HFSS: Optimal Phased Array Modeling Using Domain Decomposition

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "HFSS: Optimal Phased Array Modeling Using Domain Decomposition"

Oswald Ryan
6 years ago
Views:

HFSS: Optimal Phased Array Modeling Using Domain Decomposition 15.

1 HFSS: Optimal Phased Array Modeling Using Domain Decomposition Release Authors: Dane Thompson Nick Hirth Irina Gordion Sara Louie Presenter: Dane Thompson

2 Motivation Electronically scannable antenna arrays often contain semiarbitrary element layouts with hundreds or thousands of elements. HFSS V15 includes new enhancements to enable easy creation and accurate/fast simulation of such finite arrays ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

3 Overview Goal: To demonstrate the superior accuracy, flexibility, and speed of finite antenna array modeling in HFSS V15. MagVector PhaseVector Finite Array DDM (FA-DDM) w/febi New in v15 Array Mask with Padding Cells New in v15 MPI New in v15 Composite excitations v ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

4 Outline Part I: Finite Array Domain Decomposition Overview Part II: Accuracy Part III: Flexibility Part IV: Speed/Capacity Conclusion ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

5 Part I: Finite Array Domain Decomposition Overview Part I: Finite Array Domain Decomposition Overview Part II: Accuracy Part III: Flexibility Part IV: Speed/Capacity Conclusion ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

Finite Array Domain Decomposition Utilizes Replicated DDM Unit Cell to

Model Unit Cell geometry expanded to finite array through a simple GUI

reduces the meshing time associated with finite array analyses.

6 Finite Array Domain Decomposition Utilizes Replicated DDM Unit Cell to Address Array Concerns Geometry and Mesh copied directly from Unit Cell Model Unit Cell geometry expanded to finite array through a simple GUI Adaptive Meshing Process imported from Unit Cell Simulation Dramatically reduces the meshing time associated with finite array analyses. Mesh periodicity reinforces array s periodicity ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

7 Finite Array DDM Tool Advantages Advantages of the new finite array tool in V14 of HFSS: 1. Solves much BIGGER arrays on the same hardware 256 element Vivaldi with metal thickness 2. Obtains ACCURATE results that match HFSS explicit simulations 3. Enables EFFICIENT simulation of large finite arrays utilizing domain decomposition (DDM) 4. Makes it EASY to transform a master/slave unit cell into a finite array ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

8 Part II: Accuracy Part I: Finite Array Domain Decomposition Overview Part II: Accuracy Part III: Flexibility Part IV: Speed/Capacity Conclusion ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

9 Accuracy Goal: Demonstrate the pattern accuracy of finite array domain decomposition (DDM) Enabling feature: FEBI absorbing boundary with FA-DDM New V15 Radiation Boundary vs FEBI Primer FA-DDM Boundary Details Far-field Pattern Accuracy Comparisons ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

well for incident angles less than 25-30

absorption of radiation boundary affects

10 Radiation Boundary: Incidence Angle Dependency Radiation boundary functions well for incident angles less than Radiation Boundary Radiation Boundary Poor absorption of radiation boundary affects radiation pattern ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

11 PML Incidence Angle Dependency PML PML Blue Trace is with thicker PML PML functions well for incident angles less than Better absorption leads to better consistency in the patterns ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

12 FEBI Incident Angle Dependency FEBI Hybridization FEBI Hybridization Pattern Results are Insensitive to Incidence Angle ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

13 FA-DDM Side Absorbing Boundaries with PML (V14 Setup) Radiation Boundary on HFSSv14 Side Walls Can Affect Pattern Results PML Vacuum buffer region mimics FA-DDM Radiation boundary on sides ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

14 FA-DDM Side Absorbing Boundaries with FEBI V15 Improved Accuracy Through FEBI Enhancements IE Solution Can to Touch the Array s Ground Plane No longer need Radiation Boundary on the Side Walls FEBI radiation boundary FEBI radiation boundary surrounding the array on five sides ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

15 FA-DDM Boundary Setup FEBI radiation boundary FEBI radiation boundary surrounding the array on five sides PerfE or finite cond. w/inf Gnd option checked Infinite ground plane everywhere ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

Accuracy Comparison Uniform 3x3 vivaldi array Test Cases: 1.

