi) 45 Segment
More informationHISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD INDEX TO PHOTOGRAPHS. BLACK AND WHITE PHOTOGRAPHS OF HElM BRIDGE
HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD Cerritos Channel Port oflong Beach Los Angeles County California BLACK AND WHITE PHOTOGRAPHS OF HElM BRIDGE Photographer: Stephen Schafer, September 2010 CA-HEIM-l
More informationBEFORE THE CHRISTCHURCH DISTRICT PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL
BEFORE THE CHRISTCHURCH DISTRICT PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER OF The Canterbury Earthquake (Christchurch Replacement District Plan)
More informationPrepared for: Rocklin. Prepared by:
APPENDIX L Sierra Gateway Apartments Transportation Impact Analysis Report Prepared for: Rocklin Sierra Apartments II, LLC Prepared by: SIERRA GATEWAY APARTMENTS TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT PREPARED
More informationTRACY HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN RECIRCULATED DRAFT SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VOLUME III OCTOBER 2015
TRACY HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN RECIRCULATED DRAFT SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VOLUME III OCTOBER 2015 APPENDIX H-6B CORRESPONDENCE DOCUMENTS LIVERMORE, DATED FALL 2014 Chau, Elizabeth From: Sent:
More informationSECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2015 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 198 Van Buren Street, Suite 300 Herndon, Virginia 20170 JANUARY 2016 Introduction The
More informationCorridor Management Committee. January 14, 2016
Corridor Management Committee January 14, 2016 1 Today s Topics 2 Regional METRO System Overview 2016 Project Overview: Key Activities and Milestones Municipal Consent Schedule Design Resolution Schedule
More informationC Line Rapid Bus 90% Design
C Line Rapid Bus 90% Design Karyssa Jackson, Community Outreach Coordinator Shawn Walding, Senior Engineer Metro Transit TAAC August 2, 2017 1 Today s Discussion Informational Feedback from February Project
More informationALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT DESIGN COMMITTEE July 20, :00 p.m., Bayfront Center, Founder s Lounge
ALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT DESIGN COMMITTEE July 20, 2004 4:00 p.m., Bayfront Center, Founder s Lounge Members Present Members Absent City Staff Present Don Morris, Chair Ed Montanari Rich Lesniak Randy York,
More informationDESIGN CRITERIA MEMORANDUM
State Route 49 Realignment Study DESIGN CRITERIA MEMORANDUM ATTACHMENT G SR 49 Realignment Study STATE ROUTE 49 El Dorado to Coloma El Dorado County, CA DESIGN CRITERIA MEMORANDUM Introduction The El
More informationKing County Ombudsman Whistle-Blowers Office Complaint
King County Ombudsman Whistle-Blowers Office Complaint Filed by: Ho-Chuan Chen, Ph.D., P.E., Supervisor, Travel Forecasting and Data Management Group (TFDM) Hossein Barahimi, Transportation Planner III,
More informationTraffic Impact Study for the TAVA Homes Project at 1584 East Santa Clara Avenue in the City of Santa Ana
Traffic Impact Study for the TAVA Homes Project at 1584 East Santa Clara Avenue in the City of Santa Ana March 2011 Prepared for: URS Corporation 2020 E. First Street, Suite #400 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Tel:
More informationRutgers Interactive Lane Closure Application (RILCA) for Work Zone Planning User Manual. New Jersey Highway Authority. Garden State Parkway
Rutgers Interactive Lane Closure Application (RILCA) for Work Zone Planning User Manual Prepared for Garden State Parkway New Jersey Highway Authority April 2007 Developed by: Rutgers University Intelligent
More informationMetropolitan Council Transportation Committee. September 12, 2016
Metropolitan Council Welcome Commissioner Ulrich SCALE and Collective Impact in Scott County - Mayor Williams Regional Priority Corridors Highways Transit Moving Forward SCALE Scott County Association
More informationEASTSIDE CITY OF BELLEVUE/ PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE MULTI-PRIVATE MULTI-PRIVATE
SITE COMPARISON CHART CITY Bellevue County Kirkland Kirkland Redmond ADDRESS 555 116th Ave. Lane 118th Ave. 14955 90th St. ACREAGE 5.6 10.7 7.5 5.5 7.2 to 11.6 ACRES ZONING COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
More informationCommunity Update. June 21, 2011
Community Update June 21, 2011 Presented at Beth Sholom Synagogue Presented by: Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Minister of Transportation Councillor Karen Stintz, Chair, Toronto Transit Commission Eglinton-Scarborough
More informationNOVEMBER department of transportation CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Statewide Computerized Traffic Signal Systems Needs Assessment
department of transportation NOVEMBER 2015 CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Statewide Computerized Traffic Signal Systems Needs Assessment EARLY DEPLOYMENT NEEDS ASSESSMENT-NOVEMBER 2015 The Connecticut
More informationSouth Mountain Freeway Interchange Selection
slide 1 South Mountain Freeway Interchange Selection Public Private Partnership (P3) Today s Agenda Project Overview Interchange Selection Pavement Selection Lawsuit Update Design and Construction Q&A
More informationVirginia Department of Transportation Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Action Plan Implementing the Independent Review Panel Recommendations
Virginia Department of Transportation Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Action Plan Implementing the Independent Review Panel Recommendations Initial Panel Charge August 2009 To review existing policies and
More informationThe Surveyor s Guide to Automotive Simulation:
DLR.de Chart 1 The Surveyor s Guide to Automotive Simulation: Development and Evaluation of Guidelines for Straightforward Road Surveying for Driving Simulator Databases and Test Development of Driver
More informationThe Address Point Data Standard for Minnesota Overview and Frequently Asked Questions
The Address Point Data Standard for Minnesota Overview and Frequently Asked Questions Introduction. Address points are a core geospatial infrastructure dataset for Minnesota. They are a foundational data
More informationFacebook West Campus. Planning Commission Meeting February 25, 2013
Facebook West Campus Planning Commission Meeting February 25, 2013 Meeting Purpose Review and make a recommendation to the City Council on the following items (Attachment C): Statement of Overriding Considerations
More informationJohnson City Regional ITS Architecture Update Review Workshop. March 12, 2015
Johnson City Regional ITS Architecture Update Review Workshop March 12, 2015 Introductions Workshop Overview Review of the Draft Regional ITS Architecture Document Discussion on Existing and Planned ITS
More informationMARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018
MARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018 TODAY S AGENDA o Key driver of the program o Recommended plan o Project summaries o Next steps 2 KEY DRIVER: PUBLIC INPUT o Atlanta City Design o Atlanta s Transportation
More informationRPMA - Roadway Project Mapping Application
RPMA - Roadway Project Mapping Application RPMA Training Documentation Version: 1/9/2018 Title of Report 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents...2 Background Info on Roadway Project Mapping Application...3
More information