FA-DDM with FEBI PML Explicit 1 2 FEBI Explicit All radiation surfaces are

Surrounding air cells are not visualized with the FA-DDM display, but they are

16 Accuracy Comparison Uniform 3x3 vivaldi array Test Cases: 1. Explicit with PML 2. Explicit with FEBI 3. FA-DDM with PML 4. FA-DDM with FEBI PML Explicit 1 2 FEBI Explicit All radiation surfaces are seeded at Lambda/6 for highest pattern accuracy FA-DDM w/pml FA-DDM w/febi 3 4 Surrounding air cells are not visualized with the FA-DDM display, but they are present for the solver V14 suggested setup for FA-DDM V15 improved accuracy for FA-DDM ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

17 3x3 Vivaldi Array Boresight SideLobe Horizon The three setups expected to be the most accurate agree very well. Let s zoom in to see more detail ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

18 3x3 Vivaldi Array Boresight Accuracy db Most accurate setups 0.01 db Boresight gain is within 0.01dB for the three setups expected to be most accurate, including the FA-DDM w/febi solution in HFSS V ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

19 3x3 Vivaldi Array Sidelobe Accuracy Most accurate setups 0.05 db FA-DDM setup available in HFSS V db FA-DDM setup available in HFSS V14 Sidelobe gain is within 0.05dB for the three setups expected to be most accurate, including the FA-DDM w/febi solution in HFSS V ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

20 3x3 Vivaldi Array Horizon Accuracy 0.12 db 0.79 db FA-DDM setup available in HFSS V15 FA-DDM setup available in HFSS V14 Most accurate setups Horizon gain is within 0.12dB for the three setups expected to be most accurate, including the FA-DDM w/febi solution in HFSS V ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

circular waveguide elements Both arrays with Lambda/6

Plane Solid: FA-DDM Circles: Explicit Phi = 90deg Cut

solved array and FA-DDM solved array patterns are in

21 Accuracy Example #2 - FA-DDM vs. Explicit array 547 element hexagonal array composed of circular waveguide elements Both arrays with Lambda/6 seeding operation on radiation surfaces Phi = 0deg Cut Plane Solid: FA-DDM Circles: Explicit Phi = 90deg Cut Plane Solid: FA-DDM Circles: Explicit The explicitly solved array and FA-DDM solved array patterns are in agreement over a dynamic range of ~60dB ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

22 Part III: Flexibility Part I: Finite Array Domain Decomposition Overview Part II: Accuracy Part III: Flexibility Part IV: Speed/Capacity Conclusion ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

23 Flexibility Goal: Enable quick/easy generation of shaped or sparse finite arrays. Enabling feature: Array mask with padding cells New V15 Array Masks Shaped/Sparse Arrays HFSS Toolkits for Arbitrary Array Generation ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

cells enable array shaping Note the small changes in

24 Array Mask in HFSS V14 vs HFSS V15 HFSS V14 Uniform cartesian grid Active or Passive HFSS V15 Padding cells enable array shaping Note the small changes in the selection dialogue ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

Array Mask Cell Types Each element in the array mask can be set to one of the three following types: New in V15 1. ACTIVE (blue cells): Element is present and has ports. 2.

25 Array Mask Cell Types Each element in the array mask can be set to one of the three following types: New in V15 1. ACTIVE (blue cells): Element is present and has ports. 2. PASSIVE (white cells): Element is present and is terminated in a matched load (no ports). 3. PADDING (gray cells): No element present. Options: a) Air only b) Air with infinite ground Active elements ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

2 The array mask 'A' vector direction is down.

26 Array Mask Setup 1 The array element distribution is dependent on the master/slave A and B vector directions. 2 The array mask 'A' vector direction is down. The array mask 'B' vector direction is to the right. 'A' vector direction 'B' vector direction ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

27 Array Mask Setup (cont.) 3 The master/slave pairs should be along the X and Y axes as shown to create an array that visually maps to the array mask. M1 Default top-down view. M2 S2 S1 'A' vector (red-solid) 'B' vector (blue-dotted) ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

28 Flexibility Shaped Arrays Diamond Circular Oval Square/Rectangular Hexagonal Triangular/Trapezoidal ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

29 Flexibility Sparse Arrays Randomized Hex Asymmetric Spiral/Hex Small Spiral Thinned Snowflake Hex Panels ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

30 HFSS Toolkits New in V15 Iron Python programmable Toolkits are now available in HFSS V15 Toolkits enable users to create custom GUIs inside of HFSS with wizard like functionality Navigation to Toolkits is under HFSS > Toolkit ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

HFSS Toolkit for Array Shape Generation 1 The Array

2 In this example Toolkit, the following arrays may be

However, the toolkit is modifiable by the user to

3 Also included in the toolkit is the ability to

31 HFSS Toolkit for Array Shape Generation 1 The Array Toolkit makes array shape generation easy! 2 In this example Toolkit, the following arrays may be generated: Hexagonal Hexagonal Random Snowflake However, the toolkit is modifiable by the user to generate ANY array type desired! 3 Also included in the toolkit is the ability to import an array mask from a.csv file 0 = Active 1 = Passive 2 = Padding ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

32 Part IV: Speed/Capacity Part I: Finite Array Domain Decomposition Overview Part II: Accuracy Part III: Flexibility Part IV: Speed/Capacity Conclusion ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

33 Speed Goal: Simulate large arrays faster and larger than ever before! Enabling features: 1) MPI data transfer New V15 2) Composite Excitations New V15 Composite Excitations Message Passing Interface (MPI) ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

34 Composite Excitations What is it? A new solution type in HFSS. How does it work? Solves a high port count iterative solver problem (such as FA-DDM) with a defined magnitude/phase excitation vector that can be treated as a single excitation. MagPort1: 1 AllOthers: 0 Solve Traditional Iterative*: MagPort2: 1 AllOthers: 0 Solve Composite: MagVector = [ ] PhaseVector = [ ] Solve MagPortN: 1 AllOthers: 0 Solve What are the benefits? Solve a subset of the scan volume MUCH more quickly than running all excitations in the array independently (but have to run again for each Edit Sources state change) *Multi-port iterative solves are multi-threaded with HPC ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012 Only N simultaneous ports can be solved with N cores.

35 Composite Excitations Solve Time for Varying Array Sizes Vivaldi element. Relaxed settings. Radiation boundary w/lambda/6 seeding. Array Size Solve Time [hh:mm] Full Array FA- DDM Composite Excitations FA-DDM Speedup 3x3 1:10 0:08* 9x* 4x4 1:28 0:09* 10x* 8x8 6:51 0:27* 15x* 12x12 28:39 0:42* 41x* 16x16-0:53* - 20x20-1:14* - Simulation Time [minutes] Full Array Composite Number of Antenna Elements As port counts rise into the hundreds, simulation time slows. Composite excitations allows quick extraction of one custom excitation vector to observe active s-parameters, and near-field/far-field results ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012 *Provides active s-parameters and pattern data at one scan angle

36 Composite Excitations Examples 1. Diamond tapered vivaldi array 2. Asymmetric hex spiral array 3. Small spiral array 4. Snowflake array 5. Large hex array ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

37 Diamond Tapered Vivaldi Array Tapered Vivaldi array 15 x 16 array mask 240 total cells 128 active cells 512 excitations Boresight angle 2hr3 min 148GB distributed RAM ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

38 Asymmetric Hex Spiral Array Spiral shaped 27X27 array (13 rings) 2 HPC Packs FA-DDM Composite Excitations RAM: 11.4GB Time: 8 minutes ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

39 Small Spiral Array Spiral shaped 9X9 array, 25 ports, 50 modes 1HPC Pack FA-DDM Full Array Analysis RAM: 1.4GB Time: 18 minutes ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

40 Small Spiral Array Spiral shaped 9X9 array, 25 ports, 50 modes Control of Sidelobe Level: Tapered feed A post-processing variable is used to sweep the magnitude taper of the array and to animate the pattern result in real time ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

tradeoff between beamwidth and sidelobe levels Plain lines =

Phi = 90 Tapering the magnitudes yields minimal sidelobes,

41 Small Spiral Array Spiral shaped 9X9 array, 25 ports, 50 modes Control of Sidebobe Level: Tapered feed Plot the tradeoff between beamwidth and sidelobe levels Plain lines = tapered magnitudes Symbol lines = uniform magnitudes Phi = 0, Phi = 90 Tapering the magnitudes yields minimal sidelobes, but a wider beamwidth and lower gain ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

42 Snowflake Array Snowflake shaped array, 529 circular WG elements, 1058 modes 2 HPC Packs FA-DDM Composite Excitations RAM: 62 GB (distributed) Time: 27 minutes The goals of this sparse array are to: 1) Reduce side lobe levels 2) Reduce element count for the same electrical aperture (cost) ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

43 Snowflake Array Snowflake shaped array, composite excitations Sidelobes >22dB below peak 22.3dB Active S-parameters are available for the given excitation vector ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

44 Snowflake Array - Animated E-field E-field 5mm above aperture Circularly polarized elements ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

45 Large Hex Array Circular waveguide element, hexagonal arrays 18 rings 1027 elements 2054 modes Can HFSS solve over 1,000 elements? 38 min 105GB distributed RAM* *Solved with accurate settings ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

46 MPI Simulation statistics for an 8x8 vivaldi array on V14 (with RSM) vs. V15 (with MPI) The RAM reduction is due to changes with the mesh in the air cells in V15 The solve time improvement is attributable to MPI and updated algorithmic changes. Steered beam RAM [GB] Time [hh:mm] Speedup vs. V14 V14 FiniteArrayDDM 91 28:10 - V15 FiniteArrayDDM 65 8:37 3.3x V15 Composite Excitations* Using 2 HPC Packs 63 0:29 58x* *For a single scan angle ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

Capacity Save Radiated Fields Only Save Radiated Fields Only Option enables running large array simulations without filling up the hard disk.

47 Capacity Save Radiated Fields Only Save Radiated Fields Only Option enables running large array simulations without filling up the hard disk. 8x8 Vivaldi Array 64 unit cells 4 excitations per unit cell 256 total excitations Full array simulation (not composite excitations) Saves fields for each excitation Setup Save all fields (default) Save radiated fields only Disk Space Used 589GB 2.98GB Disk Space Savings reference 198x ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

48 Conclusion Part I: Accuracy Part II: Flexibility Part III: Speed/Capacity Conclusion ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

changes have made FA-DDM simulations several times faster in HFSS V15 Composite excitations allows simulating

49 Conclusion The new FEBI touching ground plane option enables highest accuracy far-field calculations Array masks with padding cells enable great flexibility for easily creating semi-arbitrary shaped arrays MPI and algorithmic changes have made FA-DDM simulations several times faster in HFSS V15 Composite excitations allows simulating specific scan angles of huge port count finite arrays quickly and efficiently ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

50 Acronyms/Terms Acronyms DDM - Domain decomposition method FA-DDM - Finite array domain decomposition method FEBI - Finite element boundary integral PML - Perfectly matched layer MPI - Message passing interface Terms Explicit - Means the array is drawn manually without the finite array tool. Or the array is explicitly created ANSYS, Inc. November 14, 2012

Workshop 10-1: HPC for Finite Arrays

Workshop 10-1: HPC for Finite Arrays 2015.0 Release ANSYS HFSS for Antenna Design 1 2015 ANSYS, Inc. Getting Started Launching ANSYS Electronics Desktop 2015 Select Programs > ANSYS Electromagnetics >